…are plants dying off and growing out of control from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Blazing Cat Fur, with a post on what Germany planned to do before the NYE rapefest.
Humpday!
Read: If All You See… »
…are plants dying off and growing out of control from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Blazing Cat Fur, with a post on what Germany planned to do before the NYE rapefest.
Humpday!
Read: If All You See… »
There’s spin, and then there’s Spin (via Ed Morrissey)
(CBS News) After Iran released 10 U.S. Navy sailors from custody early Wednesday morning, some media outlets reported that the U.S. had issued an apology to Tehran in order to secure the sailors’ freedom. But Vice President Joe Biden told CBS News that there was “no apology†given.
“When you have a problem with the boat, (do) you apologize the boat had a problem? No,†Biden said in an interview with “CBS This Morning†on Wednesday. “And there was no looking for any apology. This was just standard nautical practice.â€
The vice president explained that the “the Iranians picked up both boats — as we have picked up Iranian boats that needed to be rescued.†Iranian officials then “realized they were there in distress and said they would release them, and released them — like ordinary nations would do.â€
Can anyone explain how it just so happened that two US Navy boats both happened to be in distress at the exact same time? While together? There’s Spin, and then there’s flat out Unicorn Land. John Kerry delves into Unicorn Land, as well
NEW: Secretary John Kerry thanks Iranians for US Navy sailors’ departure from Iran. https://t.co/eI2NDI70cE pic.twitter.com/MXz3tkXhaP
— ABC News (@ABC) January 13, 2016
These people really do think you’re stupid. Thanking the Iranians? This delves into the same buffoonery as blaming a previously unknown video for the attack in Benghazi. Does this look like US Navy members being rescued?
https://twitter.com/NoahCRothman/status/687290811898269697
I repeat, what were they in distress from? Calm seas, no storms. Did both boats just happen to break down at the same time? Maybe they were being stalked by a Megalodon. Or mermaids. All share the same reality.
And Iran isn’t yammering about the boats being in distress, and are demanding an apology
Gen. Ali Fadavi also told state TV Wednesday that the American boats showed “unprofessional acts” for 40 minutes before being picked up by Iranian forces.
“Certainly U.S. presence in Persian Gulf and their passage has never been innocent and we do not deem their passage as innocent,” Fadavi said, adding that Iran Foreign Minister Javad Zarif “had a firm stance (during a telephone conversation with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry) on their presence in our territorial waters and said they should not have come and should apologize.”
Will US media have the fortitude to demand answers from this administration? Made myself laugh.
Read: Good Grief: Biden Thanks Iran For Helping Our Boats “In Distress” »
People, meaning Warmists, scoff when I note that ‘climate change” is almost solely about far left politics, and not science. Yet, virtually everything surrounding this “issue” relates to Leftist policies, and most of the Believers are Leftists. People such as those at the New Internationalist Blog, who are very much a smattering of Progressives, Marxists, and Socialists (the Soviet Union/China types, who are really authoritarians, versus the textbook definition). These are people who want “social ownership” of the energy sector, meaning, 100% government control. Quite frankly, there are so many wacky Leftist phrases in this article and the excerpts that almost the whole thing would need to be placed in bold
Stop Aviation, Stop Co2lonialism
….
Though the particular effects of projects such as the tar sands pipelines may only have been a threat in recent years, the drivers behind these projects have much deeper roots. The reason that the negative impacts of climate chaos are distributed in the way they are is linked to three intersecting processes: capitalism, colonialism and patriarchy. Not only are these systems are premised on massive inequality that take hierarchy, be it based on wealth, race or gender, as a necessary condition to function, but they have an insidious way of trying to convince us that this oppression is the natural order of things and that ‘there is no alternative’.
Capitalism, with its need for never ending economic growth, requires ever increasing amounts of natural resources and energy, which always leads to increasing pollution and waste. That is why the only time in recent history CO2 emissions have decreased globally is during the financial crisis. Capitalism relies on exploitation. Exploitation of labour and of nature. Colonialism was a key driver of the shift to capitalism, with much of industrialization being made possible due to slavery. Similarly, as Siliva Federici shows, the evolution of patriarchy was key in in the expansion of capitalism and colonialism. This happened in various ways: from relegating women to the domestic sphere, which allowed for men’s labour to be exploited in industry; to taking away women’s power over their reproduction, meaning birth rates could be controlled for the good of state and capital; to the horrific violence that occurred to hundreds of thousands of women through the burning of ‘witches’. All of this oppression reinforced the power of the state and capital, and the techniques for doing so – for example torture and burning of witches – were often put on trial in one setting e.g. the colonies and then brought back to Europe – and vice versa.
Anyone get the idea that these people hate capitalism? Interestingly, capitalism allowed these folks to create a blog, using software and a platform (web hosting) created by capitalism, all while they use capitalism to advertise their wares, such as the New Internationalist web-shop. Are they giving the merchandise away free, or at least selling the products to consumers, er, comrades, at prices the comrades can afford individually?
It’s in this context that the climate justice movement, including the fight against aviation expansion, needs to stand in solidarity with those most affected by climate change. And with the big NGOs clearly needing to decolonize themselves, with organizations like AVAAZ forcefully attempting to silence the Wretched of the Earth bloc at the most recent climate march in London, it’s down to the grassroots to show real solidarity.
The links between aviation and continued co2lonialism couldn’t be clearer. Not only is aviation the fastest growing source of CO2 in Brittan, which means more and more extraction, but the gulf between those who do and don’t fly couldn’t be wider. Globally, a mere 5 per cent of the population has ever taken a flight. So those arguing for expansion are doing so for the benefit of a tiny elite. Even within the Brittan, 70 per cent of flights are taken by just 15 per cent of the population. Aviation is a clear example of the North-South divide. Communities in the global South suffer twice: first from extraction and then from the effects of climate change, whilst the global North primarily uses aviation as a form of leisure or to expand processes of capital accumulation.
And, if you fly, you are one of the Big Shots with Privilege, and should stop it right now. Or, better, yet, be forced by Government to stop it right now. That’s what they really want, along with a destruction of capitalism. Even though they practice it themselves.
For all you Warmists, you’ve been warned. If you fly, you’re part of the problem. Stop flying now.
BTW, what the heck is “Brittan?” It wasn’t a typo. It’s written that way 5 times.
Read: Cult of Climastrology: Aviation Is “a continued pattern of privilege for the very few” »
A doomy prognostication for a sunny Monday from the Cult of Climastrology
Climate change means more fear, less fun for global middle class: UBS
The erosion of wealth among the world’s middle class due to climate change is a threat to economic and social stability which could spur its 1 billion members to push for action on global warming, Swiss bank UBS Group AG said.
In a study of middle-class consumption in 215 cities around the world, UBS analysts found spending priorities were noticeably different in cities most at risk from climate change such as Los Angeles, Tokyo and Shanghai.
In those top-risk cities, the middle class spent between 0.6 and 0.8 percent more on housing compared to the national average, and less on luxuries, entertainment and durable goods.
The report said middle-class households are already changing their lifestyles in the cities most exposed to hotter temperatures, rising sea levels and extreme weather such as storms and floods.
“More fear, less fun is how we might sum it up,” said the study https://www.ubs.com/microsites/climatechange/en/home.html.
In places with high risks of climate-related shocks, people spend more on the upkeep of their properties. And homes may decrease in value if certain places become less appealing to live, eating into wealth, the report said.
Huh. Imagine that. People spending money on the upkeep of their homes. That never happened before, right? Could it also be that costs are higher in these leftist areas, what with their higher taxation, policies that increase costs, and, hey, could part of it be “climate change” policies that increase costs, and force homeowners to spend more for upkeep, repair, and replacement?
Read: Bummer: Hotcoldwetdry Means More Fear, Less Fun For Middle Class »
…is a rising sea which means you have to tattoo yourself with the CO2 level of your birth year, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with a post on rising Obamacare premiums.
Read: If All You See… »
We learn about this from Warmist Morgan Curtis, who learned about this new fad after taking a long fossil fueled flight to Europe, before engaging in Climate Journey, ending up in Paris
Why I left the Paris Climate Summit with an activist tattoo
I never imagined I would get a tattoo during the U.N. Climate Summit in Paris. Yet here it is, newly healed and permanently inked on the inside of my right wrist.
The tattoo is three numbers and a symbol: “355<” in 25-point font, styled as if from a typewriter. It’s my commitment to the people of the climate movement, to listening to and sharing their stories of climate justice.
When I was born in October 1991, the concentration of carbon dioxide — the primary greenhouse gas emitted by human activity — in our atmosphere was 355 parts per million. In the early 20th century, we topped 300 ppm for the first time in 800,000 years, beginning the destabilization of our climate and society through rising planetary temperatures.
I never knew these exact numbers before, but now that they’re printed on my wrist, I will never forget.
She was in one of the typical Warmist workshops, learning about how to force everyone else to live the life Warmists refuse to live themselves, how to tax Other People, the typical Cultist stuff, in this case, a “sustainable activism” workshop, when she learned of what is called Birthmark, whereby idiots tattoo themselves with the CO2 level of their birth year.
My #birthmark tattoo: 355 = CO2 ppm in 1991. < is inequality, is this crisis being human, story, culture > numbers pic.twitter.com/aVlwQMUUqp
— Morgan Curtis (@morganhcurtis) January 12, 2016
To be honest, I’ve seen dumber tattoos, as I’m sure you have. Of course, having a tattoo like this means that those Warmists will be certain to want to explain it to everyone, much like the joke about Vegans having to tell everyone they are a vegan.
I originally wasn’t sure where on my body to get the tattoo, until I remembered the action I was committing to. My tattoo provokes stories, visible each time I shake the hand of someone new, or share a cup of tea with a friend. Christian decided the same. I had tears in my eyes
In other words, a reason to preach and screech at everyone.
This comes via Steven Milloy, who calls this the latest in climate idiocy. One of the people in his comments notes
Instead of using trendy fads, why don’t you find some real proof of any problem and tattoo that on your self – would mean much more to be a positive human than a sheeple! (IMHO)
Better yet, Warmists should live the life they expect the Government to force Everyone Else to live if they think this issue is so real and dangerous. Show us the way. Because if they refuse to do all this, why should we believe them?
Read: Cult Of Climastrology Members Now Tattooing Themselves With Their Birth Year CO2 Level »
An epic showdown between two politico wonks. On one side, you have Ann Coulter, who has seemed to relish going way over the line over the past few years, and has lost much of her charm among Conservatives. On the other, you have Liz Mair, Republican media consultant, who, let’s face it, has been attached to multiple losing Republicans (McCain/Palin, Romney, Rick Perry, Carly Fiorina, Scott Walker (presidential bid)). She’s also a big Libertarian. It made for good TV, for at least the few who watch MSNBC (video available at the link)
(Mediaite) Ann Coulter and Liz Mair fought on MSNBC tonight over Donald Trump‘s conservative credentials… and at one point, Coulter’s own credentials.
Mair repeatedly told Chris Matthews that Trump is a liberal who is to the left of Hillary Clinton on some issues, but said many conservatives only like him because of his immigration stance.
Ann mostly argued the exact same thing, except that Trump’s liberal leanings do not matter, because he’s talking about immigration, and wants to do something about it. I guess it doesn’t matter to Ann that Trump has also talked about amnesty once a wall is built, or that he doesn’t talk about other measures that would limit illegal immigration. I can almost understand Ann’s attachment to Trump, because she has been such a big supporter of stopping illegal immigration. But, he has many leanings to the left of Hillary. And, a lot that are Republican/Conservative.
They also differed on the question of whether Cruz is a natural-born citizen. Mair said yes, while Coulter said it’s a problem. Mair pointed out that Coulter was on the other side of this issue three years ago. Coulter’s response? “I changed my mind.â€
Coulter stated ““Natural born … means you have to be born within the country,†she said.” Via Twitter we see
TED CRUZ CAN RUN FOR PRESIDENT! I worried on @seanhannity @ his Calgary birth, But his mother was a US citizen, so he was born a citizen.
— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) February 14, 2013
The fight got even better, when Ann said her dream ticket would be Trump/Romney
Mair concluded, “That is the proof right there that you are in no way conservative and no way interested in conservative policy.â€
Let’s not forget that Ann was a major Chris Christie supporter. You can see Donald Trump’s positions here, many of which, as stated, are Conservative. But, he’s also, as mentioned, discussed amnesty. Other than just building a wall and deportations, he has a few ideas, some of which are good, some won’t make much of a difference. He was pro-choice, then he switched to pro-life. Maybe he’s legitimate, maybe not. He’s yammered on about wanting Canada’s universal health care system. He’s favored a ban on “assault weapons”. Many of his economic policies are very much liberal. He approves of taking private property for government to give to other private entities.
Say what you will, Trump is pumping up a lot of liberals and moderates, with a smattering of libertarians and conservatives. His support is not eroding. Would he be better than any Democrat running? You bet. Would I prefer him over Rubio or Cruz? Heck no.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Liz Mair To Ann Coulter: “You’re In No Way A Conservative” »
…are plants which will wither away from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Pamela Geller, with a post on yet another refugee rape coverup in Sweden.
Read: If All You See… »