…is a horrible, evil, no good golf course sucking down water and causing temperatures to skyrocket, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on three scary words.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a horrible, evil, no good golf course sucking down water and causing temperatures to skyrocket, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on three scary words.
Read: If All You See… »
As we’ve seen, where there’s smoke there’s usually fire when it comes to the way the FBI under Mr. Obama was going after Trump, his campaign, and his people
Senators: Strzok-Page Texts Suggest FBI Wanted to Develop Sources Within Trump Administration
Two top Republican senators are asking Attorney General William Barr to look into text messages between former FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page that suggest that shortly after the 2016 election, the FBI wanted to develop sources within the incoming Trump administration for surveillance purposes.
Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) wrote in a letter to Barr on Thursday:
[I]n the course of our oversight work we have reviewed certain text messages that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trump’s transition team. In text messages exchanged between former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, the two discussed the possibility of developing ‘potential relationships’ at a November 2016 FBI briefing for presidential transition team staff.
While discussing who should attend the briefing, Strzok texted Page on November 17, 2016: “If Katie’s husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships.â€
Grassley and Johnson wrote that the nature of the communications and the precise purpose of any attempts to “develop relationships†with Trump or Pence transition team staff “are not immediately clear.â€
“Were these efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations? Further, did any such surveillance activities continue beyond the inauguration, and in the event they did, were those activities subject to proper predication?
“Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed,†they wrote.
These are questions that need to be answered. We got the investigation into Trump and his campaign and Russia Russia Russia, which was a big fail for the Trump haters on the left and the #NeverTrumpers on the right. Now it is time to investigate just how parts of the Executive Office, as led by President Barack H. Obama, spied on a presidential candidate.
Read: Did FBI Consider Infiltrating Presidential Elect Trump’s Administration? »
This is a new one, in my experience. I’ve witnessed many a Warmist complain about the news media not providing enough (doomsaying) coverage of anthropogenic climate change. Further, they’ve taken to whining when news allows skeptics to debate and reply. I don’t think I’ve seen a Warmist make this case, though
Climate change reporting should be obligatory
By any objective standards, the global climate and biodiversity crisis should be front page news almost every day. Rationally, you would expect updates on the battle to maintain a habitable biosphere to also be leading most TV and radio news bulletins. We do not, it seems, live in a world governed by reason
Let’s note one thing: people often think of the word “obligatory” as something one should really do. Many bloggers will write headlines like “Obligatory Post On Something”. But, looking at the dictionary, we get “required by a legal, moral, or other rule; compulsory.” So, some of that is by actual government.
Climate breakdown has been labelled the “problem from hellâ€. Sphinx-like, it appears both remote and abstract, yet simultaneously overwhelming and complex. If ever a crisis seemed designed to stymie humanity’s ability or will to confront it, this is it.
While Ireland’s collective response to the climate crisis has been woeful, the 2017 report by the Citizens Assembly revealed a previously untapped public appetite for radical action. This in turn gave the political impetus for the creation of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate Action (JCCA).
People get most of their information via the media, and the prominence it gives to a story shapes how seriously the public regard it. Since the climate crisis is covered only fitfully, and often simply framed as a dispute between opposing factions, it’s hardly a surprise that so many people have no idea just how dire the situation already is.
The JCCA report recommends: ‘the imposition of climate change content quotas on all licensed broadcasters’ as is now the case for news and current affairs. This is a bold, potentially transformative proposal, as it would require broadcasters to develop expertise and real depth in this crucial field.
And boom, there it is: governmental laws requiring certain coverage of Hotcoldwetdry, and you know that the regulations would require it be covered only towards the Warmist side, while disallowing skeptical coverage. And they could get away with it in much of the world, where they do not have anything like the 1st Amendment, which protects freedom of the press. The Cult of Climastrology is most certainly Authoritarian.
Read: ‘Climate Change’ Reporting Should Be “Obligatory” Or Something »
Open Borders advocates are a crazy group. They say they’re not for the criminals, they want them gone. Just keep the good ones (stop me if you’ve heard this before). Yet, they keep doing all they can to protect all of them. Remember the incident in the UK in 2018 where a bunch of people raised hell on an airplane to stop the deportation of an illegal back to Somalia?
(UK Daily Mail) Officials escorting Yaqub Ahmed on a flight from Heathrow to Turkey were forced to abandon his deportation when around a dozen holidaymakers who felt sorry for him angrily intervened shortly before take-off.
At one stage during the astonishing episode, filmed on mobile phones, one traveller complained: ‘They’re separating him from his family’, while others chanted ‘take him off the plane’.
When harassed security guards caved in and walked 29-year-old Ahmed off the Turkish Airlines flight, he was seen thanking those on board for their support as they cheered and applauded.
But the passengers who thought they were doing a good deed were unaware that the man they were defending had been sentenced to nine years in jail for his part in a vicious gang rape of a teenage girl – and that another member of his gang later fought for Islamic State in Syria.
He and his compatriots gang raped a 16 year old girl. As one person stated when the real info came out “Well done silly interfering, self-seeking, do-gooding idiots!’” Now, of course, at least for Ahmed, he was a refugee. The Open Borders advocates want them to have a free pass, as well, and would block the deportation flight of a rapist in Washington
Sanctuary Airports: Washington State Official Bans Deportation of Criminal Illegal Aliens
An executive order by King County, Washington, Executive Dow Constantine signed this week bans the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency from using the King County International Airport, commonly known as Boeing Field, to deport all illegal aliens from the country, including those convicted of crimes against Americans.
Constantine, in a statement, said his decision to ban ICE from using the airport to charter deportation flights of criminal illegal aliens is because King County “respects the rights of all people.â€
“Here in King County, we are a welcoming community that respects the rights of all people,†Constantine said. “My Executive Order seeks to make sure all those who do business with King County uphold the same values.â€
“Our goal is to ban flights of immigrant detainees from our publicly owned airport, and I hope members of Congress shine a light on this practice and how it is currently funded,†Constantine continued.
Of course, he can’t necessarily legally do this, because federal law takes precedence over state, county, and local law on the subject of immigration. Plus, airports tend to be under the jurisdiction of Los Federales, as this is interstate and international travel. You can put all your money in betting that ICE will visibly move illegals and other deportees through Boeing Field.
Read: Not Open Borders: Washington Airports Ban Deportation Of Illegal Aliens »
…is a sea that will soon rise and swamp all the coastal cities…soon!!!!…, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on a German women’s mag showing how to treat stab wounds after unfettered immigration from Islamist areas.
Read: If All You See… »
Hyper-Warmist Bill De Blasio isn’t looking to ban all hot dogs sales in NYC (yet), as has been going around
Hot dogs may become harder to find following the approval of New York City’s version of the Green New Deal as local politicians pick of the sword to take on climate change.
On Monday, Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-N.Y.) slapped his signature on his city’s blueprint for combatting climate change. Following in the footsteps of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the city passed a Green New Deal to mobilize the city’s resources to combat climate change.
Unfortunately for hot dog lovers, the plan includes a goal of eliminating processed meat from all city-owned property.
According to NYC’s Green New Deal, hot dogs must go if New Yorkers want to maintain a “livable climate.†The plan details the city’s goal of “reducing the purchasing of beef and phasing out the purchasing of processed meat†from all city-owned facilities.
Now, Snopes jumped into this, based on the erroneous report by an iHeart radio affiliate claiming all hot dogs would be banned from NYC, which ran through social media like wildfire. That is false. But, in attempting to show this is false, Snopes drops the ball
First, hot dogs are not being banned throughout the city. The city government plans to reduce the purchase of processed meats consumed at city-run facilities, such as hospitals, public schools, and correctional facilities, but this policy will have no effect on vendors, restaurants, grocery stores, or any other privately owned businesses that sell hot dogs, or on their customers who eat them.
Second, the city’s plan to reduce the consumption of hot dogs is only partly based on an effort to “improve climate.†NYC’s “Green New Deal†policies are part of the city’s “OneNYC 2050: Building a Strong and Fair City†strategy. While these policies address climate-change issues, they also deal with community well-being and the general health of the city’s population. The section of OneNYC 2050 dealing with processed meats can actually be found in the “Healthy Living†portion of this strategy. More specifically, the section dealing with processed meats explains that reducing the consumption of hot dogs will lower the risk of heart disease and cancer.
So, just banned for government facilities, and, that OneNYC 2050 is really primarily about ‘climate change’. The fact that it would lower risks of heart disease and cancer is just a byproduct. A lower ranking reasoning.
Here’s the relevant section of OneNYC 2050 (emphasis ours):
ADOPT MORE SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION PRACTICES IN CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
The City will shift away from goods that have an outsized impact on the environment and identify opportunities to reduce waste and cut GHG emissions throughout City government. Through updates to our Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) and executive action, we are ending the purchasing of unnecessary single-use plastic foodware, reducing the purchasing of beef, and phasing out the purchasing of processed meat.
It’s right there: GHG emissions, otherwise known as greenhouse gases.
So, yes, it is primarily about ‘climate change’, but, no, not everywhere. That comes later. Or at least an attempt at a prohibition on processed meats.
Read: NYC Looks To Do Away With Hot Dog Purchases By City For ‘Climate Change’ »
The Extinction Rebellion wankers are still at it in the streets of London
Rebels have climbed onto a dlr train at #canarywharf holding signs saying ‘business as usual = death’ and ‘don’t jail the canaries’#TellTheTruth #Actnow pic.twitter.com/GdNkxwErdh
— Extinction Rebellion Global (@ExtinctionR) April 25, 2019
Screwing up people’s day for fake science
BREAKING: Time for MONEY to tell the truth on its role on the Climate and Ecological Emergency
Extinction Rebellion UK is hitting the financial industry today to demand they tell the truth about the devastating impact the industry has on our planet. #lse #rebelforlife pic.twitter.com/zqof4bkCbR
— Extinction Rebellion Global (@ExtinctionR) April 25, 2019
They’ve glued themselves together. What kind of idiot does this? The cops showed up quickly and found a way to un-glue them and arrest them.
Remember, the talking point is that supporters of Open Borders don’t support illegal alien criminals, just the “good ones”. They apparently feel that the good ones are criminals (via Hot AirHot Air)
Newton judge, court officer charged with obstruction of justice
The indictment in the case states Judge Shelley M. Richmond Joseph and Court Officer Wesley MacGregor are to be charged today in federal court.
Judge Joseph, the indictment alleges, allowed an illegal immigrant wanted by immigration officers to leave Newton District Court without being detained for possible deportation.
“I’m not gonna allow them to come in here,†the judge is alleged to have told the man’s defense attorney. She was basically keeping an ICE officer on the outside of the courtroom
The judge, federal prosecutors are alleging, allowed Jose Medina-Perez to walk after being arrested by Newton police on drug charges last April. He was also wanted for drunken driving out of Pennsylvania and ICE had a detainer on him.
As Hot Air’s John Sexton notes
That description is a bit more passive than what actually happened. WCVB 5 reports Judge Joseph didn’t just allow Medina-Perez to run off, she came up with a plan to facilitate his escape with his defense attorney
In the courtroom, Joseph ordered the courtroom recording device to be turned off in order to conceal the conversation about the plan, the indictment said.
According to the indictment filed by United States Attorney Andrew Lelling’s office, MacGregor agreed with the immigrant’s defense attorney to release the immigrant through a rear door in order to evade the federal officers. Joseph participated by creating a pretext for the immigrant to be brought downstairs for “further interview†so he could be released through that door, the indictment said.
Newton, Mass, is a sanctuary jurisdiction. Turning off the microphones is a big no no. So is helping a criminal illegal alien escape lawful detention for a federal agent. The illegal alien has already been deported twice, meaning unlawful re-entry is a felony under federal law. Red State rips into the story, and now
I suppose that all involved had a good joke at the expense of the ICE agent, ICE in general, and the Godless Trump who would dare to deport a poor, downtrodden illegal.
The US Attorney for Massachusetts, Andrew Lelling, seems to be a man without an great sense of humor. The case was referred to a grand jury and today both Joseph and MacGregor were indicted.
Court documents show Newton District Judge Shelley M. Joseph and court officer Wesley MacGregor face 4 federal charges: perjury; obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting; obstruction of a federal proceeding, aiding and abetting; and conspiracy to obstruct justice. pic.twitter.com/zhauVKhk3y
— WBZ NewsRadio (@wbznewsradio) April 25, 2019
The perjury charge is only against MacGregor who told the grand jury that he didn’t know there was an ICE agent in the courthouse despite the tape of him being told that.
Too bad the charges do not include violations of 8 US Code 1324(a), conspiracy/aiding or abetting. It really is way past time to start nailing those who help illegal aliens.
Read: Judge, Lawyer Face Multiple Charges For Releasing Illegal Alien Criminal »
How soon till AOC claps back at him?
Climate movement grandpa James Hansen says the Green New Deal is ‘nonsense’
In the 1980s, NASA scientist James Hansen brought climate change to the attention of Congress, and shortly thereafter the public. Humans, he testified in 1988, were responsible for rising global temperatures.
But the man who put his reputation on the line to alert the world to the dangers of global warming doesn’t appear to agree with the most recent crop of climate advocates.
In April 20 debate with Sunrise Movement’s Varshini Prakash and Christian Aid’s Amanda Mukwashi, Hansen called the Green New Deal “nonsense.†(snip)
That tension came to a head when Hansen appeared visibly aggravated by the progressive proposal and Prakash, realizing that one of the most prominent climate scientists in the world was scoffing at her organization’s central focus, could only laugh in disbelief.
It’s not that James doesn’t want many of the things offered by the GND, he just thinks it is nonsense overall. Plus, he wants a carbon tax, which the GND doesn’t call for. Plus, he seems to understand that you can’t just do it all in one go, and that the GND is so far overboard that it’s idiotic.
Green New Deal Would Reward Rich, Hurt Poor
(snipping to end, worth reading everything in between)
If a Green New Deal is ever implemented, says Mills, it would rob the poor by raising energy costs, while “giving money to wealthy people in the form of subsidies to buy $100,000 cars, to put expensive solar arrays on their roofs, or to be investors in wind farms.â€
“It’s upside-down Robin Hood,†he adds. “That’s a bad deal.â€
Kinda like how Obama rewarded all his donors with loans for “green” projects with the Stimulus.
Read: Bummer: James Hansen Calls Green New Deal “Nonsense” »