Horrific Bombing At Boston Marathon

This is tragic

(NY Times) A series of explosions erupted near the finish line at the Boston Marathon on Monday. The Boston Police Department confirmed that they were looking into an explosion, but had no further comment.

There were apparently 2 explosions, the second being bigger than the first. Reports are that there are a lot of injured and some dead, and that body parts were flying. My prayers go out to all.

See Hot Air, Twitchy, and Deadspin for coverage, as well as all the usual. I’m at work so can’t keep up.

As a sidebar, I have to wonder how seen we will be treated to Liberals blaming conservatives, anti-tax or anti-government folks on the right, etc.

Read: Horrific Bombing At Boston Marathon »

If All You See…

…is a loss of biodiversity on a fossil fueled boat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Watcher Of Weasels, with a discussion post on whether the Iraq war was worth it (crossed at Joshuapundit).

Read: If All You See… »

“Blue Tits Provide Insight Into Climate Change”

With a headline like that, how can I not blog it?

(Phys.org) Researchers believe that the size of birds’ nests created in response to changing weather patterns may be partly to blame for reproductive failures over the last two years.

Sorry, chums, it’s about birds

An article in the April edition of The Biologist, the Society of Biology’s magazine, explains that birds produce different sized nests depending on the weather.

Dr Deeming’s studies of great tits and blue tits breeding in nest boxes at the University’s Riseholme Park campus have shed light on how nests are built and how they function.

What did they find? Well, the nests are thicker when it’s cold and thinner when it’s warm. Because, you know, weather.

However, as climate change brings more unpredictable weather patterns the way birds construct nests will be affected. In both 2011 and 2012, for example, early spells of warm weather were followed by much lower temperatures.

And there you go, it’s all your fault for refusing to give up your fossil fueled vehicle, buy local, and take a shower lasting more than 2 minutes. Because beforehand the weather was always the same and completely predictable. We never had anything like Indian Summer, a phrase that goes back to the late 1700’s. But, of course, “climate change” is an unscientific term created to denote that Mankind’s activities cause everything.

Anyhow, blue tits.

Read: “Blue Tits Provide Insight Into Climate Change” »

Chris Murphy (D): US Government Can’t Function On 17% Of GDP

Well, certainly with liberals in government. He says this as he slams Obama

(Politico) Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said Monday he thought the 18 percent tax rate paid by President Barack Obama and other wealthy people was too low.

“The fact is we can’t run this country based on the amount of revenue that we’re collecting today,” Murphy said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” during a discussion that related to the rate Obama had paid.

“We can’t collect 18 percent from people making that much money and be able to afford to build roads and bridges and educate kids and do the medical research we used to,” Murphy continued. “We just sort of need to make a fundamental admission that this nation can’t run on collecting 17 percent of GDP and that largely needs to come out of the pockets of the people making that kind of cash.”

Have they tried? Before the Progressive era of US government started, they had no problem running it with less. Government spending at the start of the 20th century was 7%. Then Los Federales decided that they were going to pay for everything and create tons of entitlement programs and was taxpayer money in idiotic programs, along with shifting more and more power into the hands of the federal government, which increased spending.

The problem here is that politicians, especially Democrats, want more and more of your hard earned money. On the flip side, the same people who advocate for higher spending and higher taxes aren’t willing to pay more themselves. Mr. Obama could have not itemized, not taken all the deductions allowed, and payed the full rate. Did he? Obviously not.

And let’s not forget that the States still spend quite a bit of money themselves. And that almost 50% of the citizens have a net zero federal tax liability, which also decreases the amount of revenue that the States collect when the federal tax liabilities are imported into the State tax forms.

I’d  be interested to see Chris Murphy’s tax rate. Oh, wait, it was a measly 22.4% federal for 2011. Oh, and he’s been late in paying his property taxes before. Step up, Chris, send a check to the IRS.

BTW, 17% would be around 2.66 trillion dollars.

