Queen Nancy Really Upset About A Possible Congressional Paycut

And typically unhinged

(The Hill) House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday that she opposes a cut in congressional pay because it would diminish the dignity of lawmakers’ jobs.

“I don’t think we should do it; I think we should respect the work we do,” Pelosi told reporters in the Capitol. “I think it’s necessary for us to have the dignity of the job that we have rewarded.”

The sequestor would cause a reduction of pay for lots and lots of federal workers, including those in Congress.

“It’s a hard question to ask me because most of my colleagues are the breadwinners in their families,” she said. “A pay cut to me doesn’t mean as much.”

Call me old fashioned, but serving in Congress was supposed to be a privileged and a duty, as well as a sacrifice, not a permanent job designed to enrich oneself. The average American household income was a bit over $60,000. Congressional electees receive $174,000 a year. Plus all the perks and ability to make lots of moola just by being a federally elected official. Meanwhile, out here in the real world, lots and lots of American citizens are taking pay cuts thanks to this Democrat run economic malaise. With the coming full implementation of ObamaCare, of which Pelosi was instrumental in passing, many Americans are seeing their work hours cut.

Scott Ott has some ideas about dealing with Congressional pay, including

Peg Congressional pay changes to changes in the median household income — down about 8.24% since 2007 — putting their pay at about $159,663. Of course, if they really wanted to identify with the people, we could set their pay AT the median household level, a cut of roughly $110,000. Members who serve inner-city districts could have their’s set to local rates.

When Nancy P regained control of the House, the country went into a deep, deep recession from which it has yet to recover. Incomes are down, the deficit is high, debt is now over $16 trillion, etc and so on.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Queen Nancy Really Upset About A Possible Congressional Paycut »

Boxer To Introduce “Fee And Dividend”

Polish a turd and rename it and it’s still a turd

(SFGate) Sen. Barbara Boxer plans Thursday to co-sponsor a radical plan to control carbon dioxide emissions modeled on Alaska’s rebates of oil royalties to residents.

The California Democrat is a marquee draw for an otherwise obscure bill by Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont liberal and independent. Called “fee and dividend,” the legislation is an unusual variant on a carbon tax. It would impose a fee on carbon emissions at their source, such as coal mines, raising the price of fossil fuel energy.

Perhaps Babs should discuss how well this went the last time Democrats brought it up, when, with control of the House and Senate it couldn’t pass. Oh, and she should ask how well this worked for the Queensland, Australia Labor Party, which enacted similar legislation and subsequently lost the next elections so badly that they aren’t even a recognized political party.

But instead of giving the proceeds to the government, three-fifths of the money would be refunded to U.S. residents.

Yup. This will supposedly raise $1.2 trillion over 10 years. And, sure, we’ll see that money back as our cost of living skyrockets

Read: Boxer To Introduce “Fee And Dividend” »

If All You See…

…is an evil fossil infused beer bottle foreshadowing a sea that will rise up over a drought world, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day Proof Positive, with a post on the reality of raising the minimum wage.

Read: If All You See… »

Climate “Scientists” Prove That Climate Astrology Is Real

And they’re getting really, really worked up over it

(News24) Cape Town – Scientists and environmentalists have reacted with anger to emerging reports that dismiss the reality of climate change.

Perhaps they should get mental health checkups before they harm others.

“No doubt, Africa is one of the most vulnerable continents to climate variability and change because of multiple stresses and low adaptive capacity. Environmental and climatic stress also raises existing inequalities between rich and poor,” Professor Oliver C Ruppel told News24.

Yeah, because this hasn’t gone on for billions of years. One of the popular hypotheses about the rise of Man is that the changing climate turned forests/jungles with lots of trees into savannas, causing our ancestors to come down out of the trees. Alas, Ruppel is a law professor, which I guess passes for a “climate scientist” nowadays.

Also mentioned are

  • IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri (no degree in climate science)
  • Richard Worthington, World Wide Fund for Nature climate expert (no degree in climate science)
  • Greenpeace Africa climate & energy campaigner Melita Steele. (no degree in climate science)

Ruppel is also a lead author for AR5, the next UN IPCC report. So, we now have lawyers writing the IPCC? Well, it’s now wonder, when he says stuff like this

“There is wide scientific consensus that the increased number and intensity of climate change induced natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcano eruptions, tsunamis and hurricanes, is of alarming concern,” said Ruppel, though adding that not all climate events lead to disasters.

Climate astrology at its finest.

Read: Climate “Scientists” Prove That Climate Astrology Is Real »

Whew! “Marco Rubio’s Water Flap Shall Pass”

Our long national nightmare is over!

(Politico) Sen. Marco Rubio’s inopportune case of cotton mouth during his State of the Union response may slow his rapidly rising stock, but will likely have no little lingering impact on his 2016 prospects, Republican operatives said Wednesday.

“The water moment did not bother me,” said Republican strategist Bruce Haynes, of Purple Strategies. “I thought it made him human. Washington types will snort and buzz about it but it probably made the average voter smile. And for Republicans, making voters smile is a welcome change of pace.”

I really, really wanted to ignore this non-story story. It is much ado about nothing. Of course, this nothing burger allows the 90% liberal media to focus on anything other than what Rubio’s message in response to Obama’s SOTU was about. And highlights exactly why the media is worthless. The morons at CNN (which would have no ratings without airports and company break rooms) actually put up a graphic wondering if drinking water was a career ender, then said “it was a joke“.

Then Maggie Haberman finds all sorts of squishy Republicans who show “concern” over the response and the water moment. Let’s see: Rubio had a sip of water. Obama is unable to complete a sentence or speech, especially off teleprompter, without a constant litany of ums, ahs, ers, and other pause words.

Strange how no one in the media wonders about this.

Read: Whew! “Marco Rubio’s Water Flap Shall Pass” »

Sen. Blumenthal: The Real Meaning Of Valentine’s Day Is Gun Control

Also, never letting a good crisis go to waste while dancing on the graves of kids in an attempt to push a limitation on the 2nd Amendment rights of law abiding citizens while failing to take into consideration any laws that affect criminals

How to send your love to Newtown

Today is bittersweet. All across America, people are giving their loved ones tokens of their affection. A box of chocolates. A dozen roses. Homemade Valentine cards. And that’s the way Valentine’s Day should be.

Except this Valentine’s Day is different. Today also marks the two-month anniversary of the tragic shooting of 20 innocent school children and six dedicated educators in Newtown, Conn. The grief of these 26 families is unimaginable. Undoubtedly, all Americans send them their love this Valentine’s Day. But love is not enough. We owe these families more than our love and support. We owe them action.

To be brutally honest, we do not owe them anything more than our empathy and love. We were not the ones who killed them. We were not the ones who want bat guano insane. And let’s consider that all the guns, including the Bushmaster .223, were legal under Connecticut law. Blumenthal goes on to point out that many polls show support for universal background checks, securing our schools (which Dems mostly won’t allow with armed guards) and a federal database to track guns

With broad public support, a system of background checks on gun and ammunition purchases simply makes sense. Over the last decade, background checks on guns have prohibited 700,000 individuals from purchasing guns- 700,000 felons, domestic abusers, addicts and seriously mentally ill individuals prohibited from purchasing a firearm. Unfortunately, existing laws enable those same individuals to engage in private sales at gun shows or over the Internet, undetected and undeterred…

The number of people who can purchase guns without a background check is small. This has been discussed again and again. Registered dealers, on the Internet and at gun shows, are required to perform a check. If you buy one on the ‘Net, it is sent to a registered dealer. And, here’s an important point: can Blumenthal show proof that guns purchased without a check in the manners he mention have been used in crimes? That said, I’m not against background checks. Now, checks for ammunition purchases? Now we’re starting to get creative in finding ways to limit people.

We must take action on ammunition purchases. Last month, I introduced the Ammunition Background Check Act. This bill is simple, but far-reaching in its potential impact. It would require an instant background check for the sale of ammunition. The legislation creates an essential enforcement mechanism where one currently does not exist, and should be a commonsense component of a comprehensive strategy to reduce gun violence.

Blumenthal forgets to mention, as he moves the goal post, how this is going to make a difference. Other than increasing the costs of ammunition, as well as immediately giving the Central Planning Office information on your ammo purchases, what will this do? Criminals do not generally walk in to a store to purchase.

We must also do more to stop the scourge of illegal gun trafficking in our communities. A bill pending in the Senate would help crack down on the straw purchase of firearms – a practice where an individual with a clean background buys a gun for someone who is prohibited from obtaining one. Closing this loophole would make it a federal crime to purchase a gun with the purpose of transferring it to someone else.

Perhaps Richard should have a talk with Obama and Eric Holder and discuss why their underlings were doing just this.

Richard also mentions mental health support, and how reform could be difficult. He’s right. Sadly, it seems that people with mental health issues are going to be demonized and see their Rights restricted, even though they have broken no laws, it’s just that someone else broke the law.

None of these common sense reforms is easy. But, on this Valentine’s Day, and on every day going forward, we owe it to the families of Newtown and to all families grieving over a loved one lost to gun violence, to have the political courage to act – now.

And virtually none of the offered legislation will stop people bent on using a gun for violence. Unbelievably stiff laws in Chicago have not only failed to stop gun violence, it seems as if criminals are taking advantage of the stiff laws.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Sen. Blumenthal: The Real Meaning Of Valentine’s Day Is Gun Control »

Whatcha Reading?

I experience this typically one to two times a week. Yes, that does mean I read that many books a year. Mostly science fiction, some fantasy (no frigging sparkly vampires!), a bit of mystery/thriller, and good zombie books as much as I can get them. Though, the one I just finished by Lisa Olsen, Angel Of Mercy, was kinda chick scifi. It was free (like tons of books I get for Kindle), and she has a couple other really good books like The Touch and Pretty Witches All In A Row. It was pretty good, she’s a great writer.

PS: I’ve started a nice gory zombie book to make up for all the feelings.

Read: Whatcha Reading? »

If All You See…

…is snow which only happens because a fossil fueled helicopter is making the climate warm, you might just be a Climate Astrologer

The blog of the day is The Lonely Conservative, with the full text of Marco Rubio’s SOTU response.

Read: If All You See… »

Schoolkids Won’t Know What Working School Buses Look Like

In the rush to save the planet from overheating, no one thought about how all those planet boiling GHGs would cause cold

(Northern Life) It would seem today’s modern fleet of school buses hasn’t been built for Northern Ontario weather.

According to the Sudbury Student Services Consortium, there is a problem with vehicles manufactured after 2010 which makes them hard to run in cold weather.

Changes to the engine design to make them more energy-efficient has had the unfortunate side effect of turning diesel fuel into gel in the extreme cold.

That’s exactly what happened Jan. 23, when school buses were cancelled because of record cold temperatures, which dipped below -36 C.

Students are also complaining of being cold on these buses because the engines aren’t able to run the heaters properly on such days.

I suppose this is what Obama meant when he said “But for the sake of our children and our future, we must do more to combat climate change.”

Read: Schoolkids Won’t Know What Working School Buses Look Like »

Ted Nugent Responds On Gun Control

Unfortunately, the Nuge was on his best behavior, and only provided some rare meat

(Buzzfeed) But when it came to gun control proposals, he didn’t mince words.

“Its more nonsense. Nothing he proposes or nothing he’s been proposed would have stopped any of the shootings. None of those shooters are gonna register anything,” Nugent said as dozens of reporters huddled around the conservative agitator just off the House floor.

“Canada finally abandoned its multibillion waste of a C68 gun law where goose hunters and farmers had to register their squirrel rifles. And it didn’t do anything to reduce crime or save any lives.”

“Who doesn’t know this? Who doesn’t know that registration and limitation on magazine capacity and the color of guns has anything to do with saving lives and reducing crime?” the “Nuge” argued, before his handler whisked him away for a television interview.

That’s because Nugent understands that what Obama and Democrats are pushing is to control gun ownership for law abiding citizens, making them more reliant on The Government for protection from criminals. And because Democrats simply do not like guns and do not want (Other People) to be allowed to own guns.

(The Hill) Obama on Tuesday acknowledged that policymakers will never eliminate gun violence altogether. But any progress on that front, he argued, is worth the effort.

“Our actions will not prevent every senseless act of violence in this country. … But we were never sent here to be perfect,” he said. “We were sent here to make what difference we can, to secure this nation, expand opportunity, and uphold our ideals through the hard, often frustrating, but absolutely necessary work of self-government.”

Strange how the majority of gun violence occurs in gun free zones and Democrat areas with massive restrictions on gun ownership by law abiding citizens.

Read: Ted Nugent Responds On Gun Control »

Pirate's Cove