House Republicans Finally Listen, Pass Bill With Border Wall Funding

By William Teach December 21, 2018 – 6:41 am

We should remember that Congress passed legislation well over a decade ago that required the construction of a border wall, they just haven’t funded it in full

(Breitbart) The House passed a spending bill that includes $5.7 billion in border wall funding, sending the bill to the Senate.

The House passed the spending bill with border wall funding, 217-185, featuring strong Republican support for the bill and no Democrat support for the bill.

The House started a renewed effort to push for $5.7 billion in wall funding after President Donald Trump declared on Thursday that he will not sign a bill that does not include border security funding. Trump also threatened to veto any legislation that comes before him without security funding. The revised funding bill also includes $7.8 billion in disaster relief.

“I’ve made my position very clear,” Trump said. “Any measure that funds the government must include border security.”

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) cheered the bill’s passage in a statement on Thursday, saying, “Tonight the House passed a Continuing Resolution to keep the government open, secure our borders, and provide relief to communities harmed by natural disasters.” (snip)

Meadows also said that he came away with the impression that Trump will not relent on his fight for border security funding, even though Democrats will likely reject the measure in the Senate.

And now it is back over to the Senate

Rep. Perry said that Senate Democrats will face a tough time explaining why they will not vote for funding a border wall.

“Nine Democrats are going to explain to their constituents, their bosses, why they would rather shut down the government than stop the flow of illegal immigrants, human trafficking, and fentanyl and opioids,” Perry said. “If they can make that case to their constituents, God bless them.”

Three Dems look like yes votes to push the bill in the Senate to a floor vote, so six more would be necessary to avoid a filibuster. Chuck Schumer has said the that bill is dead in the Senate, but, is it? Is this the hill Democrats want to die on, defending not securing our southern border against illegal aliens? Does he want to be roasted by President Trump over this? Every shot, every tweet, every message will be on the news for everyone to see.

Read: House Republicans Finally Listen, Pass Bill With Border Wall Funding »

Posted in Current Affairs, Illegal Immigration | 8 Comments | Trackback URL

Inevitable: SJW Group Sues Over Voter ID

By William Teach December 20, 2018 – 2:24 pm

In North Carolina, we voted on a constitutional amendment enshrining voter ID this November, which passed 55.49% to 44.51%. Hence, the NC General Assembly passed a law, which was utterly reasonable in what IDs were required, and the governor vetoed it, which was then over-ridden by the Senate. And now

From the link

Six voters challenging the state’s new photo ID requirements filed a lawsuit minutes after the regulations became law.  The complaint was filed in Wake County Superior Court along with a motion requesting a preliminary injunction, asking the court to halt the implementation of the law until the case can be heard in court.  State lawmakers overrode Governor Cooper’s veto of S 824, Implementation of Voter ID Constitutional Amendment, on the afternoon of Wednesday, December 19, 2018, as part of a lame-duck legislative session in which several members who lost re-election voted in favor of the override.

The full complaint can be found below.

“The North Carolina Constitution provides numerous and inviolable protections for the fundamental right to vote of all its citizens,” Allison Riggs, senior voting rights attorney for the Southern Coalition for Social Justice.  “Just because the North Carolina Constitution now authorizes, with exceptions, the presentation of a picture ID when voting does not mean those other longstanding protections can be ignored or violated.”

Of course, these elitists, who all surely have some sort of ID that would be approved, feel that minorities are too stupid to get an ID (free ID’s were enshrined in the new law, and were also baked into previous state law

purposefully discriminating against and disproportionately impacting African-American and American-Indian qualified voters, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause in Article 1, § 19;

Why do they always feel that Blacks need protecting? Rather patronizing and racist, eh?

unduly burdening the fundamental right to vote, in violation of the Equal Protection Clause in Article 1, § 19;

Considering how many other states require some form of ID along the way, and that pretty much most people have one, how is this a burden?

They throw a few other reasons at the wall, but, at the end of the day, no one is disenfranchised, since there are measures for those who show up without and ID, as well. What this is really about is making sure that people who shouldn’t be voting won’t be stopped.

Read: Inevitable: SJW Group Sues Over Voter ID »

Posted in NC News | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach December 20, 2018 – 1:00 pm

…is a world turning to desert from too much carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Elephants, with a post on TDS and how it works.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Coons, Flake Introduce National Carbon Tax

By William Teach December 20, 2018 – 10:30 am

They say that it will raise the incomes of working Americans by sending them a government check

If Coons wants to lead, when will he give up his own use of fossil fuels and make his life carbon neutral? Oh, right, right, he’s rich, and can afford to keep living his life the same. He’ll just pay a small penalty or carbon offset for his own bad behavior.

From Coon’s webpage

U.S. Senators Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) today introduced bipartisan legislation to pay a monthly dividend to every American family.  The Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act places an increasing price on carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions, designed to drive down pollution, address climate change, and encourage market-driven innovation in clean energy technologies.  Revenues received will be returned directly to the American people in the form of a monthly dividend, protecting energy consumers and low- and middle-income households.  The legislation aims to help accelerate American innovation to advance clean energy solutions, incentivize our trading partners to lower emissions, and prevent thousands of pollution-related deaths annually. A related bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Congressmen Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), Francis Rooney (R-Fla.), John Delaney (D-Md.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Penn.), and Charlie Christ (D-Fla.).

“Climate change is a serious threat to our economy, our security, and our way of life, and we need leadership from all parts of our society and government to tackle it,” said Senator Coons.  “Putting an economy-wide price on carbon and other greenhouse gases is a comprehensive way to reduce emissions, spur innovation, and create jobs.  I am proud to introduce this legislation with my good friend Jeff Flake, who has long been a champion of market-based climate legislation since his days in the House.  I am hopeful that we will continue to have bipartisan conversations about addressing this issue.” (snip)

A one-pager on the bill is available here.

The bill text is available here.

Let’s take a quick look at that one pager

Carbon Dividend – The legislation rebates 100% of net revenues from the carbon fee to the American people as a monthly dividend. This protects consumers and the economy, maintains revenue neutrality, and offsets cost increases for most Americans, including low- and middle income Americans. An equal share is provided to all adults with a Social Security Number or Taxpayer Identification Number and a half share is provided on account of children. Additionally, the first payment is made one month in advance so that families and households are able to cover any increased energy costs.

In essence, he and the others are admitting that this will drastically skyrocket the cost of living for low and middle income Americans. So Government gives money to citizens, which makes them more reliant to Government, and more under the thumb of Government. Funny how that works.

Apparently, getting serious about ‘climate change’ means artificially increasing the cost of living, hosing the middle and lower classes, and increasing the power and scope of the federal government.

This will, of course, never see the light of day in the GOP run US Senate.

Read: Coons, Flake Introduce National Carbon Tax »

Posted in Democrats, Global Warming | 56 Comments | Trackback URL

Say, What Would Jesus Say About ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

By William Teach December 20, 2018 – 7:00 am

So, yeah, of course it’s that time of the year where the Cult of Climastrology attempts to link their insane anti-science beliefs to all things Christmas, and there is nothing more Christmas than Jesus. UK Guardian writer Megan Mayhew makes a big, big admission about ‘climate change’, though

What would Jesus do? Talking with evangelicals about climate change

I was, frankly, nervous about speaking to people of faith in the south about climate change. I wrestled with my own preconceived notions and past experiences, and was surprised when conversations took inspiring, if not transcendent, turns.

Secular as I am now, I still think fondly of my childhood minister, Dr Lehman, who loved college basketball and Honda Accords (he drove 13 of them during his lifetime). At the conclusion of each Lakeside Baptist service, he’d call the eastern North Carolina congregation to action.

In other words, she’s an anti-Christian religion bigot.

My frustration from those years has at times stopped me from reaching out to those in the faith-based community, especially regarding political issues like climate change. I’m aware of my own bias, the way it was formed by negative experiences, and how it limits my understanding of believers and their choices. This realization helps me understand why believers might in turn have problems connecting with someone like me.

She made a big woopsie there, because Warmists are not supposed to tell us that this about anything other than science.

I spoke with people of faith in Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina and Virginia, and it became clear that the primary barrier to climate action is the fact that it’s been yoked with the liberal agenda. Climate activist and author Anna Jane Joyner, whose father is the pastor of a megachurch in North Carolina, writes that she grew up lumping “environmentalists in with hippies and liberals and all the other people who were probably going to hell”.

Of course, ‘climate change’ has little to do with the environment, because the climate is always changing.

Anyhow, sorry, there is zero mention of Jesus beyond the headline. Because Jesus would probably say something along the lines of “stay out of the politics of Caesar and preach the Lord’s word.” Seriously, these same people who like to trot out Jesus’ name for their ‘climate change’ nuttbaggery also are the ones who sue to get everything Christmas removed from the public domain.

Read: Say, What Would Jesus Say About ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

Posted in Christmas, Global Warming, Unhinged Tools | 24 Comments | Trackback URL

One Of The Illegals Released By Wake County Sheriff Assaulted Woman, Causing Her To Drop Baby

By William Teach December 20, 2018 – 6:46 am

It’s not like we didn’t know this was going to happen: Gerald Baker pretty much said he was going to make sure that the Wake County Sheriff’s office would refuse to enforce laws Baker didn’t like. And we know from yesterday that he let 16 illegals go, with the potential to release more. Here’s one of them

Wake sheriff’s move may mean stepped up immigration enforcement

Federal immigration officials are not happy after they say a violent offender who is in the country illegally walked out of the Wake County jail Monday after he was accused of hitting a woman during a domestic dispute.

New Wake County Sheriff Gerald Baker says he will not participate in 287G, the federal program where local jails check the immigration status of people arrested and detain them.

One of those people was Jose Cordero-Jimenez, who is charged with assaulting a woman.

According to the arrest warrant, Cordero-Jimenez punched and kicked the victim before she dropped their infant son twice.

After his arrest, he was released the same day on a $2,500 bond.

Under the federal 287G program that the former Wake sheriff complied with, the suspect would have been held and handed over to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, but Baker ran on a promise to stop that cooperation.

Even in the era of #MeToo, Liberals cannot find it in themselves to be outraged over a violent illegal alien who assaulted a woman repeatedly being let out of jail rather than being turned over to ICE.

ICE officials say this means they have no choice but to go out into the community and look for those in the country illegally.

“When public safety threats are released back into the community, they are free to re-offend in the time that it takes between their release and the time it takes to locate these individuals and to re-arrest them to take them back into custody,” said ICE spokesman Bryan Cox.

And these illegals often disappear and never return for their court dates. But, when they do, ICE will now be present at the Wake County courthouse.

Baker said the ICE detainment policy is divisive.

“It only serves to further divide and intimidate the citizens of Wake County. It is a policy decision made by ICE to step up enforcement efforts in neighborhoods and at work sites,” Baker has said.

Enforcing the law is divisive? Who knew!

Said Baker: “Cox seems to imply that my office is under a duty to notify ICE when a person is released on bond. This is not the case. We are not an arm of the federal government.”

So, if a kidnapper was caught, and, remember, that is a crime whereby Los Federales get involve, he wouldn’t bother notifying the FBI because it’s the job of the federal government? Seriously, how long does it take to make a call, send an email? It’s always some excuse with these illegal alien lovers. Again, I’m looking forward to all the Outraged articles about ICE making sweeps in Wake County, picking illegals up at court, and so forth.

Read: One Of The Illegals Released By Wake County Sheriff Assaulted Woman, Causing Her To Drop Baby »

Posted in Illegal Immigration, NC News | Comments Off on One Of The Illegals Released By Wake County Sheriff Assaulted Woman, Causing Her To Drop Baby | Trackback URL

Baltimore Women Does Gun Buy Back, Plans To Get Bigger Gun

By William Teach December 19, 2018 – 3:07 pm

Government at work, folks (via Twitchy)

Twenty-five dollars for rifle magazines that carry more than 10 rounds, one-hundred dollars for revolvers, pump and bolt action weapons, two-hundred dollars for semi-automatic weapons and five-hundred dollars for full-auto weapons.

Thing is, that semi-auto pistol mostly likely cost more than she got back. Unless it’s old and worn out, not worth it. And, a fully automatic weapon? That would most likely be illegal to possess.

The Mayor and Police Commissioner say the gun buyback program is another tool in the waged war against violent crime some research shows gun buyback programs are not effective in reducing violent crime in urban settings.

Mayor Pugh told FOX45, “Our point here is, there are guns on the streets of our city. We are signaling folks out there, we don’t care if its grandpa’s gun or your gun, we want it.”

What they mostly get back are guns that were stolen. They give the thieves money, then they steal more guns.

Read: Baltimore Women Does Gun Buy Back, Plans To Get Bigger Gun »

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Liberal World | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach December 19, 2018 – 1:00 pm

…is a holiday where people take long fossil fueled trips to visit people which is horrible, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Scoop, with a post on a lawsuit to get Trump’s tax records getting shut down.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 16 Comments | Trackback URL

Deranged Warmist Names New Creature After Trump

By William Teach December 19, 2018 – 12:17 pm

Remember, though, that politics has nothing to do with science

Blind creature that buries head in sand named after Donald Trump

A newly discovered blind and burrowing amphibian is to be officially named Dermophis donaldtrumpi, in recognition of the US president’s climate change denial.

The name was chosen by the boss of EnviroBuild, a sustainable building materials company, who paid $25,000 (£19,800) at an auction for the right. The small legless creature was found in Panama and EnviroBuild’s Aidan Bell said its ability to bury its head in the ground matched Donald Trump’s approach to global warming.

Trump’s distinctive hair has already led to comparisons to a poisonous furry caterpillar and a golden-plumed pheasant, while a yellow-crowned moth was called Neopalpa donaldtrumpi in 2017. (snip)

The newly discovered creature is a caecilian and its naming rights were auctioned to raise money for the Rainforest Trust. The scientists who found the 10cm amphibian have agreed to use the name Dermophis donaldtrumpi when they officially publish the discovery in scientific literature.

Bell said: “It is the perfect name. Caecilian is taken from the Latin caecus,meaning ‘blind’, perfectly mirroring the strategic vision President Trump has consistently shown towards climate change.”

The funny part is that these scientists take long fossil fueled trips to search for new species. And that their Trump Derangement Syndrome is so great that Trump now has something that is named after him and will be for thousands of years if not more.

Read: Deranged Warmist Names New Creature After Trump »

Posted in Global Warming, Unhinged Tools | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Democrats Promise “Dawn Of New Era” On ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

By William Teach December 19, 2018 – 7:03 am

Do they understand that this will be a mostly wasted effort? That they’ll have lots of speeches and votes and such and then the legislation will die in the Senate?

Democrat led U.S. House to take on climate change says Markey

A Democratic majority in the U.S. House in January will mark the “dawn of a new era” in fighting climate change, according to U.S. Sen. Ed Markey.

Markey held a morning meeting Monday at his Boston office with representatives of more than 20 environmental groups to discuss priorities for the new Congress. Addressing reporters afterwards, he outlined an agenda that includes items that have yet to become law at the state level: a transition to 100 percent clean energy, and a carbon-pricing system.

Along with achieving 100 percent clean energy within the next 20 years and laying down markets for putting a price on carbon, Markey’s climate action priorities include promoting energy efficiency, halting fossil fuel exports, and ushering in offshore wind, which he described as the next frontier in clean energy.

Markey, a Malden Democrat, is set to serve in a Senate that remains under Republican control, while this year’s midterm elections ushered in a new Democratic majority in the House. The flip in House control means the dynamic is now different in Washington, Markey said.

“A green agenda can come out of the House of Representatives that then empowers the senators who care about these issues, including Republicans, because it will no longer be a bottled up agenda,” he said. “This agenda is now about to become real. It’s about to become alive.”

First, if Markey remembers, it was primarily Democrats from his state, Massachusetts, who blocked the Cape Wind project for well over a decade. Second, and more importantly, nothing Markey proposes will make it out of committee for a vote. When the people get a vote, they turn down any type of carbon taxing scheme. Halting the exportation of a fully legal commodity? Expect massive lawsuits if that passed, which it won’t. It won’t even get a vote, unless Mitch McConnell wants to embarrass Democrats and show them for the big government wankers they are.

100% clean energy in 20 years? Not unless someone creates something new. If offshore windfarms are so great, why aren’t Cult of Climastrology towns and states, such as California, slapping them up all over?

“We are going to save all of creation by engaging in massive job creation,” he said.

Say, has Mr. Markey stopped using fossil fuels himself?

Read: Democrats Promise “Dawn Of New Era” On ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Democrats, Global Warming | 4 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove