Islamic Feminist Responds After Duke University Cancels, Then Reinstates Her Speech

As usual, the forces of extremist Islam attempted to rule the day. At the end of the day, Asra Nomani, the author of “Standing Alone: An American Woman’s Struggle for the Soul of Islam”, won the day

(Time) This past week, University of Michigan students watched American Sniper after the university first cancelled the film’s showing amid protests from an Arab-American Muslim student that the film offended her. The episode at Michigan was like my own painful experience at Duke University after a Muslim student group recently blackballed me.

Tuesday night, while Islamic State fighters gained new ground in Syria, I walked onto a stage at Duke University to argue for a progressive, feminist interpretation of Islam in the world. Staring into stage lights, I counted the number of people looking back at me: nine, not including my parents and son.

“I would have come here to speak to just one person. To me, it is simply a victory to stand before you,” I said.

Five days earlier, the Duke University Center Activities and Events had cancelled my talk after the president of the Duke chapter of the Muslim Students Association sent an email to Muslim students about my “views” and me, alleging that I have a nefarious “alliance” with “Islamophobic speakers” and noting that a Duke professor of Islam, Omid Safi, had “condemned” me. After I asked for evidence against me, the Center for Activities and Events re-invited me. A spokesman for Duke said the university regrets the misunderstanding.

We constantly hear about the need for moderate Muslims to speak out against the hardcore version of Islam being spread around the world, particularly in mosques and schools. When one does, the forces of hardcore Islam work overtime to stop them, and the so-called free speech loving Liberals rarely, if ever, come to the defense of the moderates. In this case, where were the liberals in defending a feminist Muslim?

This experience goes beyond feminism to a broader debate over how too many Muslims are responding to critical conversations on Islam with snubs, boycotts, and calls for censorship, exploiting feelings of conflict avoidance and political correctness to stifle debate. As a journalist for 30 years, I believe we must stand up for America’s principles of free speech and have critical conversations, especially if they make people feel uncomfortable.

By standing on stage, I was standing up to the forces in our Muslim communities that are increasingly using tactics of intimidation and smears such as “Islamophobe,” “House Muslim,” “Uncle Tom,” “native informant,” “racist” and “bigot” to cancel events with which they disagree.

Kudos to her. There needs to be more brave Muslims willing to stand up to the Muslim student groups, which are often linked to and backed by the Muslim Brotherhood. Will Liberals also stand up for people like her? It happens here and there, but, too often they side with the extremists.

Read: Islamic Feminist Responds After Duke University Cancels, Then Reinstates Her Speech »

Washington Post Editorial Board Suddenly Concerned With “Ideals” When It Comes To Rubio

Back in 2008, the Washington Post Editorial Board published a gushing piece coming out (unsurprisingly) for Barack Obama, based on Obama’s ideals and beliefs, but failed to mention one thing he had actually done during his adult years that made him qualified in the least for the job of POTUS (BTW, the piece is a howler, which you have got to read for a hoot). In 2015, well, things change. Because Republican

Mr. Rubio offers a candidacy based on ideals

MARCO RUBIO formally entered the GOP presidential field Monday with an address at Miami’s Freedom Tower. The setting, a building through which Cuban immigrants transited in their escape from Fidel Castro’s Cuba, highlighted two core themes on which the Florida senator will base his campaign: an inspiring personal story and a promise to muscularly advance American values, particularly abroad. “When America fails to lead, global chaos inevitably follows,” he said to loud cheers.

His record is less clear-cut than those themes. A leading face of the 2010 tea party insurgency, Mr. Rubio has spent more time working with establishment Republicans than against them during his four years in the Senate. A first-term senator without executive experience, he is attempting to cast himself as a tough leader with experience in foreign affairs. A Republican who promotes tax cuts for the wealthy, he also supports a governmental role in alleviating poverty.

Suddenly, executive experience is important. Suddenly themes are unimportant. Weird, right?

Sometimes, however, he has ducked when political courage has been needed. In the Foreign Affairs Committee, he voted against President Obama’s plan to strike Bashar al-Assad’s brutal regime in Syria after Mr. Assad had killed 1,400 civilians with chemical weapons, even though he had sharply criticized Mr. Obama for inaction in the conflict. (Mr. Obama later changed his mind.) As a leader in Florida’s legislature, he oversaw passage of climate change policy, but since rising into the national spotlight he has struggled to articulate a position on the basic science. His reform-minded tax plan would balloon the debt.

Strange that the WPEB wasn’t concerned about Obama ducking virtually every single tough vote, consistently voting “present” during his time in politics at both the State and Federal levels.

Mr. Rubio declared Monday that his campaign is about the future, setting the country on the right course at home and abroad so that it can live up to the ideals that allowed the son of Cuban immigrants to become a serious presidential contender. “The time has come for our generation to lead the way toward a new American century,” he declared. If his record has its share of contradictions, his status as a fresh face, relatively unknown to most voters, gives him a chance to define himself with greater focus and clarity.

In other words, a chance to define himself more as an Establishment Republican who sucks up to liberal news outlets and provides more legislation that Liberals like. Think on this from the 2008 piece ending

ANY PRESIDENTIAL vote is a gamble, and Mr. Obama’s résumé is undoubtedly thin. We had hoped, throughout this long campaign, to see more evidence that Mr. Obama might stand up to Democratic orthodoxy and end, as he said in his announcement speech, “our chronic avoidance of tough decisions.”

But Mr. Obama’s temperament is unlike anything we’ve seen on the national stage in many years. He is deliberate but not indecisive; eloquent but a master of substance and detail; preternaturally confident but eager to hear opposing points of view. He has inspired millions of voters of diverse ages and races, no small thing in our often divided and cynical country. We think he is the right man for a perilous moment.

So, style over accomplishment was good for Obama, but not Rubio, who actually has some accomplishments, including being the majority leader and Speaker of the House in the Florida legislature, actually Doing. We can certainly expect much more of these types of opposition in contradiction to what Liberal news outlets believed from 2008 as the long, long, long election cycle cruises on.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Washington Post Editorial Board Suddenly Concerned With “Ideals” When It Comes To Rubio »

Bored Grandma To Make “Climate Change” A Top Agenda Item

Remember, Hillary bragged about flying almost a million miles on fossil fueled planes during her tenure as Secretary of State, something Ed King at Responding to Climate Change fails to note

Hillary Clinton to make climate ‘top of agenda’ for White House run

Tacking climate change and investing in clean energy would be a priority for a Hillary Clinton presidency, according to the man running her bid to become the next US president.

John Podesta, who recently quit his job as advisor to President Barack Obama, tweeted this would be “top of the agenda” for Clinton as she prepares her run for the White House.

In a speech last December Hillary Clinton said Obama’s carbon cutting policies “must be protected at all costs”, labeling them “unprecedented” and calling for politicians to “act decisively… to head off catastrophic consequences.”

Isn’t it interesting how uber-rich folks like Hillary and Obama want to skyrocket your cost of living, and Warmists/Dems follow right along in their own destruction?

Read: Bored Grandma To Make “Climate Change” A Top Agenda Item »

If All You See…

…is a horrible charcoal grill cooking evil climate un-friendly meat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Rhymes With Right, with a post on thinking money in politics was bad.

Read: If All You See… »

Nothing Like Marching Through Snow To Protest “Climate Change”

Oh, wait, sorry, I forgot that cold and snow are caused by “climate change”

ail reported. If it were a real thermometer it would have shown temperatures at a chilly 44 degrees Fahrenheit by 4 p.m. — the high for the day. Most of the day, however, temperatures were lower with some wind chill and high humidity.

Poor little snowflakes.

Read: Nothing Like Marching Through Snow To Protest “Climate Change” »

Good News: DOD Claims Bible, Constitution, Declaration Of Independence “Sexist”

I’ve mentioned this before, and I’ll mention it again: the Left has a virtual lock on many sectors, such as the entertainment industry, the legacy news, unions, Lawyers guild, education, and many others. Now they are going after organized religion and the military. They used to try and destroy them from the outside. Now they are working to do it from the inside, which leads to things like this

(Daily Caller) According to a Defense Department approved “sexism course,” the Bible, the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence all contribute to modern sexism.

Those three cherished texts all count as “historical influences that allow sexism to continue,” according to a presentation prepared by the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute, whose mission is to give a ”world-class human relations education.” (snip)

“The content of the lesson is provided to generate academic discussion concerning how these historical documents have been included in discussions about the topic of sexism,” Lt. Cmdr. Nate Christensen, a Defense Department spokesman, told The Daily Caller.

Liberals always have to create in “ism” in order to conquer and divide.

But following TheDC’s request for comment, the sexism course — as well as two other courses listed on DEOMI’s website, entitled “Prejudice & Discrimination” and “Racism” — were taken offline.

In other words, they didn’t want people seeing the actual material.

TheDC continues on with a discussion of the other two courses, regarding “raaaaacism” and the newest bugaboo, “privilege”.

When do our troops train to actually, you know, defend the nation?

Read: Good News: DOD Claims Bible, Constitution, Declaration Of Independence “Sexist” »

Marco Rubio, The Other GOP Establishment Candidate?

I was expecting a howler of idiocy from the NY Times’ Nate Cohen after the beginning

Marco Rubio, who announced his bid for the presidency on Monday in a call to donors, has been called the “best communicator” in the Republican Party. Over and over and over again.

But he has little to show for it.

Of course, Obama had nothing to show for his time in office, both at the federal and state levels. But, that’s not where Cohen is going

He enters the fray with surprisingly low support. Despite four years of national prominence, he has averaged 6 percent of the vote in primary polls over the last few months. That’s the same or worse than five candidates who are thought to have a much smaller chance of winning the nomination: Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, Ben Carson, Mike Huckabee and Chris Christie. Mr. Rubio is acceptable to many but, so far, the first choice of few.

Obama was at the bottom early on, as well. People have forgotten that Hillary was the choice of the media and Establishment Dems. John Edwards was the choice of the Netroots and young Dems. It was only when Edwards flamed out that Obama really rose in the polling and started competing with Hillary. One has to wonder how much Rush Limbaugh’s “Operation Chaos” affected the Dem primary, keeping it going, allowing Obama to take it home.

Here’s what really caught my interest

His central problem is that Jeb Bush has found considerable support from the party’s mainstream conservative and moderate donors in the so-called invisible primary — the behind-the-scenes competition for elite support that often decides the nomination.

Mr. Rubio is competing for many of the same donors and operatives as Mr. Bush. Both not only come from the same state but also from similar ideological wings of the party. Despite the initial insurgent bid against Charlie Crist that made him a Tea Party hero, Mr. Rubio has always been an establishment-oriented candidate. The reporting about Mr. Rubio’s time in Washington suggests that he has followed an elite-driven path, following all the rules, seeking the guidance of the conservative intelligentsia, and trying to lead the party toward a compromise on immigration reform — the preferred means of the establishment-business wing of the party to expand the party’s general election appeal.

Other than Rubio’s foray into “amnesty-lite” the other year, Rubio would certainly be more viable and acceptable as an Establishment guy than Jeb Bush. He certainly carries much less baggage than Bush, and many of his ideas are more acceptable. If, though, you still think Rubio isn’t Establishment, let’s hear from mostly squishy Jennifer Rubin

So, too, with the GOP, which needs a makeover, not only generationally but also in tone, in focus and in the charisma category. Even the young men (e.g. Sen. Ted Cruz) seem older than they are and certainly embody the angry, harsh attitude for which Republicans have been pilloried. Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (who could well be on a ticket with Rubio, in either the top or supporting role) is the “everyday” American Hillary Clinton can only describe abstractly. Walker is tenacious and pugnacious, qualities Rubio has not shown. Rubio, however, has plenty going his way. He has not been on the national stage forever, has a gee-whiz enthusiasm about him and is skilled to a degree we have not seen since Bill Clinton was in his prime. His passion is genuine, especially when it comes to fighting tyranny and pushing for the accessibility of the American dream. A son of immigrants who fled repression can express a keen awareness of the nature of repressive regimes and a hagiographic view of the United States. (At the Conservative Political Action Conference, Rubio declared, “See, America doesn’t owe me anything. I have a debt to America that I will never be able to repay.  . . . For me America isn’t just a country, it’s the place that literally changed the history of my family, it’s a nation of equal opportunity, it’s the most powerful force for good the world has ever known.”)

Establishment attitude encapsulated. Ted Cruz as “angry and harsh”. Walker and Rubio as super awesome.

Either way, the debates should be interesting and spirited, something that may not happen on the Democrat side.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Marco Rubio, The Other GOP Establishment Candidate? »

When You Really Need Someone To Tweet Something Obscenely Dumb, Ask DWS

Bless her heart

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/587707719060217856

https://twitter.com/Crunched4time/status/587692421917474817

Read: When You Really Need Someone To Tweet Something Obscenely Dumb, Ask DWS »

Hotcoldwetdry Is Like A “Civilisational Wake-Up Call” Or Something

Doom

(The Platform) Climate change is changing everything and time is not on our side

Today, carbon dioxide molecules make up approximately 400 parts per million. This notorious greenhouse gas is one of the most significant contributors to climate change. Merely 160 years ago, carbon dioxide molecules made up just 250 parts per million. The safe level to sustain life as we know it cannot exceed 350 parts per million. Going past this point will change all life on earth – it is changing all life on earth.

Interesting. Life cannot be sustained with CO2 above 350ppm? Weird how a good chunk of the Earth’s history had much, much higher levels of CO2 and life thrived.

Droughts and floods, mass extinction of species and a rise of pests, coral bleaching and acid rain, deforestation and desertification, hurricanes and tornadoes, rapidly shrinking ice caps and rising sea levels… the list goes on and on. We know that climate crisis is causing catastrophic detriment to the biosphere. And the burden of reversing these effects, if this is even possible, is left to this generation – a generation globally faced with a great recession, austerity and war, alongside other impediments that previous generations faced, including poverty, poor access to basic human needs, income disparity and so on. In the current state of affairs, it is unreasonable to demand that humans focus all their energy on tackling the climate crisis when they are also encumbered by social-economic crises. But actually, could the two be related? Naomi Klein says they have one common root: Capitalism.

Funny how hatred of capitalism (by people who engage in consumerism ) seems to crop up so often among Warmists, eh?

Read: Hotcoldwetdry Is Like A “Civilisational Wake-Up Call” Or Something »

If All You See…

…is an evil carbon infused charcoal fire, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Evil Blogger Lady, with a post on the difference between Hillary and Scientology.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove