People Want Organizers Of St. Greta’s Climate March To Pay To Repair Greenspace

Tom Nelson has a better idea

From the article

Hundreds have called for the organisers of a Greta Thunberg climate change rally to pay for damage caused to green space.

Around 15,000 people are believed to have attended Friday’s Bristol Youth Strike 4 Climate rally, churning up College Green and angering many.

A fundraiser was set up for repairs, which then resulted in calls for rally organisers to cover the costs.

The organiser said people had done their best in the muddy conditions. (snip)

The combination of thousands of people and heavy rain turned much of the grass into mud, angering some.

Gavin Mountjoy commented on Facebook: “Oh the irony, hundreds of people turning up to talk about our planet dying end up destroying a green area.”

Meh, the damage was really linked to ‘climate change’

Read: People Want Organizers Of St. Greta’s Climate March To Pay To Repair Greenspace »

If All You See…

…is an ocean that will very soon rise up and swamp all the land, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on today’s Daley Babes in lingerie.

Read: If All You See… »

Nothing Will Ever Be The Same From Coronavirus And ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

Cultists just can’t help injecting their cult into every topic, can they? They’re like that person you know who always has to interject their favorite topic into every conversation. You know that person

Coronavirus and climate crisis: nothing will be the same again

The pounding and discomposed mobilization of politicians and media against the coronavirus reminds of Peter and the Wolf: what could we ever do to communicate a real emergency, when the climate crisis at the gates will begin to have a serious impact on our lives (as it is already doing on those of millions of other human beings), now that everyone sees that the wolf is not there, or is not a wolf? (snip)

This is how the right (in tune, though denied, with the centre and left-wing establishments, whether they are aware of it or not) is preparing to face by force of arms the consequences of the climate crisis: mass migrations in and from the rest of the world, and struggles against the disruption of living and working conditions and of the territories within each country. Continuing to squeeze gas and oil from the belly of the Earth pumping CO2 into the air. (snip)

The climate and environmental crisis will upset all of them. From now on, and whether you like it or not, things will change for the worse: the weather will no longer be predictable, and sometimes not even bearable; work may be missing because the markets that supported it will disappear; shops and supermarkets will not always be full and we will have to give up many things; we may find ourselves without a car or without gasoline, or with trains that are seven hours late; the light may no longer come on every day, water may no longer run off the tap for hours, houses may remain cold, holidays may fade because planes no longer depart and illnesses from unknown viruses may multiply. And all these things will have to be remedied together with those who suffer with us. But above all we must anticipate them, identifying, taking and imposing new paths, because if we wait for those who govern us to do so, those who continue to think only of building high-speed rail links, pipelines, Olympics games and giant stadiums, while “our house burns”, we will end up burned with it.

This was translated out of Italian. I suspect it reads worse in the original language.

Read: Nothing Will Ever Be The Same From Coronavirus And ‘Climate Change’ Or Something »

Axios: No Matter Who Wins, Big ‘Climate Change’ Policy Won’t Happen

Amy Harder may very well have a point

Big climate change policy unlikely no matter who wins the White House

Don’t hold your breath for big climate policy changes — even if a Democrat wins the White House.

Why it matters: Congress is likely to remain gridlocked on the matter, leading to either more of the same with President Trump’s reelection or a regulatory swing back to the left no matter which Democrat wins — but far short of a legislative overhaul.

The big picture: Climate change is reaching a new high water mark as a political concern for American voters, and Democratic presidential nominees are promising aggressive policies.

Really, we know that if Trump wins, you won’t get any sort of authoritarian, big government, big taxation legislation passed or policies enacted. Heck, even small ones will not happen. Now, if a Democrat wins

All Democrats have aggressive climate plans, but it’s an open question whether any would first push climate legislation over other priorities — especially health care.

Sanders, for instance, has campaigned more on Medicare for All than he has on the Green New Deal.

  • We could face a rerun of 2009, where newly inaugurated President Obama chose to first pursue a health care bill before climate change.
  • Running out of political capital after that grueling fight was one of many reasons the climate bill failed.

Amy even breaks it down as to what happens if a Progressive (nice Fascist) Dem wins and if a “moderate” Dem wins. Regardless, she says you just won’t see a big bill or policy. The one thing she’s missing is that there are enough Democrats out there who realize that passing this type of legislation which would dramatically increase the cost of living for Americans would mean an utter blowout of the Democrat party in the next election cycle, much like happened to the Labor Party in the 2012 Queensland, Australia election. This is why the Democrat run House refuses to vote on AOC’s Green New Deal. Why the Dems failed to pass any significant Hotcoldwetdry legislation when they controlled Congress in 2009 and 2010.

The intrigue: A path to passage of, say, a clean energy standard or a carbon tax would require a grand bargain-type bipartisan compromise, like we saw in 2015 when Congress paired renewing clean-energy subsidies with lifting a ban on oil exports.

It won’t happen.

Read: Axios: No Matter Who Wins, Big ‘Climate Change’ Policy Won’t Happen »

Trump, WHO Director Look To Calm Coronavirus Fears

One of the president’s jobs is to attempt to keep Americans, and, really, the world, from freaking out. Freaking out won’t help the situation. No one slammed Obama for attempting to calm fears when Ebola broke out (they did slam him for failing to have strong enough quarantines). Democrats, and the media, on the other hand, are trying to stoke fears, which is where Trump’s “hoax” comment came from

One of my people came up to me and said, “Mr. President, they tried to beat you on Russia, Russia, Russia. That didn’t work out too well. They couldn’t do it. They tried the impeachment hoax that was on a perfect conversation. They tried anything. They tried it over and over. They’ve been doing it since you got in. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. Think of it. Think of it. And this is their new hoax.”

He didn’t call Coronavirus a hoax, he called the Dem and media response the hoax in fearmongering and slamming Trump, for making is political. And they prove him right, like here and here. Meanwhile, Trump will continue to attempt to calm things

Trump seeks to quell fear as first U.S. coronavirus death is reported

President Trump sought to ease rising fears about the coronavirus epidemic on a day when the first U.S. death from COVID-19 was reported and more cases were reported on the West Coast.

Trump said that a “medically high risk” woman in Washington state had died from the virus but added no other details about her case. State health officials, in their own statement, said a middle-aged man with underlying health problems had died of the virus.

Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers of Disease Control, tweeted later in the day that “CDC erroneously identified the patient as a female in a briefing earlier today with the President and Vice President.”

Trump said he hoped that Americans would not curtail their daily lives because of the virus and portrayed the risk as minimal.

“So, healthy people, if you’re healthy, you will probably go through a process and you’ll be fine,” Trump added.

The president said he had put in place “the most aggressive actions taken anywhere in the world,” although China has confined millions of people to their homes, and other countries, including Japan and South Korea, have taken strong measures including closing public schools.

Wait, is the media saying they want Trump to round people up and confine them? Obviously, if he ordered that, they would slam him. This is why Trump called them a hoax.

Obviously, Trump is wrong for not scaremongering, right?

WHO director says there’s a need to prepare for a ‘pandemic’ but global markets should ‘calm down’ as coronavirus wreaks havoc on the economy

Amid global panic around the spread of coronavirus, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), called on global markets to “should calm down and try to see the reality.”

“We need to continue to be rational. Irrationality doesn’t help. We need to deal with the facts,” Ghebreyesus said Sunday during a panel discussion at the King Salman Humanitarian Aid Center’s International Humanitarian Forum in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, according to CNBC.

He’s right. But, the media is always about “if it bleeds, it leads”, and looks to freak people out for ratings. And, of course, to hurt Republicans.

Meanwhile, wash your hands and do not touch your mouth or eyes. Perhaps don’t travel to the Islamist nation of Iran.

Read: Trump, WHO Director Look To Calm Coronavirus Fears »

Hotcoldwetdry Is Making The Kids Angry Or Something

Perhaps someone should explain to them how much government is controlling their lives and will be taking out of their paychecks. And then how much more government will be controlling their lives and taking from their paychecks if the policies they advocate for are passed. That’s, if they can find a job thanks to the policies the Cult of Climastrology pushes, along with all the other Statist stuff

Climate change is not only worrying kids; it’s also making them angry

Parents aren’t getting it, and that’s a problem.

“Hey, Mom,” Cyan Cuthbert, 15, asked one day after class at Walter B. Saul High School in Roxborough. “Did you know we’re gonna die because people like to litter?”

Like a lot of youngsters, Cuthbert, a freshman, is obsessed with climate change, a big topic at the school, which specializes in the study of agriculture and the environment. Grown-ups, she said with astonishment, are simply not scared enough of melting polar ice caps and acidifying oceans.

“It’s not registered in our parents’ heads yet,” Cuthbert continued. “I want a job, a house, kids someday. But I can’t have that if the Earth is on fire, and my children won’t ever know what an elephant is.”

While no precise data exist on how climate change manifests itself in children’s behavior, it’s becoming clear that kids’ perpetual presence on social media and the internet stoke zealous preoccupation and incite a woke attitude that can’t be extinguished.

The crime rate for Philly is not as bad as many big cities, being an 8, meaning it is safer than 8% of US cities (100 is best). Their property crime is actually not that bad, but, their violent crime rate is three times the Pennsylvania rate. Maybe the kids should worry about that.

“Kids are freaked out and terrified,” said Washington, D.C., psychiatrist Lise Van Susteren, who served as an expert witness in Juliana v. the United States, a lawsuit brought in U.S. District Court in Oregon in 2015 by young people claiming to have a constitutional right to be protected from climate change. The case was dismissed in January.

“Some are unraveling, and the little ones have no coping mechanisms,” she said. “One 4-year-old believes his family dog will become extinct and die. Some older kids are wondering why they should even bother going to college. Many fear having children of their own.

You can blame the adults for this: it’s simply child abuse the way they have made mental messes out of children for political purposes. There’s lots and lots more crazy in the article, so, let’s end with this

Youth agency over climate change is apparent throughout the Philadelphia area, according to Maria Stroup, director of Impact Center in Haverford, a nonprofit staffed by former educators who connect socially conscious youngsters with dozens of community organizations.

“Kids are p—ed,” Stroup said. “Battling climate change is not an adult movement; it’s kids’.”

OK, if they feel that way

Read: Hotcoldwetdry Is Making The Kids Angry Or Something »

If All You See…

…is armor needed for societal breakdown and violence from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Blazing Cat Fur, with a post on kids as young as 8 picking coffee for Starbucks.

It’s redheads week!

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another fantastic day in America. The sky is blue, the Sun is shining, and it’s a whole new month. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. JoNova covers Coronavirus in Iran, and Australia blocking flights
  2. Not A Lot Of People Know That highlights NOAA using dodgy Russian data
  3. Weasel Zippers notes Crazy Joe Biden promising to raise taxes on guy who got a tax cut
  4. Vox Popoli wonders if Spielberg is next on the #MeToo hit list
  5. The Right Scoop has President Trump announcing new travel restrictions for Coronavirus (say, how long till the deranged sue to block those restrictions?)
  6. The Lid features several states introducing legislation to ban the gender confused from competing against biological women
  7. The Last Tradition covers New Yorkers unhappy with the plastic bag ban
  8. The First Street Journal discusses the crazy anti-lynching bill
  9. The American Conservative goes among the Bernie Bros
  10. Raised On Hoecakes notes Marriot’s “green” program
  11. Powerline wonders if Democrats are rooting for the Black Death
  12. Political Clown Parade highlights the yapping turds at CNN
  13. Pacific Pundit notes Comrade Bernie getting on the wrong fossil fueled private jet
  14. Moonbattery discusses a male gender confused teacher wanting to use the little girls bathroom
  15. And last, but not least, Jihad Watch covers acid attacks and other violence from Muslims in India

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me.

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. And do you have a favorite blog you can recommend be added to the feedreader?

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Peak Coronavirus: NY Times Links It To ‘Climate Change’ And Globalism

We’ve finally hit the point where one of the biggest news outlets in the world has their editorial board making the link

Here Comes the Coronavirus Pandemic

Back in 2002, when the SARS virus made its fateful leap from bats to civet cats to humans, global health experts warned that the ensuing outbreak was a harbinger of things to come: Climate change and globalization were conspiring with an array of other forces to make it much easier for old animal diseases to morph into new human ones. It was only a matter of time before one of those diseases proved truly catastrophic. The world could avert the worst consequences if it started planning.

Getting beyond the insanity of linking ‘climate change’ when it is winter in the Northern Hemisphere, including China, the NY Times editorial board typically comes out for porous, if not open, borders, as well as taking in every refugee who wants in. Heck, for taking them whether they want to come or not.

In the meantime, this much is not in dispute: SARS-CoV-2 spreads easily — more easily than SARS or seasonal flu — and is tough to detect. It’s the kind of virus that would be extremely difficult to contain even in a best-case scenario, and the world is hardly in a best-case scenario now. Rising nationalism, waning trust and lingering trade wars have undermined cooperation between global superpowers. Rampant misinformation and growing skepticism of science are imperiling public understanding of the crisis and governments’ response to it.

Refer back to Picard. The media makes fun of Trump, or gets in high dudgeon, over him blasting them and Democrats for politicizing Coronavirus, and then they prove Trump right.

Anyhow, the piece meanders around, and includes several points about how dangerous it is, including

Here we are again. In December, another new virus — SARS-CoV-2 — made the leap from animals to humans. It has now infected more than 83,000 people across more than 50 countries. Nearly 3,000 people have died, most of them in China where the outbreak began. Global health experts are once again sounding the alarm. It’s unclear how bad things might get this time around. Covid-19, the disease caused by this new virus, appears to be between seven and 20 times more deadly than seasonal flu, which on average kills between 300,000 and 650,000 people globally each year. But that fatality rate could prove to be much lower, especially if it turns out that many milder cases have evaded detection.

Here’s also the NY Times in the straight news section

On average, seasonal flu strains kill about 0.1 percent of people who become infected. The 1918 flu had an unusually high fatality rate, around 2 percent. Because it was so contagious, that flu killed tens of millions of people.

Early estimates of the coronavirus death rate from Wuhan, China, the epicenter of the outbreak, have been around 2 percent. But a new report on 1,099 cases from many parts of China, published on Friday in The New England Journal of Medicine, finds a lower rate: 1.4 percent.

The coronavirus death rate may be even lower, if — as most experts suspect — there are many mild or symptom-free cases that have not been detected.

Slate notes

Here’s why it would be: Most public health officials now feel that widespread infection outside of the current hot zones like China and South Korea is no longer a matter of if but when. Containing the virus is likely impossible. So the next question is: Just how bad will the cases here be? In China, the death rate has been reported as zero in children under 10 and very low, 0.2 percent, in healthy adults. Unfortunately, the rate is far higher, as high as 14.8 percent, in the sick and elderly (though as is always the case in outbreaks like this, it is hard to know how many of these older and often chronically ill hospitalized patients died with COVID-19, not of COVID-19). The reported overall death rate of 2 percent is essentially a weighted average of these numbers.

This is why most health professionals are recommending that you wash your hands well and don’t touch your eyes and mouth. The US Surgeon General, Jerome M Adams, and the CDC recommend that, and to stop buying masks unless you are already sick. Doctor Adams was rather upset over the purchase of all these masks. And, really, if you’re sick, stay home. Of course, the Washington Post has to fear-monger with a story about the millions killed during the 1918 outbreak. And of course whining about Trump. Notice above, the mortality rate is estimated to be lower, and could seriously be not much above the standard flu. People are much healthier and have better access to health care now than 1918.

Anyhow, ‘climate change’ and globalism. Don’t leftists love globalism?

Read: Peak Coronavirus: NY Times Links It To ‘Climate Change’ And Globalism »

Super-Progressive UC Santa Cruz Terminates Graduate Students Demanding More Money

You know, these graduate students could have taken jobs elsewhere than the university. Heck, they could have gotten outside jobs and earned. But, no, they Demanded the college take care of them. While not working

UC Santa Cruz fires 54 graduate students participating in months-long strike

The University of California, Santa Cruz, issued termination letters on Friday to 54 graduate students who have been waging a months-long strike for a cost-of-living-adjustment amid soaring rents.

The firings came as graduate students at the University of California, Davis, and University of California, Santa Barbara, began their own cost-of-living strikes in solidarity. One of their demands is that all UC Santa Cruz graduate workers who participated in strike activities be restored to full employment status.

The 54 UC Santa Cruz graduate students who received termination letters on Friday are just a fraction of the 233 graduate student instructors and teaching assistants who have refused to submit nearly 12,000 grades from the fall quarter since December.

This month, the students’ grading strike expanded, as teaching assistants refused all teaching duties and research assistants refused additional work. Some classes and office hours have been canceled because of the strike.

The students are striking for a $1,412-a-month cost-of-living adjustment, which they say they desperately need amid a growing housing crisis in California. Most students are spending between 5o% and 70% of their $2,434-a-month salary on rent, some forced to live in substandard apartments with many roommates in order to stretch their dollars.

Now, try this at your job: refuse to work while demanding more money. What happens? You’re promoted to customer, right?

The graduate students are represented by United Auto Workers Local 2865, which negotiated a contract in 2018 that included a no-strike clause: meaning the current strike, known as a “wildcat strike”, has been taken without the union’s approval.

Huh what? Auto workers union?

“Teaching assistants who choose to withhold grades or refuse to teach are in violation of that contract,” Gordon said, adding that such actions “unfairly impact undergraduate students while doing nothing to further the conversation on how to address the challenges of the rising cost of living, with which all students and employees across UC must contend”.

Have fun trying to get jobs with other colleges after this. And, won’t look good when they try for private sector jobs. Don’t like the pay? Go elsewhere. Don’t like conditions? Go elsewhere. It is fun to see these uber-Progressive colleges crack down, eh?

Read: Super-Progressive UC Santa Cruz Terminates Graduate Students Demanding More Money »

Pirate's Cove