What’s that old saying about the road to Hell being paved with good intentions? Communist countries also talked a lot about the public good
Reversing climate change should be treated as a global public good
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who was in Washington last week for the annual Spring Meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, made a valuable and insightful observation in a side conversation with a group of India observers.
Hmm, so he took a long fossil fueled trip from India, a nation which is putting up lots and lots of coal power plants?
In reference to climate change and assorted efforts to mitigate and even reverse it, she rued that while the European Union’s carbon tariffs – the so-called border adjustment mechanism (BAM) – are a unilateral and burden-shifting effort at climate mitigation, the underlying earnest desire to act on the climate front must be recognised and given a more productive form and channel. That calls for a wider debate on global public goods that Sitharaman referred to.
There’s a lack of awareness or debate about global public goods and externalities. And there’s no agreed-upon definition of them. (snip)
A public good costs money to provide. Normally, the state provides the public good, paying for it from the proceeds of taxation. That is in the case of national public goods, where the provider and the beneficiaries are clearly definable and have a defined mutual relationship.
In the case of global public goods, things get complicated. The cost of providing global goods is borne nationally but the benefits are enjoyed globally. Naturally, governments prioritise national commitments over global public goods. The challenge when it comes to global public goods then becomes – who will provide, who will pay, and how? There are no easy answers. But another concept from economics can help us with an answer: externalities.
In other words, putting government in charge of most things. But, hey, this is all about science, not authoritarian science, right?
Read: Hey, We Should Treat Reversing ‘Climate Change’ As A Global Public Good Or Something »
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who was in Washington last week for the annual Spring Meetings of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, made a valuable and insightful observation in a side conversation with a group of India observers.
Israeli Foreign Minister Eli Cohen asked China to “influence” Iran to cease developing its illegal nuclear weapons program, inviting Beijing to play a bigger role in the Middle East as relations with the United States under leftist President Joe Biden have deteriorated.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit tossed a Berkeley, California, ban on gas stoves on Monday, saying that the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempted state and local authorities in regulating natural gas.
In the spring of 2021, Linda Brandmiller was working at an arena in San Antonio that had been converted into an emergency shelter for migrant children. Thousands of boys were sleeping on cots as the Biden administration grappled with a record number of minors crossing into the United States without their parents.
Mayor Adams promised to take a bite out of New York City’s greenhouse footprint Monday by reducing carbon output when it comes to emissions caused by the production and consumption of food — especially meat.
The pandemic was probably the result of a “research-related incident” at a laboratory in Wuhan, China, a lengthy US Senate report concluded.
In suburban Houston, parents rose up against a top-rated school district, demanding an entirely new reading curriculum.
Ukraine will “test and use” any non-banned weapons to liberate its territory, including Russian-occupied Crimea, the head of its National Security and Defence Council said on Friday.

