Sadly, Snowden’s Nightmare Comes True

So says The Politico

Edward Snowden’s nightmare may be coming true.

Not exile; not the danger of imprisonment or prosecution; and not his newfound association with dictators, lawyers and impresarios.

Snowden’s worst fear, by his own account, was that “nothing will change.”

“People will see in the media all these disclosures, they’ll know the lengths the government is going to grant themselves powers, unilaterally, to create greater control over American society and global society,” he told The Guardian last month after he’d asked it to identify him as its source. “But they won’t be willing to take the risks necessary to stand up and fight to change things, to force their representatives to actually take a stand in their interests.”

Since Snowden’s revelations, what has happened? There was an initial furor, but this turned almost immediately to a focus from the media and elected politicians in demonizing Snowden. I’m not going to condone what he did, except in terms of that he did inform the American people just how badly the government was spying on them. Snowden is still a bad person. His leaks go well beyond being a whistleblower. But the focus became Snowden, not what he let us know about. His motives. Then his travels. What Russia and other countries would possibly do.

Then other stuff came along. Amnesty. Egypt. Etc. And we’ve moved, mostly, from the notion that the government spies on us. I suspect that this is partly due to the notion that we do not trust the federal government to be restrained. Consider all the things the TSA was doing to flyers. Lots and lots of outcry. Has anything really changed? No.

Here’s Eugene Robinson, who I disagree with at least 98% of the time

I don’t believe government officials when they say the National Security Agency’s (NSA) surveillance programs do not invade our privacy. The record suggests that you shouldn’t believe them, either. (snip to the end)

The biggest lie of all? That the American people don’t even deserve to be told what their laws mean, much less how those laws are being used.

While Eugene has a few partisan and silly moments (mentioning Rand Paul and tin foil hats in 2nd paragraph, in next to last he says government acts in good faith…I doubt he would say the same if Bush was in office, or there was a President McCain or Romney), it is a good op-ed, worth the read.

Read: Sadly, Snowden’s Nightmare Comes True »

Nanny Bloomberg Pushes Law To Force Composting

Why is NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg such a popular fellow? Because he perfectly encapsulates what Progressives stand for: bigger and bigger governmental control over Other People’s lives, from big things down to the tiny things. This is what Progressives want, but notice the use of the phrase “Other People’s lives”. When it comes to laws, regulations, burdens, penalties, taxes, anything restrictive, Progressives always want Other People, Someone Else, That Guy, to bear the burden, never themselves. Take Bloomberg’s big soda ban: Progressives thought it was a great idea to fight obesity, because obesity is bad for “climate change”. They just didn’t want the ban to effect themselves. Taxation? They like the idea of higher taxes on That Guy, on That Group, never on themselves. Air conditioning is Bad, but we should restrict Someone Else from having it, never themselves.

Anyway

(Heartland) Mayor Michael Bloomberg—the man who brought about the failed supersize soda ban and restrictions on trans fats in city restaurants—is pushing for a law forcing New York City residents to compost their food refuse.

Bloomberg’s proposal would encourage voluntary composting initially, and then make food composting mandatory by 2015-2016.

Opponents decried yet another expansion of the nanny state and also worried about food composting expanding the city’s rat population.

“People seem to be able to recycle their paper and bottles without too much trouble, despite lots of outcry when it first started decades ago,” said Nicole Gelinas, a Searle Freedom Trust Fellow at the Manhattan Institute. “I think the point of the expanded voluntary pilot is to see if they can do this, too, or if it causes too many problems with improperly disposed waste—rats, etc.”

That doesn’t matter, we have a planet to save. Or something. And turning building superintendent into composting cops is a small price to pay, along with the possible increase in rats. Oh, and

Stier notes the trucks that will be necessary to collect the food waste will put more vehicles on New York City streets, consume more oil and gas, and emit more pollutants into the city’s air.

“There’s no way food scraps can be picked up from every home throughout the city without greatly increasing the number of trucks, traffic, and tyranny,” Stier explained.

And all those extra trucks will put more evil “carbon pollution” into the atmosphere, causing the Earth to boil and islands to tip over. And, yes, composting is also a big concern for Warmists, who proclaim that by doing this lots of that evil “carbon pollution” could be removed from the atmosphere. And when you get down to the nuts and bolts of “climate change”, when you get to the heart of the matter, head into the engine room, you find that the “climate change” movement is all about Progressive (nice fascism) politics, not about any sort of science and/or environmentalism.

Read: Nanny Bloomberg Pushes Law To Force Composting »

NY Times Publishes Pro-Muslim Brotherhood Op-Ed

Of course, this is one of the great things about American democracy (don’t start with the “it’s a Republic” thing), based on the 1st Amendment: allowing other viewpoints. Which is interesting for the NY Times, because, at best, they rarely allow more than super-squishy Republicans to publish op-eds. Anyhow, here’s the Brookings Institute’s Shadi Hamid, director of their Doha center, based in Qatar, which is a rather Islamist country

Demoting Democracy in Egypt

WHEN Mohamed Morsi became Egypt’s first democratically elected president last year, it was an especially sweet victory for the Muslim Brotherhood, the region’s oldest and most influential Islamist movement. After a long history of repression, the Brotherhood had finally tasted triumph. But their short-lived rule ended Wednesday when Egypt’s army deposed Mr. Morsi.

They were repressed exactly because of their hardcore Islamist beliefs, wanting to institute Sharia law as the basis for government. How’s that type of government work out? See “Afghanistan” prior to the US invasion in 2001. Also see “Taliban”, which were surely more hardcore than the Muslim Brotherhood. See Iran, and the way the Clerics are involved in all politics.

The Brotherhood’s fall will have profound implications for the future of political Islam, reverberating across the region in potentially dangerous ways. One of the most important political developments of recent years was the decision of Islamist parties to make peace with democracy and commit to playing by the rules of the political game. Leaders counseled patience to their followers. Their time would come, they were told.

They made the decision to “play by the rules” in order to infiltrate governments and institute their hardcore brand of Islam. The Muslim Brotherhood has long been the political arm, the arm that isn’t heavily violent like al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and the other Islamic terrorist groups. Groups like the Muslim Brotherhood look to quietly and (mostly) peacefully transition governments over to Islamist ones. We see this same type of infiltration throughout the world, including Europe and America. In Egypt, though, they had a prime opportunity to take over the government and institute their agenda with ouster of Mubarak and the elections. They made the mistake of moving too fast in their agenda.

Now supporters of the Brotherhood will ask, with good reason, whether democracy still has anything to offer them. Mr. Morsi’s removal will breathe new life into the ideological claims of radicals. Al Qaeda and its followers have long argued that change can’t come through the democracy of “unbelievers”; violence is the only path. As the Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri once said, “What is truly regrettable is the rallying of thousands of duped Muslim youth in voter queues before ballot boxes instead of lining them up to fight in the cause of Allah.”

The Brotherhood and its supporters were never about democracy, except as a tool to institute their hardcore ways. At the end, though, the Brotherhood is behind lots and lots of violence, repression of women, harsh criminal penalities (stonings and such). Yet Hamid is trying to tell us that the MB getting thrown out of office due to protesters, with the help of the military, who did not want the hardcore political setup, is a Bad Thing.

To limit the fallout from this week’s events, Egypt’s new government must ensure that the Brotherhood and its Freedom and Justice Party are reincorporated into the political process and free to contest — and win — parliamentary and presidential elections. Otherwise, Islamist parties’ faith in democracy could be irrevocably damaged.

There’s not much information out there regarding Hamid and what his leanings are, but I just have to wonder what his motivation is. The People of Egypt wanted Morsi and his MB hardcores gone: why would they be let back in? Would we accept the Nazi party being integrated into government? How about the KKK (well, unless you’re the Democrat party, and hold a KKK member as a paragon of virtue)? Would Hamid support a political party based on instituting the Christian or Jewish religions throughout government? In the comments, NY Times reader Kurt writes

Democracy is more than holding periodic elections. It also entails acceptance of limits on governmental and societal power to compel individual conscience. And, since such suppression is the very reason for being for Islamist parties such as Mr Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood, Mr Hamid’s laments ring hollow.

Good point. One that many in our own government here should learn.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Times Publishes Pro-Muslim Brotherhood Op-Ed »

Obama Extolls Independence Day In US While Expressing Concern Over Freedom In Egypt

Mr. “Hi Everybody” trots out his weekly address

Hi everybody.  I hope you all had a safe and happy Fourth of July, filled with parades, cookouts, fireworks and family reunions.

We celebrated at the White House with a few hundred members of the military and their families. And we took a moment amid the festivities to remember what our Independence Day is all about – what happened 237 years ago, and what it meant to the world.

On July 4th, 1776, a small band of patriots declared that we were a people created equal – free to think and worship and live as we please.  It was a declaration heard around the world – that we were no longer colonists, we were Americans, and our destiny would not be determined for us; it would be determined by us.

It was a bold and tremendously brave thing to do.  It was also nearly unthinkable.  At that time, kings and princes and emperors ruled the world.  But those patriots were certain that a better way was possible.  And to achieve it – to win their freedom – they were willing to lay it all on the line.  Their lives.  Their fortunes.  Their sacred honor.

They fought a revolution.  Few would have bet on our side to win.  But for the first of many times to come, America proved the doubters wrong.

Of course, does anyone actually believe Obama believes this? He surely would have allied himself with King George and the over-bearing and unaccountable Colonial governors. But, anyhow, he’s not quite as concerned about Egyptians wanted a non-Islamist democratic model government

(The Hill) President Obama late Wednesday declared himself “very concerned” by the Egyptian military’s overthrow of the country’s democratically elected president and said his administration was reviewing U.S. military aid as a result.

In his first statement since the Egyptian army and the opposition overthrew President Mohamed Morsi and his Muslim Brotherhood government, Obama repeated that the United States was not taking sides in the dispute and avoided using the word “coup.” He called on the military to quickly restore power to a “democratically elected civilian government.”

“The United States is monitoring the very fluid situation in Egypt, and we believe that ultimately the future of Egypt can only be determined by the Egyptian people,” Obama said in a statement. “Nevertheless, we are deeply concerned by the decision of the Egyptian Armed Forces to remove President Morsy and suspend the Egyptian constitution.

It is actually the law to cut off aid after a coup. Will Team Obama deem this a coup? They seem to have more in common with Morsi (or is it “Morsy”?) than with those who would prefer not to have a tyrannical (and Islamist) government. The Daily Beast (surprisingly) takes a harsh look at Obama’s revisionist history regarding Egypt.

Obama has a terrible record when it comes to the Arab Spring, starting with the Iranian Green Revolution. He was always too late, if involved at all…well, except for Libya, where he used US military force to make sure France and Britain continued to get oil from Libya. And how’s Libya looking now? As far as America goes, Obama has virtually eliminated US influence in Egypt, and the Egyptian people showed their derision.

BTW, out of the top ten favorite July 4th moments for the White House, of course 6 of them are about Obama (and the one about visiting the troops in Iraq featured Joe Biden, not Obama).

Read: Obama Extolls Independence Day In US While Expressing Concern Over Freedom In Egypt »

If All You See…

…are the wonderful colors of the United States Flag, you might just be an American Patriot

The blog of the day American Glob, with an awesome patriotic cartoon.

And, yes, more pics below the fold

Read More »

Read: If All You See… »

Independence Day Patriotic Pinup

Happy Independence Day! An excellent day to remember what this nation was founded on. I’ve always liked the above pinup, just seems to encapsulate the holiday. There are a few more of my favorites below the fold.

What’s happening in Ye Old Blogosphere? The Fine Patriotic 21 (worked my way down the feedreader)

  1. American Perspective has patriotic bunnies
  2. Blogs For Victory has the Declaration
  3. Bookworm has Madison Rising’s Star Spangled Banner
  4. Cold Fury notes what it’s all about
  5. Dioneges’ Middle Finger has cheesecake
  6. Flopping Aces also has the Madison Rising SSB, plus more
  7. Jihad Watch discusses the choice between freedom and slavery
  8. Maggie’s Farm has July 4th links
  9. Maggie’s Notebook notes how America became America
  10. Michelle Malkin has thoughts on the day
  11. Political Clown Parade has good wishes
  12. Powerline has the eternal meaning
  13. Randy’s Roundtable has Independence Day wishes
  14. Reaganite Republican has July 4th Funnies
  15. The Astute Bloggers have July 4th music
  16. The Camp of the Saints has July 4th 2013 style
  17. The First Street Journal has Happy Dependence Day
  18. The Jawa Report has birthday wishes
  19. The Daley Gator has the Declaration
  20. The Lonely Conservative wants the government out of your grill
  21. Theo Spark has a somewhat patriotic pic dump
  22. More: The Victory Girls offer Independence Forever
  23. Ninety Miles From Tyranny has freedom from tyranny day
  24. Proof Positive has Ronald Reagan on the price of freedom

Do you have a patriotic post today? Celebrating July 4th? Women in patriotic bikinis? Linkback or drop me an email (wteach(at)thepiratescove.us) and I’ll add you to the list!

Read More »

Read: Independence Day Patriotic Pinup »

Bummer: Sea Rise Worse Than We Thought

And by worse, I mean worse for the disciples of the Cult Of Climate Change

(Daily Caller) When Barack Obama promised to slow the earth’s rising sea levels and heal the planet during the 2008 campaign, he probably had no idea that curbing carbon dioxide emissions might not lower the sea levels.

A study published in the Journal of Geodesy found that the sea level has only risen by 1.7 millimeters per year over the last 110 years — about 6.7 inches per century — all while carbon dioxide concentrations in the air have risen by a third, suggesting that rising carbon concentrations have not impacted the rate at which sea levels are rising.

The study used data from the Gravity Recovery And Climate Experiment satellite mission and analyzed “continental mass variations on a global scale, including both land-ice and land-water contributions, for 19 continental areas that exhibited significant signals” over a nine-year period from 2002 to 2011.

The results echoed a study conducted last year, which also found that sea level has been rising on average by 1.7 mm/year over the last 110 years. This was also suggested by two other studies conducted in the last decade.

“The latest results show once again that sea levels are not accelerating after all, and are merely continuing their modest rise at an unchanged rate,” said Pierre Gosselin, who runs the climate skeptic blog NoTricksZone. “The more alarmist sea level rise rates some have claimed recently stem from the use of statistical tricks and the very selective use of data. Fortunately, these fudged alarmist rates do not agree with real-life observations. Overall the latest computed rates show that there is absolutely nothing to be alarmed about.”

Well, that’s just a fastball to the groin, wouldn’t you say, Warmists?

Of course, Warmists will say “see? We were right. The sea level is going up!” Yes, yes it is. Alas, what this confirms is that global sea level rise is pretty much within the statistical norm. What does that mean? Essentially, over the last 7,000-8,000 years the sea rise has been estimated to be an average of 6-8 inches per century. The reason that time frame is used is due to the effects of the ending of the last glacial age leveling off. From around 20k years ago, the sea rose roughly up to 140 meters (459 feet) in roughly 13,000 years, heading into the Holocene.

Now, think back to math class: how does one arrive at an average? We take a bunch of numbers, add them together, and divide by the number of data points. What this means is that during the past 7-8K years, there have been times where sea rise has been much higher warm periods), and times where much lower, perhaps even negative (cool periods). Yet, this warm period is simply average regarding sea rise.

Of course, what Warmists will tell us … if they even acknowledge the study… is that maybe it’s at the lower edge of average now, but in the future, dooooooom! And then they’ll jump in their fossil fueled SUVs to run errands.

PS: Just to be perfectly clear, the Earth is currently in a warm period, which could last for another couple hundred years, but, once again, we see that it is primarily natural, not driven by CO2.

Read: Bummer: Sea Rise Worse Than We Thought »

On Independence Day, Liberals Can’t Help Being Jerks

What is it about July 4th that brings out the worst in Liberals? For a party that says they are “progressive” and future looking, they sure seem to focus on all the bad that has occurred, and whine and whine and whine. The Washington Post features not one, not two, but three negative pieces (in fairness, they have a few positive pieces, but why bother with the negative on this day?). First, here’s the Editorial Board whining about the Declaration of Independence

“WE HOLD THESE truths to be sacred and undeniable,” Thomas Jefferson wrote in his first draft of the Declaration of Independence (the composition of which was regarded as something of a minor administrative chore, as noted by the historian Joseph Ellis). He showed the draft to John Adams and Benjamin Franklin, who suggested “self-evident” instead — perhaps a polite way of saying to the British crown: “as any fool can plainly see.” Although Jefferson (uncharacteristically) accepted the change without complaint, the “truths” that all men are created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights were not self-evident to everyone, even in the American colonies, where a sizable part of the population was loyal to Great Britain and a great many more simply wanted the revolutionary turmoil to end so things could get back to normal.

The obvious contradiction of the Declaration’s fine sentiments — the institution of slavery — had to be swept under the rug in 1776 lest southerners withdraw from the fragile and sometimes fractious coalition that was forming behind the idea of independence….

Here’s E.J. Dionne Jr calling for Marxism

Last week, the Aspen Institute gathered a politically diverse group of Americans under the banner of the “Franklin Project,” named after Ben, to declare a commitment to offering every American between the ages of 18 and 28 a chance to give a year of service to the country. The opportunities would include service in our armed forces but also time spent educating our fellow citizens, bringing them health care and preventive services, working with the least advantaged among us, and conserving our environment.

Yes, he does mean the military, in terms of Lefties joining in order to liberalize the institution. Add in the far left service stuff. And here’s the kicker: The American Revolution Was a Flop

The easiest way of assessing whether the United States would have been better off without its revolution is to look at those English-speaking countries that rejected the American Revolution and retained the monarchy, particularly Canada, which experienced an influx of American refugees after the British defeat. The U.S. performance should also be assessed against the ideals the new country set for itself — namely, advancing life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

Lot’s of whines about slavery, which the writer, a Canadian, acknowledges was defeated during the Civil War. Complaints about citizens being incarcerated (no mention that liberal justice system policies makes this worse). Whines about this, whines about that.

Which brings us to the related matter of the revolution’s long-term impact on politics. While the Canadian, Australian and British governments have shown they can get things done, including passing tough austerity budgets in recent years, the norm in Washington has become paralyzing partisanship and gridlock.

In these senses, the American Revolution was a flop. Perhaps it’s time for Americans to accept that their revolution was a failure and renounce it. (For their part, many Russians have.)

I’ll resist the notion to smack this Canuck around while insulting Canada: it’s not Canada’s fault that the WP published this drivel for Independence Day.

Many other papers have pulled the same thing, negative articles and op-eds. Kudos to the NY Times for avoiding this (except for one linking slavery to the American Revolution.) Here’s their Editorial Board

There is something self-evident about the Fourth of July. We know its origin and its meaning. Its iconography is straightforward, even if the text behind it — the Declaration — is complex. It retains a simplicity that resembles no other major holiday. It celebrates a vital principle, but it is lacking in rites and ritual. We set aside the day, which seems to include a bit of everything — family, patriotism, parades, and simply doing nothing. Yet you could say its significance can be found in the doings of any ordinary American day — something that’s all too easy to forget until July Fourth comes along as a reminder.

I’m going to avoid what the loonies at the Left wing blogs say, however, if you want the most loony tunes piece, here you go

That’s why I’ll do no flag waving or banner display. I’ll recite no Pledges of Allegiance, nor stand for the Star Spangled Banner. Patriotic speeches and other jingoistic claptrap will draw no applause from me.

There’s so much loony (in some cases, wrapped around real issues) in the piece that I couldn’t even figure out what to excerpt, so I simply went with the the above. Whines about Vietnam, complaints about America in 3rd world countries, drones, rendition, Dick Cheney, Bush, the 2000 Election, and so much more (but never mentions Obama by name) from Mike Rivage-Seul, who is a liberation theologian (read: far far left moonbat), who, really, just put into words what so many Liberals think. Yet, he’s still here living in the United States, a country he seems to hate. Much like other Lefties, who never seem to leave the country they despise.

Want to piss a liberal off today? Wave the flag

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: On Independence Day, Liberals Can’t Help Being Jerks »

Delaying The Employer Mandate Was A Huge Mistake By Team Obama

Like you, I’ve had time today to listen to the talking heads and read the blog posts on Obama delaying the rollout of the employer mandate (read Gabriel Malor’s discussion of what the mandate is). Erika Johnson has a good breakdown as to the massive job losses that will now be put off till after the 2014 midterms. Team O and the Democrats surely do not want the optics of lots and lots of layoffs couple with employees being downgraded from full to part time, plus all the lawsuits that would be filed, as they attempt to retake the House.

However, I believe Team O made a huge, huge mistake. First, it violates the law. The January 1, 2014 date is not a deadline that can be pushed off. It’s Christmas, it’s your birthday, your anniversary, tax day. It’s a scheduled court date. It’s “your power bill is due on..” There is no latitude. I’m interested to see what their excuse is for violating the very law they pushed for and extolled for years.

Second, this gives Republicans a huge talking point for the mid-terms. I suspect that Team O thought they were picking the lesser of two evils, the other being to let it start and deal with the fallout, and see a big Tea Party turnout. However, Conservatives will be out in force either way: this might bring lots more independents and moderates out to vote against Democrats, will leaving Dems sitting at home. Think of this talking point from Republicans:

Folks, you have a choice: you can vote for the Party which passed a bill that was so huge, so unwieldy, so damaging, so job killing, so impossible to implement that Democrat President Obama decided to violate the hard implementation date and push it off till 2015, after the elections occur, telling people that this was really, really hard to implement. Who would have thought a 2,000+ page bill which has generated over 20,000 pages of regulations (it will probably be more by election day) would be so difficult to implement?

Obamacare was opposed by the majority of Americans before it was passed, and hasn’t become anymore popular since. Sure, there are some parts that are popular, designed in the same way one might grind up horrible tasting medicine and mixing it with honey. Republicans have stood with you and attempted to repeal and replace Obamacare with common sense solutions. Democrats have stood with Mr. Obama on Obamacare, except when they need to get elected, then they don’t want to talk about it. “Obamacare? What’s that? Never heard of it” they’ll say.

Obama and the Democrats told us if we didn’t pass this citizens would die. Yet, they provided waiver after waiver for their campaign donors. Now they push the employer mandate off for a year….after the election….so doesn’t that mean, by their own talking points, that they want citizens to die?

Democrats are either playing games, trying to minimize the true pain that is caused by Obamacare in order to win the elections, or they’ve created a monstrosity that is impossible to implement. More than likely, both. Are these the types of people you want to trust in government?

Or something like that. I’m not a politician, I don’t speak politician.

I also have to wonder if Congressional Democrats were blindsided by this, and not just the rank and file, but Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid too boot. Obama’s relationship with them hasn’t been much better than his relationship with Congressional Republicans. Heck, Bush might have had a better relationship with Pelosi than Obama does. And their strategists might well be saying this is worse. If employers were laying people off and/or reducing hours down to part time, they could demonize the private sector. Not now.

We’ll see if Republicans have the fortitude to attack and demonize when election season is upon us. Or whether they’ll get squishy.

Read: Delaying The Employer Mandate Was A Huge Mistake By Team Obama »

If All You See…

…is snow that is caused by too much heat because someone used their hair dryer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is All American Blogger, which notes that regulations may have killed Google Reader.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove