…is horrible evil carbon polluting ice cream, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on Palm Beach jihad, which is being ignored by the media.
Read: If All You See… »
…is horrible evil carbon polluting ice cream, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on Palm Beach jihad, which is being ignored by the media.
Read: If All You See… »
Funny how Warmists so often recommend the destruction of capitalism in favor of hard left authoritarian governmental economic systems. Here’s Jeff Sparrow at the UK Guardian
Climate change is a disaster foretold, just like the first world war
(you’ll need to read the first 2/3rds yourself for full context)
From a global perspective, the necessity to abandon fossil fuels cannot be denied. But for individual economies, change risks undermining comparative advantages.
If we don’t sell coal, says Malcolm Turnbull, our competitors will – which was, of course precisely the logic of the British fleet expansion in 1908.
The devastation of the first world war eventually engendered a wave of revolt from a populace appalled at the carnage their politicians had wrought.
Climate change has not yet spurred an equivalent of the mutinies in France or the revolution in Petrograd or the uprising in Berlin.
Yet Labor’s appalling equivocation over the Adani mine – a piece of environmental vandalism for which there can be no justification – illustrates the urgency with which we need a new and different type of politics.
The stakes could not be higher. Lamps are going out all over the natural world … and no one will ever see them lit again.
Funny, the UK Guardian wouldn’t be operating without capitalism.
As Eric Worrall points out
Perhaps pseudocryptic demands for a “new and different type of politics†is what fanatics do when they realise ordinary people have stopped listening to their ranting.
Pretty much.
Read: Warmist Recommends Bolshevik Revolution To Stop ‘Climate Change’ (scam) »
Dallas Morning News contributor David J. Bier has an interesting article on legal vs illegal immigration at the southern border, but does miss something when he eventually takes a few shots at President Trump
Legal immigration has soared as illegal entries have dwindled
Here’s the paradox of immigration in America right now: The economy is roaring, and wages are rising, yet 2017 was another year of virtually no illegal border crossings. On average, each Border Patrol agent apprehended just 16 people all year — one every three weeks, tied for the lowest rate since World War II. This is down from when Border Patrol agents apprehended an average of 261 crossers per agent in 1996.
Where have the illegal crossers gone? Newly released statistics from the Department of State give a plausible answer: They haven’t disappeared; they’ve become legal.
The 16 apprehensions per agent in the entire year was significantly fewer than the 21 apprehensions that each agent was making in a month throughout the 1990s. This figure actually overstates the agency’s current workload because so many of today’s “apprehensions” are, in fact, asylum seekers, families and unaccompanied children who turn themselves in to the agents. (snip)
From 1996 to 2017, the number of temporary visas issued to seasonal workers on farms and other industries increased tenfold, from 23,204 to 236,695. Even while Congress has done little on other immigration issues, seasonal worker programs have gradually expanded.
Entries using these visas have increased twice as fast as the number of legal documents issued themselves, meaning that each worker is crossing back and forth legally in a way that was much less common in 1996. This is partly because an increasing share of the visas are going to Mexican workers who can easily criss-cross the border. In 1996, Mexicans made just 60 percent of all border crossing entries. In 2016, that figure was 90 percent.
Of course, these aren’t actually legal immigrants: they’re temporary workers. A person who comes to the U.S. for a two week visit, be it for work or vacation, isn’t an immigrant, either. Regardless, most of us have no problem with these temporary work visas, not when they are willing to do the work. It becomes a problem when they overstay those visa, which has increasingly become a problem, hence the reason ICE, as directed by President Trump, is focusing hard on interior immigration enforcement.
Of course, it seems we shouldn’t even bother with border security in Bier’s world
While Border Patrol has tripled its manpower and constructed a system of more than 600 miles of fences and barriers during this period, increased security is not the primary explanation for the reduction in illegal immigration. We know this because it hasn’t actually worked very well.
According to the Department of Homeland Security, the agency caught only half of the people who actually attempted to evade entry in 2014 and 2015 (i.e., not the asylum seekers or children). The best estimate by Princeton University’s Douglas Massey finds that in the 1990s, 95 percent or more border crossers eventually made it across after multiple attempts. All of the increased enforcement decreased the success rate only to 75 percent. In other words, now that the economy has rebounded, many more people ought to be attempting to sneak into the country.
