Obama Vacations As The World Burns

Hey, don’t blame me for the headline: blame either Dana Milbank or a Washington Post editor for it, as Milbank notes that the optics of Obama playing golf and vacationing are not particularly good

(Washington Post) President Obama must really be teed off.

Hillary Rodham Clinton, his once-loyal secretary of state and his likeliest successor, has gone rogue, criticizing his foreign policy as too timid.

Obama responded with not one but two rounds of golf.

Clinton, in an interview with Jeffrey Goldberg published by the Atlantic over the weekend, offered a withering comment on the Obama doctrine, described in shorthand by White House officials as “don’t do stupid s—.” Said Clinton: “Great nations need organizing principles, and ‘Don’t do stupid stuff’ is not an organizing principle.”

As the criticism became public, Obama was doggedly sticking with his plans to go on vacation — a decision that, if not in the category of stupid stuff, could fit under the heading of “tone deafness.”

Yes, yes, presidents always take vacations. And they do it as Big Things Happen. But, Obama takes this to new levels. He was on the golf course within an hour of arriving at Martha’s Vineyard after his brief, and late, TV appearance Saturday. He gave a brief, and, again, late, statement on Monday, and then took off for a fundraiser. He rarely lets himself be photographed while golfing, but, this time he did. As Milbank notes, the optics are bad. It shows him as detached. Here’s the thing: Obama has never cared what other people think, except in terms of getting himself elected. Since his re-election, he’s been freed from worrying about that, and he will do whatever he wants, regardless.

Yes, presidents take vacations. And a few hours off. Presidents will have their advisers and materials to make decisions. They are never really “off”. One has to wonder about Obama, though, and whether he is really engaged. It so often seems like he’s a squirrel, which has a remarkably short attention span. Or, a teenager, which also has an incredibly bad attention span. “Oh, look, a nut, I’ll do something with it” and then move on. There never seems to be any detailed planning or focus. Just a quick response, then move on. But, hey, what’s this? (via Ace and Weasel Zippers)

You have to understand that if you seek that office, then you have to be prepared to give your life to it. Essentially, the bargain that I think every President strikes with the American people is, ‘you give me this office, then in turn my fears, doubts, insecurities, foibles, need for sleep, family life, vacations, leisure, is gone. I am giving myself to you.’

And the American people should have no patience through whatever’s going through your head [i.e., the President’s head] because you’ve got a job to do.

And so how I think about it is, that you don’t make that decision unless you are prepared to make that sacrifice.

Huh. But, times change, and the semi-retired president is entirely unconcerned about the optics.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Obama Vacations As The World Burns »

Georgia Schools Not Impressed With Back Sale Restrictions

I think the operative word in the story is “asinine”

(EAGnews.com) Outrage is growing against federal restrictions on school bake sales and fundraisers.

“We don’t have enough teachers in our classrooms and now we are expected to hire some type of food police to monitor whether we are having bake sales or not. That is just asinine,” John Barge, Georgia state school superintendent tells WSB-TV.

Barge and the state Board of Education are attempting to get an exemption from the snack rules, which would allow only 30 sales per year per school. (snip)

“What an overreach this is for Washington to tell us what our school can and cannot sell to raise money in our schools,” Barge says, according to WSB.

These Big Government regulations (#ThanksMichelle) are causing lots of problems with fundraising for various school groups, events, teams, etc.

“The effect has been not what was intended,” says Jack Carter of Richland District 2 near Columbia, South Carolina. “The effect has been kids don’t eat in the cafeteria anymore, and that’s nationwide,” he tells WLTX.

Carter implied there will be a new type of segregation in schools – those that have good lunches, and those that have Michelle Obama’s.

https://twitter.com/Kelly_PaigeM/status/498639188167000065

https://twitter.com/zoe_mariee99/status/498543842677628929

Oh, then there’s this classic

Read: Georgia Schools Not Impressed With Back Sale Restrictions »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful climate change believer friendly city, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Flopping Aces, with a post on the world class screwup that is Barack Obama.

Read: If All You See… »

Aussie Warmist: Hey, Let’s Just Ban Stuff

Perhaps they should start by banning the use of fossil fuels by Warmists. Oh, and the use of the Internet by Warmists, because it uses lots of energy. Here’s Crikey’s Paddy Mannington (via Climate Depot)

Screw consultation, let’s just ban stuff: how to really fight climate change

Here’s an idea. If the business community and the conservative side of politics are never going to embrace market mechanisms to tackle climate change — what our PM has derisively termed a “so-called market in the non-delivery of an invisible substance to no one” — then let’s stop pandering to them and go back to banning stuff.

Emissions trading schemes (ETS) or “cap and trade”, as the Americans call it, was meant to be a business-friendly, economically rational alternative approach to regulation and the command economy. It was used there successfully in the 1990s to stop acid rain by reducing emissions of sulphur dioxides and nitrogen oxides. It is a strategy the US energy industry — as executives will tell you in a quiet moment — is extremely comfortable with.

But if the business lobby is going to go into hysterics about every sensible proposal to establish an ETS — or worse, jump into bed with the climate sceptics and abandon action on climate altogether, as they’ve done this year — then stuff ‘em.

Are the lobbyists and spinmeisters worried about red and green tape? Always. That’s their job. Let’s give them something to really worry about. All business wants is a level playing field. If the law establishes we are going to reduce emissions fast, companies will work within the law (ultimately, gladly, because you’d be mad to think businesspeople are not concerned about climate change). Australia’s economy will get what early-mover advantages the Germans and Japanese and Californians haven’t hoovered up.

Lest you think this is a joke, it’s not. Mannington is dead serious. He offers 4 ideas, which, surprisingly, do not force Warmists to live the carbon neutral lifestyle. Yeah, weird, right?

These direct actions are entirely compatible with our current system of government. No revolution is required: all we have to do to solve climate change is unplug fossil fuels, plug in renewables, and stop chopping down forests. If we can’t do that — as the sub-title for Naomi Klein’s forthcoming book This Changes Everything declares — it’s capitalism versus the climate, and there’s no doubt which will win.

OK, so, all Warmists need to do is to stop using fossil fuels and erect solar panels and wind turbines for their homes….as long as those homes aren’t built with wood from trees.

Read: Aussie Warmist: Hey, Let’s Just Ban Stuff »

Sharyl Attkinson: Things Would Be Much Different If Watergate Happened Today

How so?

(Mediaite) On This Week Not with George Stephanopoulos, former CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkinson said that journalists today were more hindered, and politicians more emboldened, than they were in the days of Woodward and Bernstein.

“I think that we’ve gone backwards since that time when we really felt empowered as journalists,” Attkinson said.

The video comes from the Daily Caller, which goes on to add linky love to Attkinson’s comments

“Nixon would basically refuse to turn over tapes to Congress,” she continued. “His aides would refuse to testify to Congress, or would take the Fifth, or would lie to Congress with a fair amount of impunity. Woodward and Bernstein would be controversialized on social media by special and political interests who use Facebook accounts.”

“And then at the end,” Attkisson declared. “Nixon would go on a popular late-night comedy show, during which time he would humorously refer to his attackers who were political witch-hunters who believe in Area 51-type conspiracies.”

Missing is that most of the media would take Nixon’s side, doing all they can to protecting him. They would be protecting him. Well, if he had a D after his name, of course.

Read: Sharyl Attkinson: Things Would Be Much Different If Watergate Happened Today »

Dems 2014: Not Only Running From Obama, But Running From Being Democrats

You don’t say. Democrats don’t want to run on who they really are?

(Politico) It’s one thing for Democrats running in red parts of the country to sound like Republicans on the campaign trail. It’s another when Democrats running in purple or even blue territory try to do so.

Yet that’s what’s happening in race after race this season.

Faced with a treacherous political environment, many Democrats are trotting out campaign ads that call for balanced budgets, tax cuts and other more traditionally GOP positions. Some of them are running in congressional districts that just two years ago broke sharply for President Barack Obama.

The Republican-flavored ads provide an early glimpse of how Democrats will wage their 2014 campaign. Democrats, hampered by Obama’s rising unpopularity and the tendency for conservatives to turn out at higher levels than liberals in midterm years, face the reality that swing congressional districts favorable to them in 2012 will be far less so in 2014.

Politico’s Alex Isenstadt provides multiple examples, and what we see is that, while it is nothing new for Democrats to lie about their stances as elections approach, they are going even further than before. For instance

Colorado Democrat Andrew Romanoff, who’s running in a district that Obama won in 2012 and 2008, has started airing a commercial that strikes a tea party theme. It highlights his record as speaker of the state House of Representatives when, he says, he helped balance the state’s budget.

This is the pattern, to lie about what they stand for. It happens in quite a few elections. And when elected, to go back to their Leftist ways.

Essentially, what we are seeing is a repeat of 2012, but amped up on Red Bull. You have Dems running as Republicans, or at least as Blue Dog Democrats if they are hard core Progressives (nice fascists). You have them running from Obama. Literally, such as when he comes to their State/District. They are not only avoiding the topic of Obamacare, they are running away from it. They’re running anti-Obama ads. They’re treating Obama as a pariah. Ask Hawaii Gov Neil Abercrombie what happens when one embraces Obama.

The question is, will Republicans take advantage of this? Will they point out that Democrats aren’t interested in running on who they are? That they’re lying? Will they contrast the Dems records with their talking points? The GOP should take a page from Democrats, and make the election All About Obama, tying all Dems to him, pointing out the contradictory talking points and Democrat beliefs.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Dems 2014: Not Only Running From Obama, But Running From Being Democrats »

Lord Prescott, Another High Flying Climahypocrite

It’s amazing how easy it is to find climate change hypocrites, wouldn’t you say?

(Daily Mail) He is meant to be helping to save the planet. Yet Lord Prescott has clocked up more than 40,000 air miles in five months – all while travelling to and from climate change conferences.

Since February the ex-Deputy Prime Minister and former Environment Secretary has attended all-expenses paid summits in Europe, North America, India and China.

There he has delivered lectures on the perils of damaging the environment and discussed new legislation which could restrict the ability of others to fly or drive cars in future.

But he has been leaving a substantial carbon footprint of his own.

The circumference of the globe is about 25,000 miles, meaning the former Hull East MP has travelled around the world almost twice in less than six months.

Now, the majority of the conferences and such that he has attended are all about “climate change”. Warmists get very upset when it is pointed out that they do not practice what they preach. The thing is, they don’t even try. Like Lord Prescott, they expect Everyone Else to pay the price for their beliefs. Warmists will, of course, attempt to deflect and change the subject, especially placing the blame back on skeptics, getting personal, blamestorming, etc. You know the tricks. At the end of the day, though, they aren’t willing to make changes in their own lives to match their beliefs. Even minor ones. Even just cutting back.

Read: Lord Prescott, Another High Flying Climahypocrite »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful climate change friendly big city, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Right Wing News, with a post stating that Iraq would not be happening with a President Romney.

This is Big City week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Bill Randall

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in the Once and Future Nation Of America. This pinup is by Bill Randall, with a wee bit of help. This one interested me, as I had a long conversation with someone over the march of technology yesterday, the changes I’ve see in just my lifetime. Though, I don’t remember 1959, having been born in 1967. I do remember square TV’s in nice wooden cabinets, though. I remember having a few black and white ones. I remember rabbit ears. I remember there being less than 10 channels, despite being in the NYC market. I remember the wonder of cable TV starting. Now look where we are. Amazing.

What’s happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. American Power notes the flags on display at London terror march
  2. Raised On Hoecakes wonders if perhaps WalMart should pay people more
  3. The Lonely Conservative notes another peaceful Leftist Common Core supporter
  4. Public Secrets covers retreating glaciers, which are nothing new
  5. protein wisdom wonders what kinds of people show up at protests
  6. Proof Positive notes less bread, more circuses
  7. Political Clown Parade notes the world’s most dangerous community organizer
  8. Moonbattery covers the cost of stopping “climate change” vs adaptation
  9. Legal Insurrection wonders of McDonalds is replacing cashiers with machines
  10. Jihad Watch covers Islamists stoning a woman to death in Syria
  11. House Of Eratosthenes covers math is hard
  12. Fire Andrea Mitchell has a “you don’t say” for the media regarding terrorist vs militant
  13. Director Blue points out how much ESPN costs you on your cable bill
  14. Capitalism Is Freedom features a mom who is a tad over-protective
  15. And last, but not least, Wizbang notes a lawsuit by an atheist, upset because those who pray get discounts at a restaurant

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Pro-Terrorist Activists March On UN In Protest Of Israel

Obviously, all the news outlets (most of whom are a citing this same AP article), are calling them “pro-Palestinian”. At the end of the day, though, they are supporters of the terrorist groups in Gaza, like Hamas, and want the destruction of Israel

(AP) A sea of Palestinians and their sympathizers lined Manhattan streets Saturday, marching to the United Nations and shouting that Israel’s response to missile attacks was genocide that took children’s lives.

“What they’re doing is wrong,” said Ayia Mustafa, 12, of the New York borough of Bronx. “I’m here to protest what’s going on in Gaza. What’s going on is wrong — bad things like killing children.”

She was among about 500 demonstrators who walked to the United Nations on Manhattan’s East Side after gathering behind police barricades off Columbus Circle to protest Israeli actions in the Gaza Strip.

Hamas, which the United States and other countries consider a terrorist organization, governs much of Gaza.

It’s very easy to protest here in the United States. Heck, it is ingrained in the 1st Amendment, as long as it is peaceable. They should try going to Gaza and see what happens if they protest against Hamas launching rockets towards Israel’s civilian population, which sometimes land short and kill Gazans. Not that these anti-Semites would protest in that manner, but Hamas would put them down if they did.

Maybe they could protest Hamas using women and children as human shields. Much of the protest centered around children being killed in Gaza. Children put in harm’s way by Hamas.

Heck, the woman in the shorts, one of many dressed inappropriately according to Islamic law, should try walking around Gaza like that.

Mostafa Asadi, an engineer from Philadelphia who came to New York for the protest, said the current violence in the Middle East started more than six decades ago.

“The Zionists took Palestinian land and expelled them in 1948, and now Israel is trying to control the area,” said Asadi, 55, an Iran native who hoisted a sign that said: “Stop the U.S.-Israeli blockade of Gaza.”

“The Israelis are racist,” said Asadi.

I wasn’t aware that one could be racist against your own race. But, then, this is the level of idiocy we have to deal with. Or, is that brainwashing?

Of course, this was all planned by the communist/socialist group ANSWER (hat tip to American Power), which finally found a protest they like, having ignored military action by the US the moment Obama was sworn in. ANSWER also held another pro-Hamas pro-destruction of Israel march in Los Angeles last weekend.

The Times Of Israel also noted the protest, using the same AP article, and someone notes in the comments

these protesters – everywhere – Such Simpletons. Stop the Occupation. Free Palestine! SImpletons. Free Palestine …. then what?? More grievances, more grievances, endless grievances. More rockets, more unrest, more tunnels, more provocations. Grievances by Palestinians and hamas to the UN – crying about allowing cement deliveries blocking their progress for infrastructure … yet the world sees it was to construct these tunnels – moral of the story – Palestinian leaders cannot be trusted.

At the end of the day, all they want is the destruction of Israel.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Pro-Terrorist Activists March On UN In Protest Of Israel »

Pirate's Cove