If All You See…

By William Teach August 1, 2014 – 1:00 pm

…is a house collapsing because of climate change, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on Joe Scarborough’s credibility.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

The Climate Change Revolution Begins With You (Taking A Fossil Fueled Trip To Spread Awareness)…

By William Teach August 1, 2014 – 11:02 am

…about how Evil fossil fuels are and how we’re all doomed. Of course this is at MSNBC

The climate change revolution begins with you

September 21, 2014 is shaping up to be a day for the history books. Echoing the words of Paulo Coelho, “Life was always a matter of waiting for the right moment to act.” That moment is now.

When people ask: “Where were you when the world came together and changed for the better?” Without hesitation you will tell them: “I was in the streets of New York City, part of the People’s Climate March.”

Surrounded by old friends, and new friends, by family, by neighbors and by tens of thousands of people from all walks of life and every ethnic, religious and political background, we will tell them: “We came together to let the world know that we want and demand a brighter future for our children and ourselves.”

The Secretary General of the United Nations has put out a call to world leaders to join him at a summit in New York City on September 23, the day before the opening of the Annual United Nations General Assembly:

“There is opportunity amid this [climate change] peril – a chance to change the way we do business, plan our cities, fuel our homes and factories, and move our goods and ourselves. A low-carbon path beckons – a path that can create jobs and improve public health while safeguarding the environment. To help set us on this course, I invite all of you to a Climate Change Summit … in New York City.”

We are a coalition of parents’ organizations that are joining forces to encourage participation in the March on September 21 – including Moms Clean Air Force, The Mothers Project, Mothers Out Front, Climate Parents, and many more. We will be joining labor groups, students, faith based organizations, environmental justice groups, artists, grandparents, military families, teachers, bankers, engineers, farmers and factory workers – hundreds of organizations and hundreds of thousands of individuals – collectively letting our world leaders know we are watching them closely and we can’t wait any longer for climate solutions.

Hmm, that’s quite a few people heading to NYC for a march, putting out quite a bit of “carbon pollution” from fossil fueled travel, wouldn’t you say? This next part is even more amusing

Our elected leaders have been talking for more then 20 years, taking little real action to address the climate crisis.

And, what, exactly, have the Warmist peons been doing over those same 20 years? They sure refuse to take any substantive actions within their own lives

Meanwhile, our planet has been getting sicker,

and we have put the future of our children and ourselves in peril. It’s time that our leaders heard clearly from us. Unless they work together for positive change, we will find and elect others who can and will create this change. We teach our children to lead by example, yet our elected officials, business and community leaders have been poor role models when it comes to climate solutions.

And we’re right back to the question “what are Warmists doing in their own lives to reduce their own carbon footprints?” In this case, they are increase them.

BTW, mark your calendar for September 21st, see if the Gore Effect comes into play.

Read: The Climate Change Revolution Begins With You (Taking A Fossil Fueled Trip To Spread Awareness)… »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Climahypocrites, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Senator Blunt: Obama’s “Hatin'” Comment Like Something From Junior High

By William Teach August 1, 2014 – 10:00 am

It’s what he said after that that really brings it on home

(St. Louis Today) Told of the “hating” quote, Blunt said it sounded like “the kinds of things that happen in junior high, when you say that somebody else is a really bad person.

“That is no way to begin to work with that person,” Blunt said.

An excellent point. How does one actually work with anyone who makes everything extremely personal, and is constantly nasty, mean-spirited, and insulting? Things that currently go way, way beyond typical politics. Well, you don’t. Especially when Obama’s policies are ridiculous, silly, and failures to start with.

Read: Senator Blunt: Obama’s “Hatin'” Comment Like Something From Junior High »

Posted in Barry Obama | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Poll Shows GOP Standing Tough On Border Most Important Issue

By William Teach August 1, 2014 – 8:34 am

Is it?

(Breitbart) Polling data compiled by Tea Party Patriots and provided exclusively to Breitbart News shows that a majority of Republican voters think Republicans standing strong on immigration is more important than repealing Obamacare, getting to the bottom of the Benghazi or IRS scandals—or anything else for that matter.

When asked by TPP’s pollster which issue they think is the important for Republicans in Congress to deal with, 34.6 percent of GOP voters said stopping the flow of illegal immigrants across our southern border. Stopping Obama’s “illegal overreach” with executive power came in a distant second with 24 percent of GOP voters saying that’s the most important, while 23 percent saying repealing Obamacare is the most important and just 7.2 percent say the IRS scandal is the most important issue and 2.8 percent say the Benghazi scandal is most important. A total of 8.4 percent of GOP voters said they don’t know or refused to answer.

The poll was conduced with 1,000 likely GOP voters on Thursday, July 24 via a combination of cell phones and landlines nationwide, with a margin of error of 3.2 percent.

I do have to wonder how much of this is simply related to the current illegal immigrant issue, and if this would have been different a few months ago. And, if it will be different a few months from now, when there will surely be some other crisis that replaces this one.

On the bright side, the NY Times is apparently very upset over the “Rebellion inside the GOP”

Conservatives in the House rebelled against their leadership on Thursday to scuttle an emergency spending measure that addressed the migrant crisis at the southern border, pushing the issue to a showdown on Friday as lawmakers prepared to leave for a five-week recess. The unexpected turmoil offered a coda to the dysfunction that has gripped the Capitol for much of the year.

The failure of the comparatively modest Republican border bill, coupled with the Senate’s own inability to even bring a Democratic alternative to a vote, emphasized how the prospects of a broad immigration overhaul — which at the beginning of the 113th Congress held great bipartisan promise — have ground to a crashing halt.

William Kristol noted several good reasons to kill the bill, one of which is that Senate Democrats wouldn’t take it up and Obama threatened to veto it. John Boehner will give it one more try today. Perhaps Ted Cruz’ anti-deferred action bill will get a vote?

Unfortunately, GOP leadership, squishy and Dem-lite as always, just doesn’t get it. Instead of going with squishy methods, get tough. Stand on Law. Ignore the idiots using personal invective and ask them to put forth exactly what they want to pass and why. Put Democrats on the defensive, force them to defend amnesty for illegals/law breakers. Republicans should listen to the people who vote for them.

No one should possibly think this crisis just happened, not with the mid-terms coming up. This issue is a way to change the dynamics away from Obamacare, the stagnant economy, and Obama over-reach, and paint Republicans as heartless and worthless. And, if Republicans give in to Democrats, that will keep Republicans and Conservatives home on election day.

Read: Poll Shows GOP Standing Tough On Border Most Important Issue »

Posted in Current Affairs, GOP, Illegal Immigration | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Satanists Use Hobby Lobby Ruling For Democrat Style Purposes

By William Teach August 1, 2014 – 7:53 am

This is an interesting turn of events. Who knew that Satanists have the same positions on abortion as Democrats?

(ABC News) A group of Satanists are using the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby decision to promote their own political initiatives — which are the polar opposite of the Christian craft store giant.

The Supreme Court ruling allows Hobby Lobby to opt out of providing contraceptives to employees on the basis of their religious beliefs. Now, The Satanic Temple plans to cite the verdict as justification for the protection of their own beliefs. (WT-gotta admire the media’s continued ability to fail to represent the ruling properly)

The Satanic Temple, a religious group based in New York but with followers across the country, is using the ruling to fight informed consent laws which mandate that women considering abortions must be given state-approved literature about the procedure.

“We should only have to review medical or scientific information based solely on fact and not politicized,” said Jex Blackmore, the head of the Detroit chapter of The Satanic Temple. “Some of that state-drafted information is medical in nature [but] it’s just that it’s written in a very biased format.”

The group announced the initiative last week and have provided a form letter intended to enable women to opt-out of receiving the pamphlets distributed under the informed consent laws. They contend that the informed consent pamphlets run counter to their religious beliefs. Women are able to print off the opt-out form, fill it out and hand it to their doctor. If the doctor still gives them the state-mandated forms in spite of the letter, The Satanic Temple says it will file a lawsuit on their behalf.

Huh. So Satanists are upset by informed consent laws when it comes to abortion. So are Democrats, who have been fighting informed consent laws since they were passed, and are very upset over them. In fact, Senate Democrats have recently begun pushing a bill that would wipe out all State level informed consent laws, along with virtually every pro-life law. Seems that Democrats are more hard cored in favor of abortion than Satanists.

When it comes to fighting any lawsuits that The Satanic Temple brings forward regarding informed consent laws, it appears that the devil is truly in the details.

“It really puts the conservative Christians and the anti-contraceptive Catholics in a bind: They’re going to have to argue that a religious group should lose a RFRA claim that is on par with the Hobby Lobby claim,” Hamilton said.

“The courts cant pick and choose between beliefs.”

An interesting point. Of course, they haven’t actually made a case as to how the informed consent pamphlets violate their religious beliefs. There’s nothing in this article, nor any other articles I’ve perused, that explain that position, which would be necessary to sue. They really do not make a case on their website. Unless they’re saying that politics is against their religion? According to their press release, this is based on the notion that “The Satanic Temple believes that the body is inviolable — subject to one’s own will alone.” Wouldn’t that mean that the baby should be accorded the same will over their body?

However, at the end of the day, it looks more like this is really about fundraising, nothing more, nothing less, for the Satanic Temple. Kinda like with Democrat emails: give us money.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Satanists Use Hobby Lobby Ruling For Democrat Style Purposes »

Posted in Current Affairs | Comments Off on Satanists Use Hobby Lobby Ruling For Democrat Style Purposes | Trackback URL

Say, Why Does Hamas Store Its Weapons In Civilian Areas?

By William Teach July 31, 2014 – 3:12 pm

Good question. The Washington Post finally deigns to notice what most other people already know, in their own unique fashion

Why Hamas stores its weapons inside hospitals, mosques and schools

To many observers, one of the most troublesome facts of the Gaza Strip conflict — which has killed around 1,340 Palestinians, many of them civilians, and 56 Israeli soldiers — has been Israel’s apparent willingness to strike civilian institutions such as mosques, schools and hospitals. On Wednesday, following a strike on a school while its inhabitants slept, killing 20 people and wounding dozens more, a United Nations official said Israel had violated international law. “I condemn in the strongest possible terms the serious violation of international law by Israel forces, said U.N. official Pierre Krähenbühl. “This is an affront to all of us, a source of universal shame. Today the world stands disgraced.”

Israeli military officials, for their part, say the reality of the strikes is substantially more complicated and claim Hamas’s maintenance of military operations inside civilian institutions precipitate such attacks.

“Hamas chooses to use these protected areas for military purposes in order to shield itself from IDF strikes,” the Israeli Defense Forces said this week. “And to draw international condemnation of Israel if the IDF is forced to respond.”

This is followed by a rehash of how Hamas is hiding weapons within hospitals, mosques, and UN schools. If you thought that WP writer Terrance McCoy was going to condemn Hamas, you’d be wrong. The article is about as vanilla and “just the facts, Ma’am” as one will see in today’s liberal media.

For years, Hamas has “planned carefully for a major Israeli invasion,”according to a Washington Institute for Near East Policy report. In addition to an elaborate tunnel system, there was the “integral use of civilians and civilian facilities as cover for its military activity; schools, mosques, hospitals, and civilian housing became weapons storage facilities, Hamas headquarters, and fighting positions … IDF imagery and combat intelligence revealed extensive use of civilian facilities.”

Whatever its plan, the outcome of this practice is indisputably devastating — both in Palestinian lives lost and Israel’s standing in the international community. As images of death and tragedy clog news outlets, international condemnation of Israel mounts. Which, according to the Israeli military, is exactly what it predicted would happen.

Interestingly, Hamas’ use of civilians and civilian property as shields rarely elicits condemnation from the liberal media nor liberals. When it does happen, there is usually some sort of “oh, but, you know, those Israeli’s are mean, too” accompanying said condemnation. There is a false moral equivalence created, when it is Hamas, a terrorist group, which is at fault.

Read: Say, Why Does Hamas Store Its Weapons In Civilian Areas? »

Posted in War On Terrorism, Wonky Media | Comments Off on Say, Why Does Hamas Store Its Weapons In Civilian Areas? | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach July 31, 2014 – 1:00 pm

…is a wonderful, wonderful carbon friendly big city full of like minded Warmists, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Maggie’s Farm, with a post on open borders.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | Comments Off on If All You See… | Trackback URL

Is The List Of Warming Excuses Actually 29?

By William Teach July 31, 2014 – 10:57 am

I have it set at 14. The Hockey Schtick says it’s 29

1) Low solar activity 

2) Oceans ate the global warming [debunked] [debunked] [debunked]

3) Chinese coal use [debunked]

4) Montreal Protocol 

5) What ‘pause’? [debunked] [debunked] [debunked] [debunked]

8) Faster Pacific trade winds [debunked]

9) Stadium Waves

10) ‘Coincidence!’

11) Pine aerosols

12) It’s “not so unusual” and “no more than natural variability”

13) “Scientists looking at the wrong ‘lousy’ data” http://

14) Cold nights getting colder in Northern Hemisphere

(Rest below the fold)

15) We forgot to cherry-pick models in tune with natural variability [debunked]

16) Negative phase of Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation

17) AMOC ocean oscillation

18) “Global brightening” has stopped

19) “Ahistorical media”

20) “It’s the hottest decade ever” Decadal averages used to hide the ‘pause’ [debunked]

21) Few El Ninos since 1999

22) Temperature variations fall “roughly in the middle of the AR4 model results”

23) “Not scientifically relevant”

24) The wrong type of El Ninos

25) Slower trade winds [debunked]

26) The climate is less sensitive to CO2 than previously thought [see also]

27) PDO and AMO natural cycles and here

28) ENSO

29) Solar cycle driven ocean temperature variations

We can certainly expect plenty more if the Pause continues. Of course, we are all missing one important one in our lists: “shut up”. Yes, Warmists use that as an excuse. Oh, and then there’s the ever popular “the science is settled”.

Read: Is The List Of Warming Excuses Actually 29? »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | Comments Off on Is The List Of Warming Excuses Actually 29? | Trackback URL

Obama Pulls Normal Schtick: Mocks Republicans Before Asking For Their Help

By William Teach July 31, 2014 – 8:38 am

By the way, will Obama be required to pay for the full use of Air Force One, since he really had no official, presidential duties event on the schedule? His supposed events were strictly partisan. Shocking!

(CNS News) As President Barack Obama accuses Republicans of wasting taxpayer money on a lawsuit against him, Obama himself is traveling all over the country at taxpayer expense, eating barbecue, raising money, and indulging his inner celebrity before adoring crowds.

“We love you! We love you!” the people shouted in Kansas City on Wednesday. “Thank you,” Obama replied, as he launched into a partisan speech, criticizing Republicans for blocking his liberal “opportunity agenda” and listing all the things he’s done on his own:

“So some of the things we’re doing without Congress are making a difference, but we could do so much more if Congress would just come on and help out a little bit, Obama said.

“Just come on. Come on and help out a little bit. Stop being mad all the time. (Applause.) Stop just hating all the time. Come on. (Applause.) Let’s get some work done together,” said the president who has shown no inclination to negotiate with Congress, even when he’s in Washington.

He actually said “hatin'”. Seriously. Twitchy referred to him as “President Beiber“. Of course, Obama gives us plenty of reason to be mad, considering his clear violations of law and Constitution.

That’s right, Obama is constantly threatening to veto what the GOP led House passes. And Obama and his White House minions always seem to forget that the House has passed numerous bills, quite a few which are economic, that languish without a vote, nor even a committee hearing, in the Democrat led Senate

Read: Obama Pulls Normal Schtick: Mocks Republicans Before Asking For Their Help »

Posted in Barry Obama | Comments Off on Obama Pulls Normal Schtick: Mocks Republicans Before Asking For Their Help | Trackback URL

For Democrats, It’s Impeachment 24/7

By William Teach July 31, 2014 – 8:04 am

Here are a few points from the Republicans articles of Impeachment for Obama

  • Article XXIV: Spying on American Citizens, Without a Court-Ordered Warrant, in Violation of the Law and the Fourth Amendment
  • Article XXVI: Announcing the Intent to Violate Laws with Signing Statements
  • Article XXVII Failing to Comply with Congressional Subpoenas and Instructing Former Employees Not to Comply
  • Article XXVIII: Tampering with Free and Fair Elections, Corruption of the Administration of Justice

Seems rather ominous, eh?

Anyhow, here’s Nate Silver on the subject

House Speaker John Boehner said Tuesday that Republicans have no plans to impeach President Obama, and that all the impeachment talk was driven by Democrats hoping to stir up their base.

Boehner’s statement isn’t literally true: There have been mentions of impeachment around the edges of the GOP and by some Republican members of Congress. But on the whole, Democrats are spending a lot more time talking about impeachment than Republicans.

Consider, for example, the Sunlight Foundation’s Capitol Words database, which tracks words spoken in the House and Senate. So far in July, there have been 10 mentions of the term “impeachment” in Congress and four others of the term “impeach.” Eleven of the 14 mentions have been made by Democratic rather than Republican members of Congress, however.

Impeachment chatter has also become common on cable news. On Fox News this month, Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor, called for Obama’s impeachment, for instance. But for every mention of impeachment on Fox News in July, there have been five on liberal-leaning MSNBC.

All in all, it has been Democrats who have the ones mostly discussing impeachment. There was a brief flurry of blog posts from Conservatives immediately after Sarah Palin brought the issue to the forefront with two Facebook posts. Democrats have been fundraising (successfully) like crazy off the notion. Liberal media types have been running rampant with opinion pieces. The Washington Post has two breathless op-eds by Dana Milbank and E.J. Dionne running on their web front page this morning. The Hill also noticed that Democrats just can’t stop talking about impeachment. Even the White House is pushing the meme.

Let’s ask the relevant question: if it was a Republican president acting in such a lawless manner, would high ranking Democrats be pushing for actual impeachment proceedings? They never would have considered this, right?

(Daily Caller) In a speech on the floor of the House Wednesday, Texas U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee claimed that Democrats never sought to impeach President George W. Bush.

Not only is that claim false, but Jackson-Lee actually co-sponsored a 2008 bill to do just that and spoke in at least one House committee hearing in support of the effort.

In 2008, former Ohio U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, a prominent opponent of the Iraq war, introduced a bill titled ”Impeaching George W. Bush, President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors.”

Jackson Lee and 10 other Democrats co-sponsored it.

Hmph. Say, remember when John Conyers held his little fake impeachment trial in the Capital basement? Twice? And all the left wing groups, such as After Downing Street, World Can’t Wait, and so many others, that pushed impeaching Bush? Oh, and then there’s this, which the Daily Caller forgot to mention

(Democrats.com) By a bipartisan vote of 251-166, the full House of Representatives sent Dennis Kucinich’s 35 Articles of Impeachment to the Judiciary Committee.

That means Chairman John Conyers now has the power to decide whether to hold impeachment hearings – or not.

Those points at the beginning of the post come directly from Kucinich’s Articles of Impeachment named in the above excerpt.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: For Democrats, It’s Impeachment 24/7 »

Posted in Barry Obama, Democrats, GOP | 4 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove