…is an evil grill cooking evil meat, along with an evil CO2 infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on a racist judge abusing crime victims.
Read: If All You See… »
…is an evil grill cooking evil meat, along with an evil CO2 infused beer, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on a racist judge abusing crime victims.
Read: If All You See… »
Let’s not forget, Obama’s carbon footprint was estimated to be 41,000 metric tons, the equivalent of 2200 American households. Of course, that estimate was produced in 2009, well before we realized just how often Obama would take long fossil fueled flights, including separate ones from his family and dog, as well as the number of times he’d take a big motorcade to play a round of golf. Which leads to
Obama to push climate change for Earth Day
President Obama plans to spotlight his climate change plans next week, saying Saturday that “there’s no greater threat to our planet” than ever-rising temperatures.
The week will be built around a presidential trip to the Florida Everglades on Wednesday, which is Earth Day.
“The Everglades is one of the most special places in our country, but it’s also one of the most fragile,” Obama said in his weekly radio address. “Rising sea levels are putting a national treasure — and an economic engine for the South Florida tourism industry — at risk.”
So, he’s going to take a fossil fueled flight, followed by a huge fossil fueled motorcade, to head to Florida to highlight Hotcoldwetdry.
The sad part is that the Everglades are endangered from actual environmental issues (pollution, pesticides, illegal dumping, overuse of water, etc). But, instead of focusing on those real issues, these hardcore members of the Cult of Climastology blow those off and worry about the fake issue of anthropogenic climate change.
Obama to take unnecessary 0.2 MPG roundtrip to the Everglades to tell us not to waste energy https://t.co/uA0DHEXpac
— Tom Nelson (@TomANelson) April 18, 2015
Read: Man With Largest Carbon Footprint In World To Push “Climate Change” For Earth Day »
Marco Rubio may be, among others, dynamic, young, a great speaker, and supposedly the “one Republican who can beat Hillary”. He can guarantee that Conservative voters, the people more likely to get out and vote during the primaries, as well as tune in during the Neverending Debates, will run from him with stuff like this
(Breitbart) Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), a 2016 GOP presidential candidate, said he believes that President Barack Obama’s first executive amnesty for so-called DREAMers—the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)—is “important†and he won’t reverse it himself if elected president. He delivered these remarks in a Spanish-language interview he gave to Univision’s Jorge Ramos.
“I believe DACA is important. It can’t be terminated from one moment to the next, because there are already people benefiting from it,†Rubio said in Spanish on Ramos’s television program, according to an English translation provided by the media service Grabien. “But yes, it is going to have to end. It can’t be the permanent policy of the United States, and I don’t think that’s what they’re asking either. I think everyone prefers immigration reform.â€
On one hand, he is correct, at least procedurally. Obama has already given these folks executive amnesty. On the other hand, the amnesty is not permanent. It has a time limit on it. Because only Congress can pass laws that make it permanent. But, from a practical and realistic point of view, would we suddenly do away with the DACA and start deportation? No. On the other hand, yammering about how great it is is a Bad Idea, unless one is a Democrat candidate. Most Establishment Republicans keep these beliefs to themselves.
Ramos followed up, according to the translation, by asking: “But then, to clarify, you would put an end to DACA once immigration reform is approved, but what would happen, Senator, if there is no immigration reform; would you cancel DACA anyway?â€
Rubio answered that DACA will end only when a legislative substitute with the exact same or similar policy prescriptions—a legislative amnesty for illegal alien minors—is implemented. He also said in Spanish that, if elected president, he believes that America cannot deport illegal aliens here in the country right now, and he expects a legislative solution will be implemented that essentially has all the parts of the massively controversial “Gang of Eight†bill that he would pass piece-by-piece.
This is the Establishment Republican belief, and Rubio is very much and Establishment Guy, who never really abandoned his belief in amnesty. This is not pandering to Latinos, especially since those here legally are typically not in favor of rewarding those here illegally. This is a Belief, and will be a serious impediment to Rubio obtaining the GOP nomination.
Some say Rubio is positioning himself to obtain the VP slot. Perhaps.
Read: Marco Rubio Is A Big Supporter Of Obama’s DACA Amnesty »
Yes, totally psyched. However, I have one bugaboo: if this is taking place 30 years after Return Of The Jedi, that means that, according to the Expanded Universe, Chewbacca has been dead for 9 years, since the character was killed off in the book Vector Prime, during the Yuuzhan Vong war, which takes place 25 years after the Battle Of Yavin (ABY), which is how the timeline for the Star Wars Universe is put together.
Interestingly, the movie picks a time, which would be 34 years ABY, where there is nothing written or done within the Expanded Universe.
Read: Star Wars: The Force Awakens »
This is a big pull at Memeorandum, but it was something I had already seen previously, since I read NJ.com pretty much every day (I’m originally from NJ, the parents are still there, I get my Devils and NY Giants news, and they provide great links)
(NJ.com) Â About a month after Jim Boggessposted a “white history month” sign in the window of his Main Street deli, an ensuing lack of business caused him to close his business. This despite a public apology and handshake with Bhakti Curtis, the mixed-race customer who had raised a ruckus over it.
Now, beset by creditors, Boggess has posted a fundraising appeal on the website GoFundMe. It is titled “Jimbos white history sign gone bad.”
The link has the text of the appeal, which you’re welcome to read.
Now, first, this does show the typical double standard. We are allowed to have X History Month/Day for virtually everything else. But, not for Whites. If someone tries, it is Very Bad And Evil, ya know.
More importantly, let’s consider this from the comments
Freedom of Expression does not mean freedom from consequence. He’s probably hoping to get a huge amount like the pizza place in Indiana. It will be interesting to see if the crowd funders go for it.
True. That’s always a thought passing through my head. But, imagine the outcry if a Black/Gay/Latino/Whatever was boycotted due to putting a “History Month” sign. Let’s also consider this
He’s probably a liar and a fraud too. He hangs up sign in March and less than a month he has creditors knocking on the door – doesn’t pass the smell test.
And that was my first thought, as well.
Read: Flemington, NJ Deli Owner Closes Down Shop After Posting “White History Month” Sign »
…is a horrible fossil fuels powered grill cooking evil extreme weather causing meat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Free North Carolina, with a post on 2nd Amendment hating Tim McGraw.
BTW, I’d heavily advise NOT going to the link in the photo while at work. I found the picture cruising Google images.
Read: If All You See… »
This was something that was Very Important to the UK Guardian (which still hasn’t divested its own portfolio from fossil fuels)
The climate crisis: five demands from young voters
The Guardian went to the University of Sussex to find out what students think about green issues in the run-up to the election. Our panel was chaired by writer and presenter Rick Edwards
And the top 5 demands are
1) Divest from fossil fuels.
Why? Well, because. That’s why.
2) Modernise how we talk about climate change
Apparently because the talking points from the last 25+ years have become stale. Here’s the one that interested me the most
3) Take lifestyle choices seriously. Alternative lifestyles are not to be scoffed at. Young members of the audience spoke with passion about their quest to reduce carbon emissions by becoming vegan, cycling everywhere and boycotting flying. “We need to build a better picture of what a zero-carbon lifestyle looks like,†said Green MP Caroline Lucas from the floor. People might be more encouraged to reduce their carbon emissions if wearable devices, along the lines of Fitbits, existed to gamify the process, said Paul MacInnes. We need to stop tinkering around the edges and be more radical.
I’m 100% behind this. All Cult Of Climastrology members should embrace these alternative lifestyle choices, making their own lives carbon neutral. No use of fossil fuels. Etc and so on. Of course, they’ll then whine about having no money and no lives and demand that Government take care of them.
4) Our current climate change targets aren’t robust or ambitious enough.
Of course. They always want more and more. Which, of course, means more and more government.
5) Don’t let austerity take the focus off the environment. Use environmental initiatives to help us out of the economic crisis.
Well, they haven’t worked at all during the current economic crisis, and many countries, in particular Germany, are moving away from the “environmental initiatives”, which have nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with politics.
Read: Say, What Do Young Voters Want Regarding “Climate Change”? »
Just 3 long, long days ago, when she met “voters” in Iowa
(UK Guardian) Clinton laid out four campaign planks: 1) revitalizing economy 2) supporting families 3) getting dirty $$ out of politics 4) defending against threats seen and unseen
Clinton said she would support a constitutional amendment to eliminate dark money from US politics.
Well, that’s for Other People, you know
(Huffington Post) Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign will accept donations from lobbyists and political action committees, a difference in policy from the man she’s hoping to replace, President Barack Obama.
Of course, putting the policy into practice was something completely different for Team Obama, which certainly took money from both, which even the Huff Post had to admit later in the article.
The Clinton campaign confirmed that there would be no prohibition on such donations, after The Huffington Post was tipped off by two lobbyists supportive of the former secretary of state’s run for the White House.
“Hillary Clinton has a long history of taking on tough fights against special interests, whether or not they’re donors to her campaigns,” said Jesse Ferguson, a spokesman for the campaign. “She strongly supports campaign finance reform and has voted for tough lobbying reform, but as long as Republican groups and candidates are going to spend millions attacking Hillary, we need the resources to fight back.â€
Will Hillary require every PAC and lobbyist to publish who the donations came from, in order to stop that “dark money”? Ha! Made myself laugh.
And we all know that most Democrats/Liberals/Progressives will excuse Hillary when she takes “dark money”, just like they’ll excuse her for using tons of fossil fuels even as she (supposedly) campaigns against “climate change”.
Read: Hillary Campaign Excited To Take Money From Lobbyists And PACs »
Well, of course, as Cult of Climastrology tenets tell us, the cold and snow is caused by climate change. Or just weather. It depends on the agreed upon talking points. But, in Warmist World, it’s just a foretaste of the doom of the future, you guys
(Daily Caller) Global warming activists should probably start planning their protests for the summer because the second climate rally — within just days of a major one in Canada — has been buried in snow.
Student activists with Fossil Free CU have camped out the University of Colorado, staging a “sit in†meant to show the Board of Regents the group’s commitment to getting the school to divest its endowment of fossil fuel holdings.
The group’s Facebook page shows students braving the elements to convince the Board of Regents to ditch fossil fuels to fight global warming. Unfortunately for them, the “Gore effect†has kicked in and may blunt their arguments that the world is catastrophically warming.
They received about 3 inches of global warming snow on Thursday. And more on tap for Friday.
“We’ve been speaking with the regents, and they really haven’t been budging,†Austen Bernier, a student activist, told the Daily Camera. “They’ve failed to take bold action; they’ve failed to commit to creating a pathway to divestment even though they let us come talk at the last board meeting. With their failure to take action, our point here is to create a safe space where we can have the dialogue that they’re refusing to have.â€
What is it with college students and “safe spaces”? Which are places the poor whittle snowflakes go to play with dolls and coloring books, and have themselves a good lie down, as they say in England. Well, they’ll need their “safe space” for that crying jag
(Washington Times) The board voted 7-2 against divesting its $2.7 billion endowment from fossil fuels, citing state law and university policy requiring prudent investment of public funds, then defeated a second proposal to launch a sustainable investment advisory committee.
Will the protesters pledge to eliminate fossil fuels from their own lives?
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Bummer: Colorado Climate Change Protest Hit With Cold, Snow »