…is an evil plastic water bottle causing the atmosphere heat up and dump huge amounts of snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a post on the State Dept. hosting the Muslim Brotherhood.
Read: If All You See… »
…is an evil plastic water bottle causing the atmosphere heat up and dump huge amounts of snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Nice Deb, with a post on the State Dept. hosting the Muslim Brotherhood.
Read: If All You See… »
Though, if you really want to survive, you’ll have to move to Norway, which has an 82.7% chance
The Countries Most Likely To Survive Climate Change In One Infographic
Climate change is real, and it’s coming. But we’re all going to be affected in different ways. How will your country fare?
The folks at Eco Experts put together a great infographic based on data from the Notre Dame Global Adaptation (ND-Gain) Index, an annual ranking of which countries are best poised to adapt to a warming world.
While the maps provide a great zoomed-out perspective of what’s going to happen globally as the earth warms, there are a few caveats to keep in mind when checking it out:
First, these maps are based on country rankings, not comprehensive evaluations of each country. In other words, the best-ranked countries are only as great as they seem compared to the countries that are performing less well.
Additionally, the ranking looks only at the level of entire countries. All of the state-specific, region-specific, or city-specific data gets somewhat lost in this zoomed out perspective.
Here’s part of the graphic. It’s huge, so you’ll have to hit the link to peruse the entire thing

Of course, not mentioned, is a third caveat, namely that Warmists are bat guano insane. Fourth, Mankind survived the previous Holocene warm periods, which were warmer than the prognostications for the warmth in 21o0. And Mankind did quite well during the warm periods.
Read: Good News: USA Has 78.9% Change It Will Survive Hotcoldwetdry »
A few entrepreneurial teens in Bound Brook, NJ, learned in a valuable lesson in government dominance
Bound Brook cops stop teens seeking snow shoveling work
School was closed for the blizzard that wasn’t, but there was still enough snow on the ground that two Bridgewater-Raritan Regional High School seniors thought they could make a few extra bucks.
In the process, Matt Molinari and Eric Schnepf, both 18, also learned a valuable lesson about one of the costs of doing business: government regulations.
The two friends were canvasing a neighborhood near this borough’s border with Bridgewater early Monday evening, handing out fliers promoting their service, when they were pulled over by police and told to stop.
Bound Brook, like many municipalities in the state and country, has a law against unlicensed solicitors and peddlers.
Despite the rule, however, Police Chief Michael Jannone said the two young businessmen were not arrested or issued a ticket, and that the police’s concern was about them being outside during dangerous conditions, not that they were unlicensed.
You have two issues, first, this was mostly about stopping people from making money without a license. Anyone going door to door needs a license that costs $450 and is good for 180 days. Second, being told that you are not allowed to go outside and walk around? What nation are we living in?
“We don’t make the laws but we have to uphold them,” he said Tuesday after reading some of the online comments about the incident. “This was a state of emergency. Nobody was supposed to be out on the road.”
He’s right, they don’t make the laws, but, if President Obama can tell law enforcement to ignore the law regarding illegal aliens, the Bound Brook police can ignore some teens wandering around offering to shovel snow, especially when this goes to many people calling them to come.
The police say the story is about someone calling because they saw a “suspicious” person walking through yards, and that they were concerned for the safety of the teens. We’re quite a delicate society now, eh? Grandpa would like to let you know that he walked 5 miles to school in the snow. Uphill. Both ways. With an onion on his belt.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Want To Shovel Snow For Money? There’s A Permit For That »
Another great example of Climourettes, which is defined as the inability of people to stop themselves from interjecting “climate change” into every discussion (video at the link)
(Huffington Post) Â Bill Nye is weighing in on Deflategate again, but this time he has a few props and a message to share about something far more important.
New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick claimed atmospheric conditions and temperature changes could have caused footballs to lose air pressure during the team’s AFC Championship win over the Indianapolis Colts.
On Sunday, Nye said taking that much air out of a ball would require an inflation needle. But in a new video posted on Funny or Die, The Science Guy declared that “one test is worth 1,000 expert opinions,” and put some footballs into a fridge set to 51 degrees, or the temperature at the Jan. 18 game.
That’s where the video takes a very different turn.
“While we’re all obsessed with Deflategate, let’s keep in mind that there’s something about which you should give a fuck,” Nye said. “Yes, like Tom Brady, the world is getting hotter and hotter, and you know why? Because we humans are pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.â€

Nye then began listing things that contribute to climate change — including long-winded Deflategate press conferences — and followed that up with a rallying cry.
Oh, you mean things like videos on the web that use lots of energy?
Read: Bill Nye: Forget Deflategate, “Says ‘Give A F**k’ About Climate Change Instead” »
…is a flooded world because Other People take fossil fueled trips, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The People’s Cube, with a post on the Warm On Women, ISIS style.
Read: If All You See… »
If it is, I blame the Warmists for refusing to give up their own use of fossil fuels, hairdryers, ice makers, hair spray, refusing to unplug every appliance not in use, refusing to live in a tiny house, refusing to grow their own food, walk or bike to work, and only buy local
Here’s How We Know Global Warming Made the Blizzard Worse
Manhattan may have gotten the wimpy end of Juno, but the storm chin-checked New England. Boston is buried in snow. Hurricane-force winds buffeted Nantucket. The storm surge may have permanently altered shorelines from New Haven, Connecticut, to Portsmouth, Maine. Storms have always happened in winter, but the excessively violent ones? They’re getting more common, and that’s due to climate change.
“It’s winter, and we have storms, so that part is entirely natural,†says Kevin Trenberth, a senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, the federal government’s center for understanding weather and climate. “The global warming aspect relates to the fact that the oceans are warmer, and the air above them is more moist.â€
So, does this mean that the oceans were super-duper warm during the Little Ice Age, the Dark Ages, and, heck, the last glacial age and Snowball Earth?
Also, weren’t we told that the heat was hiding in the deep oceans?
Trenberth’s expertise puts him in the potentially uncomfortable position of trying to use scientific data to answer what has become a politicized question. But he says that doesn’t bother him because the numbers speak for themselves. Climate models—heavy-lifting computation that simulates the fluid dynamics of the whole planet—show that oceans are like batteries, charging up with extra warmth as atmospheric carbon continues to warm the planet. But that energy storage isn’t free. What goes in must come out, feeding bigger, badder storms. In the case of Winter Storm Juno, extra warmth in the ocean possibly lowered air pressure by a few bars. That means more wind and bigger storm surges.
So this is all based on computer models? Good grief.
Not to be outdone, VICE News goes with
Climate Change Is Bringing More Extreme Precipitation Events to the Northeast
And Full Time Whistle
Blizzard of Nor’Easters No Surprise, Thanks to Climate Change
The contents of the fables pretty much mirror the excerpted one, the same as many, many other articles, so, it looks like Warmists received their marching orders. Then there’s the New Republic
It’s Time to Remind Climate Change Deniers That Weather and Climate Are Different
This myth is routinely debunked, but one more time doesn’t hurt: Weather is not climate. The weather is immediate conditions—rain, snow, sunshine, etc.—while the climate is long-term trends.
Perhaps they should be telling Warmists this, since they now blame every weather event on “climate change”.
A blizzard or a cold snap doesn’t disprove climate change. It doesn’t cancel the fact that ten of the hottest years on record have occured since 2000, with 2014 as the the warmest yet.
So, they set the condition that nothing can disprove their pet cult. And, they apparently haven’t gotten the info that 2014 is not necessarily the warmest yet. But, really, even if it was the warmest, even if they were right on snow being caused by heat, that in no way proves anthropogenic causation.
Weather forecasts are also not the same as climate projections, because weather predictions are short-term by nature. And despite improved forecasting over the last few decades, weather forecasts are only as accurate as meteorologists’ initial data, like atmospheric conditions, ocean surface temperatures, and how well real-world physics is represented in their models. Imperfect knowledge of those conditions makes weather predictions highly variable.
Climate models, on the other hand, can’t predict the weather on a specific day, but they do show trends and averages. They deal with different data, including conditions of the deep ocean, vegetation, and the sun, and how greenhouse gasses impact the system. “The ability (or not) of predicting a single storm on a given day in a specific portion of the U.S. has little relevance to skill in predicting long-term climate associated with long-lived greenhouse gases,†Norman Loeb, an atmospheric scientist with NASA, said in an email.
Which is interesting, because “climate models” have consistently failed. Remember when we were told that snow would be a thing of the past? Remember when we were told that the 2005 hurricane season would be “the new normal”? Then landfalling hurricanes dropped off. We were told that Superstorm Sandy would be the new normal. Nope.
Climate deniers upset that Tuesday’s blizzard skipped New York City can take comfort that the city will face more historic storms in the future.
Of course it will. That’s the way nature works. Of course, in Warmist World, they seem to forget that “weather is not climate.”
Read: Warmists Continue Pushing Notion That Juno Was Proof Of “Climate Change” »
Good thing we exchanged him for 5 hardcore Taliban members, eh?
(NBC News) Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who was held captive by enemy forces in Afghanistan for five years, will likely be charged with desertion, senior defense officials tell NBC News.
The officials point out that Bergdahl will likely face a lesser charge of desertion described in the Uniform Code of Military Justice as leaving a post to avoid duty or shirk an important assignment, based on his actions when he left a remote outpost in June 2009.
Those charges carry a maximum sentence of 5 years in prison upon conviction, but sources tell NBC News the Army is considering crediting Bergdahl for the 5 years he spent in captivity and be given the opportunity to avoid prosecution by leaving the Army with a “less than honorable discharge.”
If accepted, Bergdahl could be denied as much as $300,000 in back pay and benefits and be reduced in rank from Sergeant to Private First Class or lower.
It does seem that the charges are being lowered, most likely for political reasons, ie, in order to minimize the damage to Obama. An Air Force commander told the Army Times that no decision has been made as of yet, but, I think we can all see the writing on the wall.
Let’s also not forget that the prisoner swap was deemed illegal by the GAO.