Are You Ready For Higher Taxes Due To Govt “Climate Change” Regulation?

I mentioned Friday that Team Obama was going to release all sorts of papers and a supposed “climate change” plan Friday, and now we have a few more details

(The Hill) The Obama administration released thousands of pages on Friday documenting federal agencies’ vulnerabilities to climate change and what those agencies plan to do about it.

In all, 38 agencies released climate change adaptation reports and sustainability plans to address climate threats and reduce greenhouse gas emissions across the federal government.

Many of these “plans” mean costs for running those 38 agencies will increase, which means less money for core missions, which means Democrats will want to take an even bigger bite out of citizen paychecks.

The Postal Service is worried about “increased flooding, rising sea levels and more intense weather events” that could “disrupt its ability to provide mail service and increase costs for maintaining infrastructure.”

Fortunately, more and more people are forgoing the use of the USPS.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) calls climate change “one of the top public health challenges of our time.”

Fortunately, everyone will be forced to get crappy Ocare plans which they cannot afford to use.

NASA found that 66 percent of its assets are within 16 feet of mean sea level, and that beach erosion is encroaching on the nation’s “access to space.”

Fortunately, NASA barely bothers with Space anymore.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation will issue design and construction standards for new buildings to be 30 percent more sustainable and cost effective.

Well, hey, no problem there, the FBI isn’t allowed to investigate a lot of issues, thanks to our highly politicized Attorney General.

Under the sustainability plans, other agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency will cut heating and cooling loads in its labs.

No mention whether the Obama White House will change their own energy consumption patterns to comply. Nor anything about Obama significantly reducing his massive use of fossil fuels to campaign, fundraise, vacation, and play golf.

What does all this mean? Democrats pushing for higher taxes to pay for it all.

Read: Are You Ready For Higher Taxes Due To Govt “Climate Change” Regulation? »

If All You See…

…is snow created by too much heat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Fire Andrea Mitchell, with good news on Sgt Andrew Tahmooressi, who has finally been released.

Read: If All You See… »

Pause Excuse #56: Underestimating Cooling From Volcanoes

Another week,  another excuse

(The Hockey Schtick ) New excuse #56 for the “pause” in global warming: Satellites underestimate cooling from volcanic aerosols

A paper published today in Geophysical Research Letters states, 

“Understanding the cooling effect of recent volcanoes is of particular interest in the context of the post-2000 slowing of the rate of global warming”

and finds

“recent volcanic events are responsible for more post-2000 cooling than is implied by satellite databases” which “translates into an estimated global cooling of 0.05 to 0.12 °C.”

By way of comparison, the IPCC formula claims post-2000 warming from CO2 was 5.35*ln(400/369) = 0.43W/m2 *(3C/3.7Wm-2) = 0.35C warming, which is at least three times larger than the estimated volcanic cooling found from this paper. Therefore, volcanic cooling would not be sufficient to account for the zero degrees global warming post-2000 (actually post-1996). This implies that either this new paper is incorrect regarding volcanic cooling account for the “pause,” or that the IPCC exaggerates climate sensitivity to CO2. 

It’s always interesting how Warmists so often blame nature for the Pause, but hyper-ventilatingly blame Humanity for the warming. It’s almost like they aren’t actually interested in science.

Read: Pause Excuse #56: Underestimating Cooling From Volcanoes »

Kay Hagan Has No Problem With Outside Money For Herself

As Noah Rothman notes, she gets scolded by…PBS!

Here is a transcript of the exchange via Real Clear Politics:

SEN. KAY HAGAN (D-NC): North Carolina is this purple state, but I feel very good about where we are. I do think that this out of state money is something that I’m very disappointed in. But it is because of the Supreme Court –

GWEN IFILL, PBS: But you’ve benefited from it as well?

HAGAN: You know, I think no matter who gives money it should be disclosed and I think it should be transparent. I’ve got legislation in the Senate that would do just that. Thom Tillis doesn’t support that. We’ve got to let the American public know who is putting this money forward. If you think about it, you’ve got a handful of the wealthiest people in this country that are dictating what 350 million hear and see on TV and that’s wrong. To me, that’s not democracy.

IFILL: But as long as that money is coming from people who support you it’s okay?

HAGAN: You know, I certainly wish that we could have disclosed where people — where no matter who gives money the public knows and follows that. That’s why I support this bill.

Noah goes on to note

Hagan failed to elaborate on her proposal to limit the amount of money an individual can donate to political candidates or causes. Her proposal would require amending the Constitution and rewriting the First Amendment, which the Supreme Court determined protects free expression that can be construed as contributing money to political causes. Ifill chose not to press that little issue either.

He also tells us about all the outside money flowing to Dems. Hypocrites!

Read: Kay Hagan Has No Problem With Outside Money For Herself »

Democrats Second Guess Their #WarOnWomen Campaigns

Lots of hand-wringing going on in this Saturday front page NY Times article

Democrats are nervously counting on an enduring edge among female voters in most states to prevent a Republican rout in Tuesday’s elections. Yet so great is the uncertainty that even before the returns are in, some are second-guessing the party’s strategy of focusing more on issues like abortion and birth control than on jobs and the economy.

The danger for Democratic candidates is that their advantage among women could be so reduced by dissatisfaction with President Obama and the country’s course that it is not enough to offset Republicans’ usual edge among the smaller population of male voters. Should that happen, a party pollster, Geoff Garin, acknowledged, “They’ll lose.”

They’re is also an issue that women could realize they are being patronized, treated like hot house flowers, denigrated, and may actually take the time to learn about the issues that Dems are pushing. Many may not give a damn about abortion on demand. Many will realize that the “wage gap” schtick isn’t quite as simply, or as real, as Democrats portray it. Most voters do not care about these issues. They economy still stands head and shoulders about social/women’s issues. This is validated by poll after poll after poll.

The object of the #WarOnWomen push by Democrats is to get their single young female vote out to the polls. Will it work? Will it keep the election from being a total blowout? Stay tuned through Tuesday night.

Read: Democrats Second Guess Their #WarOnWomen Campaigns »

Illegal Alien Voting Has Links To The Motor Voter Act

How do you solve it?

(Fox News) As more states begin providing illegal immigrants and their children with driver’s licenses and ID cards, officials are concerned some also are registering to vote — some by mistake, and others on purpose.

The problem came to light recently in North Carolina, which compared its voter rolls against a federal immigration database. The cross-check of 10,000 voters found 1,425 likely non-citizen voters, including 109 illegal immigrants or so-called “Dreamers.” Almost 10 percent registered to vote when getting their driver’s license. But election officials say the problem is nationwide.

“In terms of a check and balance that would prevent an individual who is a non U.S. citizen from registering to vote, that doesn’t exist. There’s absolutely nothing stopping them,” said Neal Kelley, Orange County registrar of voters and chairman of the California Association of Election Officials.

The problem, officials say, dates back to the 1993 federal Motor Voter Act, which requires states to offer residents the ability to register to vote when they obtain a driver’s license or ID card. In some states, the driver’s license and voter registration application are on the same form, and the applicant simply signs. In small print, the form says applicants acknowledge they are U.S. citizens. In other states, voter registration is a separate form and applicants check a box. In either case, once signed, the forms are automatically sent to the county or state registrar of voters, and the name is added to voter rolls.

In most states, they do not check citizenship. Here in North Carolina, those who were given DACA “amnesty” by Mr. Obama receive a license which says “legal presence no lawful status”. But, the requirement to show ID at the polls doesn’t start till 2016. But, will poll workers, meaning Democrats, ignore that they aren’t legally allowed to vote? Other states do not have any terminology to distinguish lawful status.

Here’s another issue that is not mentioned: what about those who do have lawful status, visitors, legal residents, those going through the citizenship process, etc, who obtain DLs but are not legally allowed to vote since they are not actual citizens? The Motor Voter Law makes for an interesting conundrum. If the coming GOP controlled Senate, to go with the GOP controlled House, pass a law requiring citizenship checks at the DMV, Democrats will say this is an “unfunded mandate”, and wastes the time of DMV employees. Even though the original law does exactly the same. Perhaps the GOP controlled states will pass requirements. And, surely the Obama controlled DOJ will immediately sue.

“They’re asked to check a box that they’re a U.S. citizen, but that’s not good enough,” said Kris Kobach, Kansas secretary of state. “We have so many aliens on our voter rolls who check that box — either because they’re trying to break the law or because they didn’t know exactly what they were doing.”

I’m sure many really do not know what they are doing when they fill out the voter registration form. Many probably think they are supposed to do it, because they are given the form. Many probably can’t even read it.

The ACLU claims the federal immigration database isn’t perfect and could disenfranchise voters.

And the ACLU really offers no ideas to fix this other than “stop checking”, which means legal US citizens have their votes essentially disenfranchised as they are offset by those of the illegals. One would think the ACLU would care about this. In fact, they’re pretty much dead set against voter ID.

Under the National Voter Registration Act, states are required to remove from their registration lists ineligible voters. But U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder refuses to enforce the statute. Not a single such lawsuit has been filed since the beginning of the Obama administration, according to author John Fund.

“This is such a huge problem,” Kobach said. “And once the aliens get on the voter rolls, solutions don’t solve the problem. If you want to work with the federal government, they’re going to make you jump through a whole bunch of hoops.”

Democrats, who caterwaul and shriek when they lose elections (they still whine about Election 2000) about voter fraud, are dead set against any requirements that make sure that people who are not legally allowed to vote are stopped from doing so. Makes you wonder why.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Illegal Alien Voting Has Links To The Motor Voter Act »

Special Snowflakes At DOE Want You To Have Climate Change Friendly Pumpkins

And by special Snowflakes,  I mean the type that can only be created by Hot.

(Renewable Energy World) The DOE is always looking for ways to make renewable energy appealing. To that end, they’ve proffered up some ideas to incorporate green energy into the classic Halloween tradition of pumpkin carving.

Conveniently, October is also National Energy Action Month, so you’d get double brownie points for picking one of their designs. The options include:

A CFL light bulb, complete with the squiggly glass,

Several pumpkin carving ideas are supplied, because nothing says spooky to kids like

 photo IMG_20141031_153304_zpsijarbubp.jpg

Those who opt for these eco-friendly carvings are encouraged to submit photos of their handiwork to the DOE via Twitter, Facebook, Instagram or email. The department will publicize selected entries.

Why do warmists have to ruin every holiday? And lest one think the DOE has nothing to do with this

To learn more about how to recreate these designs on your pumpkins, or about avoiding cold weather terrors like energy vampires, check out the full story here.

That link leads to The Blaze,  which links to energy.gov

Daffy Screwball photo DaffyScrewball.gif

Read: Special Snowflakes At DOE Want You To Have Climate Change Friendly Pumpkins »

If All You See…

…is a holiday that features candy which causes obesity which is bad for “climate change”, you might just be a Warmist

Yeah, this is more of a pinup, but, hey, I can combine memes! The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on liberals justifying the end with the means. Of course, their ends generally suck like a starving vampire, too.

There are a couple more extra photos under the fold, leftovers I downloaded for the Halloween theme.

Read More »

Read: If All You See… »

Warmists Super Psyched To Brainwash Kids In School

Obviously, all the teaching of “climate change” will be one sided. Especially since of something very interesting

(Washington Post) It’s no secret that certain political worldviews prevent people from accepting the science of global warming.

And it’s not just that conservative and pro-free market beliefs are strongly correlated with dismissal of climate science. Get this: Conservatives who are more scientifically literate, or better at math, are even less likely than their ideological compatriots to accept global warming. That’s how powerful ideology can be — and such findings have often been used to call into question whether educational initiatives can really make any difference when it comes to hot-button scientific issues like climate.

A new study just out in the journal Climatic Change, however, suggests education may work after all.

Got that? Conservatives who are scientifically literate are more likely to know that human caused climate change is a bunch of mule fritters, hence,  Warmists must blame skepticism on ideology, and push for indoctrination in school.

In other words, climate science education may well work to counteract political ideology after all — at least if you get to kids when they’re young enough, before ideological views have become crystalized.

It’s no secret liberals have been using schools as indoctrination centers for decades,  if not the last 100 years. They certainly do not want to provide all  views,  just their narrow, dogmatic, cultish, un-science views.

Read: Warmists Super Psyched To Brainwash Kids In School »

Project Veritas Releases Video Highlights Dems Urging Illegals To Vote

Democrats are for voter fraud when it helps them

As Allahpundit notes

Man, did O’Keefe pick the right moment and the right state for this clip. By now everyone in conservative media has seen that bombshell Old Dominion study claiming that Democrat-heavy non-citizen votes may have delivered a Senate seat to Al Franken six years ago, which made a filibuster-proof majority possible for ObamaCare two years later. That same study claimed that Obama’s 2008 margin of victory in — ta da — North Carolina might also have been provided by non-citizens. And now here we are, five days away from a major midterm election in which control of the Senate hangs in the balance, and Kay Hagan’s leading Thom Tillis by one thin point in good ol’ NC. If she wins that race by a thousand votes, you’ll have confidence in the integrity of the outcome, won’t you?

No wonder Democrats are so virulently against voter ID. Oh, and giving drivers licenses to illegal aliens.

Read: Project Veritas Releases Video Highlights Dems Urging Illegals To Vote »

Pirate's Cove