Surprise: Hillary’s In-secure Server Held US Government’s Most Secretive Programs

If this was you or me, we’d already be in jail under indictment

(Fox News)  Hillary Clinton’s emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government’s most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.

Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified “several dozen” additional classified emails — including specific intelligence known as “special access programs” (SAP).

That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets.

Hillary may well make it through the nomination process and come out ahead of Sanders and O’Malley, with nary a mention of her issues in any debates, and with the MSM willing to forgo asking her tough questions, but, what happens when she has to deal with the Republican candidate, and all the reset of the GOP, asking questions? It won’t work well with the MSM attempting to ignore the issue, particularly when, not if, it comes up during one or more debates.

That’s all assuming she isn’t indicted prior

Intelligence from a “special access program,” or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as “top secret” – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton’s private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a “need-to-know” because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection — or a human asset — at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated “classified” have been found on Clinton’s server, though the Democratic presidential candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.

Having SAP information on that server would see the rest of us serving long prison sentences, and, as the article goes on to say in a quote “There is absolutely no way that one could not recognize SAP material.”

Read: Surprise: Hillary’s In-secure Server Held US Government’s Most Secretive Programs »

If All You See…

…is an evil fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Reaganite Republican, with a post wondering if Drudge and Breitbart are getting paid for good Trump coverage.

Read: If All You See… »

Psychology Is Totally Necessary In The Fight Against ‘Climate Change’

I love how this spreading awareness missive starts out

Why Psychology Should Be A Part Of The Fight Against Climate Change

Climate change isn’t just a political, social and economic issue. It’s also a deeply psychological one — and now, behavioral scientists are using psychology to better understand the complex relationship between people and nature.

Notice what was not mentioned? Science. Glad to see that Warmists are finally admitting that the issue has nothing to do with science.

An increasing number of psychologists are arguing that in order to tackle the growing threat to our environment, we need to understand people’s emotional and cognitive responses to this new reality, which can run the gamut from denial to indifference to outrage to anger to grief.

In other words, they’re very upset that people aren’t rushing out to enable government to restrict their personal freedom, to run their lives, and to vastly artificially increase their cost of living, all after 25+ years of spreading awareness, in what has become an increasingly unhinged manner. They’re desperately searching for a manner in which to get people to give a damn, because, even Warmists generally do not care enough to make changes in their own lives to match their professed beliefs.

“Most people who acknowledge that climate change is occurring feel that the public response has been inadequate,” said Dr. Susan Clayton, a conservation psychologist at the College of Wooster in Ohio. “Psychologists have been looking at how it is that people process this information about risk and come to their understandings — so that’s useful to know in terms of thinking about how you can create messages that are more effective for people in terms of getting them on board.”

Notice the “Other People” syndrome, whereby Warmists expect Everyone Else to care. But, again, why should they when so few Warmists practice what they preach?

It’s not just because people don’t care, she argues. Rather, our emotional response to the issue, which for many people is a deep but unprocessed sense of anxiety and loss, can leave us feeling powerless and paralyzed.

Or, it could be that people think it is a minor issue, particularly when stacked up against real issues, one which most people just do not care about. You can also repeat the whole “practice what you preach” meme.

Anyhow, the rest is all gobbledygook, but, an amusing read.

Read: Psychology Is Totally Necessary In The Fight Against ‘Climate Change’ »

Republicans Who “Own Climate Change” Would Have Lots Of Advantages Or Something

Warmists are always trying to get Other People to believe in anthropogenic climate change, finding new and inventive methods. Of course, actually providing rock solid scientific evidence has escaped the Cult of Climastrology, being something that is virtually impossible to do, and inference is not causality. Hence, we get things such as this

7 Advantages for Republicans if They Owned the Climate Debate

Now that a global climate deal has been struck in Paris, it’s up to each nation to live up to its commitments. Republicans leaders in Congress have vowed to fight anything to do with climate change. But there are many good reasons smart Republicans should reevaluate their resistance to both science and the global consensus, and in 2016 make climate change a political issue of their own.

Here are those 7

1. Climate change is an immigration issue.
Climate change will hit the crowded tropics worst. Droughts, floods and severe storms in Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean could cause massive northward migrations on a scale dwarfing what Europe experienced last year. Accepting climate change would help Republicans end the stalemate on illegal immigration and push for a realistic and comprehensive policy that prepares us for the future of mass immigrations. (See my recent blog post, Why Trump’s Wall won’t Work.

Got that? Republicans should not only accept what is mostly a left-leaning political position on Hotcoldwetdry, but also the left-leaning position on immigration.

Here’s the other 6

  • Nuclear energy could make a comeback (there’s no need to believe in Hotcoldwetdry to push nuclear, and, heck, let’s not forget that the few Warmists who push nuclear get shut down by the rest of the CoC)
  • Better alignment with the military (the military that must take the viewpoints of the CiC.)
  • Ending the era of oil will diminish the clout of non-democratic regimes (a bit of rhetorical jujitsu. Instead, we could develop our own sources on our own property, along with dealing with countries such as Canada)
  • Oil would no longer fuel conflict in the Middle East. (no worries, the hardcore Islamists would continue with the main reason, namely, what’s written in the Koran)
  • Personal integrity (this, coming from people who demand everyone else comply with the tenants of Hotcoldwetdry, yet refuse to modify their own lives to comply)
  • Denying climate change may cost Republicans the next election (doubtful. Climate change is typically last or next to last on the list of concerns by American voters. Many may believe, but, they do not care all that much)

Then we get

Ironically, Republican presidents have a great history when it comes to the environment. Nixon created the EPA. Teddy Roosevelt started the National Park system. If Republicans owned climate change as their own issue, then they could set the debate on whether government programs and carbon taxes should lead the way, or private enterprise and tax incentives. Isn’t that a debate worth having in an election year?

‘Climate change’ is not an environmental issue, it is a political issue. And it is cute how Republicans are supposed to embrace taxation as a policy to “solve” climate change. In other words, this whole thing is about Republicans acting like Democrats.

Read: Republicans Who “Own Climate Change” Would Have Lots Of Advantages Or Something »

Cruz Hits Trump On Amnesty, Liberal Values

It goes to show, when you tangle with a guy who is incredibly smart, and was a national debate champion while at Princeton, a guy who graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School in 1995, and a guy who’s sponsored over 97 conservative pieces of legislation in the Senate, said guy is not going to back down nor get into the hemming and hawing which other candidates have descended into. Silly Molly Ball has said the in-fighting is all part of a “portrait of a party on the verge of coming apart,” which is the type of fable that we see many times during election season. This is what’s called “robust debate”

(Fox News) Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz launched one of his toughest attacks yet against fellow contender Donald Trump in New Hampshire Monday night, accusing the billionaire real estate developer of being “nowhere to be found” during during the debate in Congress over whether to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants.

“If you didn’t stand up and fight amnesty, when the stakes were live or die, do we lose this permanently or do we win, I would suggest as voters you have reasons to doubt the credibility of the promises of a political candidate who discovers the issue after he announces for president,” the Texas senator said at a town hall meeting in Whitefield.

Let’s not forget that Trump has called for amnesty even while declaring he’d built the border wall. Trump has been pretty crystal clear in his support for amnesty.

Cruz also questioned whether Trump is a true conservative, noting donations he’s made to Democrats over the years, including $50,000 in 2010 to Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, the former chief of staff to President Barack Obama. And Cruz rejected Trump’s self-comparison to Ronald Reagan, saying he was “pretty sure” Reagan never supported or made large donations to Democrats.

One can understand donations from a businessman to a candidate, attempting to curry favor in a race which was going to go Democrat 100%, but, $50k? And not that long ago.

“Donald Trump has said he thinks eminent domain is fantastic and he supports using government power to seize private people’s homes to give them to giant corporations to say hypothetically build a casino,” Cruz said. “We have an obligation to protect the rights of Americans and private property is central to the rights of Americans.”

Trump agreed with the Kelo decision “100%“. Trump has recently stated that he only supports eminent domain “when it creates jobs“. While taking private property for private use. Is that a conservative position?

(The Hill) “If he’s giving checks to Democratic politicians and he supports their views… then it starts to suggest, ‘gosh if he publicly supports their views if he finances their causes,'” Cruz told Boston radio station WRKO. “Then suddenly when he announces as a candidate for president, every single one of his views changes — listen if he has had a change of heart, I am thrilled.”

Cruz, who is competing with Trump for the GOP nomination, added that if Republican voters want a nominee who will “cozy up to Chuck Schumer — by the way he’s written checks to Chuck Schumer, I never have — then you ought to be backing him.”

Trump tried to attack Cruz on his loans from Goldman Sachs and Citibank, to which Cruz responded

“You want to assess who stands with Wall Street? Then look at the actual records of the candidates,” he added. “Donald Trump vocally and enthusiastically supported TARP, the bailout of the big banks. He vocally and enthusiastically supported Barack Obama’s stimulus plan.”

While Donald certainly has many Conservative/Republican positions, he also has many Leftist positions and squishy Establishment Republican ones, as well. And, for all Trump’s bluster about 9/11 after Cruz hit him with NYC liberal values, it seems as if Trump did not give to 9/11 charities. Nor does Trump give all that much to charities in the first place, at least not his own money.

Trump should be praised for attacking Democrats harshly, rather than tiptoeing around, as Republicans so often do. He should be praised for refusing to back down when the media and Democrats start whining, something Republicans usually do. But, is he really a Conservative? He has some good positions. He also has some bad ones. Rubio is being destroyed be Conservatives for his Gang of 8 illegal aliens legislation. Why is Trump getting a pass?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Cruz Hits Trump On Amnesty, Liberal Values »

‘Climate Change’ Will Harm Your Eyes Or Something

Another day, another scary story, all because you, yes you, refuse to handwash your clothes and let them line dry in the middle of winter. And turn your evil heating down to 58. And take a hot shower. And haven’t given up meat. And took a shower longer than 2 minutes. And used more than 2 sheets of TP. And and and

Ways Climate Change Can Harm Your Eyes

In order to treat routine but sometimes impairing degenerative eye conditions that come with age, many of us even seek out treatments from a Laser Eye Surgeon or other eye specialist. But what if our eye health is being negatively affected by something far bigger and of far more global concern and consequence that most of us struggle to understand? (snip)

As Greenhouse gases and pollutants enter the earth’s atmosphere and hang thickly, they cause damage to the Ozone layer; that part of our planet’s precious atmosphere that works to filter potentially damaging UV rays from the sun. If human beings are exposed to excessive amounts of this UV radiation, over an extended period, and without any preventative approaches to mitigate the effects of that exposure, we may find ourselves suffering not only from sunburn, but potentially poor eye health.

Some studies show that as much as five percent of an adults eye problems could be directly attributed to the impacts felt as a result of the depletion of the Ozone Layer and our growing exposure to damaging UV radiation. Symptoms that an adult might include experience and report to their optician include but are not limited to the formation of cataracts, macular degeneration, redness and itchiness, and inflammation of delicate parts of the eye.

And there you have it. You drove your fossil fueled vehicle to work, hence, you’ve destroyed the ozone layer and damaged other people’s eyes. You bastards!

Here’s something funny, though

Would it surprise you to learn that our eyes are not only at risk from things you’d expect are related to climate change, like Ozone depletion and Greenhouse gases, but also some of the measures we take to decrease Greenhouse gases and our carbon footprint?

This is evident, given that as we seek to mitigate the effects of climate change, we are increasingly turning to solutions such as the use of Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL)in our homes and places of work and in other environments that we frequent such as gyms, shopping centres and libraries. Using solutions like CFLs absolutely helps us to save on electricity costs and potentially reduces our impact on the environment, but many people don’t ever stop to consider that some of the CFLs and fluorescent lights can also emit damaging UV radiation.

Oops.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Will Harm Your Eyes Or Something »

If All You See…

…is an ocean that will rise up hundreds of feet from the use of evil fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on Mounties in hijabs.

Read: If All You See… »

Cult Of Climastrology Uses MLK To Pimp ‘Climate Change’

Earlier, we had the Washington Post Editorial Board using MLK Day to advocate for hardcore Islamists and violent, rapist refugees. Of course, you didn’t think that someone within the Cult of Climastrology wouldn’t use the occasion to yammer about ‘climate change’, did you?

It seems, though, as if Al Gore’s Climate Reality forgot to follow through on their plan to discuss Hotcoldwetdry in relation to “climate justice” and MLK. Nothing over at Facebook, no follow up tweets. Maybe later?

Would Dr. King be a big believer in ‘climate change’? Only he knows, but, perhaps a man who was fighting for freedom and equality might be a bit annoyed that the people pushing ‘climate change’ tend to be people who are advocating for more governmental control of people.

Read: Cult Of Climastrology Uses MLK To Pimp ‘Climate Change’ »

Democrat Candidates Work To Outdo Each Other On Being Anti-2nd Amendment

The Democrats held a debate Sunday night, the perfect time to make sure as few people as possible watch, a way to ensure that Hillary Clinton can continue her march to her coronation as the Democratic Party Establishment Candidate. They discussed a variety of talking points, including who is the toughest on ownership of firearms by law abiding citizens

(Yahoo News) The three Democratic presidential candidates sparred over gun control early on in their debate in Charleston, S.C., on Sunday night.

Their exchange began with questions about the shifting position of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders on a bill limiting liability for gun manufacturers and sellers whose products are used in crimes. As Sanders has gained in the polls, frontrunner Hillary Clinton has attacked him on the issue.

Though the spotlight was on Clinton and Sanders, the long-shot third-place candidate Martin O’Malley got in the last word on gun control. O’Malley, the former governor of Maryland, argued that both Clinton and Sanders are “inconsistent” on guns. (snip)

The exchange began with the moderators asking Sanders about reversing his position on a 2005 bill that gave some gun manufacturers and sellers immunity from liability. Sanders voted for the legislation, and Clinton had been attacking him for it before he announced a change of heart on Saturday, just before the debate.

Placing liability on the manufacturers for their products working correctly would be a death knell on the industry, which is exactly the point in pushing this issue. Do we sue alcohol makers for people getting drunk and killing themselves or others?

Anyhow, Bernie is super enthused that the NRA has given him a D-minus rating. Hillary has an F. So does O’Malley, who fought back against his two rivals

“When it comes to this issue, I’m the one candidate on this stage that actually brought people together to pass comprehensive gun safety legislation,” he said, later adding, “It did have a ban on combat assault weapons, universal background checks, and you know, we did not interrupt a single person’s hunting season. I’ve never met a self-respecting deer hunter that needed an AR-15 to down a deer.”

A couple points. First, for all his gun safety legislation, many cities in Maryland are very violent, especially Baltimore, which has seen a massive uptick in “gun violence” in 2015. If these universal background checks work so well, what’s up with all the shootings? Why is Baltimore, a city he was mayor of from 2000-2007, known for the massive use of bullet proof plexiglass in stores to protect the workers from extreme violence, often from people illegally in possession of guns?

This may play well to the Democratic base, and those few who actually watch these debates, but it won’t do well during the General election season.

Read: Democrat Candidates Work To Outdo Each Other On Being Anti-2nd Amendment »

Washington Post Editorial Board Says MLK, Jr., Would Totally Accept Refugees

In case you were unaware, today is Martin Luther King, Jr., Day. As such, it behooves the Washington Post Editorial Board to publish an editorial which proclaims that he would support all the “Syrian” refugees and other Muslims that Mr. Obama wants to import to the United States, an editorial that starts out, unshockingly, with bashing a few Republicans who have called for a temporary hold on bringing in more of these Muslim refugees until we can truly verify who they are.

But on the holiday set aside to honor Martin Luther King Jr., it is worth recalling that tactical consequences are not the principal reason Americans should find the Trump proposal repellent. We are a nation founded on the ideal that every individual has value and deserves to be judged on his or her own merit. Each of us can make choices about the importance, to ourselves, of our racial or national heritage, our religion or lack thereof, our sexual identity. No one else has the right to make those choices for us. Being Muslim, or black, or Irish American doesn’t tell anyone else who you are, much less what you are worth. When we start judging people based on the categories they belong to, we diminish ourselves.

Interesting. If we’re supposed to be judged on our own merit, then, according to the members of the WPEB, we should do away with all quotas, whether they be for school, work, sports, movies, awards, etc. According to the WPEB, groups like the NAACP, Black Lives Matter, and the Congressional Black Caucus should be abolished.

Double interesting, if no one else has the right to make choices for you, per the WPEB, then the WPEB should be against the way women and gays are treated within Islam.

Oh, and as far as judging people based on the categories they belong too? Perhaps the Editorial Board should look at how their paper continually judges negatively all those who fail to follow their WP’s liberal beliefs.

In April 1963, while he was in jail for leading nonviolent demonstrations against segregation in Birmingham, Ala., Dr. King, an Atlanta minister, faced criticism for having come from outside the state to stir up trouble. He rejected the “outside agitator” label. “Anyone who lives inside the United States can never be considered an outsider,” he wrote.

That might leave room to think of foreigners differently; nations have a right to decide who may enter. But Dr. King would have been the first to say that recognizing the humanity of every person is essential in those decisions as in domestic affairs. “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny,” Dr. King wrote in the same letter. “Whatever affects one directly affects all indirectly.”

Don’t you find it interesting that the WPEB, comprised mostly of White Liberal Men, just happens to know exactly what Dr. King would think on this issue?

Perhaps Dr. King might think differently. If we’re using the quote, perhaps he might think that all these refugees directly raping and sexually assaulting women and girls might indirectly affect all of us. Perhaps he might be a bit concerned over the need to provide class on “how not to rape”. Perhaps he might be a bit concerned about the violence and criminality that so many of the refugees bring. Perhaps he might be a bit concerned about how women are treated liked 2nd class citizens within Islam. I dare say Dr. King might know a bit about discrimination, and wouldn’t be too pleased at the way women and gays are treated within Islam.

That’s a precept that can be found in some variation in most of the world’s religions. It’s easy to preach, harder to practice. Our difficulty in sensing our place in that “inescapable network of mutuality” helps explain why a police officer may be more likely to shoot a fleeing suspect who doesn’t look like him, why we may be more forgiving of drug addiction when it afflicts people who do look like us — and why we can harden our hearts to desperate refu­gee children whose families worship an unfamiliar God.

Except, the majority of these “refugees” arriving in Europe so far tend to be young, fighting age males. One town had to take the extreme step of banning “Syrian” refugees from the public swimming pools because of all the sexual harassment originating from the refugees.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Washington Post Editorial Board Says MLK, Jr., Would Totally Accept Refugees »

Pirate's Cove