Government Wants Government To Force Companies To Disclose ‘Climate Change’ (scam) Risks

Funny how so much of this comes down to the use of government force to force compliance among the private sector, giving government more and more power

Government should force companies and pension funds to disclose climate change risks, say MPs

The government should make it mandatory for large companies and pension funds to report their exposure to climate change risks, a committee of MPs has said.

Current rules encourage short-term thinking while neglecting concerns such as sustainability, the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) said. It recommended that new rules on climate change disclosure should be in place by 2022.

Institutional investors are sometimes confused about the extent of pension trustees’ duty to consider environmental risks, the MPs said.

‘Climate change’ is not the environment, no matter how much the Warmists want to link it.

The report urges the government to lay down in law the duty that pension funds and other large asset owners have to consider the long-term value of their investment. In light of this duty, institutional investors should be considering environmental risks, the committee said. (snip)

Mary Creagh MP, chair of the Environmental Audit Committee, said: “We need to fix the incentives in our financial system that encourage short-term thinking. Long-term sustainability must be factored into financial decision making. (snip)

“We want to see mandatory climate risk reporting and a clarification in law that pension trustees have a duty to consider long-term sustainability, not just short-term returns.” (snip)

The government should require fiduciaries to actively seek the views of their beneficiaries when producing statements of investment principles, the MPs said.

It’s just Big Government for your own good, you know. Because they know better or something.

Read: Government Wants Government To Force Companies To Disclose ‘Climate Change’ (scam) Risks »

Guy Goes To Gun Show, Learns You Can Get A Flamethrower. And That People Are Nice. And He’s Been Told Lies

Craig McCarthy of NJ Advance Media decided to check out a gun show to see what really happens, and learned that things aren’t quite what he read about via anti-gun propoganda. Good on him for going through with the article, because so many other reporters would have either spun this in a gun grabber manner, only discussing The Worst Ever, or just spiked it

‘Can I buy that flamethrower?’ and other burning questions I had at my first gun show

In the back of the Allstar Family Fun & Events Complex in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, past the skeeball tables and arcade games, dozens of dealers are set up in the 48,000-square-foot space, and all of them are trying to put a firearm in my hand.

Handguns are locked in glass cases and a handful of matte-black AR-15-like rifles, advertised as Jersey-legal, sit innocently on stands pointing out toward potential buyers.

There are hundreds of bolt-action and semi-automatic rifles and shotguns tied-off with zip ties, all carefully laid-out and meticulously arranged on sturdy folding tables, topped with camo, black, red or blue tablecloths.

The sellers and I talk about “scary” guns, the “stupid” laws that limited accessorizing rifles and how not feeling a black holster on their belt makes them feel unsettled, unsafe or anxious.

And I listen to it all — the unsolicited takes on the presidency of Donald Trump, the headlines that have dominated news cycle after news cycle, Russians and the deep state.

Then I saw it: A flamethrower.

Yeah, someone was actually selling a flamethrower. It was $999, and is actually legal in 48 states. It also looks like a colossal waste of money, and certainly not any good for personal or home defense (unless you have a spider). But, then, how many signed up to purchase Elon Musks’s so-called flamethrower?

Why’d I go? I feel undereducated on the pro-gun side of the contentious national debate, so I convinced my editors to let me take the drive.

I really want to understand the gun culture.

At the show, I tell the sellers, “I am shooting a gun for the first time next week.”

“So, you are coming over to our side?” asks Bill Green, one of the vendors who welcomes me.

“Oh, you’re going to love it,” Norsela Cole says with a smile before reminiscing about the first time she shot a gun: her husband’s .22 in their backyard.

Sounds like they were being pretty nice. Anyhow, Mr. McCarthy offers up a few quotes from those right wing gun folks, even going so far as to write that this is the “antithesis of Childish Gambino’s country featured in his recent music video.” But, the important part is that he wanted to see about buying guns, since NJ is super restrictive (depending on the list, NJ is always somewhere in the top 7) on guns, and does not allow gun shows.

In Pennsylvania, gun shows are an extension of a licensed seller’s shop.

“You are in my store right now,” John Tidd says.

Background checks are required by law for every purchase from a business with a Federal Firearms License, often referred to as an FFL.

Sellers are responsible for knowing all the different laws in each state. They say, if they sold one in error, they would be tasked with retrieving the gun from that buyer from where ever they live.

McCarthy finds there is no gun show loophole, at least in Pa., and in particular at this gun show, because everyone is a dealer, and would be risking their ATF license, their business license, and felony charges if they didn’t follow all applicable laws. He also learns that it would be rather difficult to purchase a handgun for use in New Jersey, and there’s no way around it. Further, many dealers just plain refuse to sell handguns to people outside of the state, particularly NJ.

Oh, and he could buy a long gun. Because he already had his firearms identification card from his municipal police department. But, quite a few do not have NJ approved rifles (mags that only hold 15, no flash suppressor, no adjustable stock.

When I leave, I feel as if I understand the gun culture more, at least in this area, after the open and friendly conversations.

They all agree background checks are important, and they agree there’s an issue that needs to be addressed with gun ownership and mental health.

He also learns that gun owners want a dialogue, but, that can’t happen in the current political environment. Which is surely doing a soft shoe dance, because 2nd Amendment supporters can’t give in on even minor things, because the gun grabbers will just want more and more and more.

Read: Guy Goes To Gun Show, Learns You Can Get A Flamethrower. And That People Are Nice. And He’s Been Told Lies »

Good News: ‘Climate Change’ Isn’t All Bad News

The flat earther’s in the Cult of Climastrology who think that any minor change in the Earth’s temperature, something that never happened during the previous 4.5 billion years, is doomy have found something to be positive about

Climate change isn’t necessarily all doom and gloom for Newfoundland and Labrador
‘Doom-and-gloom’ view on climate change is one-dimensional and unproductive, say local researchers

See? It’s unproductive

First, a disclaimer: overall, climate change has a negative impact on global ecosystems, biodiversity, and economy.

And most of the article is about doom and gloom.

Read: Good News: ‘Climate Change’ Isn’t All Bad News »

If All You See…

…is a horrible, evil gas powered grill cooking horrible, evil meat that’s causing the world to turn to desert, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Blazing Cat Fur, with a post on how NFL fans feel about the kneeling ban.

It’s grilling week on IAYS!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Peter Ciernia Patriotic pinup

Happy Sunday! Another super fine day in the great nation of America. The Sun is shining, the mockingbirds are mocking, and it’s a great day to be outside. This pinup is by Peter Ciernia, with a wee bit of help.

What’s happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Independent Sentinel highlights more awesome (bomb making) Middle East imports
  2. Weasel Zippers covers Texas’ plan for armed veterans in schools
  3. This ain’t Hell... has some feel good stories
  4. The Right Scoop covers how NFL players plan on continuing to ruin the sport
  5. The Powers That Be isn’t impressed by Comrade Sanders’ latest scheme
  6. The Lid covers Congress passing the “Right To Try” law
  7. The Last Tradition highlights another burger joint having to apologize to the police
  8. The First Street Journal covers #NeverTrump Bill Kristol losing the last of his mind
  9. The Daley Gator has the left’s war on kids
  10. White House Dossier also covers the Right To Try law, and how the MSM ignored this
  11. Powerline discusses how illegal marijuana is shipped from Colorado to other states
  12. Political Clown Parade thinks there must be a pony nearby with all this (John Brennan) manure around
  13. Pacific Pundit features a lunatic at The Atlantic fantasizing about Trump punching Melania
  14. Legal Insurrection has Starbucks’ SJW training manual
  15. And last, but not least, Just One Minute wonders if Mueller can subpoena Trump

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Ohio Is Using Actual Law To Go After Actual Criminals With Illegal Firearms

See, on one hand, you have Vox pimping yet again an article of the Australian solution, which is banning and forced confiscation, but, remember, no one wants to take away your guns

Then we have this from the Biz Pac Review

Pay attention, Chicago. Ohio blows up gun control narrative – laws not new, just need enforcement

The latest number of gun and violent crime indictments in Ohio just threw cold water on the liberal narrative about gun control.

On Friday, the Department of Justice announced 13 new gun-related indictments in the state, making for an increase of about 60 percent over the previous two fiscal years, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

Liberal media outlets are not likely to focus on the news of gun control that works – the kind that takes firearms out of the hands of criminals and uses the law to punish them.

The Ohio indictments covered crimes ranging from falsifying information on a background check, illegal possession of a firearm by a felon to possessing a firearm in a drug crime, laws that aren’t new but just needed to be enforced.

The latest indictments and the increased number of gun-related prosecutions are aimed at keeping dangerous criminals off the streets according to Justin Herdman, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio. The defendants have long criminal histories with many violations including drug trafficking, robbery, felony assault and assault on a police officer.

“These defendants include those with a long history of violent crime, as well as defendants who have illegally obtained guns for criminals to use in violent crime like carjackings,” Herdman said in a statement. “As part of Project Safe Neighborhoods, we will continue to work with local police and federal law enforcement to target the most dangerous offenders and make our community safer.”

There was a big focus on going after actual criminals, in keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and people who should not have firearms, and it is working. Rather than going after the rights of law abiding citizens by passing more “common sense gun control” laws, the existing laws were used in the manner in which they were designated.

Meanwhile, in cities which tout gun-control laws like Chicago, the criminals seem to have the upper hand. More than 1,000 extra police officers patrolled Chicago’s neighborhoods over the Memorial Day weekend but there were still eight people killed and 32 others wounded by gunfire, according to WLS-TV.

As BPR points out, most all the cities on the Forbes most dangerous list have Democrat mayors. To take that further, most of them have a majority of Democrats sitting on their legislative chambers, if not full control. Chicago, and places like NJ, can whine all they want about guns coming in from the outside, but they aren’t really trying to do anything about the criminals who use the guns, just interfering with the Rights of law abiding citizens.

BTW, this Tweet featured at a Hill article about youths marching in orange is a hoot

Read: Ohio Is Using Actual Law To Go After Actual Criminals With Illegal Firearms »

Who’s Up For Some Nikki Derangement Syndrome?

There’s plenty of Trump Derangement Syndrome around, like this blue check nutball who actually linked Trump to the Buffalo Wild Wings Twitter hack.

Then there’s Nikki Haley Derangement Syndrome (via Twitchy)

Seriously, people having a hissy fit over a necklace. But, wait, there is more post Twitchy post!

Read More »

Read: Who’s Up For Some Nikki Derangement Syndrome? »

If All You See…

…is a jungle that will soon disappear from carbon pollution atmospheric cancer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on sounding crazy when trying to explain the gender confused craziness.

And a doubleshot under the fold, clearing out the last photo I downloaded, so, also see Legal Insurrection, with a post on Covered California doing a bit of rationing.

Read: If All You See… »

The EU’s Article 13: Why Government Controlling The Internet Is A Bad Thing

For those who are big supporters of the Obama era Net Neutrality rule from O’s FCC, do you really, really think it’s a good idea to give the government a massive say in how the Internet acts? Is it really a good idea to treat it as a public utility, like the phone system from the 1940’s? Because nothing could go wrong, right? They wouldn’t get a bee in their burr and decide to get a little wild, right? You love your memes, right?

(Moonbattery) Many take open communication on the Internet for granted. They shouldn’t. The free Internet will not last unless there is major pushback against attempts to put it in a straitjacket, like the European Union’s Article 13:

Article 13 of the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on copyright in the Digital Single Market, to give it its full name, is an attempt to reshape copyright law for the internet age. It’s based around the relationship between copyright holders and online platforms, compelling the latter to enforce tighter regulation over protected content. …

The Article stipulates that platforms should “prevent the availability” of protected works, suggesting these ISSPs will need to adopt technology that can recognise and filter work created by someone other than the person uploading it. This could include fragments of music, pictures and videos. …

The Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition has previously warned that: “Some requirements contained in Article 13 can enable abusive behaviour, thereby threatening freedom of expression and information”. Last October, 56 leading academics published a set of recommendations on the proposed directive, including claims that Article 13 is “incompatible with the guarantee of fundamental rights and freedoms and the obligation to strike a fair balance between all rights and freedoms involved”.

All those memes you like to spread around? Most would be illegal under Article 13. Would you be happy that your ISP would be monitoring your every move on the Internet? That they’d be checking every upload to make sure it is Compliant? When you give up power to government, they will use that power. And then mission creep slips in, and you wonder what happened.

Read: The EU’s Article 13: Why Government Controlling The Internet Is A Bad Thing »

Totally Not A Religion: Pope Summons Oil Execs To Talk ‘Climate Change’ (scam)

Nice that this pope cares more about a mythical issue way more than the murder of the unborn. How often does he talk about that? Summon Liberals to the Vatican to talk about it? Did you hear the Pope chiming in about the recent vote in Ireland to allow abortion on demand? Anyhow, remember, folks, this is totally about science.

Pope summons oil execs to Vatican to talk climate change

Pope Francis will meet with some of the world’s oil executives next week, likely to give them another moral nudge to clean up their act on global warming.

Climate change policy and science experts are cautiously hopeful but aren’t expecting any miracles or even noticeable changes.

The conference will be a follow-up to the pope’s encyclical three years ago calling on people to save the planet from climate change and other environmental ills, Vatican spokesman Greg Burke confirmed Friday. Cardinal Peter Turkson, who spearheaded the encyclical, set up the June 8-9 conference with the executives. The pope himself will speak to the leaders on the second day of the summit, organized with the University of Notre Dame, Burke said.

Officials at the Vatican and Notre Dame would not disclose who is coming. BP, however, confirmed that its CEO Robert Dudley plans to attend, and Exxon Mobil said CEO Darren Woods would be there. Woods said this week that his company is trying to balance the risks of climate change with growing demand for energy to raise living standards in the developing world.

It is rather amusing that the Pope is summoning oil execs to take fossil fueled trips to the Vatican to discuss Hotcoldwetdry from the use of fossil fuels. And the Pope came back in January from taking long fossil fueled trips to Chile and Peru. And plans on trips to Switzerland, Ireland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and India this year. Will he be walking? Biking? Taking a horse? Rollerblades?

Dana Fisher, a sociologist who studies environmentalism at the University of Maryland, said the pope is cementing his leadership on climate.

“He certainly is trying to lead for the planet and lord knows we need it,” she said.

Gary Yohe, an economics and environment professor at Wesleyan University in Connecticut, said the executives might feel compelled to listen to the spiritual leader of nearly 1.3 billion Catholics.

“This is not somebody you can ignore,” Yohe said. “It might be a come to Jesus moment for them.”

Totally not a religion.

Read: Totally Not A Religion: Pope Summons Oil Execs To Talk ‘Climate Change’ (scam) »

Pirate's Cove