Many are not trying now, thanks to the White House pushing for implementation of the U.S. laws to rid the nation of illegal aliens, for which the leftist media was very helpful in constantly posting breathless articles about how scary this is for illegals, how doomy. Which helped reduce the flow. And Trump allowing ICE, the Border Patrol, and other law enforcement to do their jobs helps.
Instead, potential undocumented border crossers have found their way into the legal system. As the number entering legally has increased, the Border Patrol’s job has become much easier. They have effectively gained control over the border for the first time since the early 1960s, with guest worker programs an important factor. America has two guest worker programs for seasonal laborers, the H-2A for agriculture and the H-2B for other industries, both created in 1986.
Wait, I thought border patrol didn’t work? No? Under Obama, things were rather different, with illegals streaming across the border. That has dipped immensely under Trump.
While anti-immigrant groups on the right and union-founded groups on the left have fought the H-2 trends, a coalition of moderate Democrats and Republicans has defended the programs, citing solid evidence that they don’t displace U.S. workers and do increase economic growth. Trump’s businesses use both programs, and he defended the practice in a GOP primary debate in 2016.
The trends paint a compelling picture of what would happen if the administration does limit the flow: a lot more illegal immigration.
But, Trump isn’t recommending a reduction in these visas. This is conflating a reduction in actual immigrants looking for citizenship to those who actually bring something to the table, rather than bringing in lots who have few work skill. This is the way most of the 1st World countries do it.
And this is why we can’t have an adult conversation on the subjects, because Leftists always muddy the waters.
Read: Legal Immigration Has Gone Up While Illegal Has Gone Way Down »
Democrats are so cute when they’re pandering
(The Hill) Democratic leaders in the House and Senate exited the Capitol on Wednesday to march with and speak to students protesting gun violence to mark one month since the Parkland, Fla., school shooting.
Senior members of Democratic leadership joined other lawmakers from the House and Senate on Capitol Hill as thousands of students marched while others around the country walked out of classes or staged other protests.
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) both spoke to the demonstrators, while other Democrats such as Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Conn.), Rep. Ted Deutch (Fla.) and Rep. Keith Ellison (Minn.) were spotted in the crowd.
“[We are] representing in Congress the students who have sacrificed so much, spoken so eloquently, commanded the attention of the nation,” Pelosi told the crowd. “We are all moved by your eloquence and fearless insistence on action to prevent gun violence.”“Don’t give up the fight! We will win,” added Schumer.
These are all people who have, at least during the work day, armed security protecting them. And not just with handguns. There are more powerful rifles available to all the security for the various Congressional work buildings (the Capital building and the two office buildings), ones which would be considered “weapons of war”, as the current talking point goes, as they are automatic weapons, which you cannot legally own.
A large crowd of students surrounded progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), whose 2016 presidential campaign was buoyed by support from younger voters. Sanders, speaking through a megaphone, thanked the students for their protest and declared that student protesters were “leading the nation” in the conversation on gun violence.
“All across this country, people are sick and tired of gun violence, and the time is now for all of us together to stand up,” Sanders said.
Un huh
Bernie Sanders Addresses Anti-Gun Rally Under Heavily-Armed Police Guardhttps://t.co/O42bcQ0M9m pic.twitter.com/fnzl5voegM
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) March 14, 2018
He had at least three armed guards, who kept telling the kids to stay back. Why do Democrats want kids to be denied the same protection they themselves have during the place they spend the day?
Oh, and then we have this
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/974040381661859840
Try jumping the fence and see if it is a gun free zone.
…is a horrible street made for fossil fueled vehicles that is cracking due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on London’s nutty, free speech hating Islamist mayor.
Wrote most of this before heading to work, forgot to finish, and didn’t set it for posting at 1pm. Happy Hump Day!
Read: Super Late If All You See… »
Of course it is. These people, the Cult of Climastrology, are worse than those who claim that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, and pass out literature that says things like that God planted dinosaur bones in the ground. At least those people aren’t using their beliefs to enact taxes/fees on Other People, while trying to initiate laws that put people’s freedom and choice in the hands of government, and, in some cases, succeeding
Extreme winter weather becoming more common as Arctic warms, study finds
Scientists found a strong link between high temperatures near the pole and unusually heavy snowfall and frigid weather farther south.The sort of severe winter weather that has rattled parts of the US and UK is becoming more common as the Arctic warms, with scientists finding a strong link between high temperatures near the pole and unusually heavy snowfall and frigid weather further south.
A sharp increase in temperatures across the Arctic since the early 1990s has coincided with an uptick in abnormally cold snaps in winter, particularly in the eastern US, according to new research that analyzed temperature data from 1950 onwards.
Extreme cold winter weather is up to four times more likely when temperatures in the Arctic are unusually high, the study found. Researchers compared daily temperatures from across the Arctic region with something called the accumulated winter season severity index, which grades winter weather based on temperature, snow fall and snow depth, across 12 US cities.

If you go looking for the link because you want that link to be there you will make sure you find the link.
Two large winter storms recently swept the US east coast in less than a week, unloading up to three inches of snow per hour in places, resulting in several deaths, thousands of cancelled flights, closed schools and snarled traffic.
The cold front even reached Florida, contributing to a recent surge in manatee deaths. So far this year, 166 of the marine mammals have been found dead off the state’s coast, with stress from the cold the leading cause of mortality. “Manatees may join polar bears as one of the first iconic victims of extinction in the wild from climate change,†said Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility.
See? Massive cold that reaches to Florida is the fault of all you people driving fossil fueled vehicles and eating burgers.
Read: Surprise: “Extreme Winter Weather” Linked To Global Warming »
As I’ve noted time and time again, if something’s happening, the Cult of Climastrology will link their un-scientific Beliefs to that event
Desperately stupid @Yale climate cult propaganda: "These March Madness mascots are in danger from climate change".
Yale is destroying its brand by allowing this complete BS to be spewed under the Yale name.
— Tom Nelson (@TomANelson) March 14, 2018
From the link
It’s March Madness. The NCAA college basketball tournament is underway. And while Wildcats, Tigers, and Rams face off on the court, some of the teams’ real-life namesakes face dangers in the wild.
Losoff: “Many of the animals that inspired the team names, these mascots, are at risk of being impacted by climate change.â€
Tara Losoff is with the National Wildlife Federation, which describes these impacts in its Mascot Madness report.
For example, big horn sheep – or rams – are affected by warmer temperatures, decreased rainfall, and melting snowpack. And the habitat of Florida’s gators is threatened by coastal sea-level rise. The list goes on – bears, wildcats, wolves, falcons, and more, all face climate-related threats.
Losoff says making a connection between mascots and climate change can help get people thinking and talking about global warming.
Because the climate never changed before the Industrial Revolution and the invention of the combustion engine, you know. Weather was always the same every single year.
Interestingly, these same Warmists aren’t complaining about all the carbon pollution for March Madness, what with the power required for the venues, all the food, all the fossil fuels used to move the teams and their supporters, etc. Probably because Warmists want to watch the games. Because they’re hypocrites.
Read: Literally March Madness: Warmists Link NCAA Mascots To ‘Climate Change’ (scam) »
At least while the lawsuits play out
(Texas Tribune) A panel of three U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals judges ruled Tuesday that most of the state’s immigration enforcement legislation, Senate Bill 4, can remain in effect while the case plays out, handing a victory to Gov. Greg Abbott and Republican supporters of the law.
As passed, Senate Bill 4 allows local law enforcement officers to question the immigration status of people they detain or arrest and punishes local government department heads and elected officials who don’t cooperate with federal immigration “detainers” — requests by agents to turn over immigrants subject to possible deportation — in the form of jail time and penalties that exceed $25,000.
The one part of SB 4 that is still on hold is a provision that punishes local officials from “adopting, enforcing or endorsing†policies that specifically prohibit or limit enforcement of immigration laws. The judges kept that injunction in place, but said it only applies to the word “endorse.†The bill, as passed and signed, would have made elected and appointed officials subject to a fine, jail time and possible removal from office for violating all or parts of the legislation.
So, any who adopt or enforce sanctuary jurisdiction policies can be punished. This has give the ACLU, who was suing, a big sad, because they very much like to protect people who are unlawfully present above lawful U.S. citizens
The American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, which represents some of the plaintiffs in the SB 4 case, said it was considering how to move forward.
“The court made clear that we remain free to challenge the manner in which the law is implemented, so we will be monitoring the situation on the ground closely,” said Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project.
You do that, chumps
The law, one of the most controversial in recent Texas Legislature history…
It’s only controversial to Leftists, who support illegal aliens and illegal immigration. The rest of us find it to be a common sense law protecting Americans over illegals.
Read: Court Upholds Majority Of Texas’ Anti-Sanctuary Jurisdiction Law »
Every teenager thinks they Know It All. I bet you thought that when you were in high school and college. I bet I did too. And, we all did dumb stuff when we were young. And every adult generation made fun of the dumb stuff kids did. But, I don’t remember my generation doing things like eating Tide Pods to the point where the detergent had to be put in locked boxes. We also weren’t as touchy and Offended by everything. We lived by the rule “sticks and stones may break my bones but names will never hurt me.” So, yeah, let’s totally let people who earned the moniker “special snowflakes” lead
Editorial: America Has Failed Its Kids on Guns. It’s Time to Let Them Lead.
Adults are supposed to take care of children — not only keep them safe, but make them feel safe. Schools are essentially an extension of the home, in that sense, providing sanctuaries of learning, of nurturing and care. But after years of attacks by people with weapons of war, students cannot feel safe and are demanding that adults end years of complaisance and act. They are not asking for their schools to become armed garrisons. Rather, they want those weapons to be brought under control. And unlike too many adults, the young people leading Wednesday’s walkout at schools around the country — inspired by angry, motivated students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, in Parkland, Fla., where 17 people were killed by a former student with an assault weapon — have had the courage to take on the industry responsible for blocking every reasonable measure to limit access to guns, including those that make it all too easy to commit mass murder.
As Stoneman Douglas junior Florence Yared said in front of the Florida State Capitol late last month, “You adults have failed us by not creating a safer place for your children to go to school. So we, the next generation, will not fail our own kids. We will make this change happen. If not today, then tomorrow, and if not tomorrow, next year. Take it from us. You created a mess for us, but we will make this world safer for our children.â€
So, if memory serves, it was a complete and utter failure of the process, of people who work for government at the local, county, and federal levels not doing their jobs. Heck, even their radios failed. That’s what the kids should be upset about. Instead, it looks like they are in gun banning/grabbing mode, which is surely being pushed by adults.
With Wednesday’s demonstration, and their March for Our Lives movement on March 24 in Washington, young voices are being heard. How will the nation’s adults respond? Hopefully, by amplifying their demand: Never again.
Following that are all sorts of quotes from these worldly Tide Pods eaters (OK, they don’t all do that. Many just take a gazillion selfies and videos of themselves involved in inappropriate, risque, and stupid behavior), but, hey, if the NY Times Editorial Board is totally behind safety, why are they not concerned with children walking out of school? Shouldn’t adults be stopping them? Those adults are charged with safeguarding and watching these children during specific hours of the day.
“We may be young but our voices are louder than you can imagine.â€
Screaming babies are loud, too. Kids denied their cookie can get pretty loud. I don’t take advice from people who spend more time on social justice idiocy than STEM, history, and real world subjects, and think that there are more than two genders. But, what this all is is the NYTEB using kids as human shields to attempt to get their gun grabbing rules and laws passed.
Read: NY Times: We Should Let Generation Tide Pod Lead On Gun Control Or Something »
On the heels of Schwarzenegger idiocy, the Washington Post’s unhinged Tom Toles takes his own stab
Should climate change be called murder? What do you call knowingly killing people?
This seems like as good a time as any to shift the climate argument from the debate club to criminal court, and former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger intends to do just that.
“I don’t think there’s any difference: If you walk into a room and you know you’re going to kill someone, it’s first-degree murder; I think it’s the same thing with the oil companies.â€
Murder. Yes, it’s about time somebody started to use language that captures the actual effect of deliberately delaying the transition to carbon-free fuel. Will people really die as a result of climate change? They already have, from the amplification of the power of storms, to more intense drought, wildfires and flooding. The World Health Organization estimates that between 2030 and 2050, 250,000 people will die from climate change. EVERY YEAR. From malnutrition, malaria, diarrhea and heat stress.

So, um, when will Tom Toles demand that Washington Post stop using fossil fuels and killing trees for their operations?
Read: Say, Should ‘Climate Change’ (scam) Be Called Murder? »