Read: Chris Murphy (D): US Government Can’t Function On 17% Of GDP »

Gun Rights Group That Almost No One Has Heard Of Backs Manchin-Toomey Legislation

This makes the Liberals at the Washington Post really, really happy, though, really, the Manchin-Toomey legislation is not much more than a token bill, which wouldn’t have stopped Newtown, Aurora, the Gabby Giffords shooting, Nidal Hasan, won’t stop the violence in Chicago, etc

In anticipation of Senate votes this week on a proposed expansion of criminal background checks for firearms sales, one gun rights organization broke with the powerful National Rifle Association on Sunday to urge support for a compromise drafted by Sens. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) and Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.).

The endorsement by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms — which calls itself the second-largest gun rights organization in the country, behind the NRA, claiming 650,000 members and supporters — is one of several moves over the past few days that have provided a boost to the hopes of proponents of background checks.

Actually, that number is closer to 600k than 650k. The NRA has 4 million. And, I don’t know about you, but I’ve never heard of them. That’s not to denigrate them, just point out that they are relatively unknown. Interestingly, the Credentialed Liberal Media ignored the CCRKB when they were writing things like

As far as breaking with the NRA, mentioned in the first paragraph, do reporters ever investigate what they write about, or do the just spin? Because the NRA did not opposed the bill, they just said that it would not stop crime. The Wall Street Journal gets it wrong, too, along with a raft of others.

Anyhow, one of the interesting things that the bill might allow would be reciprocity (which, according to the Constitution, should already be in place), but this would formalize it, meaning people would be allowed to bring their guns and their concealed carry permit to more stringent states.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Gun Rights Group That Almost No One Has Heard Of Backs Manchin-Toomey Legislation »

Watcha Reading?

Nothing I mentioned last week was interesting enough to continue reading, so, I ended up heading off to the library to borrow The Twelve by Justin Cronin, his follow up to The Passage. It was one of those expensive E-books that I refused to pay for, and, quite frankly, I’m glad. While it has held my attention, certainly not worth $13.99 on Kindle (interestingly, it is less through Amazon in hardback). It’s kind confusing in the way the TV show Lost was, and it is a slow read. Especially since I’m not able to read on my Droid like usual. Some of the detail of what’s going on seems to be implied, so you’re left wondering. It’s also long, almost 600 pages. A bit over 2/3rds through it, and started on it on Monday. Whew!

Whatca got?

Read: Watcha Reading? »

Good Grief: Joe Romm, Van Jones Link “Climate Change” To Martin Luther King, Jr.

The very fact that Romm and Jones are writing this should tell you everything you need to know, namely that “climate change” is a purely far left issue based on politics, not science. Oh, and that they have no shame

Martin Luther King And The Call To Direct Action On Climate

Van Jones and I have an op-ed in “The Miami Herald” and many other McClatchy newspapers. I will have more on the moral dimensions of climate change in later posts.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” wrote Martin Luther King Jr. from a Birmingham jail on April 16, 1963. “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. “The Atlanta-based King was explaining why he was in prison for nonviolent demonstrations so far from home, responding to a critical public statement by eight Southern white religious leaders…

They mention King quite a bit, and tipping points, and climate justice and ignoring science by referring to CO2 as “carbon”. But, then, their target audience is entirely too scientifically illiterate and brainwashed to know or care.

Many have criticized the demonstrations against the Keystone XL pipeline, which would open a major spigot to the Canadian tar sands, as unwarranted and untimely – unwarranted given our broad dependence on fossil fuels and untimely because of our struggling economy. We disagree.

We think there has been far too little direct action, given the staggering scale of the threat….

This is their real point: they’re calling for “direct action”, and when the Typical Leftists become violent, when they destroy property, burn things, etc, the usual from the Left, Romm and Jones can say “well, we were saying peaceful direct action, like when MLK, Jr, was directing it”. It’s “get out of jail free” card for Jones and Romm from what they know will occur. And what they really want to occur.

Read: Good Grief: Joe Romm, Van Jones Link “Climate Change” To Martin Luther King, Jr. »

If All You See…

…is a CO2 infused beer causing the atmosphere to hide its heat in the bottom of the sea, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Real Science, which says that the US used to be much hotter.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another fantastic day to remember the dream that was the freedom loving nation of the USA. This pinup is by, it looks like, Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Megan McCardle writes about why she ignored the Gosnell trial
  2. Raised On Hoecakes discusses the Obama “budget”
  3. The Lonely Conservative notes that kids write the darnedest things
  4. The Other McCain wonders if Amanda Marcotte eats dead babies
  5. This ain’t Hell… notes a nutjob attacking an Army officer
  6. Wizbang wonders if the cloture vote violated the 2nd Amendment
  7. The Daley Gator features vets standing up to the nanny state
  8. Wild Thing points out that Obama hates charities
  9. Sister Toldjah provides the fallout for the man who stole TOTUS
  10. Scared Monkeys discusses yet another wackjob leftists teacher who hates Jews
  11. Right Wing News has a disturbing story on a murderous illegal alien
  12. Maggie’s Notebook says Republicans should just walk away from Gang of 8
  13. Jazz Shaw discusses gun confiscation, which is already happening
  14. Bob Owens discusses a vote to give the UN power over the US
  15. And last, but not least, Gay Patriot points out that Hugo Chavez’s death is hitting NPR hard

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check outwhat I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

The posts do take a long time, so, if you want to send me your links for Rule 5 babeage or links, use ye olde email in the header bar (remove the NOSPAM part). Preferably, create the html link so I can copy and paste how you want it to read.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

NY Times Op-Ed: Bomb North Korea

It’s rare that I somewhat find myself agreeing with far left liberals on an issue, but this op-ed piece by Jeremi Suri is absurd

Bomb North Korea, Before It’s Too Late

The Korean crisis has now become a strategic threat to America’s core national interests. The best option is to destroy the North Korean missile on the ground before it is launched. The United States should use a precise airstrike to render the missile and its mobile launcher inoperable.

President Obama should state clearly and forthrightly that this is an act of self-defense in response to explicit threats from North Korea and clear evidence of a prepared weapon. He should give the leaders of South Korea, Japan, China and Taiwan advance notice before acting. And he should explain that this is a limited defensive strike on a military target — an operation that poses no threat to civilians — and that America does not intend to bring about regime change. The purpose is to neutralize a clear and present danger. That is all.

Lots of yammer after that. Let’s skip to the end

Destroying the North Korean missile before it is launched is the best of bad options on the Korean Peninsula. A prolonged crisis would undermine regional security and global efforts to stop nuclear proliferation. And a future war would be much worse. The most prudent move is to eliminate the most imminent military threat in self-defense, establish clear and reasonable limits on future belligerence, and maintain allied unity for stability — not forced regime change — in the region. This is the kind of pre-emptive action that would save lives and maybe even preserve the uneasy peace on the Korean Peninsula.

Lefties like the Booman Tribune, Political Animal, and Lawyers, Guns, and Money attack Suri himself, and forgot to delve into how insane this policy would be. Here’s Booman

My proposal is to load Jeremi Suri in a missile and launch him into the Pacific Ocean. There he can drown. And we can lose the life of one culpable moron instead of the lives of an incalculable number of innocent people who never recommended starting a war with a nuclear-armed country backed by an even better nuclear-armed country.

If Jeremi Suri is allowed to live it will be an act of mercy. But he should then be forced to wear a Depend Adult Undergarment at all times for the rest of his life.

Hmm, advocating life threatening situations simply because Suri espoused an opinion? How tolerant. What I find myself agreeing with the Liberals on is that this is a monumentally stupid idea. You have a relatively new leader in North Korea, and we all know how mentally stable North Korean leaders have been. You have a country with biological, chemical, and nerve weapons, and most likely nuclear weapons (though not necessarily good ones). You have a country with a big, strong military with lots of conventional weapons, and, unlike Iraq, they seem to take care of their weapons and machines (trucks, planes, etc.) The Korean People’s Army, when you include the active, reserve, and paramilitary, is the largest on earth, comprising 40% of the North Korean citizenry. They have lots and lots of short range rockets easily capable of traveling 40-50 miles or more.

Why is that important? The capital of South Korea, Seoul, is a mere 35 miles south of the DMZ. A city of over 11 million people, plus all those in the surrounding countryside. If there was a precision attack on said missile launcher, what would Kim Jong-un do? Are we willing to take the chance of Seoul being attack with possible WMDs along with lots of conventional weapons? There may come a time when it is necessary to take military action, but this is not it.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Times Op-Ed: Bomb North Korea »

Pirate's Cove