UN Warns 2021 Will Be A Catastrophe, Appears To Want Control Of Vaccine Distribution

By William Teach December 5, 2020 – 7:07 am

The United Nations thinks they still have the power to compel in a world that, let’s face it, is seeing each nation, particularly in the 1st World, look at their own nation first. With Coronavirus raging, think that Germany, France, England, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and so many more aren’t worried about their own nations 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th? And they will be priotizing vaccination for their citizens and recovery for their countries the same

U.N. warns 2021 shaping up to be a humanitarian catastrophe

Next year is shaping up to be a humanitarian catastrophe and rich countries must not trample poor countries in a “stampede for vaccines” to combat the coronavirus pandemic, top U.N. officials told the 193-member U.N. General Assembly on Friday.

World Food Programme (WFP) chief David Beasley and World Health Organization (WHO) head Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus spoke during a special meeting on COVID-19, which emerged in China late last year and has so far infected 65 million globally.

The pandemic, measures taken by countries to try to stop its spread and the economic impact have fueled a 40% increase in the number of people needing humanitarian help, the United Nations said earlier this week. It has appealed for $35 billion in aid funding.

“2021 is literally going to be catastrophic based on what we’re seeing at this stage of the game,” said Beasley, adding that for a dozen countries, famine is “knocking on the door.”

He said 2021 was likely to be “the worst humanitarian crisis year since the beginning of the United Nations” 75 years ago and “we’re not going to be able to fund everything … so we have to prioritize, as I say, the icebergs in front of the Titanic.”

Well, there are lots of things they can set aside in 2021. They can get rid of their climate change scam funding. All those climate change conferences. They could spend a lot less on needless travel and bureaucrats. Perhaps stop giving so much money that ends up in the pockets of dictators and governments rather than helping citizens. The UN Peacekeepers program is a disaster, what with all the rapes and property theft.

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and his top officials have also called for COVID-19 vaccines to be made available to all and for rich countries to help developing countries combat and recover from the pandemic.

Tedros appealed for an immediate injection of $4.3 billion into a world vaccine-sharing program.

“We simply cannot accept a world in which the poor and marginalized are trampled by the rich and powerful in the stampede for vaccines,” Tedros told the General Assembly. “This is a global crisis and the solutions must be shared equitably as global public goods.”

That’s nice and all, but, America should worry about Americans being vaccinated first. Germany should worry about Germans. India should worry about Indians, etc and so on. If the U.N. wants some extra cash, why not hit up their buddies in China, whom they helped hide the outbreak of COVID19 and are still helping hide what’s actually going on in China. Otherwise, they have no power to dictate anything.

Read: UN Warns 2021 Will Be A Catastrophe, Appears To Want Control Of Vaccine Distribution »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, UN | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

All You Warmists Should Cut Back On Your Gadgets And Streaming Or Something

By William Teach December 4, 2020 – 3:00 pm

I’m sure all of you younger climate cultists would be happy to give up all your smartphones, gaming systems, and streaming shows and movies, right? No more videos of everyday life, no more “creating content”, right?

Climate change: Why it could be time to cut back on new gadgets and HD streams

We need to cut global emissions, and fast – and in doing so, tech businesses are both part of the the problem – and the solution. A new report from the UK’s Royal Society finds that as technologies keep growing at pace, the onus is on the digital sector not only to reduce its own carbon footprint, but also to come up with innovative ways to reverse climate change globally.

While there is no exact figure that sums up the impact of digital technologies on the environment, the report estimates that the sector currently represents between 1.4% and 5.9% of global greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, the industry is projected to make huge strides in the coming years: for example, the total number of internet users is expected to reach 5.3 billion by 2023, up from less than four billion in 2018.

All this extra connectivity comes at an environmental cost. The complex infrastructure of cables, fibers, computers, data centers, routers, servers and radio masts that are required to run the digital world need power to be built, and even more so to be used and maintained. Data centers alone accounted for 0.8% of global electricity demand last year.

On a consumer level, the report identified small steps that can be taken to mitigate the impact of new technologies. For example, keeping phones, laptops, tablets or smart TVs for four years can halve the amount of carbon emitted compared to renewing a device every two years. Even better is to purchase second-hand devices; and users should always make sure that they recycle their old phones, which, if kept in a drawer at home, “amount to a form of landfill,” said the researchers.

Similarly, streaming should be done responsibly: the report warned that one hour of streaming on a smartphone generates eight times more emissions in ultra-high definition than it does in standard definition, despite little difference between the two options on a small screen. Turning off the video when listening to YouTube content could equally save between 1% and 5% of the service’s total emissions.

Marching orders, Warmist folks! It’d be funny watching some of these younger folks try and stream in non-HD. They surely have little idea that this is the way things used to be. For all shows and such.

The funny thing is that one has to read the article on the Internet from a site, ZDNet, which reviews and pushes computers, laptops, tablets, smartphones, TVs, etc and so on.

Read: All You Warmists Should Cut Back On Your Gadgets And Streaming Or Something »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming, Web/Tech | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach December 4, 2020 – 1:00 pm

…is a frozen heat world from climate change, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on a BLM rioter charged with murder in a home invasion in NC.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 15 Comments | Trackback URL

Coming To A Democrat City Near You: Excusing Crimes Due To “Poverty”

By William Teach December 4, 2020 – 10:30 am

Exactly where does poverty stop in Liberal World? What’s the threshold? And doing this while defunding the police

The New Untouchables

In October, the Seattle City Council floated legislation to provide an exemption from prosecution for misdemeanor crimes for any citizen who suffers from poverty, homelessness, addiction, or mental illness. Under the proposed ordinance, courts would have to dismiss all so-called “crimes of poverty”—which, according to the city’s former public-safety advisor, would cover more than 90 percent of all misdemeanor cases citywide. In effect, the legislation would create a new class of “untouchables,” protected from consequences by the city’s powerbrokers.

This is the latest and most brazen effort in the city’s campaign to establish what might be called a “reverse hierarchy of oppression.” The underlying theory is that society has condemned the lower class to a life of poverty and stigma, which leads to addiction, madness, and indigence. The poor, in the logic of Seattle’s progressive elites, are thus forced to commit crimes—including violent crimes—to secure their very existence. Therefore, as society is the perpetrator of this inequality, the crimes of the poor must be forgiven. The crimes are transformed into an expression of social justice.

On a practical level, if this ordinance becomes law, it will effectively legalize an entire spectrum of misdemeanor crimes, including theft, assault, harassment, drug possession, property destruction, and indecent exposure. Criminals must simply establish that they have an addiction, mental-health disorder, or low income in order to evade justice. The impact of this measure would be enormous. In 2019, the Seattle Police Department reported 25,993 thefts, 8,442 assaults, 6,430 property offenses, 4,194 frauds, 3,910 trespasses, and 1,640 narcotics violations—representing 72 percent of all reported crimes. If the ordinance passes, nearly all these crimes would be permitted under law.

Will Seattle do this? Why not, they have pushed through some defunding of the police, and the courts routinely blow off crimes and release the criminals. We have seen this to a smaller degree in many other cities, where crime is excused

Anyone else see the problem here? And all these uber-Progressives in Seattle, San Francisco, etc, who think these policies are great are fine with people stealing their own stuff, assaulting them, and so forth, right? They never call law enforcement, right?

Lisa Herbold, the city councilwoman who proposed the legislation, must have known that it would be controversial. Though she chairs the council’s Public Safety Committee, she attempted to launder the ordinance through the budgetary process, under the justification that it would reduce the cost of court proceedings and jail usage. During a five-minute presentation buried in an hours-long budget hearing, Herbold framed her argument in social justice terms, claiming that “poverty, institutionalized racism, and systemic oppression are root causes that lead to mass incarceration” and that “punishment and incarceration are harmful and ineffective tools to address behaviors triggered by poverty and illness.” Neither questions from other councilmembers nor public comment was permitted.

The law was tabled from the budget hearings, and scheduled later for the Public Safety Committee. Because Liberals will never give up once they have an idea, and their political cult has created the talking points to make things like this not only possible, by necessary.

Read: Coming To A Democrat City Near You: Excusing Crimes Due To “Poverty” »

Posted in Liberal World | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Big Companies Call On China Joe To Do Something On Climate Crisis (scam)

By William Teach December 4, 2020 – 8:22 am

Most companies, especially really big ones, rarely do something without seeing a benefit to their bottom line. What benefit do they see here? Why not just change the behavior of the companies, practice what they preach?

Major Companies Call on Biden to Act on Climate Change

Some major companies are angling to line up with the Biden administration on climate next year, as lawmakers and lobbyists gird for renewed policy fights in Washington.

A big slice of corporate America—including utilities, banks and auto manufacturers—signed onto a statement yesterday calling on President-elect Joe Biden to work with Congress on “ambitious, durable, bipartisan climate solutions.”

While the statement doesn’t offer support for a specific policy, its signatories represent a cross section of the U.S. economy, including Amazon.com Inc., Bank of America Corp., BP PLC, Walmart Inc., DSM and Exelon Corp.

“To achieve a net-zero economy, the United States must establish durable national policies that harness market forces, mobilize investment and innovation, and provide the certainty needed to plan for the long term,” they wrote.

Organized by the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, or C2ES, the statement comes amid a raft of corporate signaling on climate, as Biden enters office with an ambitious clean energy platform.

These same companies make all sorts of pledges that they never really keep in order to climavirtue signal. Here we have companies essentially calling for Government to implement climate scam rules on all the consumers. What financial benefit do the companies see in this? As the saying goes, follow the money.

General Motors Co., which signed the statement, said last week it would end its support for the Trump administration’s clean car standards rollback and instead support Biden’s efforts to deploy electric vehicles (E&E News PM, Nov. 23).

Flipping for the new admin, eh?

Bill Gates just released a plan for US leadership on climate change, including $35B in funding

Bill Gates, the co-founder of Microsoft and one of the world’s richest men and most prolific philanthropists, has just released a broad new plan on how the U.S. could take the lead in the fight against climate change.

“[We] need to revolutionize the world’s physical economy—and that will take, among other things, a dramatic infusion of ingenuity, funding, and focus from the federal government. No one else has the resources to drive the research we need,” Gates writes.

Interesting. Guy who’s made an enormous amount of money via capitalism wants to change the world’s economy. To what? Why doesn’t he say?

Gates calls for a dramatic $25 billion boost in spending that would bring clean energy research spending to $35 billion a year (in line with medical spending from the government). Gates notes that this could lead to the creation of more than 370,000 jobs while boosting a clean-energy agenda.

Why not spend the money of Microsoft? Or, does Bill not think the results would be profitable?

Read: Big Companies Call On China Joe To Do Something On Climate Crisis (scam) »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Economy, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

China Joe To Ask Everyone To Wear A Mask For 100 Days

By William Teach December 4, 2020 – 8:00 am

Sure, sure, not every state has a mask mandate, but, for the most part, most of the U.S. does. 34 states, D.C, and Puerto Rico. And we’ve essentially had them since before the Centers for Disease Control updated their guidance on May 31 to say that everyone should wear a mask, even though they really have little chance to stop a virus. And that cases are spiking around the 1st and 2nd worlds where people are required to wear masks. But, Joe probably has a deal for a family member for masks, possibly imported from China

Biden to call for 100 days of masks after inauguration

President-elect Joe Biden said during an interview Thursday that he plans to ask the American public to wear masks for 100 days, starting the day he is inaugurated, in order to drive down the number of coronavirus cases.

Biden, during an interview with CNN, said he will ask Americans to mask up, but only for a limited period.

“The first day I’m inaugurated I’m going to ask the public for 100 days to mask,” Biden said. “Just 100, not forever — 100 days.”

“I think we’ll see a significant reduction that occurs with vaccinations and masking to drive down the numbers considerably.”

We haven’t seen a significant reduction since the mask mandates. In fact, COVID continued to go up even with masks. Those with and without mandates have much different responses till about October, when cases started to really spike. Why? That is the real question that no one is answering, or even asking. It can’t be the onset of Fall, because Arizona and Florida did not see big drops in temperatures. (the NY Times has a good interactive page). California, with all its hardcore mandates, has a huge upswing, as does NJ and New York. So, how effective are masks?

I’m looking for more brilliant ideas from the China Joe administration and other Democrats

Read: China Joe To Ask Everyone To Wear A Mask For 100 Days »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, Joe Biden | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

United Nations Wants Humanity To “End The War On Nature” And Go Carbon Neutral

By William Teach December 3, 2020 – 3:00 pm

The building full of climahypocrites and dictators has Ideas

From the link

As an extreme year for hurricanes, wildfires and heat waves comes to an end, the head of the United Nations challenged world leaders to make 2021 the year that humanity ends its “war on nature” and commits to a future free of planet-warming carbon pollution.

With new reports highlighting 2020’s record-breaking weather and growing fossil fuels extraction that triggers global warming, U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres delivered yet another urgent appeal to curb climate change. It was tinged with optimism but delivered dire warnings, as the UN gears up for a Dec. 12 virtual climate summit in France on the 5th anniversary of the landmark 2015 Paris climate agreement.

“The state of the planet is broken,” Guterres said in a speech at Columbia University. “Humanity is waging war on nature. This is suicidal.”

But he said the two U.N. reports Wednesday “spell out how close we are to climate catastrophe.”

See above GIF.

Guterres said there’s no way the world can curb the climate change “without U.S. leadership” and urged students and other Americans to do “everything you can” to get their governments to curb emissions more quickly.

I don’t know how many times I’ve written this, but, notice that Guterres doesn’t say a thing about Warmists practicing what they preach nor the U.N. reducing its own carbon footprint to zero. Let’s demolish the 1950’s monstrosity in Turtle Bay, and ban all the diplomats, UN employees, etc, from using fossil fuels.

Read: United Nations Wants Humanity To “End The War On Nature” And Go Carbon Neutral »

Posted in Climahypocrites, Global Warming, UN | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach December 3, 2020 – 1:00 pm

…is carbon pollution driven extreme weather causing snow and frost, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Knuckledraggin My Life Away, with a post on surging murders in another Democratic Party run cities.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

Iran’s President Opposes Bill That Would Suspend UN Inspections, Increase Enrichment

By William Teach December 3, 2020 – 10:30 am

Can you guess why Hassan Rouhani opposes it?

Iran’s president opposes bill that would boost enrichment

Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani on Wednesday expressed his opposition to a bill approved by parliament the previous day to suspend U.N. inspections and boost uranium enrichment, saying it would be “harmful” to diplomatic efforts aimed at restoring the 2015 nuclear deal and easing U.S. sanctions.

The tug-of-war over the bill, which gained momentum after the killing of a prominent Iranian nuclear scientist last month, reflects the rivalry between Rouhani, a relative moderate, and hard-line lawmakers who dominate parliament and favor a more confrontational approach to the West.

The bill would suspend U.N. inspections and require the government to resume enriching uranium to 20% if European nations fail to provide relief from crippling U.S. sanctions on the country’s oil and banking sectors. That level falls short of the threshold needed for nuclear weapons but is higher than that required for civilian purposes.

Speaking at a Cabinet meeting, Rouhani said his administration, “does not agree with that and considers it harmful for the trend of diplomatic activities.” He implied the lawmakers were positioning themselves ahead of elections planned for June.

“Today, we are more powerful in the nuclear field than at any other time,” he added.

First, why are they more powerful than ever? Shouldn’t they have pretty much given up their nuclear weapons programs? Isn’t that what the Iran deal was all about? Or so we were told. Doesn’t it do that? Even with the U.S. out, shouldn’t Iran still be complying with the E.U. nations who are hooking Iran up?

Second, it sure looks like Rouhani figures China Joe will be a big pushover, rejoining and removing all the sanctions, and, surely Rouhani will demand more from China Joe to make up for what Trump did, right?

Later Wednesday, Iranian state TV said the constitutional watchdog, the Guardian Council, also approved the bill and formally sent it to Rouhani who now has has five working days to officially sign off on a bill to make it executable.

Even if Rouhani were to change his mind and approve the bill, it is unlikely to have an impact as Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has the final say on all major policies, including those related to the nuclear program.

Under the law, if the president refuses to sign the bill, it will be automatically singed by the parliament speaker to go into effect.

Is this a ploy designed to allow Rouhani to get more out of Biden, saying “hey, these people want to do this stuff, I want to work with you, but, you have to give me something more”? And the Israel haters and Iran apologists in Joe’s circle and the Democrat party will take Iran’s side and say “give them what they want for Peace In Our Time.”

Read: Iran’s President Opposes Bill That Would Suspend UN Inspections, Increase Enrichment »

Posted in Iran, Joe Biden | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

Climate Cultists Say China Joe Rejoining Paris Climate Agreement Isn’t Enough Or Something

By William Teach December 3, 2020 – 8:32 am

In all fairness, lots and lots of climate cultists were applauding the passage of the Paris Climate (scam) Agreement while also saying that it didn’t go far enough. And then they all jumped into fossil fueled vehicles to travel to the airport where they took a fossil fueled airplane trip after their working vacation in Paris

Biden intends to rejoin the Paris Agreement, but climate activists say that’s not enough

One of President-elect Joe Biden’s first acts after being sworn in on Jan. 20 will be to rejoin the Paris climate agreement, a nonbinding pact signed by nearly 200 nations that, at President Trump’s direction, the U.S. exited on Nov. 4.

Since Biden has pledged to “take drastic action right now” to address climate change, the question remains whether he and newly appointed special climate envoy John Kerry will seek to strengthen the Paris Agreement commitments agreed to by the Obama administration — which Republicans say are already too tough and will hobble the U.S. economy.

Yet international climate change advocates are already pressuring the new administration to think bigger on cutting emissions.

“The U.S. rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement is just the first step, but in order for Biden to meet the scale of the climate crisis, we must see the U.S. commit to great ambitions to reduce carbon emissions, phase out fossil fuels, and bring forward a carbon neutral economy powered on renewables,” Thanu Yakupitiyage, U.S. communications director at 350.org, told Yahoo News in a written statement. “The Biden-Harris Administration have an enormous opportunity to be a leader on climate and we will be pushing them to not only keep their promises, but go beyond.”

Warmists are never satisfied, and they never seem to practice what they preach, either. I suggest that we initiate projects in certain areas to see how this would work. Test-beds. We can start with the areas that sued fossil fuels companies, such as “Rhode Island, New York City, Baltimore, eight coastal California cities and counties, three Colorado cities and counties, and a Washington county”, along with Honolulu and Maui. Let’s see how well they do without using fossil fuels. They will have to get rid of their airports. How do people get around except on very expensive non-fossil fueled buses, because most will not be able to afford EVs? How do they bring in food and goods? Where will they put all the solar panels and wind turbines? Should be fun to see how NYC survives, as well as Honolulu and Maui, which cannot do anything without tourism money, and most food has to come from elsewhere. Sailing ships?

The U.S. is not alone in laying out ambitious targets. The European Union, which has already reduced emissions by 24 percent, has also set a goal of becoming carbon-neutral by 2050. China, the world’s leading emitter of greenhouse gases, has released a plan to become carbon-neutral by 2060.

The thing is, most nations, especially 1st World ones, who have laid out plans aren’t coming close to hitting their targets. Of course, most of their big targets are decades away, as nations realize they cannot destroy their economies for a scam. What Trump should do is send the Paris Climate Agreement to the Senate for a vote, as we know it would be rejected, making it much, much harder for U.S. courts to support it being a “legislatively tossed treaty.” Remember, Paris has no force of law, it is strictly voluntary, but, Warmists are not treating it as such, and will attempt to use the power of the courts to compel Other People to comply.

Never themselves, though. They have lives to live and shouldn’t be burdened.

Read: Climate Cultists Say China Joe Rejoining Paris Climate Agreement Isn’t Enough Or Something »

Posted in Climahypocrites, Global Warming, Joe Biden | 2 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove