Comrade Bernie Explains Why We Need Government Run Health Care

Bernie Sanders is getting ready to submit legislation for a Medicare for all scheme, which has zero chance of even making it out of committee, much less a vote on the Senate and House floors (even with all the squishy Republicans in Congress, still zero). The NY Times gives him a platform to sorta describe his scheme

Bernie Sanders: Why We Need Medicare for All

This is a pivotal moment in American history. Do we, as a nation, join the rest of the industrialized world and guarantee comprehensive health care to every person as a human right? Or do we maintain a system that is enormously expensive, wasteful and bureaucratic, and is designed to maximize profits for big insurance companies, the pharmaceutical industry, Wall Street and medical equipment suppliers?

I had no idea that that was what Obamacare created. Thanks for the 411, Comrade Bernie!

We remain the only major country on earth that allows chief executives and stockholders in the health care industry to get incredibly rich, while tens of millions of people suffer because they can’t get the health care they need. This is not what the United States should be about.

Good news: a Medicare for all scheme would mean tens of millions would see their health care rationed, along with medical practices refusing to take it. Anyway, Bernie continues the typical gripes about Big Pharma and Big Insurance and such making money (how did Bernie afford a $600,000 summer home on a Senator’s salary?) before getting to

The solution to this crisis is not hard to understand. A half-century ago, the United States established Medicare. Guaranteeing comprehensive health benefits to Americans over 65 has proved to be enormously successful, cost-effective and popular. Now is the time to expand and improve Medicare to cover all Americans.

On Wednesday I will introduce the Medicare for All Act in the Senate with 15 co-sponsors and support from dozens of grass-roots organizations. Under this legislation, every family in America would receive comprehensive coverage, and middle-class families would save thousands of dollars a year by eliminating their private insurance costs as we move to a publicly funded program.

The transition to the Medicare for All program would take place over four years. In the first year, benefits to older people would be expanded to include dental care, vision coverage and hearing aids, and the eligibility age for Medicare would be lowered to 55. All children under the age of 18 would also be covered. In the second year, the eligibility age would be lowered to 45 and in the third year to 35. By the fourth year, every man, woman and child in the country would be covered by Medicare for All.

You know what he forgot? How to pay for this. California learned that this type of scheme would cost $400 billion, double what the overall budget of the state is. Even taking all the money people and companies already spend on insurance and such, and shifting the money from the federal government for Medicaid into the pool, there would still be a massive shortfall. Tiny Vermont couldn’t figure out a way to make it work. How will Bernie?

It will be interesting to see what the funding mechanisms will be when he releases the bill.

Read: Comrade Bernie Explains Why We Need Government Run Health Care »

Stevie Wonder, Other Celebs Yammer On About ‘Climate Change’ During Hurricane Relief Benefit

The good news, the benefit raised $44 million for this Leftist dominated celeb-palooza. The bad news is could surely have raised more, if Wonder hadn’t caused people to turn the channel off

(Daily Mail) Stevie Wonder blasted climate change deniers during the ‘Hand in Hand: A Benefit for Hurricane Harvey Relief’ on Tuesday, calling people who do not believe in global warming blind or unintelligent.

The singer, 67, spoke about loving the planet before singing ‘Lean On Me’ at the charity telethon. President Donald Trump pulled the US out of the Paris climate accord in August.

Wonder said: ‘We’ve come here together today to love on the people who have been devastated by the hurricanes.

‘When love goes into action it preferences no color of skin, no ethnicity, no religious belief, no sexual preferences and no political persuasion.

‘It just loves…as we should begin to love and value our planet.

‘Anyone who believes that there’s no such thing as global warming must be blind or unintelligent.’

“We should love each other, but screw you people who don’t believe in Hotcoldwetdry.” Channel changed.

Apple donated $5 million, while Albertsons Co and Merck gave a $1 million each. Good for them. How much did Stevie give? How much did Beyonce give as she yammered on about raaaaacism and climate change? She’s made other donations, but, what about to this benefit? Oh, and what of their own massive use of fossil fuels and energy to jet around the world to play concerts which put money in their pockets?

Selena Gomez seemed to make a reference to illegal aliens. I doubt most Conservatives saw that moment, or Beyonces, as they changed the channel after Stevie.

BTW, would it kill the news outlets like NY Times, Washington Post, LA Times, ABC, CBS, etc, to give Trump credit for a pretty good federal government response? You know they’d be blasting him otherwise. As the NY Times notes, the deaths from Harvey and Irma have been very low, thanks to a variety of things that have been happening over the last 16 years. In all fairness, neither Bush nor Obama were given credit, but, all the means and methods mean little if you they aren’t enacted correctly. Team Trump did a great job.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Stevie Wonder, Other Celebs Yammer On About ‘Climate Change’ During Hurricane Relief Benefit »

Democrats Pushing Medicare For All Plan

If California couldn’t figure out how to pay for it, heck, if little Vermont couldn’t figure out how to pay for it, how will Los Federales pay for it?

(Reason)  Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) plans to unveil his long-awaited “Medicare for all” proposal for government-controlled, single-payer health care. His colleague, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), is all-in on the scheme. “Medicare for All is one way that we can give every single person in the country access to high quality health care,” she writes. “Everyone is covered. Nobody goes broke paying a medical bill. Families don’t have to bear the costs of heartbreaking medical disasters on their own.”

And for starting us along the path to all of that high-quality care, she adds, “We owe a huge debt to President Obama.”

Well, there is something there. Debt, that is. Huge, accumulating mounds of it, swamping everything in sight. In 2001, the Congressional Budget Office warned that spending on retirees—specifically Social Security and Medicare—”will consume…almost as much of the economic output in 2030 as does the entire federal government today.”

“Notwithstanding recent favorable developments,” the Medicare Trustees conceded in their report this year, “current-law projections indicate that Medicare still faces a substantial financial shortfall that will need to be addressed with further legislation.” The report foresees that “the trust fund becomes depleted in 2029.”

Realistically, we’re looking at a minimum of $48 trillion ($48,000,000,000,000) in unfunded liabilities for Medicare. Lots of Democrats, especially the newer ones like Kamala Harris (Brokifornia), are super enthused by this. Oh, and fewer and fewer doctors and health practices are accepting patients on Medicare. Will the Medicare for all scheme force doctors/health facilities to accept it?

A big part of the problem, as Cato’s Tanner pointed out earlier this year is that “Americans want widely contradictory things from health-care reform. They want the highest-quality care for everyone, with no wait, from the doctor of their choice. And they want it as cheap as possible, preferably for free.”

Promising, as Sanders and Warren do, to give everybody high-quality health care without regard for ability to pay will always find an enthusiastic audience. But delivering on that promise is likely to give us not the illusion of Medicare for All, but rather its awful, unsustainable reality.

And, how does Government pay for it? It should be amusing to see their math. If they even bother. California didn’t even bother attempting to figure out a way. They just spiked it.

Read: Democrats Pushing Medicare For All Plan »

If All You See…

….is a beach covered with detritus from climate change big waves, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Chicks On The Right, with a post on liberals tearing down a 9/11 memorial at Columbia U.

Read: If All You See… »

NY AG Sues Trump Over Rolling Back Obama Fuel Efficiency Standards

Excitable Eric Schneider, who loves investigating people for Wrongthink on Hotcoldwetdry, is unhappy

(Daily Caller)  New York’s attorney general filed a lawsuit Monday against President Donald Trump for rolling back his Democratic predecessor’s fuel efficiency standards.

Eric Schneiderman, who many believe to be one of Trump’s most bitter critics, is suing the president for delaying a rule forcing automakers to meet or exceed fuel efficiency standards. He is joining a slew of his Democratic counterparts in the lawsuit.

“Fuel efficiency standards are common sense, protecting Americans pocketbooks and reducing the emissions that undermine public health and drive climate change,” he wrote in a press statement announcing his decision. (snip)

The Trump administration took the initial steps in August toward rolling back former President Barack Obama’s vehicle emission standards. The auto industry celebrated the decision to reopen the emission standards rules.

Industry stakeholders have argued the rules place an undue burden on auto manufacturers struggling to meet emission standards amid low gas prices and lagging biofuel production. They believe the standards could potentially destroy thousands of jobs.

Most of the car manufacturers have complained about the idiotic and arbitrary requirement to double fuel efficiency standards to 54.5 MPG by 2025. It’s bad for business, bad for jobs, and, let’s not forget, bad for safety, as lighter cars put people in danger. And, it could add $3,000 to the pricetag of each vehicle sold. Which is bad for the middle and lower classes, harming both new and used sales.

Furthermore, just like earlier today, this is about an executive order, not legislation. Incoming administrations can do away with previous EOs. It’s constitutional.

Read: NY AG Sues Trump Over Rolling Back Obama Fuel Efficiency Standards »

Bummer: Hurricane Irma Not Converting People To The Cult Of Climastrology

The Warmists at the UK Guardian, a paper that has long given up on journalism in favor of activism, seem a bit upset that some people are not converting to Warmism after Bad Weather

Floridians battered by Irma maintain climate change is no ‘big deal’
On Marco Island, widespread destruction in Irma’s wake is not enough to make believers out of some climate change skeptics

They sat through hours of pummelling by Hurricane Irma, with winds pounding them at up to 115mph and rain driving in a solid white sheet as bright as a snow blizzard. Then on Monday, Floridians woke up to survey the damage, begin the cleanup and get back to carrying on regardless.

By noon, the jet skiers were back on the water, buzzing around the west coast waterways under a blue sky where only hours before Irma had shaken the trees and put fear in people’s hearts.

In other words, back to life as usual.

For its lucky escape, the US has Cuba to thank, given that the northern coast of the island soaked up an important part of Irma’s energy before the storm reached Florida. Not that the debt of gratitude will be repaid by the current incumbent of the White House.

Apparently, the Cuba weather machines saved Florida. Al hail Castro and Authoritarianism!

The question now is whether local residents, Floridians and by extension America writ large will ponder the lessons of Irma, consider its portent of intensifying extreme weather in the wake of climate change, and decide to do something about it. The early message coming from Marcos Islanders on Monday was crystal clear.

No.

Chris Roche, 52, a real estate lawyer, was taking a long hard look at the damage to his home. Three trees were down in the yard, some tiles had come off the roof and there were signs of grey mud on the road – Irma’s calling card, dredged up from the seabed and deposited right outside his door. (snip)

As for climate change? “I don’t think climate change is such a big deal.”

That was quite a striking comment just hours after a massive hurricane of terrifying force, some of which may have been the gift of global warming, tore through his home.

“I don’t think man is the tipping point. I think it’s more natural than that. We’re not experiencing historically close [to] high temperatures, not even close to it.”

And, the Guardian apparently had a tough time finding an new Converts (Warmverts?), because absolutely zero are mentioned. In fact, many were wondering why the damage wasn’t as bad as expected, which was mentioned in the Cuba paragraph. There are headlines for stories like

One has to wonder where the actual hurricane force winds were. Check the screenshot of the article, as the website for the article is down. 46mph. That’s not hurricane force winds (the measure is the windspeed over 1 minute, not gusts). And of the ground data. You can check ground data here (go to Florida, and check the stations). The pressure was very low, what one would expect with a major hurricane, but, where were the readings for hurricane force wind speeds? The vast majority of stations do not show them. Yes, there is damage, but, you could get the same damage from tropical storm force winds. I’d love an answer for this from a weather expert.

Read: Bummer: Hurricane Irma Not Converting People To The Cult Of Climastrology »

California Sues Trump Over Ending DACA

This one is amazing. You have a program that was started under executive order. EO’s are not laws. They are subject to cancellation by any chief executive with the stroke of a pen, or by Congress passing a law and getting the president to sign it (along with a few other methods, Government 101). Especially since there was no long rule making process. Yet, we get this bit of insanity

(LA Times) California on Monday sued the Trump administration, challenging as unconstitutional the president’s plan to rescind a program to protect young immigrants brought to the country illegally from deportation.

The lawsuit comes a week after 15 other states, led by New York and Washington, filed a similar legal challenge.

California Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra said Monday he decided to file a separate suit because the state and its economy will be especially harmed by the president’s action because it is home to a quarter of the 800,000 people in the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program.

“I think everyone recognizes the scope and breadth of the Trump decision to terminate DACA hits hardest here,” Becerra said after the other states sued.

There’s certainly a lot of discussion as to whether DACA is even lawful, much less Constitutional. It’s a major reach to say that cancelling an EO is un-Constitutional.

Becerra’s lawsuit says the DACA program approved by former President Obama is legal and that its repeal violates due process rights and will hurt the state’s economy.

Again, it matters zero whether Obama signed an EO that is legal, because EOs have always been subject to being turned over by an incoming president. Heck, even the same president can override his own EO. Repeal due process? Due process was wiped out in that prosecutorial discretion was dumped to provide 2 year legal statuses that could be renewed in perpetuity. The Law says the Dreamers are unlawfully present in the United States. Obama made it so none could be deported unless they did something really egregious.

California is welcome to them. They have much lower college graduation rates than the general population. California’s budget is a mess, and low wage workers do not help, especially when paired with good jobs moving out to states with better working laws and lower taxes. Their jails are filled to the brim with illegal aliens. Hey, here’s one of his great Dreamers

Obama ‘dreamer’, 23, ‘raped 19-year-old woman and tore off her EAR after attacking her with a kettlebell at the gym on the same day he assaulted a 14-year-old girl’

AG Becarra should wait to see if Congress does anything, because Trump has a 6 month expiration on the program. This is just self-serving, and will probably get tossed. It does show California’s concern for illegal aliens over actual citizens, though.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

 

Read: California Sues Trump Over Ending DACA »

Interesting: Illegal Alien Loving Canada Is Deporting Lots Of Illegal Aliens

Canada asked for all the illegals to come to Canada. They’ve been overly inviting. And the consequences of unfettered illegal immigration has smacked them in the face with the dead mackerel of reality (via Hot Air)

(Reuters)  Canada has deported hundreds of people to countries designated too dangerous for civilians, with more than half of those people being sent back to Iraq, according to government data obtained by Reuters.

The spike in deportations comes as Canada faces a record number of migrants and is on track to have the most refugee claims in more than a decade. That has left the country scrambling to cope with the influx of asylum seekers, many crossing the U.S. border illegally.

Between January 2014 and Sept. 6, 2017, Canada sent 249 people to 11 countries for which the government had suspended or deferred deportations because of dangers to civilians.

That includes 134 people to Iraq, 62 to the Democratic Republic of Congo and 43 to Afghanistan, the data shows.

Now, these illegals do tend to be the dangerous types. But, if you’re going to act like an open border country, you’ll get treated like an open border country, and reap the problems associated with this. Furthermore, one has to wonder how many others are unlawfully present in Canada and haven’t been caught yet.

The Law Of Utterly Anticipated Unintended Consequences.

Read: Interesting: Illegal Alien Loving Canada Is Deporting Lots Of Illegal Aliens »

If All You See…

…is a world turning to desert, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Climate Skepticism, with a post noting that a climate change landfall looks just like a normal hurricane landfall.

The photo that got wacked is below the fold

Read More »

Read: If All You See… »

I’m Convinced: Miss America Says Trump Wrong To Pull Out Of Paris Climate (Scam) Agreement

Well, this has changed my position completely!

From the link

Miss North Dakota, a 23-year-old who said President Donald Trump was wrong to pull the United States out of the Paris climate accord, was named Miss America 2018 Sunday night in Atlantic City.

Why, yes, that is the first paragraph of the article.

Cara Mund topped a field of 51 contestants to win the crowd in the New Jersey seaside resort, where most of the 97 Miss Americas have been selected.

In one of her onstage interviews, Mund said Trump, a Republican, was wrong to withdraw the U.S. from the climate accord aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to global warming.

“It’s a bad decision,” she said. “There is evidence that climate change is existing and we need to be at that table.”

I wonder how much in the way of fossil fuels, electricity, hair dryers, and such were required to get us to the point of having a Miss America? The carbon footprint must be enormous.

More: Newsbusters points out that the contestants were being asked to condemn Trump. Can’t we just get talented, pretty women wearing swimsuits and being talented?

Read: I’m Convinced: Miss America Says Trump Wrong To Pull Out Of Paris Climate (Scam) Agreement »

Pirate's Cove