Here We Go Again: Warmists Push Eating Insects To Tackle ‘Climate Change’

On one side, Warmists want Other People to eat less meat. Or even stop eating meat altogether. On the other side, they want Everyone Else to eat insects to replace the meat. And they keep trotting out these same memes, even though few of the people who push them do the same

GLOBAL WARMING: Eating INSECTS ‘could help tackle climate change’
EATING insects instead of beef could help tackle climate change, according to new research.

Replacing half of the meat eaten worldwide with crickets and mealworms would cut farmland use by a third, substantially reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, researchers say.

While consumers’ reluctance to eat insects may limit their consumption, even a small increase would bring benefits, the team says.

This could potentially be achieved by using insects as ingredients in some pre-packaged foods.

That last line is a hint for lawmakers, in a wish that Government will force manufacturers to put insects in their food, much like there are mandates to use ethanol with gasoline. This is all based on a taxpayer funded research paper, linked to the United Nations weenies, f course, comparing the “sustainability” of insects vs meat

They found that insects and imitation meat – such as soybean-based foods like tofu – are the most sustainable as they require the least land and energy to produce.

Beef is by far the least sustainable, the team says.

There you go, Warmists: time to change your eating behaviors. If you want to save Gaia from a fever. You do, don’t you?

Appetizing, eh?

Read: Here We Go Again: Warmists Push Eating Insects To Tackle ‘Climate Change’ »

Surprise: Yet Another Hate Crime Blamed On Trump Turns Out To Be A Hoax

Surprised Monkey is surprised!

(Daily Caller) A church organist was arrested Wednesday after he vandalized his own church with a swastika and pro-Trump graffiti in order to “mobilize a movement.”

George Nathaniel Stang, 26, admitted in a handwritten statement to spray painting a swastika, “fag church,” and “heil Trump” on St. David’s Episcopal Church in Bean Blossom, Indiana. “I suppose I wanted to give local people a reason to fight for good, even if it was a false flag,” Stang wrote, according to a local NBC report. “To be clear my actions were not motivated by hate for the church or its congregation. I of course realize now, this was NOT the way to go about inspiring activism.”

The incident occurred in November shortly after President Trump was elected and was widely covered by the press. The Washington Post reported on it and connected it to Trump’s victory, “The offensive graffiti at St. David’s is among numerous incidents that have occurred in the wake of Trump’s Election Day win.”

Liberals love creating hoaxes in order to mobilize their moonbat compatriots, and when they get caught, they aren’t even contrite. Stang has been charged with institutional mischief, a misdemeanor, so, he’ll probably get a small fine and some community service. He most like will not serve the maximum of 1 year in jail, nor any jail time.

Of course, even as yet another hate crime hoax is exposed, the Typical Players who commit them will not give them up. It’s too easy to create a narrative to demonize Republicans and Conservatives in this manner. The original act gets huge national, and even international, press and TV coverage, and the reality may not even get any coverage beyond the local news outlets and a few Conservative leaning ones such as the Daily Caller.

(And, yes, I know Surprised Monkey is an Orangutan. Don’t crush Surprised Monkey’s groove)

Read: Surprise: Yet Another Hate Crime Blamed On Trump Turns Out To Be A Hoax »

GOP Controlled House Barely Passes Bill That Doesn’t Really Repeal Obamacare

“Give us control of the White House and Congress, and we’ll repeal and replace Obamacare” we were told since 2010. Well, Republicans have it, and yet

House Republicans claim a major victory with passage of health-care overhaul

House Republicans on Thursday narrowly passed a controversial bill to overhaul the nation’s health-care system, claiming a major victory even as the measure faces an uncertain fate in the closely divided U.S. Senate.

Under intense pressure to show they can govern and to make good on their promise to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, Republicans pushed through the bill after adopting a last-minute change that earned it just enough votes to pass. However, the House version fell significantly short of the GOP’s long-held goals, making major dents in large portions of the current law but not outright repealing it.

That’s all you really need to know. It’s not repealed. For all their machinations, they might as well have simply modified Ocare. This bill was simply the same as the last bad one, with a few minor additions.

The measure proceeded without the benefit of an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office of its cost and impact on insurance coverage, and it did so after many Republicans openly acknowledged that they hadn’t read the bill. President Trump also promised “insurance for everybody,” which the measure will not achieve.

They read it the other month when they tried to pass this garbage. On the plus side, the Senate claims it has no intention in taking up the bill. Perhaps they’ll take up one of the plans by Senators like Rand Paul, which actually repeal Ocare and replace it with something that works. But, then again, perhaps not, because there are too many squishes in the Senate, once who like to use government power, because it helps their own power. And the House plan does not reduce government involvement in our health insurance and health care decisions.

The political positioning over the bill started immediately, with the GOP claiming that it would lower premiums and increase access to health insurance and Democrats casting it as a huge transfer of wealth because it would eliminate many of the taxes imposed under the Affordable Care Act, including on wealthy Americans.

Maybe it does the first, lowering premiums (and hopefully, deductibles) and increasing access. What the Democrats are whining about is the Cadillac Tax, which wasn’t scheduled to start till 2018, before it was pushed off till 2020 in a bipartisan fashion, and, unless Speaker Paul Ryan made a big change, is now pushed off till 2025. And that tax would hit regular employers, including ones with less than 50 employees, and would mean that employers would reduce their offerings in order to avoid that 40% surcharge on plans with a yearly cost of over $10,800. Heck, even left leaning unions hate it. Also, it would kill the investment tax. But, you know, the party which relies on The Rich can’t avoid trotting out their typical tax cuts for the rich, even when they aren’t being charged yet.

It really shouldn’t be this difficult. And it may very well cost the GOP the Senate in 2018, and the possibility of a massive sea change for the House is now not out of bounds. Why do we want to keep voting for this liars?

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: GOP Controlled House Barely Passes Bill That Doesn’t Really Repeal Obamacare »

From What I Hear, Illegals Bring In Lots Of Revenue Or Something

Or kill people and drive their cars after dumping their bodies

(WRAL) The man charged with the murder of a friend found dead on the Raleigh greenway drove the victim’s car on the day his body was found, according to a warrant in the case.

Jose Humberto Lara-Pineda, 18, is being held without bond at Wake County jail and is also on a detainer for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, because agents believe he entered the United States illegally from El Salvador.

Police allege Lara-Pineda killed Fredys Odilo Del Cid Ramos, 28, and dumped him in a wooded area in the 3200 block of Calumet Drive in March.

Strange. I thought the illegal alien community wanted to report all this crime to the police.

Read: From What I Hear, Illegals Bring In Lots Of Revenue Or Something »

If All You See…

…is an ocean that is turning to acid due to Other People driving fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Zilla Of The Resistance, with a post on what to do when Moonbat protesters block your car.

Read: If All You See… »

LA Times: The Pause Was Real, And Totally Confirms Human Caused Hotcoldwetdry

We know that there are well over 70 excuses for the Pause, a period where the warming was, depending on the source used, either net zero during that time or statistically insignificant. It really got to the point where no one was bothering to keep track, especially when so many were just the same excuses in new clothes. The real consensus was that 95% of the models were wrong, per actual observations. So, of course

Detailed look at the global warming ‘hiatus’ again confirms that humans are changing the climate

For years, the global warming ‘hiatus’ from 1998 to 2012 puzzled scientists and fueled skeptics looking to cast doubt on the very idea that Earth’s temperature has been on the rise, largely because of human-produced greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide — and that significant policy changes would need to be made to keep that rise in check.

Recent papers have begun to chip away at the idea of the slowdown. Now, a new analysis in the journal Nature brings together many of those arguments to show that the hiatus may not have been quite what it seemed.

“A combination of changes in forcing, uptake of heat by the oceans, natural variability and incomplete observational coverage reconciles models and data,” the researchers from the Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science in Switzerland wrote. “Combined with stronger recent warming trends in newer datasets, we are now more confident than ever that human influence is dominant in long-term warming.”

Got that? Their data is incomplete and there’s natural variability. Oh, and the oceans ate their warming. So, that means you are at fault for refusing to pay lots of fees and taxes and give up your freedom to big government. One of the findings

Climate change models did not perfectly characterize all the right complicating factors — how much solar radiation there was in a given year, for example, or the extent of the cooling effect from volcanic activity and human-produced aerosols. When those estimates are updated to reflect what actually happened, the models get much closer to reality.

So, the models stink, yet, the Cult of Climastrology was making prognostications of utter doom using them. Interestingly, there is virtually nothing that actually makes the case that all the warming was caused by Mankind’s output of greenhouse gases, especially CO2. The paper, and this LA Times article, simply mention that there was warming, it paused for a bit, then it supposedly restarted. The debate is not on warming, it is on causation. And the Cult cannot prove it has been caused and will continue to be caused mostly/solely by the works of Man.

And speaking of the Pause

Read: LA Times: The Pause Was Real, And Totally Confirms Human Caused Hotcoldwetdry »

What’s The Cost Of Illegal Immigration In The People’s Republik Of California?

California’s Democratic Party lawmakers continue their push to make the entire state a sanctuary jurisdiction, with a claim that illegals help their economy

(Sacramento Bee) As California Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León and other Democratic lawmakers gain national attention for the effort to make California the first state to declare it self a “sanctuary” for undocumented immigrants, a new report assesses the economic contributions of immigrants every year.

The 2.7 million undocumented immigrants who call California home contribute about $3 billion in taxes to the state’s economy each year, according to the Institute of Taxation and Economic Policy, a nonprofit tax research organization.

Of that, nearly $30 million in property and sales tax revenue goes to Sacramento County.

But that could be changing under the Trump administration, and the president’s promised immigration crackdown. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Secretary of Homeland Security John Kelly have said being in the U.S. without proper authorization is a crime, leading some undocumented people to retreat back into the shadows, immigration advocates have said.

The headline of the article is about whether illegals cost or save money. There’s a brief link to the Federation For American Immigration Reform, with a blurb about how they say illegals cost money, but, no figures are offered by the article. You can find all sorts of articles at FAIR, such as how much illegals cost for Social Security, the costs for law enforcement, the human smuggling, and so much more. Let’s look at costs specific for California from National Economics Editorial

In light of Donald Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigrants, it’s worth looking at the facts—how many illegal immigrants are there, and what do they cost America?

Lots. Almost $150 billion a year.

But this article focuses specifically on California, which is home to an estimated 27% of America’s illegal aliens.

You can read the full report on illegal immigrants in America here; I cover economics, crime, culture, and morality.

Illegal immigrants and their children cost California at least $30.29 billion a year in net costs—$7,352 per alien.

For context: given that California’s state budget is $171 billion, this means that illegal immigration would cost 17.7% of this spending (although much of the costs are absorbed locally).

So, if we believe the numbers from both California Democrats and NEE, then those who are unlawfully present in the United States are actually costing California a net negative $27.29 billion per year.

And, let’s not forget all the crime committed by illegal aliens. The ones who drive without insurance, leaving legal residents to pay for the repairs and injuries caused by illegals. All the illegals who are jamming up California’s jails. The time having to be wasted by law enforcement and the legal justice system because the illegals are unlawfully present in the country instead of being back in their own countries. The New Boston Post editorial board is running an article about the lies told by an illegal alien organizer, and how that person deemed everyone who wasn’t 100% behind illegals was a racist, and notes

Brockton is one of the poorest cities in Massachusetts. When legal residents of Brockton experience long lines at emergency rooms because some illegal immigrants are using the emergency room for minor medical matters; when they can’t get a modest-paying job because some illegal immigrants are willing to do the work either for less money or without following government regulations or both; when their contracting business is consistently underbid by some illegal immigrants who don’t bother with worker’s compensation insurance; when they have to pay fines for traffic violations but illegal immigrants don’t; when they might go to jail if they present false identification but some illegal immigrants skate; when they are victims of crimes committed by people who don’t have a right to be here …

That’s happening in California, as well. Emergency rooms have been shut down because of illegal aliens using them as doctor’s offices, and the ERs couldn’t afford to stay open. It’s not just the money: it’s all the other stuff, too boot.

Read: What’s The Cost Of Illegal Immigration In The People’s Republik Of California? »

Fake News: Woman Convicted Of Laughing During Sessions Confirmation Hearings Or Something

This is one of those big, big, big “or something’s”. Take a look at some headlines

That’s just a sampling of all the unhinged headlines from Democrat outlets, both straight news ones and liberal activists ones. Some hedge their bets a little bit, so they can say “no, the headline didn’t really say that”, but it’s the implication. Let’s look at that last one from the NY Times

A jury on Wednesday convicted three Code Pink activists on charges related to a protest at the confirmation hearing of Jeff Sessions for attorney general — including a Virginia woman who said all she did was break out in laughter.

Each of the three protesters faces up to 12 months in jail, $2,000 in fines, or both, depending on the outcome of a June 21 sentencing hearing.

She says all she did was laugh loudly, and expected to get shushed by security. They, instead, escorted her out

Prosecutors described her actions differently.

Ms. Fairooz had “let out a loud burst of laughter, followed by a second louder burst of laughter,” the U.S. attorney’s office said in the filing. The police then tried to “quietly escort” Ms. Fairooz from the room, but she “grew loud and more disruptive, eventually halting the confirmation hearing,” the court papers argued.

Ms. Fairooz was found guilty of the two charges she faced: one of disorderly and disruptive conduct and a charge of parading or demonstrating on Capitol grounds, according to her lawyer, Samuel A. Bogash.

What’s the Times forgot to mention was, via the first on the clickity click leftist clickbait headline list from the Huffington Post

Several jurors who spoke with HuffPost after the verdict emphasized that they were focused on Fairooz’s actions after a rookie Capitol Police officer approached Fairooz when she laughed at Sen. Richard Shelby’s (R-Ala.) claim that Sessions had a clear, well-documented and “extensive record of treating all Americans equally under the law.” A group of jurors spoke to HuffPost on the condition of anonymity.

“She did not get convicted for laughing. It was her actions as she was being asked to leave,” the jury foreperson said.

Many of the other clickity click stories mention that same thing. Disruptions like this

https://twitter.com/JoePerticone/status/818836159564484608

The headlines sent Liberals into their Typical Apoplexy.

https://twitter.com/TheH2/status/859893196716986368

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Fake News: Woman Convicted Of Laughing During Sessions Confirmation Hearings Or Something »

FBI Director Comey: Why, Yes, Huma Did Forward Classified Documents To Anthony Weiner

Yeah, so, this happened during Comey’s Congressional visit

(CNN) FBI Director James Comey revealed Wednesday that Hillary Clinton emails containing classified information were “somehow” being forwarded to former congressman Anthony Weiner by his wife and top Clinton aide, Huma Abedin.

Comey provided new details to Congress about how Clinton’s emails ended up on Weiner’s computer as the FBI director strongly defended his decision to alert Congress just days before the 2016 election about his agency’s investigation into emails potentially related to Clinton’s personal server. (snip)

In separate exchange with Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana, Comey said Abedin appeared to have had a regular practice of forwarding emails to Weiner for him “to print out for her so she could then deliver them to the secretary of state.”

But there was no indication that Abedin “had a sense that what she was doing was in violation of the law” Comey added, and investigators couldn’t prove any sort of criminal intent.

Um, according to actual law, it doesn’t matter, as Powerline notes

Comey restated his view that intentional wrongdoing is required to charge a crime here and that the FBI examined the new emails for evidence of consciousness of intentional wrongdoing. As Andy McCarthy recently explained again in this context, Comey is painfully (intentionally?) wrong on this point. Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin et al. should not be out free in what used to be called polite society lecturing the rest of us. Comey’s testimony today serves as a painful reminder of an unresolved Clinton scandal of the first order.

Let’s also remember that Hillary, Huma, and Anthony should all have been crystal clear on the rules of how to handle classified information. They had to sign numerous documents on the subject, and listen to numerous government security briefers. It’s not something they could have avoided knowing, unless they are complete idiots. Even if they were doing their best Three Monkeys impression, it wouldn’t matter: more than a few members of the armed forces and intelligence agencies have been prosecuted for much less, while claiming they didn’t know.

If you or I had done anything remotely similar, we’d be in jail for a long, long time. And, let’s be clear: if a Republican had done something similar, Democrats would be calling for that person(s) to be jailed. And they would be 100% correct.

Read: FBI Director Comey: Why, Yes, Huma Did Forward Classified Documents To Anthony Weiner »

If All You See…

…is a sea rising from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is America’s Watchtower, with a post on who would be proud of the budget deal.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove