…are evil bottles of CO2 infused beer, causing it to get so hot that temps go down, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Public Secrets, with a post on Nidal Hassan, and a recommendation.
Read: If All You See… »
…are evil bottles of CO2 infused beer, causing it to get so hot that temps go down, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Public Secrets, with a post on Nidal Hassan, and a recommendation.
Read: If All You See… »
Lots of people, from pundits to scientists, have hit Gore for his comment about “category 6 hurricanes”. Like a good little disciple, Ezra Klein takes one for the team (via Junk Science)
(Washington Post) On Wednesday, I published an interview with Al Gore in which he mentioned that the scientific community was beginning to consider Category 6 hurricanes. The line has attracted some criticism because there are no official plans to add a sixth category to the 1-5 scale. Here’s what I had Gore saying:
If you look at superstorm Sandy on October 29th, the ocean water east of New Jersey was nine degrees fahrenheit above average. That’s what put so much more energy into that storm. That’s what put so much more water vapor into that storm. Would there be a storm anyway? Maybe so. Would there be hurricanes and floods and droughts without man-made global warming? Of course. But they’re stronger now. The extreme events are more extreme. The hurricane scale used to be 1-5 and now they’re adding a 6. The fingerprint of man-made global warming is all over these storms and extreme weather events.
But this was also a segment of the interview in which I remembered struggling to keep up with Gore, and when that happens, some nuance can get lost. (A note on methods: In most cases, including this one, I transcribe these interviews in real time, with a tape recorder as back-up. I also, as is always mentioned in the introduction to the interviews, lightly edit for length, clarity, and redundancy).
He’s out of town and doesn’t have his tape recorder with him, but, hey, he’s perfectly willing to allow Team Gore to helpfully change the quote and publish the article without bothering to check the tape
“The scientists are now adding category six to the hurricane…some are proposing we add category 6 to the hurricane scale that used to be 1-5. “
I’m not sure how that is much better. He’s still claiming that scientists are adding a category 6, which they aren’t. But I guess we’re supposed to think that some are thinking about doing this, according to some un-named people. Gore’s folks go on to further “clarify”
Former VP Gore discussed the destructiveness of climate change–fueled extreme weather as being categorically above and beyond the scale we currently use. To clarify, his original comments regarding hurricane measurements were intended to convey this ongoing consideration by the scientific community.
Except, there has been no increase in “extreme weather”. Certainly not hurricanes nor tornadoes, nor drought or flood. Though I supposed there has been more extreme cold weather events, which are, of course, blamed by Warmists on Mankind’s output of greenhouse gases.
Read: Ezra Klein Takes One For Team Climahysteria, Walks Back Gore Hurricane Comment »
Have you ever dressed as a Founding Father? Well, you’re an extremist, as are the Founding Fathers, per Department of Defense training material
(The Blaze) U.S. Department of Defense education materials obtained by Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group, warn of “extremists†that will “talk of individual liberties, states’ rights, and how to make the world a better place.†Judicial Watch and other conservative media outlets claim the disclosure indicates the department is teaching that conservative views are “extremist†in nature.
The guide is reportedly authored by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, a Defense Department-funded diversity training center. Further, the documents cite the left-leaning Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) when identifying “hate groups.â€
If the SPLC is involved, you know that all right leaning people are considered haters. Muslim extremists? Never. Some highlights from Judicial Watch
While the document could certainly extrapolate certain Muslim and left leaning groups as “extremists”, the object, and focus, was to brand virtually all people on the right as extremists. The better to build a case for federal spying on the groups and individuals, and perhaps banning them.
The documents is supposedly only supposed to be used for “training purposes” but no one is supposed to use the material “on the job”. Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton had this to say
“The Obama administration has a nasty habit of equating basic conservative values with terrorism.â€
“And now, in a document full of claptrap, its Defense Department suggests that the Founding Fathers, and many conservative Americans, would not be welcome in today’s military,†he added. “And it is striking that some the language in this new document echoes the IRS targeting language of conservative and Tea Party investigations. After reviewing this document, one can’t help but worry for the future and morale of our nation’s armed forces.â€
What you have is yet another attempt to turn a government institution into one that follows far left doctrine. At one point the Left was trying to destroy the US military, particularly through denigrating it and defunding it. Now they are attempting to infiltrate it. They already have a good chunk of the federal (and state) bureaucracy. They control the public sector unions. They also control the media and teacher’s unions. What if the military is turned into just another branch of the Democrat Party?
Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.
Read: DOD Deems People Who Talk About Individual Freedom, Making World Better Place As “Extremists” »
…is a world killing plastic bottle of water, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Don Surber, with the Daily Scoreboard.
Read: If All You See… »
The question is, does the study prove us menfolk are liars?
(UK Express) A lovely pair of peepers is the first thing about a woman to draw a man’s attention, research claims – contrary to popular belief that his attention is likely to be fixed somewhat further down.
Predictably, though, his gaze does wander south next, taking in the lucky lady’s dazzling smile before an appreciative glance at her breasts. Only then is our Romeo likely to notice her well-coiffed hair and consider her overall weight before eyeing up her legs.
If all of that passes muster, the amorous chap will give some thought to her dress sense – perhaps as an excuse to take a furtive peek at her shapely derriere.
Then he will notice her height, though if she is particularly tall he may have had more trouble than usual focusing on her eyes in the first place.
Finally he will delight in her peachy soft skin, according to the survey of 1,000 men.
A spokesman for Murine eye drops, which carried out the poll, said: “This study almost crushes the common stereotype that the first thing men look at is a woman’s chest.
Actually, I can see it. At least when meeting a woman close up. I’d say when we are more than 10 feet we see the head, torso, and lower half all at once, then might focus in. Could be head, hair, smile, eyes. Or legs, breast, butt, waist, etc.
But, we now have scientific proof men aren’t pigs!
Apparently they’re stealth hurricanes, since the US mainland has not been hit by a major hurricane since October 24, 2005
(Hurricane enable: How climate change is mixing up bigger, badder storms )
Global warming and hurricanes are like Bourbon Street and Hurricanes: The farther down the road you go, the more intense they get.
Buy your Hurricanes at the Hard Rock Café, and you can probably make it through a third before you’ve dimmed enough to believe the Republican talking points on climate change. But by the time you get to The Marigny, they’re making those things with three kinds of rum, a half-gallon of rocket fuel, and the soul of an angry leprechaun.
Most climate models predict the same thing with storms: The more we stray from the climate norm, the stronger the hurricanes become. Which makes a lot of sense when you look at how these tempests work.
Those same models have failed spectacularly.
But will hurricanes find our new climate so likeable that they not only become stronger, but more frequent as well? Here, the science is unsettled. One recent model by Kerry Emanuel of MIT makes some worst-case assumptions and predicts hurricanes getting stronger and more frequent. The majority of climate models, however, predict we won’t see more hurricanes — they’ll just get a hell of a lot worse.
Judith Curry discusses this over at NPR, in terms of the big report that stated that 2005, a big, big hurricane year, would be the new norm
Curry actually entered the public eye in 2005, with a paper in Science magazine warning that hurricanes were likely to become more intense as a result of climate change. But in the years since then, she’s soured on the scientific consensus about climate change. Her mantra now is, “We just don’t know.” (snip)
Curry says her 2005 hurricanes paper “generated a lot of media attention which we were ill-prepared to deal with,” she says. “We were being attacked by the anti-global-warming crowd as well as a large number of people in the hurricane community who thought this was natural variability.”
Curry learned quite a bit over that situation, and she decided to dive in and engage with more than just the True Believers, and now wonders how much is anthropogenic and how much is natural variability. After that paper was published, hurricane landfalls dropped off precipitously. So then Warmists said, as the Grist article notes in a disingenuous way, there won’t be more hurricanes, they’ll just be stronger. Which is false, according to actual data, as opposed to “computer models”. A warmer atmospher should actually cause fewer and weaker. We’ve actually seen some of the worst activity over the past 150 years during early parts of pauses and during slight cooling (late 40’s to late 70’s).
But, Warmists have to keep up the scary stories for their cult. Even making it up, like Gore did with his “category 6” yap yap, for which he was smacked around by science and reality.
Read: Grist: “Climate Change” Creating Bigger, Badder Hurricanes »