…is a sea that shall soon rise up and wipe out Baja Mexico, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on more reasons Trump was elected.
It’s Mexican ladies week!
Read: If All You See… »
…is a sea that shall soon rise up and wipe out Baja Mexico, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is A View From The Beach, with a post on more reasons Trump was elected.
It’s Mexican ladies week!
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! A gorgeous day in America. The sun is shining, there’s a bit Fall in the air, and the NHL is in full swing. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.
What’s happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
What is that? It is Day of the Dead
(HuffPost) What’s the difference between DÃa de los Muertos and Halloween?
DÃa de los Muertos — also known as “DÃa de Muertos,†or “Day of the Dead†in English — is a holiday with Mexican origins that is celebrated on November 1 – 2. While some imagery might be close to that of Halloween, there are significant differences between the two. DÃa de los Muertos is a day to celebrate death — or, more specifically, the deceased — while on Halloween, death is seen as something to be feared. DÃa de los Muertos has both indigenous origins from the Aztec festival for Mictecacihuatl, The Lady of The Dead, and Catholic origins from the Spanish conquistadors’ All Saints and All Souls Day.
OK. Sounds interesting. Especially the wild costumes. And, it should be noted that some have it beginning on October 31st. Let’s see what Melinda Welsh, former editor of the Sacramento News & Review, thinks
Americans need a better version of Halloween: an official Dia de los Muertos
It took the brilliant Pixar film “Coco†for me to figure out what was missing: the dancing skeletons, the flower-adorned grave sites, the altars crowded with candles and framed photos of deceased loved ones. I’m talking about Dia de los Muertos, and though the celebration of this Mexican holiday is already established in Latin corners of the United States, I’m proposing we go full throttle and declare the Day of the Dead an official American holiday.
Here’s why I’m stumping for the idea. I’m a 62-year-old journalist, first diagnosed with cancer in 2014. As I’ve written in The Times on other occasions, despite surgery, chemo and radiation, my disease metastasized in 2015. When three different doctors told me I would live six months or “a yearish,†I began to think a lot about death.
Until then, like most Americans, I’d avoided the subject. Death was something to run away from — a giant negative, a dark mystery, the end of everything. Pain and grief seemed all that awaited any consideration, forced or otherwise, of what Shakespeare called “the undiscovered country.†It doesn’t take departed psychologist Ernest Becker, who won the 1974 Pulitzer Prize for his book “The Denial of Death,†to recognize that most of us will do anything to ignore mortality until it’s coming straight for us or a loved one.
For Becker, this kind of avoidance “pervades human culture†and “is one of the deepest sources of intolerance, aggression, and human evil†on Earth. I’ve learned the hard way to stop with the death denial. And that’s where “Coco†enters into it.
The Day of the Dead acknowledges, joyfully, that an end is coming for us all.
Well, you know, I can see her point, especially when she writes
Dia de los Muertos is a celebration, but it’s no frat party. It’s got a deeply spiritual side. In Mexico, families pay their respects to the souls of the dead with parades, picnics around grave sites, all-night vigils, prayer gatherings and lots and lots of music. Some families build altars — ofrendas — to the dead, heaped with mementos, the deceased’s favorite food and drink, and photos. They tell stories of lives lived and loved ones gone. Religion plays a role, but the festivities are not really about belief in an afterlife. Ultimately, the Day of the Dead is a fiesta of what ties together the living and the dead.

Perhaps at the same time we could bring Halloween back to being something scary, rather than an excuse to see who can wear the sleaziest costume and get beyond liquored up. But, wait, what’s this
Formally expanding this beloved Mexican holiday into the United States could be a repentant bow to a country whose relations with America are at an all-time low thanks to border walls, ethnic slurs, family separations and cynical immigration politics. And it’s not just that country we’d be acknowledging — parts of Africa, China and Japan also reserve a special day each year to honor their dead. Towns and cities all over the West already make room for the holiday with sugar skulls and papier-mâché skeletons, pan de muertos and ofrendas laid out among the headstones in cemeteries, in museum galleries and in parks.
And that’s how you ruin an interesting piece, delving into hardcore leftist politics in support of illegal aliens.
And it would also be amusingly fun when the social justice warriors start screeching about cultural appropriation. And you know they would.
Oh, and you just know that they’d turn it into a sexy holiday, right?
Read: LA Times: America Needs A Dia de las Muertos Or Something »
…is the notion of having just 10 years left to solve climate change doom, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Lid, with a post on Facebook removing over 800 Conservative sites.
Read: If All You See… »
This time of year always brings the most dire of ‘climate change’ doomsaying, kicking it up to 15/10, as a Big Report always comes out a month or two prior to the next UN IPCC climate change meeting a great vacation spot where 10,000+ take fossil fueled trips. And we get stuff like
Climate is not just changing – it is breaking down
Climate change or climate breakdown? Growth or wellbeing? Growth as development? Degrowth? Prosperity without growth? Climate capitalism or ecosocialism?
It matters hugely how this week’s news from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is framed in public debate. The most authoritative scientists tell us that unless global warming is limited to 1.5 degrees above pre-industrial times, the world faces extreme weather events, food shortages, wildfires, dying coral reefs, droughts, floods and poverty for hundreds of millions.
To avoid this outcome, the world economy needs a transformation of unprecedented speed and scale, involving far-reaching changes in society. We have only 12 years, they say, to achieve it by making huge strides towards eliminating greenhouse gases arising from fossil fuels like coal, oil and natural gas. The report underlines the qualitative difference between the 1.5- and 2-degree reductions previously seen as less stark. The case for radical action is reinforced by its finding that on present trends we are heading for more than a 3-degree increase by 2100 – catastrophic territory.
Climate change is an anodyne and demobilising way to describe such urgent tasks and prospective disasters, according to the ecological writer and activist George Monbiot. That’s why he calls his online movement #climatebreakdown. He makes a powerful case for the more dramatic word, to get more people talking about it and media to take the threats much more seriously.
Monbiot is a lunatic, and 25+ years of fear-mongering sure hasn’t worked out so far.
Climate breakdown on this scale poses huge conceptual, ideological and political challenges alongside the physical and technical ones. Herman Daly, whose book on steady-state economics in the 1970s pioneered modern environmental economic analysis, explains in a recent interview that steady-state comes from the realisation that “the economy is a sub-system of a larger system, the ecosphere, which is finite, non-expanding, materially closedâ€. We now “convert too much of nature into ourselves and our stuff, and there’s not enough to provide the biophysical life-support services that we needâ€.
Interesting. Steady state economics preaches about keeping the economy and the population at one size. So, population control. Who controls? Government, of course. Economy? Government is solely in charge.
Another signatory of the letter is Peadar Kirby of the University of Limerick, the author of several books on these themes. His latest work poses the question of pathways beyond the optimism underlying climate capitalism, which claims it will be possible to make the low-carbon transition by technical-scientific means, including large-scale geoengineering. Not so, says Kirby, because capitalism’s commitment to indefinite growth cannot be reconciled with a sustainable future for humanity.
In that case, he argues, we should draw inspiration from the Austrian socialist economist Karl Polanyi who argued in the 1940s and 1950s that capitalism disrupts social relations so profoundly as to provoke periodic movements to counter and reconstruct market power. We are living through such a period, he suggests. Ecosocialism, combining local sustainable initiatives with worldwide analysis and action, is his preferred way forward.
Such alternative ideas are badly needed in these dangerous times.
Huh. So, socialism. Government in full control of the economy. Which means the lives of citizens, too. Strange how Warmists keep going to this same well.
Read: Bummer: Climate Is Totally Breaking Down, Hence, We Need Socialism »
This has made the Washington Post’s Gabriel Pogrund Very Upset
President Trump praised the Confederate general Robert E. Lee whilst asking African American voters to “honor us†by voting for him at an Ohio rally which included an unexpected and provocative monologue on America’s Civil War history.
Addressing an open-air rally of around 4,000 supporters, Trump appeared buoyant as he declared that Lee was a “true great fighter†and “great general.†He also said Abraham Lincoln once had a “phobia†of the Southern leader, whose support of slavery has made his legacy a heavily contested and divisive issue.
The comments came during an anecdote about Ohio-born president Ulysses S. Grant’s alleged drinking problems. “Robert E. Lee was winning battle after battle after battle. And Abraham Lincoln came home, he said, ‘I can’t beat Robert E. Lee’,†Trump said. “They said to Lincoln, ‘You can’t use him anymore, he’s an alcoholic.’ And Lincoln said, ‘I don’t care if he’s an alcoholic, frankly, give me six or seven more just like him.’ He started to win.â€
Minutes earlier, Trump had hailed African American unemployment numbers and asked black voters to “honor us†by voting Republican in November. “Get away from the Democrats,†he told them. “Think of it: we have the best numbers in history … I think we’re going to get the African American vote. And it’s true.†He also celebrated hip-hop artist Kanye West’s visit to the Oval Office on Thursday, adding: “What he did was pretty amazing.â€
Trump’s speech threatened to reignite a highly divisive debate over America’s racial history with just weeks to go until the midterms. Trump has previously defended statues commemorating Confederate leaders, tweeting last year: “Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments.†Critics say such statues glorify historic advocates of slavery.
So, that third paragraph, where the actual context is supposed to reside, is rather tortured, is it not? The article goes on to mention that Ulysses S. Grant being a native born Ohioan, which was the point of the what Trump was saying. Twitchy has a post up about “you’re about to see libs attack Trump” over the Robert E. Lee quote, which includes
WATCH: President Trump says "Robert E. Lee was a great general" during Ohio rally, calling the Confederate leader "incredible." pic.twitter.com/HhsLI1Mk05
— NBC News (@NBCNews) October 13, 2018
But
If you listen to the clip, he’s clearly telling a story and building to the point of Lincoln appointing Grant as Lt. General and head of Army of the Potomac, where he proceeded to take Lee on and win where other Union generals had failed. Y’all are such hacks. https://t.co/SfOC9G196d
— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) October 13, 2018
Trump speaks of the Union generals that came before Grant; great generals, head of their class at West Point, but they didn’t know how to win. And Trump is right. McClellan was a disaster, and would have preferred to keep his army in camp instead of fighting. 2/
— Cam Edwards (@CamEdwards) October 13, 2018
Cam provides a lot more context, worth reading his tweets over at the Twitchy post. And this is yet another example of why the Leftist news media is untrustworthy.
Lee was, in fact, a great fighter and a great general. His record before the Civil War as part of the U.S. military was spectacular, and he did pretty well during the Civil War, up to a point. Even though he was a part of the German military during WWII, we can say that Rommel was a hell of a general, can we not? Admiral Yamamoto was a hell of an admiral, right?
Read: Trump Calls Confederate General Robert E. Lee Great General Or Something »
Remember the story on a high school kid in Harnett County, NC, who was told to remove his patriotic Trump jersey or leave by the principle?
A father tells me his son was asked by the school principal to remove this jersey during a patriotic-themed football game after people complained. Dad, a registered Democrat, says his son complied but felt humiliated. @HarnettCoSchool says it supports expression not disruptions pic.twitter.com/W9U9v2vBLF
— Tim Pulliam (@ABC7Tim) October 10, 2018
Well
(WRAL)Â Harnett Central High School is under new leadership following an incident involving a student at an October 5 football game, according to public information officer Natalie Ferrell.
(background information on the situation)
On Friday, a news release from Harnett County Schools announced leadership changes involving Gordon’s position.
According to the release, effective immediately, Ms. Catherine Jones, current principal at Harnett Primary, will serve as principal at Harnett Central High School.
Additional information about (Cindy) Gordon’s employment status was not made available.
If she was terminated, I would disagree. Yes, she made a big mistake in the way she handled this, which you can bet was as a Trump hater/Hillary supporter. Even in a very Republican leaning county, you can bet school employees are going to lean Democrat. Regardless, I believe it would have been better to treat this as a learning opportunity about people’s 1st Amendment Rights. Even reassigning might be too much, though, with more responsibility comes more penalties.
Read: Principal Who Made Student Take Off Patriotic Trump Jersey Was Replaced »
Can you guess what this all boils down to?
10 ways to accelerate progress against climate change
Climate scientists told us this week in a long-awaited United Nations report that limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would require a gargantuan global effort — and that we have roughly 12 years to do it. But how?
One bright spot in the report is that we already have the tools we need.
Let’s make something clear, though: The emissions we need to focus on now are the ones at the industrial, corporate level, not at the individual level.
Voxinators Eliza Barcley and Umair Ifran even include this tweet which I’ve posted before
Scared by that new report on climate change? Here's what you can do to help:
• Seize the state
• Bring the fossil fuel industry under public ownership, rapidly scale down production
• Fund a massive jobs program to decarbonize every sector of the economy https://t.co/ZZ7lmunfVW
— Kate Aronoff (@KateAronoff) October 9, 2018
Can you see where they’re going? Here are their 10 ides
Price carbon emissions (government)Funny how this works, eh?
…is gravity changing due to too much carbon pollution*, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Climate Change Dispatch, with a post on Warmists wanting to call hurricanes “unnatural disasters.”
*Every once in a while I just have to drop a link to show that I’m not making things up in the leads.
Read: If All You See… »