Rep Jackie Speiers (D) To Introduce Whiny E-Cigarette Bill

But, hey, it’s for the kids or something!

(AP) U.S. Rep. Jackie Speier is proposing legislation that would regulate electronic cigarettes in the same way that tobacco products are currently regulated.

Speier, D-Hillsborough, announced the proposed law — called the Stop Selling and Marketing to Our Kids E-Cigarettes Act, or SMOKE — on Friday morning in front of the San Francisco General Hospital emergency room.

Speier says the e-cigarette industry is targeting children and teenagers by offering products flavored like gummy bears, cotton candy and chocolate cake.

Parts of the legislation would prohibit the use of flavorings in the products and require the Food and Drug Administration to establish childproof packaging standards and dosage limits.

This is simply using kids to enforce the Nanny State, because You just can’t be trusted to make your own decisions. I have a post sitting in the hopper from around a month ago that I never got around to posting, featuring Tom Harkin (D) whining in the same manner.

I have to wonder: if Dems are so concerned about children being marketed to with flavors, then why aren’t they doing anything about all the flavored alcohol? How many flavors of vodka are there? How about rum? Tequila?Schnapps? Beers? Cider drinks?

Then there’s the constant legalization of pot. How about drinks infused with THC? I see watermelon, peach, and blueberry, among others. How about all sorts of treats, like chocolate bars, chocolate drops, brownies, cookies, “jolly drops”, and so many others, available in a wide variety of flavors? Where is the concern about that being marketed to kids?

In fact, this is a completely ginned up issue. Practically the only advertising you will see for e-cigs are for ones that taste like cigarettes, such as the TV commercials for Blue e-cigs. You’ll hear some for others, like Njoy, on the radio. The ones that are marketed are primarily the type where you purchase replacement cartridges to attach to the replacement batteries, what are commonly referred to as disposables, rather than ones where you are purchasing e-juice, used to fill a clearomizer, which is attached to a battery. This is what I’ve been using.

Of course the tobacco companies support these regulations, because the regs won’t affect them. They aren’t really the ones offering all the different flavors.

Perhaps Ms. Speiers can explain why she is doing the dirty business of Big Tobacco, as well as not going after THC/Marijuana and alcohol.

Read: Rep Jackie Speiers (D) To Introduce Whiny E-Cigarette Bill »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful Gaia friendly bike, you might be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jammie Wearing Fools, with a post noting a crazy place a student got stuck.

Read: If All You See… »

Mika Brzezinski To Obama: “Say, Wasn’t Al Qaeda Decimated?”

Obviously, MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski was heavily intoxicated, or perhaps was hanging with Maureen Dowd in Colorado, when she decided to ask Obama a tough question. Well, more than likely, she was attempting to give Obama a way to hit some talking points

(Mediaite) In an interview pre-taped Friday but aired on Morning Joe Monday morning, MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski pressed President Barack Obama on the deteriorating situation in Iraq, charging, “You said that the war was ended in Iraq. You said al-Qaeda was decimated. You said it was stable.”

“It was,” Obama replied. “But just because something is stable two years ago or four years ago doesn’t mean it’s stable right now.”

OK, so, He Fixed Everything, but then something happened to cause it to go boom. Gotcha. That said, if it was stable 4 years ago, that would be more a consequence of the Bush policies, yes?

Obama emphasized that the U.S. needed to work with other forces in the region to contain ISIS, but that it couldn’t go playing “whack-a-mole,” occupying a country every time an Islamic militant group popped up in the Middle East. He also denied that there was some magic U.S. action that could have been taken in Syria to prevent ISIS’ rise, and also maintained that the situation did not change his calculus for troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.

“We’re prepared to have a residual force that helps to continue to train [Afghan] forces, to continue to help stabilize the situation as you have a new government coming in,” Obama said. “But keep in mind that our goal in Afghanistan was to decapitate al-Qaeda, which had carried out 9/11. That has been accomplished.”

I’ll give Obama credit for taking out Osama Bin Laden. He was president at the time. Let’s also not forget that much of al Qaeda’s leadership was decapitated during the Bush years. Let’s also not forget that many remain, such as Ayman al-Zawahiri, Nasser Abdul Karim al-Wuhayshi, Khalid al-Habib, and many others are still out there. Obama has done a good job in playing wack-a-mole to al Qaeda and other terrorist group leaders. That cannot be taken away from him.

The problem is that there are always Islamists willing to step up to the plate as high end leaders. And more than enough others willing to be followers in the jihad. And more than enough Madrasas, mosques, Islamic religious leaders, rich Islamic leaders, and Islamic countries willing to perpetuate radical Islam. And more than enough 1st World Citizens willing to cover their eyes to the problem of radical Islam.

Read: Mika Brzezinski To Obama: “Say, Wasn’t Al Qaeda Decimated?” »

Democrats Using “Climate Change” As Wedge Issue Or Something

I hope they do use it for the 2014 elections: pushing “climate change” rules and laws hasn’t worked out so well for politicians around the world as of late (see what happened to Australia’s Labor Party). Furthermore, it would make an interesting contrast as the Democrat politicians run all around in fossil fueled vehicles campaigning

(SF Gate) When President Obama stood before students in Southern California a week ago ridiculing those who deny climate science, he wasn’t just road testing a new political strategy to a friendly audience. He was trying to drive a wedge between younger voters and the Republican Party.

Which should be a problem for everyone, as Obama acts as the leader of the Democrat Party rather than the POTUS, insulting and demeaning American citizens. Then, this is his normal modus operandi.

Democrats are convinced that climate change is the new same-sex marriage, an issue that is moving irreversibly in their favor, especially among young people, women and independents, the voters who hold the keys to the White House in 2016.

Democrats are convinced that climate change is the new same-sex marriage, an issue that is moving irreversibly in their favor, especially among young people, women and independents, the voters who hold the keys to the White House in 2016.

I wonder if young people, women, and independents are thrilled by the prospect of $5 a gallon gas along with vastly increased power bills, which will raise the cost of everything else, which will furthermore cause economic hardship and lowered hiring?

All sorts of Warmists and Democrat advisers are saying this is a super awesome mega great issue to push. Maybe not

Not all business is on board, however. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which includes smaller businesses as well as Fortune 500 companies, issued a study before the new rule was announced saying it would cost the economy $50 billion a year.

In believing they can make political capital on global warming, Democrats don’t have history on their side. The last election in which climate change was an issue was in 2010, and it was a disaster for the party.

House passage of cap-and-trade legislation to curb carbon pollution that year helped topple San Francisco Democrat Nancy Pelosi from the speakership and embarrassed California Sen. Barbara Boxer, chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, who failed to get the Senate to act. The party descended into near-total silence on the issue.

Well, in all fairness, that was just the icing on the cake (cake is also bad for climate change, because it causes obesity or something): it was more the passage of Obamacare and the utter idiocy of the Stimulus, with the notion that Democrats do not listen to the American People, that caused the loss. However, if Democrats want to run on this as a major issue, it would be interesting, considering the “pause” has lasted for over 17 years and 9 months. We know for a fact that the actual data has been changed to conform to the talking points. And we know for a fact that Warmists refuse to practice what they preach. We also know that this would give Republicans an awesome rebuttal, in terms of claiming Democrats are using “climate change” as a “Squirrel!!!!” issue to deflect from their abominable records regarding Obamacare, the economy, spying on Americans, foreign policy, failing to secure the border, and unemployment, among others.

We know that they cannot be honest: just look at the picture that accompanies the article

Of course, most Warmists are too indoctrinated and devoid of scientific knowledge to understand what is coming out of those stacks.

Read: Democrats Using “Climate Change” As Wedge Issue Or Something »

Joe Biden Threatens To Kill Reporters If They Write Negative Article About Him

Sheriff Joe is off the reservation

(UK Daily Mail) Vice President Joe Biden threatened reporters Saturday with a water gun.

Biden pulled the water pistol on members of the press during the annual media picnic at his official residence at the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C.

‘Anybody who writes a bad story about me is dead,’ he said while holding the gun. ‘I just want you to know that, get this straight, we’re not gonna kid around about this.’

Just look at this gun wielding maniac!

Horrific! Perpetuating a society of gun violence! Where’s Piers “Musket” Morgan when you need him! Will Moms Demand Action protest Sheriff Joe? How about Mike Bloomberg and his Mayors Against Other Citizens Protecting Themselves With Guns Illegal Guns? Doesn’t Joe know that water pistols give young impressionable minds the idea that guns are OK, which lead to use of actual guns? Horrible!

Obviously, the Daily Mail article was meant to be silly, while mine were facetious. And Biden was just being silly, having some fun. Most of us in the Real World understand there was no real death threat. Yet, consider that a child draws a picture of a gun and gets suspended, a child brings a water pistol to school and get suspended, and a child uses his fingers (a level two look alike firearm) to represent a gun and gets suspended, but it is okay for Joe “Shoot ‘Em Thru the Door” Biden to threaten to kill journalist while holding a water gun? NJ threatened to revoke a man’s parental rights if he didn’t take his child for psychiatric testing after the 7th grader “twirled a pencil like a gun.” Another child bites a pop tart into the shape of a gun and is suspended. Another is suspended for bringing a pink Hello Kitty bubble making gun to school. The stories keep going and going, highlighting the hysteria from certain Americans regarding “guns”.

Imagine what would happen to a child if he/she brought a water pistol to school? Oh, that’s right, suspension.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Joe Biden Threatens To Kill Reporters If They Write Negative Article About Him »

Steve Stockman Offers “Dog Ate My Tax Receipts Resolution”

I really hope this makes it to the House floor. It’d be side-splitting to see that ginned-up outrage from Democrats along with their apoplectic comments

The resolution may be cited as the “Dog Ate My Tax Receipts Resolution.”

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) must allow taxpayers the same lame excuses for missing documentation that the IRS itself is currently proffering

Whereas, the IRS claims that convenient, unexplained, miscellaneous computer malfunction is sufficient justification not to produce specific, critical documentation; and,

Whereas, fairness and Due Process demand that the American taxpayer be granted no less latitude than we afford the bureaucrats employed presently at the IRS;

Now, therefore, be it resolved that it is the sense of the House of Representatives that unless and until the Internal Revenue Service produces all documentation demanded by subpoena or otherwise by the House of Representatives, or produces an excuse that passes the red face test,

All taxpayers shall be given the benefit of the doubt when not producing critical documentation, so long as the taxpayer’s excuse therefore falls into one of the following categories:

1.         The dog ate my tax receipts
2.         Convenient, unexplained, miscellaneous computer malfunction
3.         Traded documents for five terrorists
4.         Burned for warmth while lost in the Yukon
5.         Left on table in Hillary’s Book Room
6.         Received water damage in the trunk of Ted Kennedy’s car
7.         Forgot in gun case sold to Mexican drug lords
8.         Forced to recycle by municipal Green Czar
9.         Was short on toilet paper while camping
10.       At this point, what difference does it make?

In any case, IRS can see the NSA for a good, high quality copy.

Unless the NSA’s computers go down.

Read: Steve Stockman Offers “Dog Ate My Tax Receipts Resolution” »

If All You See…

…is a horrible waste of non-renewable water to clean an evil fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on a crazy lib-talker threatening to call in fake gun reports.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in the Once And Future Nation of America. Not sure who did this very old school pinup.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. The Other McCain notes that the IRS had a contract with an email backup company
  2. The Hockey Schtick notes that wind power increases costs and CO2 emissions.
  3. The Blogmocracy wonders if we can just start the prosecutions already
  4. 90Ninety Miles From Tyranny notes 24 things supposedly ruined by “climate change”
  5. A View From The Beach discusses windmills and the VA
  6. Amy Ridenour’s National Center Blog wonders who Washington fears the most
  7. Capitalism Is Freedom discusses the privatization of porn
  8. Cold Fury features liberty vs. equality
  9. DaTechGuy explains the stages of Shut Up
  10. Fausta notes who Obama is blaming for increased illegal immigration
  11. Fire Andrea Mitchell compares Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton book sales
  12. Flopping Aces digs deep into the Washington Redskins name issue
  13. The Grumpy Patriot notes the most immoral president
  14. Jihad Watch has more from the Religion Of Peace, advocating for attacks on the US
  15. And last, but not least, Lady Liberty 1885 wonders if Kay Hagan has lost any emails

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

“Who respects a church that only echoes the secular world?”

Good question

(The Blaze) The Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)’s official embrace of same-sex marriage at its General Assembly meeting in Detroit, Michigan, Thursday has sparked a wide array of responses. From utter shock and dismay to jubilant rejoicing, observers are divided on the denomination’s decision to bless gay unions.

Consider the response from Mark Tooley, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy, a conservative Think Tank. Tooley believes the matrimonial amendment, while being touted by some as a progressive step in the right direction, will eventually lead to the denomination’s demise.

“By overturning natural marriage the PCUSA is only accelerating its already fast-paced demise. It will become even smaller, whiter and older,” he said, according to Charisma News. ”Only declining denominations reject historic Christian standards and in nearly every case that rejection reinforces the decline.”

Tooley added, “Who respects a church that only echoes the secular world?”

I’ve long held the position that it should be up to the churches, not The Government, as to whether or not to allow gay marriage. Marriage is a religious institution, not a function of government. I also have no problem with civil unions, since that is a function of government, and, really, this is America, the land of the free, and Classical Liberalism (the backbone of American Conservatism) deems that if it isn’t harming me, if it’s not directly harming me in any way negatively, why should I care? Yet, just because I think it should be left up to the churches, doesn’t mean I do not think it is wrong to go against Biblical teachings.

It does have to be balanced against the compassion and tolerance of religion, though.

Not all were against this, many were for it. The question is, how many Presbyterians will leave the denomination, both individually and the churches themselves? It’s not official yet, as the 172 regional presbyteries have to approve it next year. So far, though, 428 churches have left the denomination or folded over central theological differences since 2011, many due to to gay marriage and the decision in 2011 to ordain openly gay clergy in same-sex relationships.

Meanwhile

(NY Times) After passionate debate over how best to help break the deadlock between Israel and the Palestinians, the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) voted on Friday at its general convention to divest from three companies that it says supply Israel with equipment used in the occupation of Palestinian territory.

The vote, by a count of 310 to 303, was watched closely in Washington and Jerusalem and by Palestinians as a sign of momentum for a movement to pressure Israel to stop building settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem and to end the occupation, with a campaign known as B.D.S., for Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions.

The vote was much closer than the gay marriage one, in which 76% of the general assembly voted for gay marriage. We need to put this in context of Progressivism. I’ve been discussing exactly what Progressives do, having mentioned how Progressives are infiltrating and working to change religious (and other) institutions from within. Along with working to restrict religion from without. They move the individual churches and overall denominations towards a more secular world, slowly changing/removing what it means to be a Christian or Jew. Which, by the way, would also mean lower membership within the denominations that become secularized.

With that secularization comes the ability to do things like attack Israel with a divestment campaign. Interestingly, these divestment campaigns never seem to attack the Palestinians, people who send suicide bombers and armed rockets into Israel to attack civilian populations.

Bobby Jindal noted during his address at the annual conference hosted by the Faith and Freedom Coalition

Jindal emphasized that there was a “silent war” on religious liberty being fought in the U.S. — a country that he said was built on that liberty.

“I am tired of the left. They say they’re for tolerance, they say they respect diversity. The reality is this: They respect everybody unless you happen to disagree with them,” he said. “The left is trying to silence us and I’m tired of it, I won’t take it anymore.”

Again, much of that attempt to silence is by infiltrating and working from within. The end game is to marginalize organized religion so that it has almost no impact on anything, as well as removing it from the public domain, creating subservience and adherence to The State. That is the Progressive goal. A nation of pagans. Things like the aforementioned votes are not happening in a vacuum. They are part of the plan/goal. Now, not everything is part of the overall plan/goal: sometimes they just get lucky, along with chalking some results up to simple incompetence and/or idiocy. However, put this in context with what has happened in so many other sectors, and it makes sense.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: “Who respects a church that only echoes the secular world?” »

Climate Change Is A Moral Issue For People Of Faith Or Something

I explained yesterday, to some degree, how Progressives are working to take over all sorts of different sectors (and have taken over lots), one of which is the religious sector. Climate change is simply a politically expedient method to enforce Progressive doctrines. Over the past year or so, we’ve been seeing more and more in regards to linking Faith, ie, religion, with “climate change”. Katherine Hayhoe has big a big pusher of this, and others are following along. Like this, by Sarah King, the chair of the Arizona Ecumenical Council’s Earth Care Commission.

Climate change is a moral issue crucial to people of faith

I have served on the Arizona Ecumenical Council Earth Care Commission as both a committee member and as chairperson for about 15 years. Recently, I was asked to comment on the Environmental Protection Agency’s new carbon rule to curb the growing threat of greenhouse gases that contribute to global climate change.

I know this is a controversial topic with some people as the standards could mean that coal-fired generating plants would have to make some expensive technological adaptations and retire some units and expedite transition to clean energy sources such as solar and wind in order to reduce carbon pollution. Ultimately, we must bear these costs, however. I believe that if I am going to be true to the mandate I have as a practicing Christian, I have no choice but to come down on the side of these new protections.

Let me explain. Christians (full disclosure — I am of the United Methodist persuasion) have a gospel duty to be good citizens. This is reflected in the 2004 United Methodist Church Book of Resolutions under the heading, “Environmental Justice for a Sustainable Future,” which states: “The scale of human activities has grown so large that it now threatens the planet itself. Global environmental problems have become so vast they are hard to comprehend. The vast majority of scientific evidence suggests that carbon dioxide from fossil fuels has already caused a measurable warming of the globe. Confronted with the massive crisis of the deterioration of God’s creation and faced with the question of the ultimate survival of life, we ask God’s forgiveness for our participation in this destruction.”

We are not the only Christian (or Jewish, or Muslim or Unitarian Universalist, for that matter) religion that understands that WE ARE THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM and are calling for action on climate change. This is a concern of many faith communities, and rightly so — because climate change is a moral issue. And when it comes to moral questions, the church is morally bound to weigh in.

She goes on to write that it is “the duty of the church to speak out boldly and forcefully” on climate change because it is “greatest challenge to human survival of our time. I would think it is the job of the churches to preach about the Bible and Jesus. Silly me.

For over 15 years, the Earth Care Commission’s unofficial motto has been: “If we don’t care, who will?” It is time to show that we care.

Which is funny, because the earth has been in a statistically insignificant warming pause for longer than the group has had the unofficial motto.

As time goes on, remember the warning about how Progressives are taking over institutions, in this case religion, for their nefarious fascist purposes. Yet, few Progressives (yup, writing it again) will back their talking points up with action in their own lives.

Read: Climate Change Is A Moral Issue For People Of Faith Or Something »

Pirate's Cove