Study: Sea Rise In Miami Area Has Nothing To Do With ‘Climate Change’

Let’s look at this in two parts. First, the Spectator’s Ross Clark learned a valuable lesson, namely, you dare not ask Al Gore to offer proof. In regards to the claims of AGW causing flooding in the Miami area in Gore’s movies, Clark reached out to Shimon Wdowinski, associate professor of marine geology and geophysics at the Florida International University, the exact type of scientist one would want to talk to. Wdowinski suggested that the relationship between melting glaciers, climatic changes, and sea rise is more complex than Gore’s film makes out. Clark was given 8 minutes to interview Gore, and

When I put all this to Al Gore and ask him whether his film would be stronger if it acknowledged the complexities of sea level rise — why it is rising in some places and not in others — I am expecting him to bat it away, saying that it doesn’t counter his central point and that there is a limit to what you can put into a film pitched at a mass audience, but his reaction surprises me. As soon as I mention Professor Wdowinski’s name, he counters: ‘Never heard of him — is he a denier?’ Then, as I continue to make the point, he starts to answer before directing it at me: ‘Are you a denier?’ When I say I am sure that climate change is a problem, but how big a one I don’t know, he jumps in: ‘You are a denier.’

That is a strange interpretation of the word ‘deny’, I try to say. But his PR team moves in and declares ‘Time’s up’, and I am left feeling like the guy in Monty Python who paid for a five-minute argument and was allowed only 30 seconds. On the way out, a frosty PR woman says to me: ‘Can I have a word with you?’ I wasn’t supposed to ask difficult questions, she says, because ‘this is a film junket, to promote the film’.

This is what people who cannot defend their beliefs do: deflect. Gore refuses to debate his beliefs, because he knows he would lose. Then there’s this

Florida’s Sea Level Rose 6x Faster Than Average And It’s Not Due To Climate Change

If you’re living along the coast of Florida you experienced sea level rising six times faster than the global average and this was NOT a result of climate change. The rapid sea level rise along the US east coast from Cape Hatteras to Miami is the result of a localized sea level rise hot spot.

A new study, published in Geophysical Research Letters and undertaken by the University of Florida analyzed tidal and climate data for the southeastern seaboard of the United States. They found that between the years 2011 and 2015 sea level rose more than six times faster in the southeast United States as compared to global average sea level rise.

What is the cause of accelerated yet localized sea level rise? The answer is not climate change, but naturally-occurring climate variations superimposed on the background steady sea level rise due to a warming planet. While you may have heard of the gradual rise in sea levels globally over the past century, there appear to be rapid climate processes that affect localized sea levels on the year(s) time scale.

But, then, I’m sure Warmists, with their narrow cult-like dogma, will figure out a way to link it to/blame Mankind. Or just ignore it. Or deflect.

Read: Study: Sea Rise In Miami Area Has Nothing To Do With ‘Climate Change’ »

AG Jeff Sessions Continues Blasting Chicago Over Sanctuary City Status

Consider what he said in Miami, now that the city has given up its sanctuary jurisdiction status

(Miami Herald) Attorney General Jeff Sessions came to Miami on Wednesday to deliver a stark warning on the dangers of “criminal aliens” and praised the county’s mayor for being the first big-city leader to abandon “sanctuary” protections and detain local inmates for federal immigration officers.

“Sanctuary jurisdictions provide safe harbor for some of the most dangerous criminals in our country. That makes a sanctuary city a trafficker, smuggler, or a predator’s best friend,” Sessions said at PortMiami before an audience of local and federal law-enforcement authorities. “The people of Miami-Dade know that the rule of law guarantees equality and opportunity … Protecting this guarantee is why the government of Miami-Dade made its decision — and is working with federal law enforcement, not against us.”

