Heh heh
(Weather Channel founder John) Coleman also told the audience his strategy for exposing what he called “the fraud of global warming.” He advocated suing those who sell carbon credits, which would force global warming alarmists to give a more honest account of the policies they propose.
“[I] have a feeling this is the opening,” Coleman said. “If the lawyers will take the case – sue the people who sell carbon credits. That includes Al Gore. That lawsuit would get so much publicity, so much media attention. And as the experts went to the media stand to testify, I feel like that could become the vehicle to finally put some light on the fraud of global warming.”
It would pretty much expose that anthropogenic climate change, ie, that Man is mostly or solely responsible, is a myth designed to scare people and raise money. Why else would the majority of the Disciples of The Goracle fail to live the life they extoll for everyone else?
But there is more that could expose the Climahysterics and their faulty science
A summary of “Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate,” Singer’s latest report, was released at the conference. Singer discussed some of the study’s major findings in his address.
The report, published by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), is a rejoinder to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Singer said.
The IPCC, he said, has failed to produce any hard evidence suggesting that humans are largely responsible for the planet’s current warming cycle.
And, again, if the UN really believed its rhetoric, it would act in accordance, rather then having conferences in nice vacation spots all over the world.
Most recently, Dr. Joanne Simpson, an atmospheric scientist who previously served with the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, outlined her views in a blog cautioning against excessive reliance on climate models.
“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization or receive any funding, I can speak quite frankly,” she wrote.
“For more than a decade now ‘global warming’ and its impacts has become the primary interface between our science and society. … There is no doubt that atmospheric greenhouse gases are rising rapidly and little doubt that some warming and bad ecological events are occurring,” Simpson added.
“However, the main basis of the claim that man’s release of greenhouse gases is the cause of the warming is based almost entirely upon climate models,” she said. “We all know the frailty of models concerning the air-surface system. We only need to watch the weather forecasts.”
Na, I bet she is in the pay of Big something or other. That is the easiest answer, ya know.
If human activities were NOT solely, or even mainly responsible for global climate change, should those human activities that merely ADD to global climate change be reduced ?
Say human activities were only responsible for 49% of the change, or 40% or 33% or xx% should we make an attempt, or no attempt, to reduce our impact on global climate change ?
Yes, we should, in most cases. As far as Man’s largest contribution, agriculture, I don’t think we can do much. But, other things, like decreasing ocean pollution are real world solutions that also benefit the ecosphere.
I guess that means I shouldn’t go ahead with my new venture of selling carbon credits? I was looking forward to planting new trees in my yard for a few thousand each 🙁
Go ahead with the project. There is always some gullible liberal out there to take advantage of.
Beth
Always a good idea to plant a few trees I am not sure of how much you may expect in return for carbon off sets but please let us know. What type of trees are you going to plant ?
I can understand Coleman’s frustration. No one seems to want to have a big, media-attention grabbing debate about this.
And I’ve noticed that it’s the environmentalists, who always seem to say we should respect other people’s opinions, are the ones to attack and belittle anyone who says that maybe man isn’t the cause.
In my column that I wrote, I said that it’s time to have this debate and present both sides if we’re really serious about this topic.
My column is at: timesobserver.blogspot.com