…is a baseball that goes further because of carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Doug Ross @ Journal, with a post on 7 Obama climate scams.
It’s baseball week!
Read: If All You See… »
…is a baseball that goes further because of carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Doug Ross @ Journal, with a post on 7 Obama climate scams.
It’s baseball week!
Read: If All You See… »

Happy Sunday! It’s a gorgeous spring day in America. The birds are singing, the flowers are blooming, and baseball is back! This pinup is by Scott Blair, with a wee bit of help.
What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15
As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets†calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me
Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!
Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.
Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »
…is a massive flood from extreme weather caused by carbon pollution, which can only be fixed with a tax, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is American Lens, with a post on the chickens coming home to roost for Roy Cooper.
Read: If All You See… »
When people by carbon offsets, they are usually told that it involves planting a tree. At least, that is what all these carbon offsets providers proclaim. And Warmists are constantly screeching about planting more trees, especially at the ‘climate change’ rallies they drive to in their fossil fueled vehicles. But, um, see…
More trees, less global warming? Not exactly
Trees are considered as one of our biggest natural allies in the war against global warming, but in a new twist, scientists have found that the army of green is spewing out methane.
The University of Delaware study is one of the first in the world to show that tree trunks in upland forests actually emit methane rather than store it, representing a new, previously unaccounted source of this powerful greenhouse gas.
Methane is about 25 times stronger than carbon dioxide, with some estimates as high as 33 times stronger due to its effects when it is in the atmosphere. (snip)
Overall, the tree trunks acted as a source of carbon dioxide and as a small source of methane, but the magnitude of gases emitted varied with the species.
It’s actually not new that plants release methane: there’s a story way back in my archive about a study about food crops taking CO2 out of the air while releasing methane. But, get this: it’s all part of the natural process of life on earth. If we were all doomed, Warmists might actually practice what they preach instead of demanding taxes and fees on Other People while calling for bigger and more controlling centralized government.
Read: Uh Oh: More Trees Aren’t Necessarily Good For Globull Warming »
This has made Democrats very sad and very angry, which, to be fair, is their normal state of being. Even though Democrats constantly state that they want to get rid of the bad illegal aliens, they seem to be hell bent on defending them. Because the bad ones are the ones that ICE is mostly scooping up. Ones convicted of crimes like arson, burglary, robbery, major drug offenses, identity theft, homicide, rape, and child molestation.
JEFF SESSIONS WANTS TO DEPORT THOUSANDS OF UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said Thursday the federal government will speed up deportations of undocumented immigrants housed in federal correctional facilities. The Justice Department said the new process “saves time and resources and speeds hearings.”
Immigrants currently can wait months for a hearing before a judge. Under the changes, judges will instead visit Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facilities to provide judgments as quickly as possible. The government was holding more than 40,000 people in detention in October.
“We owe it to the American people to ensure that illegal aliens who have been convicted of crimes and are serving time in our federal prisons are expeditiously removed from our country as the law requires,” Sessions said in a press release.
Nowhere within this article, or so many others, mention the part in his press release that states “removable criminal aliens who are inmates in federal correctional facilities…” nor
“We owe it to the American people to ensure that illegal aliens who have been convicted of crimes and are serving time in our federal prisons are expeditiously removed from our country as the law requires,†said Attorney General Sessions. “This expansion and modernization of the Institutional Hearing Program gives us the tools to continue making Americans safe again in their communities.â€
So, this is about illegals convicted of crimes. Who are in jail. Back to the Newsweek article
The announcement is the latest example of the White House commitment to discouraging illegal immigration.
The funny thing here is that Newsweek, and all the other liberal media articles, are doing more to help discourage illegal immigration with their half fact articles. If they were saying “hey, this is about criminals in jails”, people thinking of coming illegally might be like “oh, I’m not going to molest a child, so, no problem, let’s cross the border and get some of that sweet, sweet, Democrat offered taxpayer money.” And the ones here wouldn’t be thinking of leaving. So, the liberal news media is actually helping, unintentionally, with their scaremongering.
Critics, however, argue it is not the attorney general’s job to become the nation’s top immigration enforcement officer.
“I think we want clarity over who’s running immigration policy,†Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti told The Washington Post in an interview Thursday in Washington. “DOJ can give some opinions, but it’s not primarily in their jurisdiction. So I know Senator Sessions has been very engaged, interested and involved in this area, but is he empowered by this administration beyond his formal responsibilities?â€
Wait, what? The nation’s top cop is not supposed to become involved in illegal immigration? Really? These people are nuts.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Read: Attorney General Sessions Has A Plan To Deport Illegals As Quickly As Possible »
You know, the plans that Obama and the Dems promised repeatedly that they could keep. Somehow, this story made it into publication by CNN
Before Obamacare, some liked their health care plans better
Stacey and Eddie Albert lead pretty healthy lives. She’s a nutritionist. He’s a personal trainer. They rarely go to the doctor, other than their annual physicals.
For years, they were covered by Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey. In 2013, they paid about $360 a month for a plan that met their needs.
That all changed the following year, when Obamacare took effect. Their premium shot up to around $650 a month for a policy that came with pediatric dental coverage and maternity services — benefits they didn’t use or want since they don’t have kids. They ended up dropping the plan after several months and even went a year without coverage for the first time in the decade they’ve been together, exactly the opposite of what Obamacare was supposed to do.
And this is what happened to millions and millions of people
Those skinny plans suited some Americans just fine. Many didn’t even know the limits of the pre-Obamacare plans because they never used enough services to become aware of them.
“They made the Affordable Care Act so ridiculously overbuilt that it’s killing people like me who pay for it,” said Tom Buxton, 59, of Littleton, Colorado. “I don’t need two doctor visits a year unless I want them. That should be my choice. I didn’t go to the doctor for five years.”
One size fits all
“The bottom line is the fact that the coverage of all these plans is basically the same for me,” he said. “However, the cost of Obamacare is substantially higher.”
How the heck did this make it through the Progressive censors at CNN?
Read: Surprise: Some People Liked Their Pre-Obamacare Insurance »
…is carbon pollution created snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on California prosecuting pro-lifers.
Read: If All You See… »
No, really, this is Important Stuff, you guys! Via Watts Up With That?, Anthony Watts explains
From the “Who freaking cares about the carbon footprint of criminals?†department comes this inane study that only a fully invested warmist could give a rats posterior about. With statements like this: “to ignore these carbon emissions risks crime prevention strategies being unsustainable.†one wonders if the author of the study really understands that the real goal of crime prevention strategies is to reduce crime, not a carbon footprint or to be “sustainableâ€.
We now must include ‘climate change’ craziness in law enforcement or something
The carbon footprint of crime has fallen, study finds
A study led by an Engineering Doctorate student at the University of Surrey has found that the carbon footprint of crime over the last 20 years has fallen.
The study, published in the British Journal of Criminology, applied estimates of the carbon footprint of criminal offences to police-recorded crime and self-reported victimisation survey data, to estimate the carbon footprint of crime in England and Wales between 1995 and 2015.
The study was conducted by Helen Skudder at the University of Surrey and supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), the Home Office, and Secured by Design Police Crime Prevention Initiatives Limited.
The carbon footprint of acquisitive and violent crime was estimated at around 7 million tonnes CO2e in 1995, falling to below 3 million tonnes CO2e by 2015. This represents a substantial carbon drop of 62% and a total cumulative reduction of 54 million tonnes CO2e over this period.
Well, hey, perhaps criminals started using hybrid vehicles as getaway cars and using low emission shoes or something.
Research lead Helen Skudder said: “All public bodies, organisations and businesses must reduce their carbon emissions wherever possible, so to ignore these carbon emissions risks crime prevention strategies being unsustainable. Our study has shown that the carbon emissions have fallen further than the rate of crime, with a 48% carbon drop observed alongside a 30% crime drop.”
What’s most important to Warmists is the reduction in the carbon footprint, not the reduction in crime.
The relationship between the drop in crime and drop in carbon footprint is complex. A 30% drop in police-recorded crime between 1995 and 2015 resulted in a 48% reduction of carbon emissions. This clearly demonstrates that there is not a straightforward relationship between the number of offences and the resulting carbon footprint. This study adds to previous research on the carbon footprint of crime, and the results presented in the paper are an important contribution towards a growing connection between crime prevention and sustainability agendas.
Wait, there have been previous studies? We could have written this one off as someone just writing a paper to punk a board to get a degree, but, this is apparently a Real Thing. A thing that shows some people should spend less time in University and more time working a real job.
Commentor Latitude notes at Watts Up With That?
Funniest part……crime is highest…where people believe this
True.
Read: Good News: The Carbon Footprint Of Crime Has Fallen! »