Now about Chicago in the same speech (which is only mentioned near the end of the above article)

Sessions used much of his speech to contrast Miami’s declining crime rate with a spate of murders in Chicago, which is suing the Trump administration over its own sanctuary policies. Chicago and other cities claim the White House can’t withhold federal funds based on declining the detention requests, which hold people after they would otherwise be free to go on local charges.

“In Chicago — a city with almost exactly the same 2.7 million person population as Miami-Dade — more than 433 people have been murdered just since the beginning of the year … That’s more than three times as many as Miami-Dade,” Sessions said. “Respect for the rule of law has broken down. In Chicago, their so-called “sanctuary” policies are just one sad example.”

And more

(Time) Attorney General Jeff Sessions continued his condemnation of Chicago’s sanctuary policies, which limit interactions between the local government and immigration authorities, saying they amount to “lawlessness” and put citizens lives in danger in a Wednesday afternoon speech.

“These policies of sanctuary cities do far broader damage to the country than many understand. At its root, it is a rejection of our immigration laws and a declaration of open borders,” Sessions said. ” It says if you enter the country last week with a criminal record and get to Chicago, we will not even support deporting you even after you commit a serious crime against one of our citizens. This is lawlessness.”

It is lawlessness. It is prioritizing people who are unlawfully present in the country, in contradiction of federal law, over U.S. citizens and those who are lawfully present. Chicago isn’t just protecting those “with no criminal records”, but those with criminal records. Serious criminal records. Rape, assault, robbery, burglary, theft, arson, attempted murder, and murder, among others.

One of the reasons given for Miami being a sanctuary jurisdiction was that they wanted to be reimbursed by Washington for the costs to hold an illegal on a detainer for that 48 hour hold. Actually, that is not unreasonable, and should be considered. The cost surely isn’t that much, and would be worth looking into, just like it would be worth it to make detainers into actual federal warrants, which require compliance by all law enforcement.

Read: AG Jeff Sessions Continues Blasting Chicago Over Sanctuary City Status »

Are You In Favor Of Free Speech In Canada? Then You Must Be A Swastika Carrying Nazi

The so-called anti-Fascist forces here in the U.S., otherwise known as Antifa, likewise like to shut down free speech, often with violence, and usually with threats of violence

(Daily Caller) Ryerson University canceled a panel Wednesday dedicated to discussing the silencing of free speech on college campuses, citing “campus safety.”

The Canadian school canceled “The Stifling of Free Speech on University Campuses,” an Aug. 22 panel featuring three doctors and a pro-free speech journalist, citing a prioritization of “campus safety” over free speech “in light of recent events,” according to correspondence obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Social justice activists set up a Facebook page entitled “No Fascists in Our City!” to protest the event. The page’s header image depicted a swastika crossed out.

Got that? If you want free speech, then you’re Hitler.

“[Progressive activists] were calling me a Nazi, a fascist, and an anti-Semite,” Dr. Gad Saad, a Concordia University marketing professor and one of the panelists, told TheDCNF. “I’m Jewish. So, they’ve lost the plot. It’s a form of lunacy that’s difficult to diagnose.”

The organizer is named Sarina Singh, not a name typically associated with Nazis.

Saad noted that people who express incorrect opinions get beheaded in the Middle East. He said that while the West was not yet at that stage, activists could “do the next best thing” and go after a speaker’s livelihood, reputation, and platform to speak. He suggested that “cowardice is the eighth deadly sin,” and that universities did not possess the “effort, courage, and testicular fortitude” to stand up to those trying to silence speech.

“You never pacify thuggery. You don’t pacify someone who’s trying to rape you. These people are intellectual terrorists. They’re rapists of truth,” Saad added.

Yes, they are. What was this really about?

“Fascists are planning to meet on August 22nd at Ryerson University to discuss how to avoid what they call ‘SJW’ Culture,” the protest description reads. “Tickets are being sold for $20 and frankly it makes us virulently ill … Considering the rise of Nationalism here and abroad we need to show these people and their guests that we will not tolerate their backward nonsense in our city.”

In other words, the so-called anti-Fascists were using fascist methods to shut down a conference on free speech that shows how people can use free speech to avoid being destroyed by Social Justice Warriors. They should probably read Vox Day’s SJWs Always Lie. It explains how to deal with these SJW Antifa free speech haters, but, of course, the school has fallen into the trap of the violence exclusion, whereby they shut down free speech due to threats of violence.

“Apparently supporting freedom of speech makes you a Nazi these days,” Saad told TheDCNF. “I think our existence is now hate speech … that I exist as an independent person who spews his thoughts freely is an affront to those who wish to control me … Orwell couldn’t have come up with the realities that we’re facing today.”

Well, if you have what is considered Wrongthink by the political Left, which is really just as authoritarian as Nazis and other fascists, they’ll do all they can to shut you down.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Are You In Favor Of Free Speech In Canada? Then You Must Be A Swastika Carrying Nazi »

Good News: We’re Soon Doomed From “Super Heat Waves”

The latest in doom and gloom from the Cult of Climastrology

New study: ‘Super heat waves’ of 131°F coming if global warming continues unchecked

In Europe, the recent heat wave was so extreme — with temperatures reaching 111°F (44°C), fueling wildfires and wasp attacks — it was nicknamed “Lucifer.” In the Middle East, as temperatures soared to 121°F (50°C), “birds in Kuwait have reportedly been dropping from the sky,” the International Business Times reported Friday.

The fires were caused by Mankind starting them, not by too much carbon pollution. It gets hot in the Middle East. Heat waves have always happened, even in the midst of Holocene cool periods. Surprise!

But, new research says, we ain’t seen nothing yet. A new study by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Union’s science and research lab, finds that “if global temperatures rise with 4°C [7°F], a new super heat wave of 55°C [131°F] can hit regularly many parts of the world, including Europe” and the United States.

So, if we go by the models, which have failed 95% of the time, things will get super bad. This is followed by continued doomsaying, leading to

Staying below 2°C rise requires all nations of the world, including ours, to not merely achieve our emissions reduction pledges made in Paris in December 2015, but to keep strengthening those reductions every few years until total global emissions are zero sometime in the second half of the century. And that can’t happen as long as Donald Trump — or any comparable global warming denier — is in office.

What does this mean? More government, taxation, fees, limited freedom, higher cost of living. Why do Warmists think none of these things will harm their own lives?

Read: Good News: We’re Soon Doomed From “Super Heat Waves” »

If All You See…

…is an evil plastic bottle and an evil gas grill, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is NoTricksZone, with a post on how climate alarmists react to opposing views.

Read: If All You See… »

Trump To Roll Back Yet Another Obama ‘Climate Change’ Rule

They keep falling like dominoes

(Daily Caller) President Donald Trump will rescind an Obama administration policy requiring government agencies to take into account global warming-induced flooding and sea level rise for federally-funded projects.

Trump will repeat the climate order that President Barack Obama signed in 2015 as part of a broader effort to streamline infrastructure permitting. Administration officials said the current process is long and cumbersome.

“For far too long, critical projects have been delayed by duplicative permitting and environmental requirements which added time and unnecessary expenses to much needed projects,” Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao said in a statement obtained by Bloomberg.

Trump wants to push a $200 billion infrastructure spending bill through Congress this fall, which he hopes will mobilize $800 billion in state and private funding. A cumbersome permitting process could hold up infrastructure projects.

Furthermore, Obama’s executive order to “improve the resilience of communities and federal assets against the impacts of flooding” could increase the upfront costs or even eliminate projects in the pipeline.

The destruction of Obama’s Hotcoldwetdry rules are coming slowly, but they are coming. They are typically burdensome, costly, create more red tape, can stop projects, and give the federal government more and more power. And, yet, the people who push Hotcoldwetdry rules, such as Obama, are massive climate hypocrites in their own lives.

Read: Trump To Roll Back Yet Another Obama ‘Climate Change’ Rule »

On Illegal Immigration, California Decides They Really Like The 10th Amendment

If you remember back to the debate over Arizona’s SB1070, a law that allowed law enforcement to enforce federal law as written, California, California law makers, and California papers took the stance that immigration was the purview of the federal government, and that states couldn’t change that in the least. Today, though, as we discuss illegal aliens, California wants to do its own thing

State makes its case against immigration conditions attached to U.S. grants

By requiring San Francisco and other California communities to allow federal immigration agents into their jails and give them 48 hours’ notice of certain immigrants’ release from custody, Attorney General Jeff Sessions is defying Congress, the Constitution and the standards of good law enforcement, California’s top attorney says.

A lawsuit by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, filed in federal court late Monday, contains some of the same legal arguments that San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera presented in a suit against Sessions on Friday: that the Trump administration is illegally restricting Justice Department financial grants by attaching immigration conditions that Congress never authorized and that are unrelated to the purpose of the grants.

Interestingly, there were no complaints when Obama threatened to do things like restrict funding from school districts that didn’t allow the gender confused to use whichever bathroom, shower, and changing room they wanted.

The state’s suit, with $28.3 million at stake in federal grants to local governments and Becerra’s office for the next fiscal year, argues further that California is constitutionally entitled to decide how to keep its communities safe by setting its own rules for contacts between law enforcement authorities and local residents, regardless of their immigration status.

Oh, so, suddenly the 10th Amendment is important to them? And they’re claiming that immigration is now a state issue? These people.

Can anyone explain what is so difficult about picking up a phone for a quick call or sending an email to ICE to let them know an illegal alien who is in jail is going to be released within 48 hours? And what’s so difficult about honoring an ICE detainer for 48 hours? Or allowing federal immigration officials access to the jails? These people are, get this, in jail for committing a crime.

The Trump administration is trying to “usurp the state and its (local governments’) discretion to determine how best to protect public safety,” Becerra’s lawyers said. Specifically, they said, the new federal rules will interfere with state laws that “strengthen community policing efforts by encouraging undocumented victims to report crimes to local law enforcement.”

Were opponents of SB1070, and all other laws passed by states that require things such as law enforcement cooperation, not just claiming that immigration is a function of the federal government, and not the states? Yes, yes they were. California is looking to have it both ways, and, more importantly, to weaken the law on those who are unlawfully present in the U.S.

Read: On Illegal Immigration, California Decides They Really Like The 10th Amendment »

Leftists Very Upset That Trump Also Mentions Violence From “Alt-Left”

For the longest time, Conservatives have been hoping for elected Republicans that fight back against Democrats and the media. Trump is certainly not a Conservative, but, he was elected under the Republican tag, and, like him or loathe him, he fights back (full comments here)

(Fox News) President Trump, responding to criticism that he failed to condemn white supremacist groups forcefully enough after the Charlottesville, Va., protest violence, on Tuesday called out “alt-left” protesters for their actions that same day, asking, “Do they have any semblance of guilt?”

The defiant statements came during a wide-ranging Q&A at Trump Tower in New York. And they instantly inflamed the controversy all over again, a day after he tried to put the issue to rest with a statement specifically condemning white supremacists.

“There’s blame on both sides,” Trump said Tuesday, echoing the language he had used Saturday when he faulted “many sides.”

Trump went on to criticize the “alt-left” for their role in stoking unrest over the weekend.

“You had a group on one side that was bad, and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent, and nobody wants to say that,” Trump said. “You had a group on the other side that came charging in without a permit and they were very, very violent.”

He’s exactly correct. Antifa and other leftist groups didn’t come to Charlottesville to counter-protest peaceably: you do not wear masks nor bring clubs, bats, and other dangerous weapons if you’re looking to be peaceful. We’ve seen the same thing at plenty of Antifa demonstrations and at ones where they show up. And they’re usually the ones that start the violence and mayhem. They are despicable people, who use anti-white and anti-cop language, who are just as bigoted and racist as the neo-Nazis, skinheads, and KKK.

None of that means that the KKK, neo-Nazis, nor skinheads are to be absolved. They are also despicable people. They do share an utter loathing of Jews with Antifa and Democrats, but, regardless, their racial beliefs are horrible. There’s more than plenty of blame to go around.

Of course, some Republicans, such as Marco Rubio and GOP Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, had hissy fits, as mentioned in the story. Democrats too had fits, but, those are expected. So many like Rubio, Ros-Lehtinen, Pelosi, the Politico, and so forth, think it’s about “redirecting blame.” No, it’s about assigning blame. If al Qaeda and ISIS get in a war of words, which then escalates to violence, who’s at fault? That’s right, both.

The NY Times editorial board likewise is incensed that President Trump would note the violence from the “alt-left”. They call it a false equivalency. In other words, Trump is exactly correct. The Washington Post states that there may be a time for this debate, but, it’s not now. Why not? We’ve seen the violence from Antifa since the election, and different violence from Leftists for a long time.

When is the best time to discuss left side violence? We’re happy to discuss the moral degradation of neo-Nazis, skinheads, and the KKK (say, when will Robert “KKK” Byrd’s name be removed from all those things in West Virginia?). Let talk about the Left’s moral degradation at the same time.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Leftists Very Upset That Trump Also Mentions Violence From “Alt-Left” »

LA Schools Are Totally Supportive Of Students Who Are Unlawfully Present And Taking Money From Citizens

Obviously, they’re all playing fast and loose with the term “immigrant”

As LA students head back to school, LAUSD has message for immigrants: ‘We stand together’

The Los Angeles Unified School District is making visible what it’s so far said in words: that immigrant students and their families are welcome at Los Angeles schools.

When students start the new school year today, they’ll walk through entrances decked with 6-foot-tall banners featuring the Statue of Liberty, long the symbol of new opportunity for immigrants. The banners will read “We Are One L.A. Unified/Standing With Immigrant Families,” and Lady Liberty will be wearing a graduation cap, a nod to the district’s goal of having every student graduate.

Superintendent Michelle King previewed the We Are One effort for “immigrant students and others who feel marginalized,” with a brief mention in her annual State of the District speech last week.

“This campaign provides resources and toolkits as well as promotes messages of inclusion to make clear that at L.A. Unified, we stand together as one unified family,” she said.

Awwwww, that’s so cute. I’m betting Michelle King would be calling the police in a heartbeat if she came home a family of illegals were squatting in her backyard. It’s called “trespassing.”

The district has made its position clear regarding immigration, sometimes in direct opposition to federal policy. In May, school board members passed a resolution reiterating an earlier commitment that any LAUSD campus is a “safe place” for immigrants and their families. They added other pledges, too, such as allowing school employees to refuse cooperation with immigration agents and offering immigrants referrals to legal help.

There are a lot of people who would like to feel safe. Like 7 year olds

An illegal immigrant who returned to the country after being deported to Mexico is accused of raping a 7-year-old girl “thousands of times.”

Victor Francisco Michel-Lara, 32, of Cedar City, Utah was arrested Sunday and faces first-degree felony charges of rape of a child, according to his arrest report. He was also placed on an immigration detainer.

When you support illegal immigration, you support people like Michel-Lara. Liberals are making the case that if you do not immediately and completely denounce all neo-Nazi’s, KKK members, and skinheads vocally and vehemently, then you are part of the problem and enabling them, so, if you do not denounce all illegal aliens, you are part of the problem and enabling them.

That said, if California loves illegals, they should all go to California. Let the state deal with the fallout.

Read: LA Schools Are Totally Supportive Of Students Who Are Unlawfully Present And Taking Money From Citizens »

If All You See…

…is an area flooded from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is America’s Watchtower, with a post on Obama knowing about Russian hacking back in 2014 and doing nothing.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove