Surprise: NJ Wants To Go After NRA And Gun Friendly States

Once again, Democrats show their true colors. Instead of going after people who use firearms unlawfully along with implementing laws that make it even harder for criminals to not be able to purchase firearms, and putting big, big penalties on criminals who possess them and use them, NJ Dems are considering assaulting the 1st Amendment Rights of the NRA and the U.S. citizens who are members

(NJ.com) Democratic lawmakers want to take the state’s tight gun control laws and expand them outside of New Jersey’s borders.

There’s new legislation that would ban state-sponsored travel to any states that don’t require their residents to obtain a permits before they purchase a firearm.

The goal is to send a message to the National Rifle Association, said State Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, the bill’s sponsor.

“Fighting the NRA on the basis logic and rational thinking has not worked,” Weinberg, D-Bergen, said. “So I think the thing that might work is fighting them with their pocketbook.”

Let me ask: how has all that gun control worked in New Jersey? It is considered to be one of the most restrictive states in the nation, yet, gun crime still occurs. A lot. Because most of the laws are aimed at law abiding citizens, not criminals. And meant to turn law abiding citizens into criminals.

And meant to go after the Free Speech rights of U.S. citizens.

If enacted, state-sponsored travel for public workers and elected officials would be banned in 37 states, according to state licensing data from the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

It’s unclear if the legislation would require New Jersey’s governor to abide by the rule if it becomes law, Weinberg said. But she said she hopes Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, would “honor it” if it clears the Democrat-controlled state Legislature and he signs it into law.

Yeah, that ought to do it. “Oh, noes, a few people from NJ might not come to our state. What shall we do?????1???”

Murphy has promised to sign the bills, including one to reduce magazine capacity, another to ban armor-piercing bullets, another to make it tougher to obtain a permit to carry a handgun, another to expand background checks on private gun sales, and two to keep firearms out of the hands of people deemed a threat to themselves and others in the state.

NJ is already at a maximum of 15 rounds for magazines. I guess they want to play the 10 rounds game. But, more importantly, they want to make it harder for law abiding citizens to protect themselves. Really, none of this is aimed at criminals. Even the last one, about being threats to themselves and others, is more about getting creative about seizing firearms than taking them from criminals.

Meanwhile, Murphy slipped a provision to tax guns in his budget. He promised to do this as a gubernatorial candidate. There aren’t any real details, but he expects to raise $1.4 million per year. A straight purchase tax would equate to about $777 dollars per firearm. Again, this is something that goes after the law abiding, not the criminals.

Read: Surprise: NJ Wants To Go After NRA And Gun Friendly States »

If All You See…

…is a field of flowers soon to be destroyed by carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Creeping Sharia, with a post on who’s in and who’s out in Europe.

It’s ladies in nature week.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup Walt Otto

Happy Sunday! A gorgeous day in America. A bit of snow and rain going on, some ducks quacking in the backyard, and the fish in the new tank are getting along (I had to get a new tank for one Blue Gourami, who was too aggressive to all the other fish in another tank, but seems fine with red Mollies).

What’s happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Ice Age Now covers blizzard warnings for six states
  2. JoNova notes that the March for (politically correct) Science failed
  3. Not A Lot of People Know That discusses the coming grim, global, green dictatorship
  4. NoTricksZone covers regulatory madness on the color of bread and fries in the EU
  5. 357 Magnum notes the pearl clutching gun haters pearl clutching
  6. A View From The Beach highlights the Gore Effect in Minnesota
  7. Bizzy Blog covers the madness of Rachel Maddow
  8. Leo Hohmann wonders if Christians have lost the right to speak out on radical Islam
  9. Chicks On The Right notes one Laura Ingraham advertiser coming back with tail between its legs
  10. DaTechGuy’s Blog has thoughts on Syria and Trump
  11. Revised History discusses two sets of rules
  12. Free North Carolina notes a nutty judicial decision on illegals and green cards
  13. Gay Patriot notes people with Chick-fil-a Derangement Syndrome
  14. Hot Air Pundit discusses Nikki Haley being tough at the U.N.
  15. And last, but not least, House Of Eratosthenes notes the hard and soft power

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/985585787399032833

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Gay Rights Lawyer Sets Self On Fire To Protest Fossil Fuels

This is a direct result of the unhinged conspiracies of doom emanating from the Cult of Climastrology. Twenty five plus years of spreading apocalyptic doom. Clamoring about the Earth burning itself to a crisp. Of all the supposed coming next mass extinction. And so forth. The responsibility rests on all the Warmists crying about fossil fuels, yet using vast amounts themselves to head to all their ‘climate change’ conference

Prominent Lawyer in Fight for Gay Rights Dies After Setting Himself on Fire in Prospect Park

A lawyer nationally known for being a champion of gay rights died after setting himself on fire in Prospect Park in Brooklyn early Saturday morning and leaving a note exhorting people to lead less selfish lives as a way to protect the planet, the police said.

The remains of the lawyer, David S. Buckel, 60, were found near Prospect Park West in a field near baseball diamonds and the main loop used by joggers and bikers.

Mr. Buckel left a note in a shopping cart not far from his body and also emailed it to several news media outlets, including The New York Times. (snip)

Friends said that after he left the organization, Mr. Buckel became involved in environmental causes, which he alluded to in his note as the reason he decided to end his life by self-immolation with fossil fuels.

“Pollution ravages our planet, oozing inhabitability via air, soil, water and weather,” he wrote in the email sent to The Times. “Most humans on the planet now breathe air made unhealthy by fossil fuels, and many die early deaths as a result — my early death by fossil fuel reflects what we are doing to ourselves.”

Gore, Obama, Mann, Schniedermann, the UN IPCC, all the news outlets proclaiming doom of this and that and the other (it’s pretty darned easy to find the doomy climate change stories. The first on on Google News is Hug Your Trees Goodbye, Thanks To Climate Change)

(NY Daily News) A second, longer note — left with the first inside an envelope marked “For the police” — said Buckel doused himself in “fossil fuel” before starting the fatal fire as a metaphor for the destruction of the planet.

“My early death by fossil fuel reflects what we are doing to ourselves,” he wrote. “A lifetime of service may best be preserved by giving a life . . . Honorable purpose in life invites honorable purchase in death.

“I hope it is an honorable death that might serve others.”

It should serve to show us that a Cult has infected Leftists around the world, along with the news media who constantly and consistently treats us to serving after serving of Doom. And, remember, they’re teaching our kids this garbage. It’s no wonder kids are such mental messes these days, and doing things like eating Tide pods.

The note has more things leftist, including yammering about “privilege”, of which Susan Wright at Red State writes

That’s every social justice primer ever written, compressed into 3 neat paragraphs.

I’m not making light of the man’s death, but if your liberalism drives you to this level of attention seeking, then it’s not just liberalism, any more. It’s a destructive form of narcissism and a disconnect from reality.

Liberalism is destructive, and the Cult of Climastrology sector is one of the worst, if not the worst. If the vast majority of what you hear and read is that everything will be bad, horrible, terrible, gruesome, terrifying, cataclysmic (insert your adjective here), and you listen and take it to heart, you’re not going to have a rosy viewpoint, are you? And this is all based on junk science with the idea to give the government more and more control over the lives of citizens and private entities, reducing their liberty and freedom.

Read: Gay Rights Lawyer Sets Self On Fire To Protest Fossil Fuels »

If All You See…

…is a horrible world killing cat, sucking up resources and causing the planet to boil, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Moonbattery, with a post on California’s free speech killing Internet bill.

Read: If All You See… »

Bad News: ‘Climate Change’ Is Making It So We’ll Eat Lobster All The Time

In Warmist World, this is a Bad Thing

SOON WE’LL BE EATING LOBSTER DINNERS ALL THE TIME

We already know some of the most documented effects of climate change: The world is getting warmer, natural disasters are becoming deadlier and happening more frequently, and the arctic as we know it may become a thing of the past. But increasing global temperatures are also leading to other, stranger developments, like the fact that we all may be eating a lot more lobster dinners in the near future.

According to a fascinating report Bloomberg dropped today — which measures how climate change is already affecting the way we eat — lobstermen off the coast of Maine are catching more crustaceans than ever. The Gulf of Maine is warming faster than 99.9 percent of the world’s oceans, according to a 2015 study by the Gulf of Maine Research Institute, causing lobsters to procreate like crazy. (Though eventually, ocean temperatures may increase so much that lobster populations actually end up having less sex.) These warmer global temperatures are causing other strange changes to the food supply: cod populations are declining, more squid are roaming the seas, Britain is suddenly warm enough to produce fine wine, and coffee growers in Indonesia, India, and Peru are moving into the mountains.

So, things change, and we’ll be able to have lobster all the time? Where’s the downside?

Read: Bad News: ‘Climate Change’ Is Making It So We’ll Eat Lobster All The Time »

Can You Guess Why Congress Won’t Pass Universal Background Checks?

This one is a doozy, which is more in the category of “Unhinged Tools”, or at least “Barking Moonbats”, rather than under the “Constitution” and “2nd Amendment” categories. Here’s Rep. John Delaney, Democrat of Maryland’s 6th district

Congressman: 97% of Americans Want One Kind of Gun Control. Here’s Why Congress Hasn’t Acted

As the nation has mourned the 14 students and three staff members killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida and marched on their behalf, a remarkable national consensus formed around the need for gun safety legislation. In a recent poll conducted by Quinnipiac University, an astonishing 97% of those surveyed said that they support requiring background checks for all gun buyers. More broadly, a Politico/Morning Consult poll found that 68% support stricter gun laws.

I’ll write it again: I have no problem with requiring a background check for every gun purchase, including private ones, and including transfers. Want to give your adult son or daughter a gun? How about getting a gun for the wife? Yeah, there needs to be a background check. Just bought one last week? Background check. Have a concealed carry permit? Background check for new firearm. Things can change. Someone who had been legally allowed could have something show up in their record. Heck, I’ll go a step further, in that there should be a permit system for purchasing ammunition. Once a year you need to renew it, much like a fishing license. This would greatly reduce the number of people legally purchasing ammo to use with their illegally possessed, possibly stolen, firearm. It would have to be very tightly written legislation, to avoid the impulses of gun grabbers to deny people who shouldn’t be denied.

Despite such broad support and public mobilization, it looks like Congress and the President will do nothing to address the issue. There is no indication Republican leadership in the House of Representatives will even bring legislation that creates universal background checks forward for a vote, let alone consider other commonsense measures that are also widely supported. Across the country, people are rightly asking how this is possible. In addition to being the right thing to do, wouldn’t it make good political sense to implement policies that nearly everyone wants?

Well, really, the problem is that if you give the gun grabbers something, they will want more and more and more. And might even take advantage of legislation that most of us agree with and use it to deny law abiding citizens their 2nd Amendment Rights. It really is that simple. Give Democrats an inch, they’ll want lots and lots more inches. Pass universal background checks, and they’ll say “this is a great starting point” and demand more.

That’s not Delaney’s idea, though. Are you ready? Put the beverage down

One of the defining characteristics of American democracy in the last decade has been the loss of the House of Representatives as a responsible legislative body that reflects the will of the people. This has happened because of gerrymandering. And that’s a big part of why my colleagues and I can’t get anything done.

Read: Can You Guess Why Congress Won’t Pass Universal Background Checks? »

NY Times Offers Mostly Reasonable Editorial Supporting Trump’s Syria Strikes

By this time, you surely know of the airstrikes on Syria. I shan’t regurgitate them. I’ll direct you to this link for the full 411 if you want it. As for opinion, the NY Times Editorial Board mostly drops their Trump Derangement Syndrome for a few minutes, though you have to wonder how it would have gone had France and England not been involved

A Coordinated Attack On Syria

President Trump has sometimes seemed to view military action as a game and foreign policy as something set by online taunts. He seemed to think that as commander in chief he could simply follow his whims.

The funny part is, this has mostly worked.

So it was reassuring that his military response to a suspected chemical attack that killed dozens of people in the rebel-held Damascus suburb of Douma on April 7 was coordinated with Britain and France. In his address to the nation Friday night, he said that preventing the use of chemical weapons was in the “vital national security interest of the United States.”

Earlier this week we got his usual bluster. “Get ready Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and ‘smart,’” the president said on Twitter on Wednesday, in his best movie tough-guy impersonation, after a Russian diplomat warned that his nation’s forces would shoot down any missile fired at their ally Syria. On Friday night his message to the Syrian regime’s two main defenders, Russia and Iran, was more measured. “What kind of a nation wants to be associated with the mass murder of innocent men, women and children?” he asked. “The nations of the world can be judged by the friends they keep.”

That’s Trump. This is who he is. He’s not a politician. He also doesn’t set red lines and then blatantly ignore the crossing of red lines.

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said that while this was a “one-off” attack, like the airstrike against Syria a year ago, the targets were involved in the production and storage of chemical agents, not just an airfield. He warned of further attacks if Syria used chemical weapons again.

The attack in Douma was an outrage. Photos showed children foaming from their mouths and nostrils. The World Health Organization reported that 500 people in Douma had symptoms of exposure to chemical weapons, and many of those who died had signs of “highly toxic chemicals.”

The thing is, you know that Democrats, and some Never Trump Republicans, are foaming at the mouth in outrage that Trump would do something like this, because they are deranged. They forget that Obama did the same thing (eventually), or excuse it. The Times does not. They do point out that this strike violates the UN charter and the Constitution, sort of.

Since then, President Barack Obama and now Mr. Trump have used those same authorizations at least 37 times to justify attacks on the Islamic State and other militant groups in 14 countries, including Yemen, the Philippines, Kenya, Eritrea and Niger, according to Dan Grazier of the Project on Government Oversight. This has allowed the Republican-led Congress to avoid public debate — and any responsibility for sending American men and women into battle.

This interpretation of the law gives a free hand to the volatile and thoughtless Mr. Trump, which could prove even more dangerous if he were to decide to attack North Korea or Iran.

First, we do need a new authorization, as the post September 11th one and the Iraq operations one do not really cover this, and, in all fairness, the NY Times had a problem with Obama ordering military strikes without a new one, though, also in all fairness, the barbs were aimed at the GOP controlled congress, not Obama. Supposedly, Senator Tim Kaine is going to offer up a new one.

It’s funny, though, that they call Trump volatile and thoughtless. They still just do not get Trump. They do not get why he won the election. And there’s no reason to explain it, because Liberals will never get it.

Anyhow, for a measured response, let’s go to CNN

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/984973525873299456

Their TDS has led them to take the side of North Korea, and they forget that the NKs have been developing nuclear weapons for decades, and set some off during Obama’s terms.

Read: NY Times Offers Mostly Reasonable Editorial Supporting Trump’s Syria Strikes »

Oh, Noes, The Ocean’s Circulation Hasn’t Been This Sluggish In 1000 Years!!!!!!!!

I’ve mostly been ignoring this idiotic bit of scaremongering, but this one takes the cake

There’s one simple point: do they have the actual scientific data to prove the assertion? Measurements from over the entirety of the last 1000 years, of which the majority was during a Holocene warm period? What about comparisons to the time during Holocene warm periods?

But, don’t totally blame Greenpeace (which uses vast amounts of fossil fuels to pull all sorts of stunts to fund-raise): the link goes to the Washington Post, where an editor either allowed hyper-Warmist Chris Mooney to write the alarmist, unscientific headline, or did it him/herself. And includes this

The two studies have their differences: The second suggests the slowdown probably began for natural reasons around the time of the Industrial Revolution in 1850, rather than being spurred by human-caused climate change, which fully kicked in later.

But like the first study, the second finds that the circulation has remained weak, or even weakened further, through the present era of warming.

So, it started naturally, but, then they just Assume that it is now all man-caused. They have no actual proof using data that can stand up to the Scientific Method. You just have to take their word for it.

Watts Up With That? also points to a 2010 NASA study that the circulation was not slowing down. Warmists might proclaim “but, that was 8 years ago!!!!!” Yes, but the ocean circulation doom study proclaims that it has been slowing down for well over 100 years. The NASA study used actual data, rather than computer models.

Anyhow, even if it is slowing, there’s no proof of anthropogenic causation.

Read: Oh, Noes, The Ocean’s Circulation Hasn’t Been This Sluggish In 1000 Years!!!!!!!! »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful low carbon method of transportation which Everyone Else should be required to use instead of fossil fuels, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Diogenes’ Middle Finger, with a post on the FCC chair telling Democrats to go pound sand.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove