If All You See…

…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jammie Wearing Fools, with a post about weird Liz Warren pictures.

Read: If All You See… »

Democrats Apparently Can Hear At A Higher Pitch Than Republicans

Of course, the more likely explanation is that they’re all bat guano insane, as well as constantly hearing racism as projection

(Washington Examiner) The job of many liberal journalists these days apparently is to discern veiled Republican racism wherever they can find it –or make it up.

The Washington Post’s Harold Meyerson, for instance has a tired column today asserting that “today’s Republican Party represents the worst traditions of the South’s dankest backwaters.” Basically opposing tax hikes and greenhouse-gas emission caps show the GOP’s roots in white racism, or something.

Meanwhile Jack Hitt at Harpers rolls out a Republicans-are-Racist charge that involves ignoring all the relevant facts.

The WE’s Timothy P. Carney goes on to explain just how stupid and factually dishonest the Harper’s piece was, in somehow saying that because Republicans were chanting USA during the speech of a Hispanic woman there was dog whistle racism involved. Of course, then facts came out. Read the whole thing.

Read: Democrats Apparently Can Hear At A Higher Pitch Than Republicans »

NY Times Oddly Unimpressed With Republicans “You Did Build That” Message

In yesterday’s Fish Wrap Of Record there were a total of 3 opinion pieces whining about Republicans taking Obama’s “you didn’t build that!” comment out of context with the RNC motto of “You Did Build That!” Here’s the Times’ uber-far left Editorial Board

It was appropriate that “We built it,” the needling slogan of the evening, was painted on the side of the convention hall. Speaker after speaker alluded to the phrase in an entire day based on the thinnest of reeds — a poorly phrased remark by the president, deliberately taken out of context. President Obama was making the obvious point that all businesses rely to some extent on the work and services of government. But Mr. Romney has twisted it to suggest that Mr. Obama believes all businesses are creatures of the government, and so the convention had to parrot the line.

Actually, that’s exactly what Obama was alluding to. I bet Henry Jarvis Raymond, who founded the NY Times, would disagree with the Editorial Board and say “damned right I built this paper!”

Here’s Nicholas Kristoff, who mentions that one of the speakers had taken government sponsored loans, goes on to say

In short, the Republicans are inadvertently underscoring the point that President Obama was expressing in his “you didn’t build that” comment in July. Obama noted then that “if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own.” He pointed to public investments in roads and bridges that enable businesses to flourish, and then he inelegantly added, “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that.” (big snip)

Who built this country? Entrepreneurs, yes. But so did schoolteachers and railway construction workers. Doctors and truckers. Scientists and soldiers. You didn’t build it, Mitt Romney — we all built it.

More on this in a bit, let’s get to Bill Keller

“We did build that,” has already been established as one of the more dishonest political memes in a campaign season undisturbed by shame. The Republicans took a clumsy phrase from an Obama speech in July, in which the president pointed out that most American business successes have been assisted by infrastructure, education or incentives underwritten by the government. The Republican spin-masters whipped this into a preposterous claim that Obama denied American entrepreneurs any credit for their creations. The fact that this slogan has been thoroughly debunked has not kept it from being the defining theme in Tampa.

Bill, like many others, decides to highlight the entire Obama comment, which is worse than just the first line. While it’s certainly true that Obama mentions many public works and the notion that we do need others to make our businesses successful, his world view seems to revolve around the notion that only with Government can a business get off the ground and get going.

Who is government? Why, the taxpayers. The citizens. Consider Obama’s line right after the “you didn’t build that”

Somebody else made that happen.

During this horrible speech, Obama mentions roads, bridges, and teachers, among others. He goes on to say “Government research created the Internet…” He does eventually pay homage to “individual initiative”, but what he is espousing is a monumentally different world view in which Big Government is super mega-awesome and nothing can be done without it, that “somebody else made that happen.”

Yes, you the person with that business did need others to make that business successful. You probably needed roads and bridges, the Internet and teachers. Who built that? Well, you did, with your tax dollars. Interestingly, it is typically private companies contracted out who build/maintain those bridges and roads. You need energy. A private company built that. Private companies expand the Internet. Teachers paid by your tax money teach people who make money to buy your product. Commerce is interconnected.

But, who did build your business, who put their ass on the line? You did. You took the chance. You may have gotten a loan from a bank, or a financial institution like…..Bain Capital….., but your butt is on the line to make the business work. Without your creativity, your leap of faith, your hard work, it doesn’t get off the ground. It starts with you. Not government. Reading the entire comment by Obama in context, it’s quite obvious that a successful business starts with Government in his world. That is the fundamental difference.

Conservatives/Republicans believe you are at the top of the pyramid of success: Obama thinks Government is. Perhaps that’s why the economy under Obama is so horrible.

Read: NY Times Oddly Unimpressed With Republicans “You Did Build That” Message »

Should Anyone Be Surprised That MSNBC Cut The Speeches Of Republican Minorities?

While Liberals are hyperventilating over an RNC attendee supposedly throwing nuts at a Black camerawoman and saying “this is how we feed the animals”, calling this racism (it may or may not have been. It could have been a jerk being a jerk to the very liberal media, or, yeah, could have been a racist), MSNBC decided to use their own “dog whistle”

(Red Alert Politics) MSNBC wants you to think the Republican Party hates minorities. So much so that the liberal news network cut minority speeches from it’s convention coverage.

If we use Democrat language, this wasn’t about MSNBC wanting to push the notion that there were no minorities speaking, it was out and out racism from MSNBC for intentionally wanting to keep minorities down. Heck, racism, Jim Crow, and anti-immigrant (legal immigrant) policies used to be part and parcel of the Democrat party platform. Until they can prove otherwise, MSNBC is to be considered a racist/bigoted organization.

When popular Tea Party candidate Ted Cruz, the GOP nominee for Senate, took the stage, MSNBC cut away from the Republican National Convention and the Hispanic Republican from Texas’ speech.

MSNBC stayed on commercial through former Democratic Rep. Artur Davis’ speech, as well. Davis, who recently became a Republican, is black.

Also missing were  Puerto Rican Governor Luis Fortuno’s wife Luce’ Vela Fortuño, Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval (Latino), and Mia Love (Black).

Will MSNBC skip Condi Rice’s speech tonight? Also Puerto Rico Gov. Luis Fortuño and New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez.  Time will tell.

I heard many of the speeches that MSNBC “missed”, except for Mia Love. Unfortunately, I also missed Chris Christy’s. I did catch most of Ann Romney’s, and, while it was a little slow to start, it really took off and pumped the crowd up. Excellent speech.

Oh, and Jammie Wearing Fool finds some more Democrat racism.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Should Anyone Be Surprised That MSNBC Cut The Speeches Of Republican Minorities? »

Bummer: GM Suspends Chevy Volt Production Again

Sales of Volts have certainly been a little bit better than previous. Of course, how many of those have been purchased by government? On the few occasions I see them on the road they have government tags or sticker denoting that this is a government fleet vehicle

(USA Today) General Motors is halting, for a month, the manufacture of its well-known Chevrolet Volt extended-range electric car.

Automotive News, citing unnamed sources, reports the Detroit-Hamtramck plant will suspend production from Sept. 17 until Oct. 15.

It would be the second interruption in production for the Volt, which can go 38 miles on battery power before needing a recharge from its gasoline engine. GM late Monday disputed published reports that the move is because of slow Volt sales. GM sold 10,666 Volts through July, way up from the 2,870 sold during the same period a year earlier.

“We are not idling the plant due to poor Volt sales. We’re gearing up for production of the new Impala,” Chevy spokesman David Darovitz said in an email.

Hmm, the Impala? It gets much less miles per gallon, but, it is a favorite with businesses and rentals for business travelers, as it drives very well on the road, which means it, you know, sells. It also tends not to catch on fire when involved in a minor fender bender. And did I mention it tends to sell?

Read: Bummer: GM Suspends Chevy Volt Production Again »

If All You See…

…is a world flooded because someone drove a car, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day Joshua Pundit, with a discussion post wondering whether America’s political climate is dysfunctional.

Read: If All You See… »

RNC Video: Switchers

Via Hot Air comes this video

Ed Morrissey also references a new video from Obama supporting Priorities USA, which both he and Jammie Wearing Fool tear apart.

Read: RNC Video: Switchers »

What Say To Muslim Extremists Praying At The DNC?

No one should be particularly surprised. Democrats constantly yammer on about “diversity”, yet they never seem to actually investigate what diversity they are supporting. These are also people who support Palestinian homicide bombers, wanted America to fail in Iraq and Afghanistan (partly because Bush was president), and many thought Osama Bin Laden was assassinated and should have been given a trial. They also believe in the mythical “separation of church and state”, but only when it is the Christian religions being separated

(The Blaze) The Democratic National Committee is raising a number of eyebrows after choosing to proceed with hosting Islamic “Jumah” prayers for two hours on the Friday of its convention, though it denied a Catholic cardinal’s request to say a prayer at the same event.

Watch the promotional video, via the Bureau of Muslim Affairs, which is partnering with the DNC for the event.

Up to 20,000 people are expected to attend the Friday prayers and Jibril Hough, a spokesman for the Bureau of Indigenous Muslim Affairs (BIMA), said the purpose of the event is to hold political parties accountable for the issues faced by Muslim-Americans.

In particular, the event will target the Patriot Act, the NYPD, the National Defense Authorization Act, and anti-Shariah sentiment.

It goes down from there.

Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, a devout Muslim and the Founder and President of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, wrote:

The leaders of this event – Jibril Hough and Imam Siraj Wahhaj [are not] moderates. They are radicals. These individuals embrace Islamist supremacy and have demonstrated support for radical ideologies. (snip)

Their jummah (group) prayer is…about empowering their Islamist and MB sympathetic groups into the very fabric of the political system so that Americans become anesthetized. We need American Muslims to speak up and marginalize these radicals. The DNC needs to understand and reject them because of their radical history and ideas.

It gets worse

The mosque of Jibril Hough, mentioned by Dr. Jasser, is owned by the North American Islamic Trust, which was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial as one of the entities “who are and/or were members of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.”

Siraj Wahhaj, the Grand Imam of the Jumah, has links to the Blind Sheikh (still incarcerated right up the road from Raleigh, my home town, on terrorism charges) and has written about getting Muslims involved heavily in politics to turn America into a caliphate and replacing the Constitution with the Koran.

So, we’re going to hear about the mean anti-Sharia sentiment by people who want to ……. push America towards Sharia law. And have deep links to Islamic extremist groups, ones that have links to terrorism.

The article references a Robert Spencer article on this issue at Front Page. Since gay marriage is also a big platform at the DNC, perhaps Democrats should read this article about homosexuality in Islam.

Read: What Say To Muslim Extremists Praying At The DNC? »

Happy 2500 Days: Obama Plans To Campaign As Potential Hurricane Isaac Hits

Over the past few days we’ve been treated to a constant litany of news that wonders if it is proper for the GOP to hold their convention at all, much less toning it down, as Isaac has been churning in the Gulf of Mexico. This notion ramped up when it looked like Isaac was going to take direct aim at the area hit by Hurricane Katrina, and even more so as Isaac takes aim at New Orleans. But, what of Obama?

(CNS News) The White House announced on Monday that President Barack Obama plans to campaign in Charlottesville, Va., on Wednesday–the day the National Hurricane Center predicts Hurricane Isaac will hit the Gulf Coast.

Wednesday, Aug. 29, is also the seventh anniversary of the day that Hurricane Katrina made landfall on the Gulf Coast in 2005.

Obama will also be “in Ames, Iowa and Fort Collins, Colorado for campaign events. The President will remain overnight in Colorado.” Obviously, according to Katrina talking points, this means Obama hates Black people. And doesn’t care about the people of New Orleans. Heck, he won’t even be close to New Orleans.

I wonder if the media will call out Obama for failing to cancel his fundraisers?

According to the center, Tropical Storm Isaac is predicted to become a Category One Hurricane by Monday night and will make landfall along the Louisiana and Mississippi coastline late Tuesday or early Wednesday.

According to the center, Isaac will have maximum sustained winds of 70 miles per hour with storm surges up to 12 feet.

Does anyone get the feeling that the National Hurricane Center, a part of the NOAA, is really, really, really, really hoping Isaac becomes a hurricane? So far, the wind projects haven’t come to fruition. And, if they’re predicting sustained 70 mph winds, well, not a hurricane. Also, that the media really, really, really wants Isaac to become a hurricane.

Tomorrow is the anniversary of Katrina. Today is the 2,500th day (not including today) since a major hurricane, category 3 or higher, hit the United States, the longest period on record. In 2005, Hurricane Wilma made landfall in Florida on October 24th. Remember this?

BOSTON — The hurricane that struck Louisiana and Mississippi on Monday was nicknamed Katrina by the National Weather Service. Its real name is global warming.

When the year began with a 2-foot snowfall in Los Angeles, the cause was global warming.

Hurricane Katrina’s real name – The New York Times

Warmists told us that because of anthropogenic global warming, every hurricane season would be like that big season of 2005. Yet, landfalling hurricane numbers immediately dropped. So they started proclaiming that the number of hurricanes would be down, but they would be stronger. Nope, that didn’t work out, either. The last hurricane to hit the US was Ike on September 13, 2008.

Hurricanes, much like other natural disasters, are fascinating to watch, but really bad for the people in the way. Even tropical storms can be really devastating (as we saw with Irene last year, for instance). If fewer tropical systems hitting the United States and causing massive damage and loss of life, well, then AGW rocks! Let’s keep it.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Happy 2500 Days: Obama Plans To Campaign As Potential Hurricane Isaac Hits »

Pathetic: Obama Memorializes Neil Armstrong With…..Obama!

Via Ace, this from Jim Treacher (who found it via Sooper Mexican), how our Narcissist In Chief remembers a true hero, Neil Armstrong

Are you sure your stomach can take this? Positive? Have some Pepto ready? I’m not taking responsibility for condition of your computer one you click the “read more inline” link

Jim writes:

Sure, Neil Armstrong walked on the moon. But only to tidy it up, so that one day it would be a suitable resting place for Obama’s kingly gaze.

Gotta love that Obama has turned NASA into a Muslim outreach center which would make sure that Neil never set foot on the moon. Unless there was a way to hook up some campaign contributors.

Read: Pathetic: Obama Memorializes Neil Armstrong With…..Obama! »

Pirate's Cove