Predictable: NY Times Figures Out Way To Slur Trump On Afghanistan Plan

Seriously, who would have thought that the NY Times Editorial Board would come out and slam Mr. Trump?

Mr. Trump on Afghanistan: More of the Same; No End in Sight

If there is a compelling case to be made for deepening the United States military involvement in Afghanistan, where the 16-year-old war has already lasted longer than any other in American history, President Trump did not make it in his speech Monday night.

Killing Islamic terrorists seems a pretty good reason.

Rather than the comprehensive strategy that is called for, his plan amounted to a jumble of ideas that lacked detail and coherence and were often contradictory. Having spent years criticizing America’s involvement in Afghanistan, he now appears inclined toward an open-ended commitment, but with no real ways to measure success and no hint of a timetable for withdrawal.

These are ideas that came from the military leadership, who want to simply kill jihadis.

New troops will be required, he suggested, but he did not say how many (there are 8,400 there now). Nor did he explain, much less guarantee, how a few thousand more troops could succeed when the more than 100,000 troops deployed during the Obama administration did not.

Wait, time out. Is the NYTEB saying that Obama’s plans were utter failures? The Times was thrilled by Obama’s surges. Remember this?

How’d that work out? Well, there was the Times article about Obama reversing himself. And then keeping more troops there than planned. But, regardless of how well or not well Obama’s strategy worked over 8 years of being president, Trump’s there now, so everything will be blamed on Trump. Blaming predecessors only applies when the chief executive is a Democrat.

With this speech, Mr. Trump has taken ownership of the war, which until now he has essentially fobbed off on the Pentagon….

Trump was left with a mess, started, yes, under President Bush, then through President Obama (which is not fully fair to assign blame, because the nation is a mess and will probably always be a mess, as long as there are any Muslim extremists, and there are Muslim extremists in Pakistan), but, hey, he now owns it or something.

…Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, told two months ago by Mr. Trump that he could deploy another roughly 4,000 troops to Afghanistan, sensibly declined to do that, at least until the president announced his strategy. Now Mr. Trump has set forth a plan, although it’s hard to dignify as strategy an address in which he said, “We will not talk about numbers of troops or our plans for further military activities.” He seems not to understand that presidents owe it to voters to be transparent.

And the Times seems not to understand that you don’t give intelligence to the enemy. They weren’t particularly bothered by Obama not announcing the troops blowing stuff up in Libya, nor in the hellholes of Africa and the Middle East taking out Islamic jihadis (give Obama props for allowing units to do this).

Obviously, the NYTEB keeps whining and whining, because they’re too invested in TDS to give Trump props for anything. If he came out today and announced that he was going to reinstated DACA and expand it, or that he’d bring in 500,000 refugees, or push a plan for amnesty for all illegals, the left, including the NYTEB, would find ways to complain. That’s TDS.

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Predictable: NY Times Figures Out Way To Slur Trump On Afghanistan Plan »

Bummer: Young Conservationists Realize Their Degrees Are Worthless

One of the problems we’ve seen for years now is that kids are going to college and majoring in disciplines that aren’t worth the paper they’re printing on, much less the tens of thousands of dollars of student debt accrued. At least with the old basket weaving degree joke, making baskets can result in money made. You can work to make awesome baskets, start your own company, and sell them for a profit. Not so much with things like this

All work, no pay: the plight of young conservationists
Qualified graduates are struggling to find paid jobs and many give up to pursue a different career. The result is a net loss for conservation work, reports Mongabay

Nika Levikov swore she would never work as a waitress again. But, today — with a master’s degree in conservation science from Imperial College London — she’s taking orders, delivering drinks, and cleaning tables to support herself.

After two years of looking for paid work as a conservationist around Europe and four months doing unpaid work in East Africa, Levikov moved to the island of Malta to work at Greenhouse Malta. Levikov, who owes over $100,000 (£77,644) in student loans, described her work at the small environment NGO as “casual” and “freelancing” — some hours are paid, others are volunteer — while the group looks to secure more funding.

“The reality many of us face is that we will have to babysit, clean toilets, and serve drinks as we try to gain the experience we need in conservation to finally get that dream job,” said Levikov, a former intern at Mongabay, who just turned 30.

“I’m not blaming anyone for my current situation in which I am utterly broke and still crossing my fingers that in the near future my career will finally take off,” she told Mongabay. “Indeed I was wrong in thinking that all my hard, unpaid work would lead to something or that having a degree from a … highly-respected university would give me a leg-up.”

Levikov is not alone.

Over a dozen conservationists related a depressingly similar story: serial unpaid internships, crippling student debt, short-term work for little or no pay, dismissive attitudes, and entry-level job requirements that include expectations of considerable field time and experience.

What they’ve learned is that just because they want something doesn’t mean they’ll get it. The Real World doesn’t work like that. And, the aforementioned notion that some degrees aren’t worth squat.

Interestingly, one of the things we learn from the article is that all these conservation groups, which get a lot of donations and money from government, are happy to pay the bigwigs lots of money, but love paying the worker bees low wages to no wages. Interesting.

Read: Bummer: Young Conservationists Realize Their Degrees Are Worthless »

If All You See…

…is horrible concrete releasing horrible carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Small Dead Animals, with a quick post on a word that’s been missing for 8 years.

Read: If All You See… »

LA Streets Getting Coated With Coolseal Means Hotcoldwetdry Is Real Or Something

Shockingly, streets get hot in the summer. The different types of paving tend to soak up the heat from the sun. And, now

Los Angeles Streets are Getting Coated with Coolseal to Fight Climate Change, Still Wondering if Global Warming is Real?

Los Angeles is currently becoming an exhibit of global warming as the temperatures continue to rise. In an effort to contain the effects of climate change, Los Angeles streets are being coated with a material that was initially known for hiding planes from spy satellites. Coolseal is being used on the streets of LA so that its sun rays reflecting property helps to reduce the temperatures and makes the city cool again. Los Angeles has been melting with temperatures reaching as high as 104-degree Fahrenheit, and this coating aims at changing the situation.

Coolseal is a grey coloured coating that reflects sun rays and the city officials had tested this coolant in 2015. The first time Coolseal was tested was in a parking lot San Fernando Valley, one of the hottest parts of town. The average summer temperatures in LA has risen from the upper 80s to more than 100-degree Fahrenheit multiple times, making global warming a crucial issue that needs to be battled.

Talk about bad writing. Almost as bad as the climate models.

The assistant director of the Bureau of Street Services, Greg Spotts spoke about the effects of Coolseal and said, “We found that on average the area covered in CoolSeal is 10 degrees cooler than black asphalt on the same parking lot.We thought it was really interesting. It’s almost like treated asphalt warms at a lower rate.” this move may make Los Angeles the first US city to test cool pavements as a way of fighting global warming.

In a time where climate change and global warming are still being termed as a ‘myth’, and its existence is still in the grey area, these reports and LA’s weather situation should be a clear example to prove that climate change is real. This coolant can actually help combat global warming in an efficient manner.

Wait, let’s jump back a second. Note that the use of CoolSeal can decrease the the temperature by 10 degrees when applied to black asphalt.

New seal on L.A. roads aims to cut heat-island effect

Climate change conjures up distant images of rising seas and cracking ice sheets, but in cities nationwide, the effects of global warming are apparent as soon as you step outside.

Known as the “urban heat island effect,” it refers to the pockets of intense heat captured by the concrete, asphalt, dark roofs and dearth of foliage that define many American cityscapes.

Los Angeles — surrounded by desert and encased in thousands of miles of asphalt — is the poster child of the heat-island effect, experts say, which explains why city officials are exploring innovative ways to combat record-breaking, rising temperatures. Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, D, wants to reduce the city’s average temperature by three degrees over the next 20 years, according to the Los Angeles Times.

This article is mixing metaphors, but, at the end, we understand that, while the average global temperature has gone up a little bit, which tends to happen during Holocene warm periods, which have happened many times, the bigger problem is UHI. Cities tend to be warmer than the surrounding countryside. While it is anthropogenic, it is not global. It is a localized effect, but is positioned as utter doom as the hot temperatures are positioned as anthropogenic global warming.

Yes, mankind does have a slight effect on the global temperature through greenhouse gases, but, most of the rest is comprised of nature doing nature stuff, along with artificial inflated temperature readings from the urban heat island effect and land use. Los Angeles is a poster child for the UHI.

The use of CoolSeal is a good idea, btw. It’d be great to use it on most road surfaces in urbanized areas.

Read: LA Streets Getting Coated With Coolseal Means Hotcoldwetdry Is Real Or Something »

Canadian PM Trudeau Finally Realizes That Uncontrollable Illegal Immigration Isn’t So Great

Back in January, Justin Trudeau took a shot at Trump over immigration

That opinion is taking a hit

(CBC) Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has a message for asylum seekers: crossing illegally into the country doesn’t offer an advantage when it comes to obtaining refugee status in Canada.

“If I could directly speak to people seeking asylum, I’d like to remind them there’s no advantage,” Trudeau said at a news conference Sunday in Montreal.

“Our rules, our principles and our laws apply to everyone.”

Trudeau’s comments come as the government grapples with a surge in asylum seekers crossing into Quebec.

In the first two weeks of August, more than 3,800 people walked over the border into the province, compared to the 2,996 who crossed throughout all of July.

Speaking prior to Montreal’s Pride Parade, Trudeau stressed that anyone seeking refugee status will have to go through Canada’s “rigorous” screening process.

Canadian systems have been hard hit by the flow of illegal aliens coming through the U.S. and landing in Canada. On the west side it seems to be those from Mexico and Central America, and the east side Haitians.

He said the government is managing the unprecedented flow of predominantly Haitian asylum seekers and that all of them will be subjected to the usual security checks and evaluations before obtaining refugee status in Canada.

Unlike in the United States, Haitians have no special status in Canada. About half of Haitians seeking refugee status in Canada have been denied in the last couple of years.

In other words, half have been deported.

If you invited unfettered illegal immigration, you’ll get unfettered illegal immigration. And all the problems that go with it.

Read: Canadian PM Trudeau Finally Realizes That Uncontrollable Illegal Immigration Isn’t So Great »

Majority Of Voters Support Keeping Washington, Jefferson, Other Statues

ABC, along with a few other outlets, is pimping a poll that states that only 29% approve of President Trump’s handling of Charlottesville, while 56% disapprove. Which is interesting when you have a D/R/I split of 33-22-42 split.

But, what of another poll?

Voters Strongly Defend Washington, Jefferson, Lessons of the Past

Despite calls by some politicians and the media for erasing those connected to slavery from U.S. history, it looks like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are going to be with us awhile longer. Voters strongly believe it’s better to learn from the past than erase it.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 88% of Likely U.S. Voters oppose removing the names of Washington and Jefferson from public places and taking down statues in their honor. Just seven percent (7%) favor the removal of their names from the public square because Washington and Jefferson like several of the other early presidents were slave owners. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Ninety percent (90%) oppose the closing or changing of Mount Rushmore because two of the four presidents it honors were slave owners. Only six percent (6%) believe the national historic monument in South Dakota should be changed or closed because it honors Washington and Jefferson.

Ninety-four percent (94%) of voters agree that it is better to try to learn from the wrongs of the past than to erase them. Just four percent (4%) think it is better to erase the wrongs of the past instead.

Voters tend to agree with President Trump’s defense of historical statues, and few think getting rid of Confederate monuments will lessen racial tensions in America.

Well, that’s a heck of a thing. But, the SJWs won’t care. Their job is to create strife and conflict and force other people to comply with their rigid SJW beliefs. They will create problems, throw urine, assault police officers, destroy property. They’ll attempt to blow statues up. Vandalize others. They’ll voluntarily go to a college named after Robert E. Lee, then suddenly realize that they’re appalled.

They should ask the question of likely voters: do you care about all this statue stuff? I suspect the answer would mostly be “no” followed by “SJWs need to get a life, go do some real work.”

Crossed at Right Wing News.

Read: Majority Of Voters Support Keeping Washington, Jefferson, Other Statues »

The Same People Who Predicted Eclipse Predict Climate Scam

https://twitter.com/BigJoeBastardi/status/899666574075887617

If the same people were involved, their computer models would have said the eclipse would be in the Southern hemisphere. Going backwards

https://twitter.com/JWSpry/status/899672728306831361

So far, pretty much everything the Cult of Climastrology has predicted has failed.

Read: The Same People Who Predicted Eclipse Predict Climate Scam »

If All You See…

…is harsh sunlight made harsher because other people drove fossil fueled vehicles, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Doug Ross @ Journal, with a post on photos of Antifa you won’t see in the media.

Read: If All You See… »

LA Times Hot Take: It’s Suddenly Up To Trump Country To Integrate Immigrants

What Justin Gest And David Lubell primarily mean as they write for the LA Times is that Trump must give amnesty to people who are unlawfully present in the U.S., with a secondary focus of integrating people who are here legally who have so far refused to assimilate, while also casting some Blamestorming and charges of raaaaacism at Republican voting areas which refuse to tolerate lawlessness, violence, trespassing aliens, and people who bring notions like treating women as 2nd class citizens, female genital mutilation, honor killings, Sharia law, etc

It’s up to Trump country to integrate immigrants now

The violence perpetrated by white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va., on Aug. 12 represents the most extreme manifestation of the cultural anxiety latent in many American cities and towns that are confronted by demographic change.

Peering at maps of concentrated blue enclaves and the vast red countryside, it may seem that there are two Americas — one that welcomes diverse peoples and facilitates their integration into the United States, and another that perceives diverse peoples as a threat to the cultural composition of the country.

Except, in those blue enclaves, immigrants are not integrating. They’re creating pockets of otherness. Pockets of illegal aliens. Pockets where English is not spoken. Demanding that we speak their language, and allow them to practice their beliefs, which are often 180 degrees opposite of America. We have a saying here in NC: if you don’t like the way we do things, I-95 goes north and south. I-40 goes west. Pick a direction.

We both keep one foot in each America. One of us is the child of a refugee father and a mother from rural Georgia, who graduated from a Los Angeles public school, lives in Manhattan and focused his recent research on white working-class people’s marginality in the Rust Belt. The other grew up in the Philadelphia suburbs, spent a year abroad in Ecuador before moving to Tennessee and later Atlanta, married the daughter of Rust Belt dairy farmers and has focused his career on reducing fear of immigrants in conservative America.

For us, the two Americas are not as separate as many think.

The big cities where we live have become the critical agents of globalization — recruiting immigrants as part of a global economy and multi-ethnic society that is more closely connected with other cities worldwide than their geographic peripheries.

Talk about some Progressive cred. Perhaps they should worry more about the violence in their own Democratic Party run cities with their “multiculturalism and diversity” first.

And indeed, a growing number of communities in Middle America have already begun to act as models for this paradigm shift in immigrant incorporation. Over the last 10 years, cities such as Dayton, Ohio, St. Louis, Mo., and Boise, Idaho have facilitated comprehensive planning processes in which long-time residents were at the table as decisions were made about how newly arriving immigrants and refugees would be received.

Which have all seen spikes in crime.

In 160 communities that have signed agreements to advance immigrant inclusion, local city councils have passed 600 policies that boost integration by accommodating second languages, facilitating access to schools, sensitizing law enforcement agencies, and simplifying small business ownership for all.

Earlier in the missive, we were told how the immigrants (legal ones) were helping in learning English. Now, we are being told that we must accommodate the immigrants (mostly illegals). And we must change the way police act towards lawbreakers, provide loans for illegal aliens, pay for their schooling, and so forth.

And, of course, the subtext is that we give them amnesty. Which means more Democrat voters in traditional Republican voting areas. Funny how that works.

Read: LA Times Hot Take: It’s Suddenly Up To Trump Country To Integrate Immigrants »

Doom: Trump Disbands Federal ‘Climate Change” Advisory Panel

It sounds more doomy if you term it “disbands” rather than “not renewing”, a notion not lost lost on either the Washington Post (which uses lots and lots of fossil fuels and energy to produce and distribute its tree killing edition) or The Hill, with it’s follow up article. Here’s the WP sounding more like Vox

The Trump administration just disbanded a federal advisory committee on climate change

The Trump administration has decided to disband the federal advisory panel for the National Climate Assessment, a group aimed at helping policymakers and private-sector officials incorporate the government’s climate analysis into long-term planning.

The charter for the 15-person Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment — which includes academics as well as local officials and corporate representatives — expires Sunday. On Friday, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s acting administrator, Ben Friedman, informed the committee’s chair that the agency would not renew the panel.

Going by definitions of disband in multiple dictionaries, you could very charitably term that disbanding, but, really, Trump didn’t. He just let the charter lapse.

The National Climate Assessment is supposed to be issued every four years but has come out only three times since passage of the 1990 law calling for such analysis. The next one, due for release in 2018, already has become a contentious issue for the Trump administration.

If it’s so unimportant that it has only be produced half the time (there should have been 6), then we do not really need to waste time on a highly political government document, do we.

The committee was established to help translate findings from the National Climate Assessment into concrete guidance for both public and private-sector officials. Its members have been writing a report to inform federal officials on the data sets and approaches that would best be included, and chair Richard Moss said in an interview Saturday that ending the group’s work was shortsighted.

A government panel pushing pro-government policies. And rarely includes all the science, just the pro-anthropogenic one.

The Hill includes this tidbit

The news comes as the Trump administration continues to face backlash for its policies on climate change, which many have labeled as skeptical.

Backlash from people who refuse to practice what they preach.

Read: Doom: Trump Disbands Federal ‘Climate Change” Advisory Panel »

Pirate's Cove