Brandon Admin Gets Rid Of Trump Rule, Allows Illegals Legal Residency If They Used Government Benefits

By William Teach September 9, 2022 – 6:45 am

In reality, this is not really the Trump rule, as illegals, and, heck, those here on visas, haven’t been able to get legal residency because they use government benefits. Also, this is something that should be done by the duly elected legislative branch

Biden administration undoes Trump-era immigration rule

The Biden administration has officially undone a Trump-era rule that barred immigrants from gaining legal residency if they had utilized certain government benefits, allowing for a return to a previous policy with a narrower scope.

The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday said a new regulation for the “public charge” rule would go into effect in late December, although the Biden administration had already stopped applying the previous version last year.

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a statement that the shift “ensures fair and humane treatment.”

“Consistent with America’s bedrock values, we will not penalize individuals for choosing to access the health benefits and other supplemental government services available to them,” he said.

No, they’re just going to penalize American citizens, and this incentivizes even more to come to the U.S. illegally, figure out a way to get those government benefits, and get legal status. And this penalizes those going through the proper naturalization process who aren’t eligible, and must follow all the rules

The public charge regulation bars people from getting green cards if they would be burdens to the United States. For years prior to the Trump administration, that was interpreted as being primarily dependent on cash assistance, income maintenance or government support for long-term institutionalization.

But the Trump administration expanded the benefits to include non-cash assistance including food stamps and Medicaid. There were numerous legal challenges, but it was allowed to be implemented in 2020. Legal challenges went on, and in 2021, the Biden administration said it would not continue defending the rule.

If you’re coming here legally, you shouldn’t be a public charge. If you’re coming illegally, well, you should be deported immediately, not given government benefits on the backs of hardworking American citizens.

However

Democrat Lori Lightfoot: ‘Immoral, Unpatriotic’ to Bus Migrants to Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, Mayor Lori Lightfoot (D) now says it is “immoral” and “unpatriotic” for Gov. Greg Abbott (R) to bus migrants from Texas to the sanctuary city.

Last week, Abbott started busing border crossers to the sanctuary city of Chicago after sending thousands over the last few months to the sanctuary cities of New York City, New York, and Washington, D.C.

Initially, Lightfoot balked at the migrant buses by calling them “racist and xenophobic.” While visiting a shelter last week, Lightfoot called Abbott’s buses “immoral, unpatriotic” and claimed the operation “defies the values of who we are as Americans.”

Democrats love illegals, as long as they aren’t jamming up Democrat cities

Read: Brandon Admin Gets Rid Of Trump Rule, Allows Illegals Legal Residency If They Used Government Benefits »

Posted in Illegal Immigration, Joe Biden | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Reports State Dutch Town May Ban Ads Featuring Meat

By William Teach September 8, 2022 – 3:00 pm

Of course this is related to the Cult of Climastrology

Dutch town may ban meat ads in public spaces over climate change: report

climate cowOfficials in one Dutch city are slated to ban most ads advertising meat in public areas because of its impact on the climate.

The motion was made by the GroenLinks, a green political party, and would go into effect in 2024 in Haarlem, the BBC reported. The meat sector in The Netherlands has opposed the move, saying it stifles free speech.

“Meat is very harmful to the environment. We cannot tell people that there is a climate crisis and encourage them to buy products that are part of it,” Ziggy Klazes, a member of GroenLinks who drafted the motion, told the Trouw newspaper.

The move would make Haarlem, just a few miles from Amsterdam, the first city in the world to ban most meat ads. It could include chicken sold in supermarkets and fast food.

If meat is so harmful, why wait till 2024? Do it now. And will any reporter ask the members of GroenLinks if they have stopped eating meat? This just continues to show that the climate cult is an authoritarian movement.

Elsewhere

Schumer in tough spot over Manchin promise

Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday pledged to add permitting reform legislation to a stopgap funding bill that would prevent a government shutdown, but he’s in a tough spot as he seeks to deliver on a promise to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.).

The permitting reform is a side-deal Schumer struck with Manchin in late July to pass a climate, tax and health care bill known as the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which is projected to help reduce that nation’s carbon emissions by 40 percent by 2030.

Manchin offered his support for the bill in July after winning significant concessions, and his vote allowed Democrats to pass a major achievement for President Biden.

Schumer made clear Wednesday that he doesn’t plan to backtrack on his promise.

The thing is, the more extreme members of the Democratic Party are working hard to scuttle the side deal. Manchin was a fool for agreeing to back the Inflation Reduction Act, ie, Build Back Better version 4, in exchange for something in the future.

I’m going to clear out some of the saved articles below the fold

Read More »

Read: Reports State Dutch Town May Ban Ads Featuring Meat »

Posted in Climate Cult, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach September 8, 2022 – 1:00 pm

…are horrible Bad Weather clouds because Other People won’t switch to taking the train, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The O.K. Corral, with a post on the most depressed cities in the U.S.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 12 Comments | Trackback URL

Janet Yellen To Take Long Fossil Fueled Flight To Make Speech Denigrating Fossil Fuels Companies

By William Teach September 8, 2022 – 10:30 am

Unshockingly, The Hill reporter Tobias Burns failed to attempt to ask Janet Yellen how she’s traveling to the violent, Democratic Party run city of Detroit. Is she taking the train or an electric vehicle? Or, a fossil fueled flight followed by a fossil fueled limo? Without fossil fuels, how does Detroit survive? The Red Wings, Pistons, Lions, and Tigers (why is there no team named Bears?) wouldn’t be able to operate. Or all the ships that come through with goods. Also, Yellen is the Treasury Secretary, not the energy or transportation secretary

Yellen will vow to ‘rid’ US from ‘dependence on fossil fuels’ in Detroit speech

st greta carTreasury Secretary Janet Yellen will call out the fossil fuel industry in a Thursday speech on the Biden administration’s economic agenda to be delivered in Detroit, Mich., where oil and gas companies have long held influence in the U.S. auto manufacturing sector.

The visit to Detroit comes on the heels of the Democrats’ passage of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which includes $14.2 billion worth of subsidies for electric vehicles meant to wean the auto industry off of gasoline in an effort to reduce U.S. transportation emissions that are contributing to a rise in global temperatures.

“We will rid ourselves from our current dependence on fossil fuels,” Yellen’s prepared remarks say.

“Our plan — powered by the Inflation Reduction Act — represents the largest investment in fighting climate change in our country’s history. It will put us well on our way toward a future where we depend on the wind, sun, and other clean sources for our energy,” her remarks continue.

Yet, you can bet it’s a fossil fueled flight and a fossil fueled limo/SUV for Yellen, and not one reporter will ask her about it, since most of the reporters are part of the climate cult. Biden and his cohorts are running around calling people Fascists and semi-Fascists, yet, it’s Democrats attempting to use the power of government to destroy an economic sector and force people into EVs, whether they want one or not. It’s not Socialism: in true socialism government mostly stays out of people’s lives, and would have direct votes on things like this. It’s over in the Authoritarianism model, which provides force of government

Yellen’s speech will also emphasize the role that private capital can play in addressing climate change, putting her generally in line with the economic, social and corporate governance (ESG) movement. The ESG movement in the financial sector pursues environmental and social equality objectives through divestment practices and getting board members with particular political views elected to company boards.

“By mobilizing private capital, the clean energy tax credits implemented by Treasury will propel our economy and workers to a leadership position in the fastest growing markets and technologies of today and the future, with positive spillovers to the rest of the world. And in the process of boosting domestic clean energy production, the law will support our energy security and insulate us from the type of fossil fuel-driven energy volatility that we’ve seen in the past year,” her remarks say.

This is a carrot and stick approach. The carrot is free money from the government. The stick is a threat that they best join the cult, otherwise there will be consequences. They’re attempting to turn the U.S. into a command economy, like the Soviet Union, Venezuela, and Nazi Germany. You will comply, Comrade.

Read: Janet Yellen To Take Long Fossil Fueled Flight To Make Speech Denigrating Fossil Fuels Companies »

Posted in Climahypocrites, Democrats, Global Warming | 19 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: California’s Solar Batteries Have Been Kicking In At The Wrong Time

By William Teach September 8, 2022 – 7:15 am

This is what happens when you have way too many government regulations coming from bureaucrats rather than the professions who do this for a living

California’s Battery Problems Heighten Threat of Power Outages

The batteries that help fortify California’s electric grid are kicking in at times when they’re not really needed, draining the power source before more critical junctures and heightening the chances of blackouts as a blistering heat wave punishes the state.

Batteries help to store extra electricity, generated by solar or hydropower. That surplus is supposed to act as a cushion for times when those intermittent renewable sources are running low. But the grid uses a pricing mechanism to trigger the batteries, rather than basing it on pure demand levels. That can lead to mismatches.

That’s exactly what happened on Tuesday, when the state declared a grid emergency and only narrowly avoided major power outages.

Batteries began discharging in the middle of the afternoon, when there was still plenty of solar power and other supplies available to meet electricity demand. That depleted the cushion before it was more critically needed in the early evening, when the state was on the brink of rotating blackouts as demand hit an all-time record and solar supplies started dropping as the sun set. If it weren’t for a timely emergency mobile-phone alert calling on Californians to conserve power immediately, swaths of the state could have been plunged into darkness.

Did not one say at some point “hey, perhaps we should change the usage priority?” If they did, were they shut down?

While blackouts were averted on Tuesday, the battery situation points to a deeper issue with the grid that could continue to exacerbate the risk of outages until it’s resolved. On Wednesday afternoon, the state’s grid operator ratcheted its energy emergency to the second of three levels after 1 p.m. local time and once again warned California could face power shortfalls.

The reason for Tuesday’s earlier-than-expected deployment of batteries likely has to do with market signals. The way the California power market is set up now, energy storage systems are called upon to dispatch by the grid operator when the wholesale power price hits a cap of $1,000 a megawatt-hour, said Cody Hill, senior vice president of battery systems at Rev Renewables, a renewable energy and storage company.

And that is set by government, not the energy companies. Government’s have way, way, way too much control over the energy sector.

Just wondering, did any reporter go to the governor’s mansion and ask to see the thermostat? See if the lights were on? Using large appliances?

Read: Bummer: California’s Solar Batteries Have Been Kicking In At The Wrong Time »

Posted in Democrats, Energy, Global Warming | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

Judge Orders Fauci, WH Press Secretary To Turn Over “Disinformation” Emails

By William Teach September 8, 2022 – 7:00 am

What are the odds that the Biden admin fails to make the deadline?

Judge orders Biden admin to turn over Fauci, Jean-Pierre ‘misinformation’ emails sent to social media giants

A federal judge in Louisiana ruled Tuesday that the Biden administration has 21 days to turn over all relevant emails sent by White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and Dr. Anthony Fauci to social media platforms regarding alleged misinformation and the censorship of social media content.

The decision by Judge Terry Doughty, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump, came as part of a lawsuit filed in May by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, accusing the Biden administration of suppressing the constitutionally protected right to free speech on elections, the COVID-19 lab leak theory, coronavirus-related lockdowns and other issues.

The Justice Department objected to the handing over of the email correspondence under executive privilege and presidential communications privilege, but Doughty decided, “This Court believes Plaintiffs are entitled to external communications by Jean-Pierre and Dr. Fauci in their capacities as White House Press Secretary and Chief Medical Advisor to the President to third-party social media platforms.”

Of course the Biden admin is attempting to shield their communications from the public, even though they have zero national security implications. The emails will show the Brandon admin attempting to get tech companies to restrict 1st Amendment Freedoms.

Schmitt, who is running for U.S. Senate in Missouri, announced the development regarding his lawsuit on Twitter.

In their initial filing, he and Landry argued that “having threatened and cajoled social-media platforms for years to censor viewpoints and speakers disfavored by the Left, senior government officials in the Executive Branch have moved into a phase of open collusion with social-media platforms under the Orwellian guise of halting so-called ‘disinformation,’ ‘misinformation’ and ‘malinformation.'”

“As a result of these actions, there has been an unprecedented rise of censorship and suppression of free speech — including core political speech — on social media platforms,” the lawsuit says. “Not just fringe views, but perfectly legitimate, responsible viewpoints and speakers have been unlawfully and unconstitutionally threatened in the modern public square.”

Well, of course they are. It’s what they do.

In response to the ruling, an administration official told Fox News that as a general matter, “as we have said over and over again since the beginning of the administration in our battle against COVID-19, it has been critical for the American people to have access to factual, accurate, science-based information.”

So, then they put their views out there, and try and convince everyone that they are correct. Shutting down opposing voices is what authoritarians do. Despots do. Government attempting to shut down opposing views, and actually shutting down views, makes people wonder why the government is trying to censor citizen’s voices.

“We believe in and we support freedom of speech, and we also believe it is important for all media platforms, including social media, to represent factual scientific information and combat misinformation and disinformation that can cost lives,” the official concluded.

You can literally see the “but” between the two, eh?

Read: Judge Orders Fauci, WH Press Secretary To Turn Over “Disinformation” Emails »

Posted in Bat Soup Virus, Joe Biden | Comments Off on Judge Orders Fauci, WH Press Secretary To Turn Over “Disinformation” Emails | Trackback URL

Surprise: Hotcoldwetdry A Lower Ranking Concern For Floridians 50 And Over

By William Teach September 7, 2022 – 3:00 pm

Good news for Warmists: it’s not dead last

Environment, climate change a mid-pack concern for older voters, per AARP poll

The environment and climate change came in at No. 6 among older voters’ top priorities for Governor.

The effects of climate change are such that some politicians will support bills that deal with climate resiliency without addressing climate change directly in their rhetoric. Meanwhile, Florida’s very name is a nod to the unique natural life that calls this state home.

However, it can be challenging for environmental issues to break through in favorable years, and this is not one — pocketbook issues that typically dominate voter concerns have some extra oomph.

A new poll from AARP shows the environment and climate change in the middle to back of the pack on issues important to people aged 50 years and older.

A bipartisan polling firm team of Fabrizio Ward and Impact Research collaborated on the poll that involved more than 1,600 Floridians the week of Aug. 24-31.

The poll, which had a 4.4% margin of error, included 500 likely voters, with an emphasis on older likely voters that included 550 likely voters 50 and older, with 262 Hispanic and 314 Black voters.

There’s two relevant graphics

So, for senate just 5%, governor 7%. Of course, when you have both environment and climate, the numbers are higher. I bet if you separated them the environment alone would be at least 4-5 points higher. Interestingly, though, is, if you refer to the last slide of the poll, you see that 58% of respondents are suburban, 26% urban, and 54% are women, so, you’d expect the number to be higher. However, the party ID is 44% Republican, 36% Democrat, 20% independent, which can also skew the poll. Regardless, it’s just more proof that after 30+ years of spreading awareness ‘climate change’ is just not that important of a real world issue. Even among Dems it only made it to 10% for the state concerns.

Read: Surprise: Hotcoldwetdry A Lower Ranking Concern For Floridians 50 And Over »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 16 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach September 7, 2022 – 1:00 pm

…is horrible heat snow from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Refuge, with a post on the special master order which says “Page #2 and Page #3 of Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling cites a quote from the DOJ own legal filing, dated May 10th, that Joe Biden ordered the National Archives and Records Administration to provide access to the FBI to review the Trump records.”

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 9 Comments | Trackback URL

Surprise: DOJ Leaks Info Claiming Trump Had Declassified Nuclear Material

By William Teach September 7, 2022 – 10:30 am

Let’s consider

(Breitbart) Former President Donald Trump’s legal team blasted the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI for scattering documents seized from Mar-a-Lago across the floor “for dramatic effect” in its latest court filing on Wednesday. (snip)

Trump’s legal team also cautioned that the DOJ would leak parts of its investigation to the media. “Left unchecked, the DOJ will impugn, leak, and publicize selective aspects of their investigation with no recourse for Movant but to somehow trust the self-restraint of currently unchecked investigators,” wrote Trump’s attorneys.

And

(Breitbart) Top House Republicans are concerned that Attorney General Merrick Garland’s unwillingness to provide certain information about the Mar-a-Lago raid to Congress through “transparent” channels will result in the public gleaning information only through Democrat leaks to the media.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) was the first to raise the issue, noting in a letter last week that a Justice Department offer to meet with a “narrow group” in Congress “mimics initial engagements by the Obama Administration during the Russia collusion hoax investigation.”

Leaks that came from the DOJ and elected Democrats who were briefed on select information. So, what do we get now? Here’s the Washington Post

Files seized at Mar-a-Lago include material on foreign nation’s nuclear capabilities
Some of the documents seized on Aug. 8 detail top-secret U.S. operations so closely guarded that many senior national security officials are kept in the dark about them.

Of course the piece is behind the paywall, hence, other outlets are covering the WaPo screed

(Newsweek) Former President Donald Trump may have declassified a document about another country’s nuclear defense capabilities—if he is correct that material stored at Mar-a-Lago was declassified.

A document about a foreign government’s defenses, including its nuclear capabilities, was among material stored at Trump’s Florida residence, according to The Washington Post.

The newspaper reported late on Tuesday that material discussing the nuclear-defense readiness of a foreign government was among documents seized by the FBI during the August 8 raid at Mar-a-Lago, citing anonymous sources familiar with the matter.

Some of the documents seized were so sensitive than many national security officials would not be able to access them without special clearance obtained from the president, the cabinet or near-cabinet-level officials.

Sources did not tell The Washington Post which country the document related to or where it had been stored at Mar-a-Lago. More than 100 classified documents were seized from Mar-a-Lago on August 8.

So, lots of innuendo, it’s all anonymous sources, so no one can verify the veracity, and all about the FBI/DOJ being pissy about a special master being appointed.

Christopher Kise, a lawyer for Trump, criticized leaks about the investigation in comments to The Washington Post published on Tuesday.

Kise said that “the damage to public confidence in the integrity of the system simply cannot be underestimated. The responsible course of action here would be for someone —anyone—in the Government to exercise leadership and control.”

“The Court has provided a sensible path forward which does not include the selective leak of unverifiable and misleading information. There is no reason to deviate from that path if the goal is, as it should be, to find a rational solution to document storage issues which have needlessly spiraled out of control,” he said.

But, this isn’t about a rational solution. There was no reason for this big dawn raid, which included tossing his wife and child’s rooms. Heck, the FBI knew where the documents were being kept, and they weren’t in Melania’s closet. Making a big show of it, coming in with military grade weapons and kevlar vests, it was all for show.

Read: Surprise: DOJ Leaks Info Claiming Trump Had Declassified Nuclear Material »

Posted in Current Affairs, Donald Trump | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

Mike Bloomberg’s Rather Upset Over Republican Resistance To ESG

By William Teach September 7, 2022 – 7:00 am

See, he doesn’t like that free market Republicans are trying to interfere with what all these private firms are doing, forgetting that a lot of this stuff is being required by Government

On Climate Change, Republicans Need a Crash Course in Capitalism

Republican elected officials seem to think they’ve found three new evil letters to pair with their favorite bugaboo, CRT, or critical race theory. This one is called ESG, which refers to investment strategies that consider environmental, social and governance issues. Critics call it “woke capitalism.” There’s just one problem: They don’t seem to understand capitalism. And flogging ESG is not only a terrible economic mistake. It will be a political loser, too.

Most people have zero idea what ESG, so, the only people who will object to blocking it are leftists

Republican critics of ESG have focused primarily on the “E,” arguing that climate change should not factor into investment decisions. Texas has adopted a law restricting the state, localities, and pension boards from doing business with financial firms that seek to limit their exposure to fossil fuel companies. Even firms that have large investments in fossil fuels are being banned, if they dare attempt to price climate risk into their portfolio allocations. Oklahoma has enacted a similar law, and other Republican leaders are moving in the same direction. Last month, Florida’s Republican governor, Ron DeSantis, supported a resolution barring pension fund managers from considering ESG factors.

ESG is, in fact, woke capitalism bordering on socialism, because the government is requiring this stuff.

All these anti-ESG crusaders position themselves as defenders of the free market. But they are attempting to use government to block private firms from acting in the best interests of their clients, including retired police officers, teachers and many others who depend upon public pensions. And in doing so, they are turning the most basic investment rules on their head.

Are they in the best interest of their clients? Remember, the SEC is trying to make climate risk disclosures a thing. Anyhow, Mike goes on and on and on from a climate crisis scam point of view, all while refusing to reduce his own outsized carbon footprint.

The thing is, ESG, on the surface, is not a problem. It’s an experiment in investing. However, as usual, the Leftists in charge took the idea and turn the Progressive nob up to 11. It’s what they do. It’s how you get things like

ESG-supporting Bank of America offers zero down payment, zero closing cost mortgages – but only for black and Hispanic communities

It helps increase the cost of energy by messing with reasonable, return focused investment.

(National Review) But if investable funds are not even chasing profitability, many more dollars are likely to be invested in companies pursuing product plans that do not gain support from the market or suffer from ineffective execution. Meanwhile, startup founders and management of existing companies will likely receive market signals that steer them away from the task of efficiently meeting customer needs and toward other priorities. They may conclude, for example, that it is better to focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion than to make product improvements, causing them to expend more of their scarce resources on the former than the latter.

They large firms are often blowing off their fiduciary responsibility to make a proper return in favor of their Wokeness.

Like many movements in America’s past, the ESG-investment crusade has taken a reasonable idea and stretched it well beyond reason. If institutional investors continue to deploy funds according to shifting criteria other than long-term profitability, and relying on imprecise metrics while doing so, they will undermine the ability of the U.S. economy to grow and to thereby improve our standard of living.

That’s what the leftists do. Of course, the ones doing this are making lots and lots of money, eh?

Read: Mike Bloomberg’s Rather Upset Over Republican Resistance To ESG »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Economy, Global Warming | 5 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove