Kristoff: Boy, These Liberal Cities Like Baltimore Sure Are A Mess And Very Bad For Blacks

Obviously, what is going on in Baltimore is cause for a National Conversation. Of course, what gets left out of that Nation Conversation are realities and root causes. Instead, we get excuses and hand wringing each and every time. The Washington Post is reporting that Freddie Gray was attempting to injure himself in the police van (this doesn’t excuse the slow response time by the police). Other media sources have heard the same information. But, hey, National Conversation. The NY Times features many National Conversations. Nicholas Kristof’s highlights just how bad liberal cities are

When Baltimore Burned

Conservatives have sometimes been too quick to excuse police violence. And liberals have sometimes been too quick to excuse rioter violence.

Point of fact: Conservatives aren’t excusing unwarranted police violence.

It’s outrageous when officers use excessive force against young, unarmed African-American men, who are 21 times as likely to be shot dead by the police as young white men. It’s also outrageous when rioters loot shops or attack officers.

In reality, Black males aged 15-19, which is the study group, are only killed 2.3 times more than for Whites. Because they are also 9 times more likely to commit murder. We also learn from that article

Can we still conclude that police singles out black teenagers?  As ProPublica acknowledges, the data on justifiable police killings are “terribly incomplete,” and “vast numbers of the country’s 17,000 police departments don’t file fatal police shooting reports at all.”

But there is an additional problem.  The numbers aren’t random.  It so happens that urban areas, that are 50 percent more heavily black than the rest of the US, are the ones that report justifiable police killings. That means police probably kill whites more often than these incomplete statistics indicate.

Huh. Strange how Kristof throws out a statistic that is “terribly incomplete”.

Yet as Obama, Anthony and other leaders also noted, there are crucial underlying inequities that demand attention. The rioting distracts from those inequities, which are the far larger burden on America’s cities.

That also represents a failure on our part in the American news media. We focus television cameras on the drama of a burning CVS store but ignore the systemic catastrophe of broken schools, joblessness, fatherless kids, heroin, oppressive policing — and, maybe the worst kind of poverty of all, hopelessness.

Well, that’s strange. Here you have a majority-minority city (65% Black) which is overwhelmingly Democrat, and has been for quite some time (the last Republican mayor served 1963-1967), and it has lots and lots of problems, and then you add in that the media, which also seems to be largely White and liberal, ignores the problems.

In Gray’s neighborhood, one-third of adults lack a high school degree. A majority of those aged 16 to 64 are unemployed.

Hooray for Democrat policies!

And Baltimore’s African-American residents have often encountered not only crime and insecurity but also law enforcement that is unjust and racist. Michael A. Fletcher, an African-American reporter who lived for many years in the city, wrote in The Washington Post that when his wife’s car was stolen, a Baltimore policeman bluntly explained the department’s strategy for recovering vehicles: “If we see a group of young black guys in a car, we pull them over.”

Eric Holder famously scolded America, saying we were cowards when it comes to discussing race. Well, here’s the ugly truth: cops go where the crime is. They see patterns. They are often familiar with the players in neighborhoods. And if a city is majority-minority, Blacks are going to see the police a lot more. And, another ugly truth is that crime is going to be much more rampant within a Black city than a white one. Often thanks the very same Liberal policies that keep them “poor, fatherless, uneducated, and hopeless”, all while liberals wring their hands and patronize Blacks. The very very liberal city of Portland, Oregon, which is 70% white, has a crime rate of 6.09, with a 1 in 164 chance of being a crime victim (Portland is often ranked very high in the best places to live). Baltimore has a crime rate of 14.28, with a 1 in 70 chance of being a crime victim. If we want to take Eric Holder up, we have to wonder exactly what the differences are between the two cities, and why Baltimore spends huge sums of their budget on law enforcement and the criminal justice system, and Portland instead has large sums to piss away on “climate change” initiatives

Likewise, the Baltimore jail was notorious for corruption and gang rule. A federal investigation found that one gang leader in the jail fathered five children by four female guards.

Again, this is all very strange that this happens in the Very Liberal City Of Baltimore.

We’ve had months of police incidents touching on a delicate subtext of race, but it’s not clear that we’re learning lessons. Once again, I suggest that it’s time for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission to step back and explore racial inequity in America.

Yes, let’s do that. I doubt Liberals will be very happy with the realities it would expose, such as liberal cities being Very Bad for Blacks.

The real crisis isn’t one night of young men in the street rioting. It’s something perhaps even more inexcusable — our own complacency at the systematic long-term denial of equal opportunity to people based on their skin color and ZIP code.

Liberal cities.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Kristoff: Boy, These Liberal Cities Like Baltimore Sure Are A Mess And Very Bad For Blacks »

New Study Totally Links “Extreme Weather” To “Climate Change”

Of course it does. And, of course, it links it to you driving a fossil fueled vehicle and living a modern lifestyle

New Study Links Weather Extremes to Global Warming

The moderate global warming that has already occurred as a result of human emissions has quadrupled the frequency of certain heat extremes since the Industrial Revolution, scientists reported Monday, and they warned that a failure to bring greenhouse gases under control could eventually lead to a 62-fold increase in such heat blasts.

In other words, this is not a scientific report, it is a political report. It simply declares that Mankind is at fault. Notice that they are scare-mongering over what “could” happen in the future. Prognostication, not science.

The planetary warming has had a more moderate effect on intense rainstorms, the scientists said, driving up their frequency by 22 percent since the 19th century. Yet such heavy rains could more than double later this century if emissions continue at a high level, they said.

“People can argue that we had these kinds of extremes well before human influence on the climate — we had them centuries ago,” said Erich M. Fischer, lead author of a study published Monday by the journal Nature Climate Change. “And that’s correct. But the odds have changed, and we get more of them.”

Politics, not science. This has all happened before, but, hey, this time it is totally different! Because we say so! Based on computer models!

For their paper, Dr. Fischer and Dr. Knutti focused on more common heat and precipitation extremes. Using computer analyses of what the climate would be like if the Industrial Revolution had never happened, they focused on the sort of weather extremes that would be likely to occur in any given location on the earth about once in 1,000 days, or a little less than three years. (snip)

Since the 19th century, the earth has warmed by about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Computer models suggest that has driven up heat extremes four- to fivefold, according to the new study.

What caused the previous Holocene warm periods? If that is not discussed, then the paper is worthless.

This whole “extreme weather” think has been debunked numerous times. There really has been no increase in heat waves, precipitation events, tropical cyclones, etc. Heck, an NOAA report debunked it. And there is no factual, real world evidence that any events are anthropogenic from global warming versus simply natural. That is not to say that there aren’t any anthropogenic causation, but this goes more towards land use and the Urban Heat Island Effect than a global causation. Localized.

“The bottom line is that things are not that complicated,” Dr. Knutti said. “You make the world a degree or two warmer, and there will be more hot days. There will be more moisture in the atmosphere, so that must come down somewhere.”

First, the world warming doesn’t prove global anthropogenic causation. Second, there were certainly heat waves in the earlier warm periods, were there not? Hey, they have to keep the money train going, so, scary stories it is.

Can they explain the 18+ year Pause?

Read: New Study Totally Links “Extreme Weather” To “Climate Change” »

If All You See…

…is wonderful, wonderful salad, which Everyone Else should be forced to eat instead of meat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Jammie Wearing Fools, with a post on Clinton Foundation transparency.

Read: If All You See… »

Scientists And Religious Leaders Discuss Cult Of Climastrology At Vatican

I’ve discussed the intersection of “climate change” and organized religion multiple times over the past year or so, as churches and such have become more interested in this mostly political issue, which is based on pushing far Left Progressive doctrine. I haven’t as of yet, dove in to the issue of the Pope coming out as a total Warmist (head to Climate Depot for lots of discussion on the subject at the moment), which is his personal perogative, though, I would think there are other, real world issues that should concern the Pontiff a bit more. That said, this NY Times article caught my attention

Scientists and Religious Leaders Discuss Climate Change at Vatican

The headline simply screams out that this is not a science issue, but a political and pseudo-religious one, more akin to a cult.

For a 2,000-year-old institution hardly known for its mutability, there was a sense of urgency at the Vatican on Tuesday when scientists, diplomats and religious and political leaders discussed climate change and its impact on the world’s poor.

“We are the first generation that can end poverty, and the last generation that can avoid the worst impacts of climate change,” Secretary General Ban Ki-moon of the United Nations said at an international symposium on climate change organized by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences. The event presaged a keenly anticipated papal letter on the environment that Pope Francis is expected to issue in June.

Funny. How did all these people get to the Vatican? Riding bicycles? Just think about how many poor people could be fed and lifted out of poverty if we weren’t spending huge amounts of time, effort, and money on Hotcoldwetdry idiocy. Think how many could be lifted if these fools weren’t blocking the use of proven energy source, like coal and oil, even nuclear and hydrothermal (dams. Yes, envirowackos block dam construction, and even want existing ones torn down).

Mr. Ban met with the pope ahead of the one-day conference here and told reporters afterward that the pope’s message in his scheduled papal teaching, known as an encyclical, would come at “a critical time,” one that “demanded a collective action.”

“Climate change is approaching much faster than one may think,” he said.

Except for that pesky 18+ year Pause.

“I count on his (the Pope’s) moral voice, his moral leadership,” said Mr. Ban, who is leading efforts to come to an agreement on limiting human contributions to global warming, which will be discussed at a climate summit meeting in Paris in December.

Funny how these same Progressives don’t listen when it comes to abortion on demand and gay marriage.But, this is a great article highlighting that it’s not science, it’s a “moral” issue, on of Leftist politics.

If you think that my assertion might be a little over the top, Leftists have spent decades taking over so many sectors, such as education, unions, entertainment, the news media, and others. They’ve had a hatred on for the military and religion for the past 40 years. They spent time trying to destroy them from the outside. Now they are working from the inside to change them. Oh, and then there’s this

EPA To Study What Faith-Based Groups Can Do For Climate Change

The Environmental Protection Agency will be spending $84,000 so churches may be studied to determine how they can help in fighting climate change.

Why destroy what you can co-opt?

Read: Scientists And Religious Leaders Discuss Cult Of Climastrology At Vatican »

CNN Anchor Knows Who’s Really To Blame For #BaltimoreRiots: Veterans

Perhaps she was “just wondering”

(Daily Caller) While conducting an interview with Democratic Maryland Representative Elijiah Cummings, CNN host Brooke Baldwin questioned whether the violence in Baltimore had something to do with the amount of military veterans in the police department.

“Another thing that has to be done here, is we’ve really got to look at our police department,” Cummings began.

“But in what sense?” Baldwin asked. “We talk about training, we talk about having officers — I was talking to the city councilman here last week. He said, ‘Brooke, these people have to live in the communities… or there’s a lack of emotional investment.’”

“And a lot of these young people — I’ve been talking about this so much. A lot of young people — and I love our nation’s veterans, but some of them are coming back from war, they don’t know the communities, and they are ready to do battle.”

There’s no doubt that the Baltimore PD has some serious issues. It takes a true Leftist, though, to attempt to shift the blame to veterans, rather than considering that so many of the problems can be linked directly to Leftist dogma. Look at Detroit. It was once called the “Paris of the West”. Now it is called the “Mogadishu of the Great Lakes”. Like Detroit, Baltimore has been primarily run by Democrats. The last Republican mayor was Theodore McKeldin, 1963-1967. We rarely ever see the same problems in cities run by Republicans.

The NY Times Editorial Board has a long discussion regarding the problems with the Baltimore PD and justice system, and these problems should not be ignored or poo-poo’d just because the NYTEB brings them up. They end with this

Mr. Obama was right on the mark when he observed on Tuesday that tensions with law enforcement had simmered in African-American communities for decades and now seemed to be bursting into view once a week.

“This has been a slow-rolling crisis,” he said. “This has been going on for a long time. This is not new, and we shouldn’t pretend that it’s new.”

He also said that addressing the problem would require not only new police tactics but new policies aimed at helping communities where jobs have disappeared, improving education and helping ex-offenders find jobs. The big mistake, he said, is that we tend to focus on these communities only when buildings are burning down.

If we want to assign blame, let’s look at the systems put in place and allowed to fester by Democrats, who run the city, not veterans.

Read: CNN Anchor Knows Who’s Really To Blame For #BaltimoreRiots: Veterans »

Warmist Makes Interesting Proposal: Remove All Energy Sector Subsidies

Over at far, far, far Left Washington Monthly, Jeffrey Leonard makes an interesting proposal

Get the Energy Sector off the Dole
Why ending all government subsidies for fuel production will lead to a cleaner energy future—and why Obama has a rare chance to make it happen.

Last September, President Obama promised that the cornerstone of his legislative program for 2011 would be to set an energy policy “that helps us grow at the same time as it deals with climate change in a serious way.”

Today, the president might seem to stand a better chance of refreezing the melting Arctic ice caps. After all, he’s up against a House Republican majority rife with members who openly deny that humans contribute to global warming, as well as members of his own party who are beholden to domestic fossil fuel industries. In November, West Virginia’s new Democratic senator, Joe Manchin, boasted to his constituents that he had secured Harry Reid’s assurance “that cap and trade is dead.”

But not all is lost. If President Obama wants to set us on a path to a sustainable energy future—and a green one, too—he should propose a very simple solution to the current mess: eliminate all energy subsidies. Yes, eliminate them all—for oil, coal, gas, nuclear, ethanol, even for wind and solar. It will be better for national security, the balance of payments, the budget deficit, and even, believe it or not, the environment. Indeed, because wind, solar, and other green energy sources get only the tiniest sliver of the overall subsidy pie, they’ll have a competitive advantage in the long term if all subsidies, including the huge ones for fossil fuels, are eliminated. And with anti-pork Tea Partiers loose in Washington and deficit cutting in the air, it’s not as politically inconceivable as you might think.

I agree with this proposal. Let’s eliminate all subsidies. Most of the energy sector actually receives mostly tax breaks, not subsidies, so this wouldn’t effect most energy other than the “alternatives.” This article from 2012 highlights the reality of energy sector subsidies, with $16 billion going to “alternatives” and energy efficiency, and $2.5 billion going to fossil fuels. Without the subsidies, a huge chunk of the “alternative” energy sector would collapse.

What Mr. Leonard is thinking of are really tax breaks (read on in the article for confirmation), most of which are the same types every other company can take advantage of, like percentage depletion allowance, foreign tax credits, domestic manufacturing deductions, R&D, equipment depreciation, etc and so on.

In fact, Heritage called for an end to actual subsidies, without touching the tax breaks, years ago, some of which overlaps Mr. Leonard’s article. Mr. Leonard also is very supportive of nuclear and natural gas. Huh. Personally, I support alternatives, but, as I’ve written time and time again, they need to be competitive without being truly subsidized by government (this applies to most things government throws taxpayer money at, but that’s a separate conversation).

American consumers will feel the pain. But as was evident during the last (albeit short-term) run-up in petroleum prices, which drove gasoline prices over four dollars a gallon in 2008, Americans will respond to higher prices with countless adjustments—in the cars they buy and in their daily routines—that in turn will move the whole economy toward more efficient energy use.

Removing subsidies from the fossil fuels sector will not cause much pain. It would virtually kill the alternatives sector. Removing all tax breaks would cause pain. It would also violate the Constitution regarding equal treatment under the law if it was only applied to energy companies.

The real question to ask is not whether some energy companies, and indeed whole industries focused on certain “protected” or government-favored technologies or fuels, would survive in their current form if we did slash energy subsidies. Imagine where the American economy would be today if the government had decided to protect and continue to subsidize steam engines or whale oil as sources of energy in past eras. The important question is whether the elimination of energy subsidies would constitute good long-term energy policy for America. Never in my lifetime has it been more important to ask this question.

I’ll admit, hyper-Leftist and Warmist Mr. Leonard makes an interesting, non-moonbat case. Unfortunately for alternatives, he’s making a case that would mostly kill it.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Warmist Makes Interesting Proposal: Remove All Energy Sector Subsidies »

Hotcoldwetdry Is The Most Important Story Of Our Lives Or Something

If that’s so, why is it that a very small number of Warmists practice what they preach? This is and interview with “Alan Rusbridger, editor-in-chief of The Guardian, on the massive response to the newspaper’s fossil fuel disinvestment campaign and the urgent need to take action on climate change.”

(The Hindu) The idea for ‘Keep it in the Ground’ — the campaign on disinvestment in fossil fuel–based energy companies launched by The Guardian early this year — was seeded by Editor-in-Chief Alan Rusbridger, who will soon step down from his 20-year leadership of the highly respected media group. In order to save the planet from catastrophic climate change, global temperatures have to stay within a 2°C threshold. This can be achieved if the 200 top fossil fuel companies wind up operations or shift to alternate renewable fuels. The campaign is therefore urging organisations to divest from such companies, and has started by petitioning two of the biggest philanthropic organisations — the Wellcome Trust and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation — to do so. The other arm of the campaign is to change readers’ mindsets on the imminent threat of climate change, by telling the story more effectively and through different media. Mr. Rusbridger spoke to Parvathi Menon in London about the campaign.

Why the campaign, and why now?

I have had a feeling for a long time that this is an important story, if not the most important story of our lives. Climate change does pose an existential threat to the species, and we haven’t got long to do something about it. If we go beyond 2° C [in global temperatures] then the consequences are really problematic for millions of people. So if that is right, then it is such an enormous story that you would expect it to be on the front page every day — and it almost never is.

I was thinking about what would I regret not having done as editor and I wished we had done more on this story to wake people up. I came back from Christmas and pulled together a group of staff. Not just the environmental writers, but economic, political and culture writers, graphic design and video people — a big group of about 45 — and asked them what they thought, and there was tremendous enthusiasm to do something. We decided to start with people we admired — the two trusts, because they are in science and health and believe that climate change is a mortal threat. And because they are progressive and intelligent, we thought they might be up to listening to the argument.

Well, that was how the campaign started, and we decided we would do reporting as well, because we are not just a campaign organisation. We will do it in multiple media, we will get poets and artists as well as data people, and investigative reporters — we will throw everything at it. And we would try and suggest ways by which the readers could join in by helping, signing petitions, lobbying, writing and putting pressure on their own places of work.

Interesting. When will the UK Guardian divest its own financial holdings from fossil fuels? When will they stop using fossil fuels to distribute their paper? Oh, and stop using so much power for their website? Hey, this is the most important story of our lives!!!!!!!

Read: Hotcoldwetdry Is The Most Important Story Of Our Lives Or Something »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful vegan hot dog, which Everyone Else should be forced to eat, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Astute Bloggers, with a post on the twisted minds of Leftists.

Read: If All You See… »

The Winner Of Today’s “Climate Change Helped Cause #baltimoreriots” Is….

Most of the tweets related to the riots and Hotcoldwetdry are snarky, but a few are wackadoodle like the above.

Read: The Winner Of Today’s “Climate Change Helped Cause #baltimoreriots” Is…. »

Dumb Headline Of The Day Regarding #BaltimoreRiots

While I grabbed this at WRAL, the article is an Associated Press article, and the headline is repeated at numerous other news outlets, including Yahoo News, Fox News, and Fresno Bee

Riots in Baltimore raise questions about police response

Do they mean question about how the police treated Freddie Gray, a known criminal (which is no excuse for what happened to him), or as to how the police responded to the riots?

A better question is, do the riots in Baltimore raise questions about the citizens of Baltimore? Some have responded very well, calling for peace and calm. You have the “hero mom delivering the slap heard ’round the world“. Others, not so much.

Read: Dumb Headline Of The Day Regarding #BaltimoreRiots »

Pirate's Cove