If All You See…

By William Teach April 17, 2025 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible private jet causing cloudless, drought inducing skies, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post a queer scientist arrested after terror attack.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

AG Bondi Looking At Unhinged Case Of Parents Being Restricted From Protesting Trans At School

By William Teach April 17, 2025 – 10:30 am

No one is really surprised that Democrat run schools and a wackadoodle judge ruled that parents are forbidden from protesting, are they?

AG Bondi Says Case of Federal Judge Blocking NH Parents from Protesting Trans Athletes Is Under Review

“I have asked my Civil Rights Division to examine this matter. This DOJ stands with women and their supportive parents,” Bondi said in response to a post from women’s sports advocate Riley Gaines about the case.

In September, several parents wore pink wristbands with “XX” on them as a sign of protest during a girls’ high school soccer game where trans-identifying male athlete Parker Tirrell, now 16, was playing on the other team.

Bow and Dunbarton School Districts Superintendent Marcy Kelley responded to the wristbands by issuing a notice of trespass against the parents, including Antony and Nicole Foote, Kyle Fellers, and Eldon Rash, according to local media reports. The no-trespass order has since expired.

That’s pretty much all they did: wear the wristbands. They were not yelling and screaming and causing problems and burning things and harassing or assaulting people, you know, what Democrats do. Wristbands.

The parents subsequently sued the school district, alleging that their First Amendment rights had been violated and asking the judge to allow them to carry signs and wear wristbands featuring “XX” at school events while the case is ongoing.

U.S. District Court Judge Steven McAuliffe, a President George H. W. Bush appointee, ultimately sided with the school district and said it acted reasonably in preventing parents from protesting.

Captured by the system much, Judge McAuliffe?

“While plaintiffs may very well have never intended to communicate a demeaning or harassing message directed at Parker Tirrell or any other transgender students, the symbols and posters they displayed were fully capable of conveying such a message,” he wrote. “And, that broader messaging is what the school authorities reasonably understood and appropriately tried to prevent.”

And, yet, the 1st Amendment allows that, especially when applied to people protesting the government, in this case for allowing fake women to compete against real women. And multiple sections of the New Hampshire constitution, in the Bill of Rights section, guarantee this type of protesting. Nothing excludes protesting at schools, and, if people are Offended, that’s on them. The Heckler’s Veto should not apply. Even the ACLU agrees.

The plaintiffs are moving on with their lives after the ruling. Maybe their kids have already left the school. But, the DOJ will be investigating, so, we’ll see what happens.

Meanwhile

Trump administration sues Maine over transgender athletes in girls’ sports

The Trump administration on Wednesday sued Maine for not complying with the government’s push to ban transgender athletes in girls’ and women’s sports, escalating a dispute over whether the state is abiding by a federal law that bars discrimination in education based on sex.

The lawsuit follows weeks of feuding between the Republican administration and Democratic Gov. Janet Mills, leading to threats to cut off crucial federal funding and a clash at the White House when she told President Donald Trump: “We’ll see you in court.”

The political overtones of the moment were clear, with Attorney General Pam Bondi — and several athletes who joined her on stage at the Justice Department — citing the matter as a priority for Trump. Bondi said other states, including Minnesota and California, could be sued as well.

Why, exactly, are Democrat run states so intent on letting the gender confused compete against real women? In allowing them, encouraging them, to be in the locker rooms, showers, and bathrooms of real women? It wasn’t that long ago that Democrats were going overboard with Me Too and women’s rights.

Read: AG Bondi Looking At Unhinged Case Of Parents Being Restricted From Protesting Trans At School »

Posted in Constitution | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Your Fault: World’s Blood Supplies Stressed From Tiny Increase In Global Temps Over 175 Years

By William Teach April 17, 2025 – 7:15 am

Here we go: something new from the doomsday climate cult. If you ever think “there’s nothing more they can blame/link”, well, no, they can always find something new

Climate Change Is Stressing the World’s Blood Supplies

Climate change is coming for something surprising: the world’s blood supply.

The only thing surprising is that the cult found a way to link it

Sherman Potter Bull CookiesWarming and extreme weather can slow blood donations, disrupt blood transport and risk the safety of transfusions, according to a new study published on Wednesday in The Lancet Planetary Health.

Extreme weather events as a result of climate change can increase demand while also limiting supply, leading to blood shortages when they’re most needed. Avoiding this deadly mismatch of supply and demand is crucial.

“Any major disruptions to the availability and safety of the blood supply puts lives at risk,” said Elvina Viennet, an infectious disease researcher at the University of the Sunshine Coast in Australia and one of the lead authors of the study.

It is the first global assessment of how climate change affects blood supplies.

I wouldn’t believe Lancet if they said the sky was blue and heavy metal music is the best, not after their utterly horseshit Iraq War deaths statistical study. Damned sure not when it comes to the doomsday cult. There is no extra extreme weather happening, just more people, and more people living in areas that experience the strong weather events that have always happened.

Weather events such as hurricanes, flooding, heat waves, wildfires and snowstorms can physically keep people from donating. Roads may be impassable and, depending on the disaster, people may have more immediate problems of their own to handle. Mobile donation centers could be unable to deploy where they’re needed.

Yup, a cult.

Read: Your Fault: World’s Blood Supplies Stressed From Tiny Increase In Global Temps Over 175 Years »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Rubio Closing State Dept Censorship Bureau

By William Teach April 17, 2025 – 7:00 am

The Biden admin tried many times and in many ways to institute censorship for Wrongthink, attempting to do end runs around the Constitution. One of those finally bit the big one

“…which cost taxpayers more than $50 million per year and actively silenced and censored the voices of Americans they were supposed to be serving.”

Of course, this is how Politico cover it

State Department eliminates key office tasked with fighting foreign disinformation

Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday announced the closure of the agency’s hub for fighting foreign disinformation campaigns — the final nail in a yearslong effort to shut down the office accused by GOP lawmakers of censoring conservative voices.

In a statement, Rubio claimed the Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference office at the State Department, formerly known as the Global Engagement Center, had “spent millions of dollars to actively silence and censor the voices of Americans they were supposed to be serving.” According to Rubio, the relatively modest federal office expended “more than $50 million per year.”

“This is antithetical to the very principals [sic] we should be upholding and inconceivable it was taking place in America,” Rubio said. “That ends today. Under the administration of President Trump, we will always work to protect the rights of the American people, and this is an important step in continuing to fulfill that commitment.”

The center came under fire from leading Republicans on the House Foreign Affairs Committee last year for allegedly silencing conservative voices through its efforts to clear up disinformation and misinformation online. Elon Musk, who now heads up the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, described the office in 2023 as “the worst offender in U.S. government censorship.”

Obviously, Democrats want to keep this stuff going, because the group in all its names went after Republicans/Conservatives.

But the center’s supporters, including Sens. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and John Cornyn (R-Texas), have asserted that it plays a critical role in combating Russian and Chinese disinformation.

And all that stuff can be moved to a different part of the State Department. Or, the CIA, DIA, and other agencies that focus on that kind of stuff. It can be monitored and supervised. Democrats do not want that. But, they should realize that any program like that can be turned against Democrats.

Read: Rubio Closing State Dept Censorship Bureau »

Posted in Government | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Say, Why Aren’t Churches Talking About Global Boiling?

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 3:32 pm

Maybe because that’s not what churches are for?

Why Aren’t We Talking About Climate Change in Church?

While nearly 90% of Christian religious leaders believe climate change is real and human-caused, most rarely discuss it with their congregations. A new study shows this silence has consequences—many church members underestimate their pastor’s views, and conversations about climate action stall. Yet we are uniquely called and positioned to lead. This piece from Blessed Tomorrow urges clergy and lay leaders alike to speak out, teach, and preach on creation care. Support and training are available for those ready to start. Click here to read the full article on Blessed Tomorrow.

Let’s see that article

Religious Leaders Are Silent About Their Beliefs

We are living in a climate changed world which is impacting everything we care about, from people and places devastated by climate disasters, to our health, food, economy, and more. Holy Scriptures remind us that the earth is sacred, (Psalm 24, Colossians 1.15-20, Genesis 1) and we are called by God to care for it. ecoAmerica’s research shows that 72% of Americans are concerned about climate change, (1) and yet, among those who attend religious services at least monthly, U.S. Catholics indicate that climate change is not discussed frequently from the pulpit and 41% say there is no discussion of climate change. (2)

While at the same time, almost 90% of Christian religious leaders at the head of a congregation believe in anthropogenic (human caused) climate change. A study published in March 2025 titled Most Christian American religious leaders silently believe in climate change, and informing their congregation can help open dialogue (3) showed only about half ever discuss climate change with their congregations, a quarter speak publicly about climate change once or twice, and only 5% discuss it more than once a month.

Katharine Hayhoe says that the most important thing we can do about climate change is to talk about it. (4) Congregational religious leaders are uniquely positioned to make a positive climate impact as 2 out of 3 Americans believe they have a high ethical standard and are directly impacted by their local church leadership. When faith leaders silence themselves on climate change, it contributes to member’s hesitancy around discussing climate change with each other:

You get the point. But, they miss that church is a place to talk about The Bible. About God. Jesus. Those associated. And, then Exodus 20

1 Then God spoke all these words:

2 I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery; 3 you shall have no other gods before me.

4 You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me, 6 but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments.

A doomsday cult should not be operating in a church. They should not be worshiping the tenants of a doomsday cult. Bowing to the climate gods. If they are yammering about a climate cult’s beliefs in church they are putting other gods before Him. If these leaders in churches are interested, do it outside of church. They’d still be breaking their oaths to God.

Read: Say, Why Aren’t Churches Talking About Global Boiling? »

Posted in Christianity, Climate Cult, Global Warming | 12 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible carbon polluting private plane, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Not A Lot Of People Know That, with a post on an investigation for a battery plant fire.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Elitist Harvard Standing Ground Against Trump Or Something

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 10:30 am

Nothing says standing your ground like supporting Jew hatred, Hamas and Islamic extremism, and the destruction of America.

Why Harvard is standing its ground against Trump

The oldest and wealthiest university in America — long a training ground for cultural elites — is quickly becoming a face of the resistance to President Donald Trump.

Harvard University vowed this week to fight a wide-ranging set of demands from the Trump administration, pitting the biggest name brand in American higher education against the White House and setting up a remarkable clash of power that could wind up in court.

The fight is quickly escalating. Federal officials have frozen more than $2 billion in grants to the university after it refused to comply with policy changes requested by the Trump administration, including to crack down on student protests, change admissions and hiring practices and submit to government audits. Trump on Tuesday suggested on social media that Harvard could lose its tax-exempt status and instead “be Taxed as a Political Entity.”

Harvard, fueled by a massive endowment valued at more than $53 billion and a powerful alumni network, is now uniquely positioned to become the most prominent U.S. institution yet to actively fight Trump’s efforts to bend elements of American civil society to his will.

Court? Why court? They can simply not take federal money. They get enough from donors. But, they got used to that sweet, sweet, strings free money from Los Federales….well, Harvard was expected to take the Democrat line in what they say and what they publish and vote Democrat. It’s a dual parasitic relationship, much like with public unions. They just never thought that this relationship could be targeted by an opposition administration. Unfortunately for them, they allowed anti-Jew and pro-Hamas demonstrations to rage on their campus and became visible.

“Politicians have traditionally, bottom line, been proud of the fact that American higher education was the envy of the world,” said Thomas Parker, a Harvard alum who is a senior associate at the Institute for Higher Education Policy, a Washington-based advocacy organization. “It is unprecedented for the view to be the opposite.”

Taking a line of Jew hatred and support for Islamic extremism makes them proud?

Harvard now must decide whether to negotiate with the Trump administration or fight back in court. The university is being represented by two lawyers with significant street credibility on the right: William A. Burck, who has represented many Trump allies in legal disputes, and Robert Hur, a Harvard alum who authored a report on former President Joe Biden’s handling of classified documents that conservatives cited as evidence of his mental decline during the 2024 campaign.

Fight back? Again, for what, taxpayer money they do not deserve? They can simply say “keep it” and move on with their Jew hatred. And things like racism in choosing students. Which is also against federal law. Even for private institutions.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that Harvard “has not taken the administration’s demand seriously.”

“All the president is asking is, don’t break federal law, and then you can have your federal funding,” she said. Leavitt added that Trump “wants to see Harvard apologize” for “the egregious antisemitism that took place on their college campus against Jewish American students.”

Realistically, Los Federales shouldn’t be funding private colleges with taxpayer money to start with. If you take the money, though, it means the feds have a say in operations. Of course, the feds have a say when it comes to admission and hiring practices per law regardless of being private. And all those education laws passed by Democrats means the feds have a say when there is rampant Jew hatred on campus. Remember, Harvard was sued by students

“Jewish students are bullied and spat on, intimidated, and threatened, and subject to verbal and physical harassment,” the lawsuit said.

That would be a violation of federal education laws. And when it is institutionalized, and the school is only taking token steps to stop it.

Read: Elitist Harvard Standing Ground Against Trump Or Something »

Posted in Barking Moonbats, RoP | 8 Comments | Trackback URL

Experts Warn There Is A Serious Flaw In The EV Market Forecasts Or Something

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 7:00 am

Can you guess what the issues are?

Experts uncover alarming flaw in EV market forecasts that could hit buyers hard: ‘This is our best attempt’

Electric vehicleA new report from Princeton University highlights a serious threat to America’s clean transportation future — and it could spell bad news for jobs, investments, and EV buyers nationwide.

Researchers at Princeton’s ZERO Lab found that if Inflation Reduction Act tax credits and Environmental Protection Agency clean car standards are repealed, electric vehicle sales could plummet. By 2030, the report estimates EV adoption could fall nearly 40% below current projections.

Without these policies, the share of new EVs sold would shrink from 40% to just 24% by the end of the decade. The fallout wouldn’t stop there — the study also warns that up to 100% of planned EV factory expansions could be canceled, and up to 72% of battery manufacturing capacity could become redundant by 2025.

These aren’t just numbers on a spreadsheet — they represent real jobs and opportunities in communities across the U.S., as well as real, tangible means of driving down air pollution that is bad for human health and slowly but consistently traps more heat in the atmosphere. Not to mention that EVs, while more expensive upfront, save money each year on lower fuel and maintenance costs such as no oil changes.

“This is our best attempt to survey available quantitative forecasts and develop an outlook on US EV sales,” explained the study’s project leader, Jesse D. Jenkins in a statement. “The report is also the only analysis I’m aware of to date that draws the connection to US manufacturing as well.”

Got that? Without massive amounts of government money the business is going to damned near collapse. Really, what will be left will be the few reasonably priced EVs and the expensive ones, because most middle and working class people won’t bother purchasing. There are no subsidies or anything for standard gas and hybrid vehicles, yet, they still sell. If government money goes away for installing home chargers who will bother except rich folks? Remember, it was only a year ago that the majority of EV buyers made between $150K to $300K.

Rolling back these credits could undo that progress and leave communities — many of which are already building factories and training workers — without the clean energy jobs they were promised. And while EVs help reduce harmful pollution that worsens asthma and respiratory illness, pulling back support could make it harder for families to afford these healthier, lower-maintenance vehicles.

Without that government money the industry will barely be able to survive. This is the very definition of Socialism from Political Theory 101.If an industry cannot survive without massive government money than it is not a viable business. ICE cars NEVER needed a tax incentive. ICE car demand grew because the US consumer viewed it as a value product.

Read: Experts Warn There Is A Serious Flaw In The EV Market Forecasts Or Something »

Posted in Collapsing Science, Global Warming | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

Newsome Signs $2.8 Billion More To Cover Medicaid Gap Due To Illegals

By William Teach April 16, 2025 – 6:45 am

The People’s Republik Of California apparently has nothing better to do with the taxpayer money than give insurance to illegal aliens

California OKs $2.8B to close Medicaid funding gap after expanding immigrant coverage

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation Monday to close a $2.8 billion budget gap in the state’s Medicaid services and ensure coverage through June for 15 million people, including immigrants, who receive health care via the program.

Whoa, whoa, wait, June 15th? $2.8 billion? For two months? Really? Can you imagine how much help for homeless Americans that could provide?

The legislation is part of the state’s solution to solve the $6.2 billion hole in the state’s Medicaid budget. It comes a year after California launched an ambitious coverage expansion to provide free health care to all low-income adults regardless of their immigration status. The expansion is costing far more than the state projected and could force the Democratic governor and Democratic lawmakers to reevaluate future coverage for millions of people. (snip)

The state hasn’t said how many people have enrolled through the expansion. Last year, the state projected that about 700,000 state residents who are living in the U.S. illegally would gain full health coverage to access preventive care and other treatment.

Um, wouldn’t this violate federal laws about assisting those unlawfully present in the U.S., particularly 8 U.S.C. § 1324? Besides that the money could significantly help Californians who are US citizens? And this is all on Democrats. They run the PRC government.

Read: Newsome Signs $2.8 Billion More To Cover Medicaid Gap Due To Illegals »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Warmists Trying Hard To Push Loss And Damage

By William Teach April 15, 2025 – 3:56 pm

Instead of making their own lives carbon neutral, they just want government in charge of doing this

Why Loss and Damage is essential for climate action in new NDCs

Anchoring losses and damages in the new round of national climate plans can provide the necessary plans and actions to safeguard people and nature, and must not be overlooked. (snip through meaningless cult talk)

Current national climate plans – known as Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs – are intended to be ‘roadmaps’ for addressing climate change by sharply reducing greenhouse gas emissions and building resilience. But these plans are nowhere near ambitious enough to do that. The consequences are that climate risks are increasing, and the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is escalating. (snip)

“Anchoring losses and damages in NDCs can provide the necessary plans and actions to safeguard people and nature. It can provide countries with a more comprehensive climate response, and ensure that the most vulnerable communities can be assisted,” he says.

Countries can take four simple steps to ensure that Loss and Damage is effectively reflected in their plans, says Chamling Rai.

First, countries must define loss and damage in the national context. It is important for countries to include a definition of loss and damage in their national context in their NDC.

Important to whom? A doomsday cult? Or, something more nefarious?

Second, countries must describe the specific losses and damages that are already happening. It is also recommended that projected losses and damages related to different sectors or geographies based on different greenhouse gas emission and temperature-rise scenarios be included where possible.

Third, countries must highlight ongoing initiatives being undertaken to avert, minimize and address losses and damages. These may include institutional frameworks, policies, on-the-ground implementation and financing measures. It is also an opportunity to highlight how the lack of global ambition to finance mitigation and adaptation actions exacerbates country losses and damages.

Finally, countries must include specific contributions on loss and damage.

Loss and damage is really the latest claptrap meant as a way to do two things. First, take money from the producing nations and spread it around the 3rd world shitholes. Second, none of this can all happen without massive government control of the citizens. That’s the only way it occurs. Where you go, what you eat, where you live, how you live. The government must know everything about everyone and ever company. It’s another stealth attempt at authoritarianism, which is the backbone of the climate cult.

Read: Warmists Trying Hard To Push Loss And Damage »

Posted in AGW Socialism, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove