If All You See…

By William Teach January 4, 2019 – 1:00 pm

…is a world blurry from too much carbon pollution in the air, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Watcher Of Weasels, with a post on catching a Progressive being good.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 29 Comments | Trackback URL

Here We Go: Excitable Brad Sherman Re-Introduces Articles Of Impeachment

By William Teach January 4, 2019 – 11:03 am

 

You know he’s totes serious because he used a hashtag

He even refers to his unhinged screed back in 2017

The Case For Impeaching Donald J. Trump
If Trump is impeached, it will not be for the initial crime, but for the cover-up.

Blah blah blah

Pretty much. Anyhow, good luck with this. Even if it makes it to the House floor (mostly likely it will be tabled in committee, not even getting a vote there), it won’t pass. And even in the minuscule chance it does pass, it won’t pass in the Senate.

Read: Here We Go: Excitable Brad Sherman Re-Introduces Articles Of Impeachment »

Posted in Democrats, Unhinged Tools | 13 Comments | Trackback URL

Pelosi Yammers On About The “Existential Threat” Of ‘Climate Change’ During Opening Remarks

By William Teach January 4, 2019 – 7:20 am

Well, she has her Duck Speak down pat

‘The existential threat of our time’: Pelosi elevates climate change on Day One

Democrats put climate change back on the forefront of their governing agenda Thursday, portraying the issue as an “existential threat” even as the caucus remains split over how forcefully to respond.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi brought up the issue in her opening address while touting a new select panel to come up with ideas on how to solve it, and the Energy and Commerce Committee announced that climate change would be the subject of its very first hearing this year. (snip)

The Democrats’ change in tone is evident in the name of the new panel. It is now called the “Select Committee on the Climate Crisis,” compared to a focus on “energy independence and global warming” when Democrats formed a similar panel was formed a decade ago.

“We must … face the existential threat of our time: the climate crisis,” Pelosi said in her opening address to Congress Thursday. “The entire Congress must work to put an end to the inaction and denial of science that threaten the planet and the future.”

By “we” she means you, as you do not see Pelosi calling on all Democrats to give up their own use of fossil fuels, for which most members use a lot. Heck, how much does Pelosi herself use to fly to and from California many times a year? You do not see her turning off the lights in the House and the members offices, which rely mostly on coal for energy, do you? Removing meat from the taxpayer funded cafeteria, do you? Telling members to take the bus or rail, do you? Living in tiny homes or living together, do you? How about lowering the temp in the House and member offices to 62?

And while people might say they care about ‘climate change’, they care a lot, lot, lot more about other issues over it. It really is a minor issue on the list of things people care about. The majority of people who are actually trying to Do Something (meaning forcing Other People to comply) wouldn’t be negatively affected by the policies, because they are rich. Like Pelosi.

Read: Pelosi Yammers On About The “Existential Threat” Of ‘Climate Change’ During Opening Remarks »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Democrats, Global Warming | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Rep Steve Cohen (D-Tn) Introduces Constitutional Amendment To Eliminate Electoral College Or Something

By William Teach January 4, 2019 – 7:04 am

Various Democrats have already called for eliminating the Senate, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Office, all because they lost to Trump in 2016. The Washington Post editorial board is yammering on about the House Democrats wanting to “restore Democracy”, but, this is about making sure that a lot of people’s votes do not count

Good luck getting all the necessary votes to get this passed. But, he’s not just going with eliminating the electoral college

(The Hill) Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tn.), a vocal critic of President Trump, on Thursday introduced two bills to eliminate the electoral college and prevent presidents from pardoning themselves or their family members.

Cohen introduced the constitutional amendments on the first night of the 116th Congress, both digs at Trump.

“Presidents should not pardon themselves, their families, their administration or campaign staff,” Cohen said in a statement. “This constitutional amendment would expressly prohibit this and any future president, from abusing the pardon power.”

The amendments are unlikely to pass since they require a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress and then must be ratified by three-fourths of states.

The pardon thing is based on Cohen’s unhinged belief that Trump’s kids will get indicted for something or other.

“In two presidential elections since 2000, including the most recent one in which Hillary Clinton won 2.8 million more votes than her opponent, the winner of the popular vote did not win the election because of the distorting effect of the outdated Electoral College,” Cohen said in his statement announcing the constitutional amendment. “Americans expect and deserve the winner of the popular vote to win office.”

“More than a century ago, we amended our Constitution to provide for the direct election of U.S. Senators,” he added. “It is past time to directly elect our President and Vice President.”

First, the 17th Amendment was a disaster, as it took away almost all the power of the state governments themselves to have representation in the federal government, which was the entire point of the Senate. Second, the massive expansion of the federal government started the minute the 17th was passed. Third, we are a federal republic: direct election of Senators removed much of that, and using the popular vote would eliminate it. Power would only be in a few states and cities.

But, yeah, this is the “Dems Can’t Stand Losing According To The Rules” bill.

Read: Rep Steve Cohen (D-Tn) Introduces Constitutional Amendment To Eliminate Electoral College Or Something »

Posted in Constitution, Democrats | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Looking Deeper Into The Democrats “Green New Deal” As They Take Over The House

By William Teach January 3, 2019 – 5:02 pm

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is telling us what the new unhinged Statist wing of the Democrats want to do (via Twitchy)

And that Green Deal?

He’s not kidding. Let’s check Section 6 (B) in that file

  • (i) provide all members of our society, across all regions and all communities, the opportunity, training and education to be a full and equal participant in the transition, including through a job guarantee program to assure a living wage job to every person who wants one
  • (iv) ensure a ‘just transition’ for all workers, low-income communities, communities of color, indigenous communities, rural and urban communities and the front-line communities most affected by climate change, pollution and other environmental harm including by ensuring that local implementation of the transition is led from the community level and by prioritizing solutions that end the harms faced by front-line communities from climate change and environmental pollution;
  • (v) protect and enforce sovereign rights and land rights of tribal nations;
  • (vi) mitigate deeply entrenched racial, regional and gender-based inequalities in income and wealth (including, without limitation, ensuring that federal and other investment will be equitably distributed to historically impoverished, low income, deindustrialized or other marginalized communities in such a way that builds wealth and ownership at the community level);
  • (vii) include additional measures such as basic income programs, universal health care programs and any others as the select committee may deem appropriate to promote economic security, labor market flexibility and entrepreneurism; and
  • (viii) deeply involve national and local labor unions to take a leadership role in the process of job training and worker deployment.

Once again, it looks like the “greens” are really about red: call it socialism, communism, Marxism, Progressivism, whatever, it’s all the same thing, using ‘climate change’ and a bit of environmentalism to push hardcore leftist beliefs.

Number 5 is a howler: the same people who want to protect sovereign rights and land rights of Indians want the complete opposite for our borders and protection for illegal aliens, as well as telling everyone how they handle their own property. Remember the Waters of The U.S. rule?

Read: Looking Deeper Into The Democrats “Green New Deal” As They Take Over The House »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 10 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach January 3, 2019 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible evil sub causing obesity which is bad for climate change (but we can all be totally body positive about it), you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Geller Report, with a post on a Washington Post reporter chanting death to America and death to Israel, among others.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | Comments Off on If All You See… | Trackback URL

Washington Post Offers Lots Of (Big Government) Ideas To Solve Hotcoldwetdry

By William Teach January 3, 2019 – 10:30 am

The Washington Post and their staff could do their part by giving up their own use of fossil fuels to gather and disseminate the news, along with using only solar panels and wind turbines to power their operations….oh, right, right, it’s all about you being forced

How we can combat climate change

Last year’s report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change sounded the alarm: The world has until 2030 to implement “rapid and far-reaching” changes to our energy, infrastructure and industrial systems to avoid 2 degrees Celsius of warming, which could be catastrophic. But the scale of the challenge can appear so overwhelming that it’s hard to know where to start. The Post asked activists, politicians and researchers for climate policy ideas that offer hope. Radical change from one state, or even the whole United States, won’t address climate change on its own, but taking these actions could help start the planet down a path toward a better future.

11 policy ideas to protect the planet

When you look at that list, you realize that other than two, nuclear and open electric markets, every single one of them involves the growth and power of Government, from the local to the state to the federal level. And that your cost of living and choice/freedom will be reduced.

As far as nuclear goes, they do not want to build new plants, ones that are that last generation, no, they just want to make sure they stay open till “green” energy is up and running. For the electric markets, this doesn’t include anything but wind and solar. They think introducing this competition will decrease costs, despite wind and solar being vastly more expensive. You know that they would block natural gas plants.

The Green New Deal is cute

While the Green New Deal would require a scale of government action not seen since the Great Depression and World War II, this type of job-creating policy is extremely popular and could ensure economic security to millions of Americans for the first time in decades, especially people of color and poor or middle-class Americans who have been left out of the economic gains of the past four decades. We can solve the biggest challenge humanity has ever faced and protect our air, water and land for future generations.

Young people have a right to good jobs and a livable future. The Green New Deal is a winning plan for both.

Funny how this looks exactly like every other Statist type proposal which grows government and looks like social justice warrioring.

You can bet that if we put a carbon tax on news orgs which use lots of fossil fuels and lots of trees to make their papers, as well as lots of energy to broadcast the news, the news media would give up their affection and preoccupation with ‘climate change’.

Read: Washington Post Offers Lots Of (Big Government) Ideas To Solve Hotcoldwetdry »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Almost All Paris Climate Agreement Nations Are Missing Their Commitments

By William Teach January 3, 2019 – 8:36 am

Is it still “historic” if nations are bothering to implement it?

Almost all countries have fallen short on climate change commitments

The Paris agreement set a goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial levels. Climate Action Tracker measures countries’ progress toward meeting this goal and the latest report finds that just two countries, The Gambia and Morocco, currently have policies that meet the 1.5-degree target.

Scientific evidence shows that a 2-degree warmer world will be far more disastrous for civilization than a world that warms by 1.5 degrees or less.

Climate Action Tracker’s Yvonne Deng notes that the group’s ratings take into account the unique situations of each country. (snip)

In addition to rating each of the countries’ commitments under Paris, Climate Action Tracker also uses what they call their CAT Thermometer, a tool that measures global temperature rise under various scenarios. For example, they’ve calculated that if countries do what they’ve committed to doing under the Paris agreements, the world will see a rise of about 3 degrees Celsius by the end of this century.

Huh. So the commitments wouldn’t be 1.5C or 2C, but 3C? Despite the world temperature going up just .9C since 1850? And only two are on track for the 1.5C goal? Where are all the other nations who were super enthused? I’m guess that all the restrictions and taxes and rises in the cost of living aren’t helping.

Hey, maybe it has to do with the people realizing that people who think of themselves as our political masters are making all sorts of deals to force citizens to pay more and lose freedom while jetting all over the world and living the high life on the public dime.

Read: Almost All Paris Climate Agreement Nations Are Missing Their Commitments »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

At White House Meeting, Democrats Refused To Even Listen To Briefing On Border Security

By William Teach January 3, 2019 – 8:25 am

One of the assigned duties per the U.S. Constitution for the federal government is to protect the borders of the nation. Things like Medicare for all, ‘climate change’, free college (which will be worth what it costs), and so much of the rest of the Democrats agenda is not. Yet, this is what we get

OFFICIAL: DEMS ‘REFUSED’ TO EVEN LISTEN TO BORDER SECURITY BRIEFING AT WHITE HOUSE

Democratic lawmakers brought a border security briefing at the White House to a screeching halt Wednesday, refusing to even listen to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, a White House official tells The Daily Caller. (video at the link)

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy echoed this version of events to reporters outside the White House immediately after the briefing, saying, “Once the secretary started, Schumer interrupted her and didn’t want to hear it.”

Republican and Democratic lawmakers after the meeting indicated little progress was made toward ending the partial government shutdown and that they agreed to reconvene Friday. The White House official says there was a consensus in the room that negotiations would be put on hold until Pelosi officially assumed her expected role of Speaker.

The White House official told TheDC that both Pelosi and Schumer refused to hear out Nielsen’s briefing and instead advocated for two solutions to end the government shutdown. Neither of the Democratic options would provide the additional funding for border security requested by The White House.

“Democrats in the room either don’t care that there is a humanitarian crisis on the border or just prefer ignorance. It was incredibly disheartening that they don’t want to know the facts when making policy,” DHS Spokeswoman Katie Waldman said in a statement to TheDC.

NBC News also reported the same

“We never did get through the complete briefing,” McCarthy said, which was led by Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, who beamed in via video link from California. “I was a little disappointed with some on the other side. Once the secretary started, Senator Schumer interrupted her and they really didn’t want to hear it.”

Just seconds after Nielsen began her presentation, according to two sources familiar with the meeting, House Speaker-designate Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif cut in. Democrats redirected the conversation to how they planned to open the government once they take control of the House tomorrow.

It’s almost like they don’t care about border security

Before interrupting – and effectively halting – the White House meeting on border security Wednesday, the likely speaker of the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., vowed “nothing for the wall” will come in talks to end the government shutdown.

“No, nothing for the wall,” Pelosi told NBC News’ Savannah Guthrie in an interview that will air Thursday on “Today.” “We’re talking about border security.”

The Democrats are offering $1.3 billion for border security, but that is not for any new wall sections, only for “enhanced surveillance” and “fortified fencing”, maybe a few drones to be able to count the illegals as they cross in and disappear. Many are saying that Trump torched a $2.5 billion compromise, but, the thing is, that was something floated by VP Mike Pence, which Democrats had zero intention of agreeing to.

So, here we are, with a party that has no care about securing out borders and protecting our citizens.

Read: At White House Meeting, Democrats Refused To Even Listen To Briefing On Border Security »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 21 Comments | Trackback URL

Who’s Up For Eight Steps You Can Take To Thwart ‘Climate Change’?

By William Teach January 2, 2019 – 4:20 pm

It’s a brand new year, so, Elaina Hancock at the U of Connecticut offers some helpful advice…I wonder how much electricity is used by UConn to operate?

Want to Thwart Climate Change? Here are 8 Steps You Can Take

Now that the New Year’s Eve party is over, it’s time to lay off the balloons and glitter – both are scourges to the environment.

UConn faculty members make the case for those and other personal lifestyle changes that can help protect the environment for future generations.

Skip the balloons, and glitter, and coffee cups, and plastic bags …

Plastics in the environment are bad news. Besides leading to immense gyres of plastics in the ocean, plastics in the environment break down into microplastics, says Michael Willig, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology and director of UConn’s Center for Environmental Sciences and Engineering. “Broken down by UV radiation abrasion during transport,” he says, “these plastics are transformed into microplastics that range in size from the barely visible (a few millimeters) to the invisible (within the range of nanoparticles).”

Microplastics obstruct digestive tracts of animals. And, Willig, says animals can also absorb and concentrate other chemical contaminants such as heavy metals and pesticides, potentially magnifying exposure to these contaminants to species further up the food chain, potentially with significant effects on humans and top predators.

Actually, those aren’t that bad, but, they are about protecting the environment, and have nothing to do with Hotcoldwetdry. Let’s look at the others

Reduce Seasonal Sodium

Actually, not a bad idea, as this is referring to the use of salt brine and similar stuff, which is seriously overused to protect the roads for drivers during winter weather events, and has actually been shown to create salt water marshes in areas nowhere near oceans. They are often sprayed early to make people believe the government is Doing Something, and they often wash away before being helpful.

  • Turn Down the Heat (they never tell us what we’re supposed to turn it down too. I keep mine at 68 in the winter. Should I turn it to 65? To what?)
  • Get Lazy with Lawn Care (you can bet the neighborhood association and/or city government will have an issue with this)
  • Plant Natives – They Make Good Neighbors (nothing to do with AGW)
  • Protect Green Space (necessary in big liberal cities which have paved over most of it)
  • Express Yourself (this is about spreading awareness as opposed to changing your own life)
  • Don’t Wait to Start! (the phrase “Lead by example, it’s contagious” is included. Yet, almost none do)

Mostly, these have nothing to do with ‘climate change’, and aren’t really Doing Something. Just give up your use of fossil fuels, Warmists, and live like it’s 1499.

Read: Who’s Up For Eight Steps You Can Take To Thwart ‘Climate Change’? »

Posted in Global Warming | Comments Off on Who’s Up For Eight Steps You Can Take To Thwart ‘Climate Change’? | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove