Oh Noes! “Republicans Are Beginning To Act Like Obama Isn’t Even President”

By William Teach March 10, 2015 – 6:47 am

If only. Here’s the Washington Post’s Paul Waldman

It’s safe to say that no president in modern times has had his legitimacy questioned by the opposition party as much as Barack Obama.

It’s as if Waldman, and all the Democrats who believe that claptrap, forgot about the 8 years George W. Bush spent as POTUS.

But as his term in office enters its final phase, Republicans are embarking on an entirely new enterprise: They have decided that as long as he holds the office of the presidency, it’s no longer necessary to respect the office itself.

Oh, they (we) respect the office: we don’t respect the quasi-dictator inhabiting it.

Is that a bit hyperbolic? Maybe. But this news is nothing short of stunning:

A group of 47 Republican senators has written an open letterto Iran’s leaders warning them that any nuclear deal they sign with President Barack Obama’s administration won’t last after Obama leaves office. (snip)

It’s one thing to criticize the administration’s actions, or try to impede them through the legislative process. But to directly communicate with a foreign power in order to undermine ongoing negotiations? That is appalling. And just imagine what those same Republicans would have said if Democratic senators had tried such a thing when George W. Bush was president.

Ah, but they did. How many times did the Democrats look to undermine Bush when it came to Iraq, and even Afghanistan? How about Nancy Pelosi going to Syria? Democrats have a long history of undermining Republican presidents.

York goes on to write more on the subject.

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/575000667053514752

Perhaps the GOP wouldn’t need to do this, which has sent Team Obama and Democrats into a (typical) rage, had Obama not looked to give away the kitchen sink to Iran.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Oh Noes! “Republicans Are Beginning To Act Like Obama Isn’t Even President” »

Posted in Barry Obama, Democrats, GOP, Iran | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

We’re Like Totally Getting a Taste Of What Climate Change Looks Like

By William Teach March 9, 2015 – 6:16 pm

And it looks cold and snowy with a hint of unhinged cult

(Central Maine) We had the first snow day at Colby College since the 1990s. I’ll take it — with a side of caution.

The recent snowstorms and Arctic-esque temperatures that have smothered the Northeast over the past few weeks are the latest in a long series of warnings Mother Nature has thrown us. Similar to when the professor hands out the essay questions the day before the exam, we are being given a taste of what the future of our climate may look like, if we continue to dance on the edge of disaster.

photo facepalm.gif

There is a new normal for the global climate, a normal defined by unpredictable and drastic weather pattern changes. We can, however, prevent further, more severe climate change effects with stringent climate change policy that protects the Earth and its people, rather than the factories that dot landscapes across the country.

Obviously, the solutions are Big Government decrees that effect Other People, rather than adherents to the Cult Of Climastrology practicing what they preach.

Read: We’re Like Totally Getting a Taste Of What Climate Change Looks Like »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 9, 2015 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible un-sustainable dog sucking up the world’s resources, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post on Netflix having net neutrality remorse.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | Comments Off on If All You See… | Trackback URL

EPA Chief Can’t Answer Whether Climate Models Correct Or Not

By William Teach March 9, 2015 – 10:49 am

Poor Gina McCarthy, having her Constitution right to not be questioned over her religion violated

(Breitbart) At a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing, Senator Jeff Sessions grilled EPA chief Gina McCarthy and left her unable to justify her money grab, showing that she could not explain whether climate change models were correct or not.

McCARTHY: I am happy to submit the full breadth of science that we have behind climate; we’ve submitted it on many occasions, we’ll do it again.

SESSIONS: The full breadth of science? I’d just like some numbers. Would you acknowledge that over the last eighteen years, that the increase in temperature has been very little and that it is well below, as a matter of fact, ninety percent below most of the environmental models that showed how fast temperature would increase?

McCARTHY: No, I would not agree with that, sir. A one-degree temperature is significant. I don’t know what you’re looking at.

SESSIONS: No, no, no, no. I am asking you, is it below the models, or above the models?

McCARTHY: I do not know what the models actually are predicting that you’re referring to. There are many models.

SESSIONS: The head of the environmental—

McCARTHY: And sometimes it’s going faster, and sometimes slightly slower than the model predicts, but on the whole it makes no difference to the validity and the robustness of climate science that is telling us that we are facing an absolute challenge that we must address both environmentally, economically from a national security perspective, and for EPA, from a public health perspective.

SESSIONS: All right. Carbon pollution is CO2, and that’s really not a pollutant; that’s a plant food, and it doesn’t harm anybody except that it might include temperature increases. Let me ask you one more time: Are you asserting, just give me this answer; if you take the average of the models predicting how fast the temperature would increase, is the temperature in fact increasing less than that or more than that?

McCARTHY: I cannot answer that question specifically.

SESSIONS: Mr. Chairman, I would just say, this is a stunning development, that the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, who should know more than anybody else in the world, who’s proposing hundreds of billions of dollars in costs to prevent this climate and temperature increases, doesn’t know whether their projections have been right or wrong.

In fact, the models have failed to the tune of 95%. And Sessions is exactly correct in that it is is stunning that Ms. McCarthy doesn’t have/know the answers to the questions as she is looking to spend lots and lots of taxpayer earned money. Because she was unable to answer many many questions, if you check the transcript. She was unable to competently discuss hurricane landfalls, atmospheric moisture, and drought conditions. But, she is rushing ahead to make sure that Everyone Else pays for her beliefs

(The Hill) Gina McCarthy is locked in a race against time to complete landmark climate change regulations before President Obama leaves office.

With just 22 months left in Obama’s presidency, the Environmental Protection Agency administrator and her team are burning the midnight oil to enshrine emissions regulations for power plants in federal law.

McCarthy says she’s “busier than [she’s] ever been” as the caretaker of what Obama hopes will be a legacy-defining achievement on climate change.

Obama and McCarthy will be gone and living the post-presidency high life while those in the middle and lower classes suffer the results.

Read: EPA Chief Can’t Answer Whether Climate Models Correct Or Not »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 12 Comments | Trackback URL

Nevada Looks To Pass “Pop Tart Gun” Bill

By William Teach March 9, 2015 – 8:03 am

This is an attempt to pass legislation that allows kids to be kids

(KOLO8) Members of the Assembly Committee on Education were treated to a snack at their afternoon hearing on AB 121: Pop-Tarts.

It was a reference to a case out of Maryland where a second-grader was suspended from school for chewing his Pop-Tart into the shape of a gun. This bill would help ensure something like that doesn’t happen here in Nevada.

AB 121 would prohibit schools from punishing students in grades K-8 for “simulating a firearm or dangerous weapon” or “wearing clothing or accessories that depict a firearm or dangerous weapon.”

“This bill is a common sense bill, it’s that simple,” Assemblyman Jim Wheeler said as he went through the proposed legislation. “It just returns common sense back to our school system.”

Sadly, there actually needs to be legislation that brings back common sense.

“This kind of reminds me of the debate the founding fathers had regarding the Bill of Rights,” Assemblyman Chris Edwards said. “Many of them thought they would never need a Bill of Rights because no government would ever violate things like freedom of speech. However, wisdom won out and they put in those precautions just to make sure those things wouldn’t happen to us. I think they were very wise to do so.”

Imagine what Government would do without the Constitution. They are already abusing it heavily. And one parent was Very Concerned

“If a child wears a t-shirt that says I support my right to keep and bear arms but it shows two stick figures and one is standing over the other with a gun, is that still okay? I think we’re opening ourselves up to a slippery slope.”

It’s not already a slippery slope to suspend young children for making a gun with their fingers and food? Florida and Texas have already passed similar legislation.

(RGJ) Such a restriction shouldn’t have to be spelled out for schools in state law, but it’s come to that, said Ron Dreher, lobbyist for the Washoe School Principals’ Association.

“We are living in a different world and, unfortunately, we have to codify it,” he said. “I guess we live in a ridiculous age.”

Yes. Yes we are.

Read: Nevada Looks To Pass “Pop Tart Gun” Bill »

Posted in Current Affairs | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Islamist Cleric Brings The Sexism Against TV Host, Tells Her To Shut Up

By William Teach March 9, 2015 – 7:51 am

If you’re thinking “hey, is saying “shut up” to a woman really sexism? Or is it just rude?”, it gets much, much better. I had the same thought when I read the UK Telegraph headline on the home page (which was slightly different from in article headline) (video at link)

A female television presenter brought an interview with an extremist cleric to an abrupt end after he told her to “shut up” and said that he did not respect her.

Rima Karaki, an anchor on Lebanon’s Al-Jadeed TV, was interviewing the London-based Islamist Hani Al-Seba’i when the argument started.

The discussion was on the possibility of some Christians joining ISIS, and, much like Obama, Al-Seba’i want off on a tangent, talking about the history of Christianity in the Middle East. Karaki informed him time was limited, and they should focus on the discussion at hand, when

“Listen, don’t cut me off. I will answer as I please … what kind of behaviour is this?” Dr Al-Seba’i asked.

When Karaki reiterated the time constraints, Al-Seba’i lost his temper and told her to: “Shut up, so I can talk.”

Nothing unusual there, right?

“It’s beneath me to be interviewed by you, you are a woman who …” he continued, before his microphone was cut off.

To which she responded

“Either there is mutual respect, or the conversation is over,” Karaki said, as she terminated the interview.

Good for her! Of course, as one commenter at the Telegraph points out

“It’s beneath me to be interviewed by you, you are a woman who ..wears a scarf. You don’t respect yourself, why should I respect you ?”… Do you guys realise her scarfs litteraly means she is beneath him ?

Interesting point. It should also be noted that Al-Seba’i is an Egyptian who was give asylum in Britain, yet another extremist allowed to reside in the UK and practice his extremist view of Islam without consequence. One also has to wonder where the feminists are. They blew a gasket over a nerd, who landed a module on a comet, wearing a really ugly shirt, bringing him to tears and forcing an apology, that you know was not accepted.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Islamist Cleric Brings The Sexism Against TV Host, Tells Her To Shut Up »

Posted in RoP | Comments Off on Islamist Cleric Brings The Sexism Against TV Host, Tells Her To Shut Up | Trackback URL

Afternoon Rush

By William Teach March 8, 2015 – 5:09 pm

Amusing story. See if you can figure it out.

I was at the Walgreen’s getting some batteries for my watches. The total for the purchase was $21.12. The cashier made a brief comment about that being an awesome number.

It took a moment for me to respond, even though I immediately understood her reference. When I did, she said she was wondering if I would get it, and I told her it was taking my brain a second because I was having PIN confusion.

She then proceeded to make a joke about Hemispheres working together. Took a second to get that one, walked back, gave her a thumbs up.

Anyone get the references, or am I just old rock?

If you guessed “Rush”, 

One of my favorite Rush songs. Especially live.

Read: Afternoon Rush »

Posted in Music | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach March 8, 2015 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible fossil fueled airplane that should have been banned in the 1940’s, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Blazing Cat Fur, with a post on bus burnings being a French thing.

It’s 1940’s week! It’s amazing the difference you see when you search “sexy 1940’s” versus latter decades.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

By William Teach March 8, 2015 – 10:27 am

Happy Sunday! Spring is almost here. If Mother Nature will cooperate. Not quite sure who did this pinup, but it seems like a much older one from before the 60’s.

Hey, did you set your clocks and watches forward?

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Gateway Pundit notes something interesting in Obama’s Selma speech
  2. The People’s Cube has the “unsociables”
  3. Wild Thing notes what Jeb Bush pushed in Iowa
  4. Yid With Lid notes what Iran’s foreign minister called for
  5. Zilla has a hammer and is not afraid to use it
  6. IMABlawg notes more wonkiness with “climate science”
  7. Ice Age now covers snow records broken in Europe
  8. Raised On Hoecakes discusses laws not being needed in Lake Worth, Florida per the city
  9. protein wisdom notes Obama silliness on guns and vegetables
  10. Powerline wonders if anyone ever fact checks Obama
  11. Patterico’s Pontifications notes that inclusiveness has fine print
  12. Pam Geller discusses an Iranian cleric vowing to raise the flag of Islam over the White House
  13. Moonbattery notes what the latest thing that is racist is
  14. Legal Insurrection names Obama’s greatest achievement
  15. And last, but not least, Fire Andrea Mitchell covers the “hand up, don’t shoot” lie

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Posted in Patriotic Pinup | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Ted Cruz Takes On Anti-Science Liberals Over “Climate Change”, GMO

By William Teach March 8, 2015 – 9:09 am

It’s nice to know that there is at least one Republican Senator willing to fight back

(Politico) Sen. Ted Cruz accused liberals of “anti-science zealotry” on global warming, genetically modified food labeling and biotechnology in Iowa on Saturday.

“The radical left loves attacking people as anti-science when anyone dares question their computer models on global warming,” Cruz told about a thousand activists during an agriculture summit on the state fairgrounds. “They scream, ‘you’re anti-science,’ when someone points out, for example, that in the last 17 years, satellite data shows there’s been no warming whatsoever.”

Progressives adhere to a totalitarian worldview, which precludes debate. When it comes to anthropogenic global warming/climate change/climate disruption/whatever they want to call it today, they are more akin to a doomsday cult.

One note for Senator Cruz: they aren’t “anti-science” on the subject: they are “un-science”, because they do not care about the science, they do not practice science on the subject, and the are all about the politics. And, if you disagree, they will come after you personally.

“The hard-core left loves ridiculing Christians who believe scripture that says God created the heaven and the earth,” Cruz went on. “They say that it’s anti-science to believe that an almighty God would do such a thing. But when it comes to biotech, suddenly these same voices become the most anti-science zealots we’ve ever seen.”

“We need to stand up to the hysteria,” Cruz said in discussing genetically modified foods. “For families, for parents, that don’t want to feed their kids GMOs, in the private marketplace, there has grown up an abundant market. You can go and purchase organic, if you want to pay more …We shouldn’t let anti-science zealotry shut down the ability to produce low-cost, quality food for billions across the globe.”

It is interesting how Liberals/Progressives, supposedly champions of the future, freak out about modern technology. Though, I will say that there does need to be some care in the use of GMO.

Ted Cruz also took on Renewable Fuel Standards at the Iowa Ag Summit

(Des Moines Register) Ted Cruz said Saturday in Des Moines that he backs production of biofuels like ethanol, but he declined to endorse the Renewable Fuels Standard, a federal program that requires transportation fuels to contain a minimum amount of renewable fuels.

“I support biofuels. I think they have a major role in the energy market. But I don’t think Washington should be picking winners and losers,” the Texas Republican said. “When it comes to energy, we should have an all of the above approach, but it should be driven by the market.”

That’s a tough stance to take in corn country, but, he’s right: there should be no mandatory use of biofuels, particularly those made from food.

Politico also has 10 takeaways from the Ag Summit.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Ted Cruz Takes On Anti-Science Liberals Over “Climate Change”, GMO »

Posted in Conservativism | 1 Comment | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove