If All You See…

…are wonderful low carbon bicycles which Everyone Else should be forced to ride, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is No Tricks Zone, with a post on electric cars being rolling climate killers.

Read: If All You See… »

Chuck Schumer Mansplains How Women’s Right To An Abortion Hangs In The Balance

I always find it interesting how so many Democratic Party voting males push hard for abortion on demand

Chuck Schumer: Our Rights Hang in the Balance

Justice Anthony Kennedy’s retirement has created the most important vacancy on the Supreme Court in our lifetimes. Whoever fills Justice Kennedy’s seat will join an evenly divided court with the ability to affect the laws of the United States and the rights of its citizens for generations. Enormously important issues hang in the balance: the right of workers to organize, the pernicious influence of dark money in politics, the right of Americans to marry who they love, the right to vote.

Perhaps the most consequential issues at stake in this Supreme Court vacancy are affordable health care and a woman’s freedom to make the most sensitive medical decisions about her body. The views of President Trump’s next court nominee on these issues could well determine whether the Senate approves or rejects them.

President Trump’s own words tell us that his nominee to the court will almost certainly vote to overturn Roe v. Wade and eviscerate affordable access to health care for millions of Americans. President-elect Donald Trump said in November of 2016 that “I’m pro-life; the judges will be pro-life.” During the campaign, he speculated that after he appointed two or three judges to the bench, Roe v. Wade “will go back to the individual states.”

In practice, sending Roe v. Wade back to the states would claw back a constitutional freedom to abortion that all American women have had for over 40 years. There are at least 20 states poised to ban abortion immediately if the 1973 decision is overturned, and legislatures in Iowa, Mississippi and Louisiana have already passed strict anti-abortion laws that could trigger challenges to the decision.

Abortion on demand is the number one belief among Democrats. How it came about that Democrats must believe in aborting the unborn at any time with zero restrictions above anything else is incredible. Seriously, this is what Chuck and the other Dems are worried about first and foremost regarding Trump’s next SCOTUS pick: the ability of a person who got pregnant from having irresponsible, unprotected sex with a person they do not want to have a baby with at a time when they do not want to have a baby.

If you do not want a Supreme Court Justice who will overturn Roe v. Wade and undo the Affordable Care Act, tell your senators they should not vote for a candidate from Mr. Trump’s preordained list. Democrat, Republican, independent, liberal or conservative — we should all want a more representative process for choosing the next Supreme Court justice.

We have a representative process: it’s called a General Election. Trump won. He ran a better campaign. Hillary is Hillary, and did things like passing out on 9/11 and failing to campaign in needed states.

Read: Chuck Schumer Mansplains How Women’s Right To An Abortion Hangs In The Balance »

Surprise: Illegal Alien Arrested For Starting Colorado Wildfire

Members of the Cult of Climastrology have been blaming the Spring Creek wildfire, along with others, on ‘climate change’: talking points down in flame

Illegal immigrant arrested for starting wildfire in Colorado, police say

An illegal immigrant has been arrested on arson charges in connection with the Spring Creek wildfire in southern Colorado that has destroyed homes and forced evacuations.

“The initial cause of the fire was human caused,” the Costilla County Sheriff’s Office said Saturday in announcing the arrest of Jesper Joergensen, 52.

He was taken into custody without incident.

Reuters reported that Joergensen is not a U.S. citizen and will be handed over to U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement once he has faced the charges against him.

Deportation officers lodged an immigration detainer to hold Joergensen with the Costilla County Jail “following his arrest on criminal charges,” ICE spokesman Carl Rusnok told Fox News Sunday.

Joergensen is a Danish national, he said.

Of course, this will not deter CoC members from fear-mongering on anthropogenic climate change as being the cause of future doom, nor will it diminish their support for illegal aliens. They’re happy to jump into their fossil fueled vehicles to go attend rallies in support of Doing Something about ‘climate change’, usually meaning “tax Other People”, as well as illegal aliens.

Nor should we forget that so much of Colorado considers itself a sanctuary for illegal aliens.

You look at the talking points about other fires, such as the others burning in Colorado, such as Sugerloaf fire, which was started by lightning. Here’s Excitable Warmist William Anderegg in the Denver Post

Fires are white-hot signs of climate change in our backyard

Scientists have been studying fires and trying to predict fire risk for decades. The drivers of fires are complicated and there’s a lot of random chance involved in any given fire, but there are some crystal clear big-picture patterns. First, the West has been warming due to human greenhouse gas emissions coming from our cars, power plants, and other sources. Hotter temperatures mean lower snowpacks, earlier snowmelts, and drier forests – sound familiar from this year? All of these factors are associated with years with lots of big fires. We have been conducting research on the San Juan National Forest for a decade and I can tell you first-hand from walking around the crispy forest last week that the trees and fuels are drier than they have been in a long while.

Second, the West is burning a lot more than it used to and climate change is behind most of this. The number of large fires like the Burro and 416 Fires has increased four-fold since the 1970s. Previous fire suppression and past land use leading to overstocked forests is likely a part of this, but some careful research done in the past few years points to climate change as the most important driver. Scientists from the University of Idaho and Columbia University found that around half or more of the recent area burned by large western US wildfires was due to climate change.

These are all what are called “assumptions”, not scientific investigation. Notice that Anderegg fails to provide proof of these assumptions, nor proof that this is mostly/solely caused by Mankind’s carbon pollution. In fact, he mentions land use, then blows it off. Nor does he tell us that he’s given up his own use of fossil fuels, power from power plants, and other things that makes his life carbon neutral.

It’s also easier to blame the mythical ‘climate change’ rather than an illegal alien.

Read: Surprise: Illegal Alien Arrested For Starting Colorado Wildfire »

The Millennial Socialists Are Coming Or Something

The NY Times’ Michelle Goldberg is super excited that openly “socialist” millennials are running and winning primaries in extreme Democratic Party strongholds

The Millennial Socialists Are Coming

In May, three young progressive women running for the state Legislature in Pennsylvania, each endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America, won decisive primary victories over men heavily favored by the political establishment. Two of the women, Summer Lee, 30, and Sara Innamorato, 32, ousted incumbents, the distant cousins Dom Costa and Paul Costa, members of an iconic Pennsylvania political family.

Elizabeth Fiedler, 37, announced her run three months after giving birth to her second child, and she had a nursery in her Philadelphia campaign office so other parents could drop off their kids before canvassing shifts. Talking to voters, she spoke of depending on Medicaid and CHIP for her kids’ health insurance, and of the anxiety she felt during two weeks when their insurance lapsed.

Lee was open about the more than $200,000 in student loans that have weighed on her since graduating from law school, which gave her a visceral sense, she told me, of the “need for free, quality education for everybody.” (An African-American woman running in a largely white district, she ended up with 68 percent of the vote.) Innamorato spoke about how her father’s opioid addiction had pushed her and her mother from the middle class. “I’ve lived the struggles of my district,” she told me.

I’m thinking that Fielder shouldn’t have had the first kid, much less the second, if she couldn’t afford them. And Lee shouldn’t have attended that fancy pants, expensive college if she couldn’t afford to repay the loans. But, hey, they’re socialists (sort of), so, they want Other People to pay for their lives.

Their races were part of a grass-roots civic renewal that is happening across this country, something that is, for me, the sole source of optimism in this very dark time. Marinating in the news in New York City, I’m often sick with despair. An authoritarian president of dubious legitimacy and depraved character is poised to remake America for generations with a second Supreme Court pick. The federal government is a festival of kleptocratic impunity. Kids the same age as my own are ripped from their migrant parents.

Way too much insanity to cover quickly, let’s just go with

Many of the D.S.A.’s (Democratic Socialists Of America) goals, reflected in Ocasio-Cortez’s platform, are indistinguishable from those of progressive democrats. But if the D.S.A. is happy to work alongside liberals, its members are generally serious about the “socialist” part of democratic socialist. Its constitution envisions “a humane social order based on popular control of resources and production, economic planning, equitable distribution, feminism, racial equality and non-oppressive relationships.”

Talk of popular control of the means of production is anathema to many older Democrats, even very liberal ones. It plays a lot better with the young; one recent survey shows that 61 percent of Democrats between 18 and 34 view socialism positively. The combination of the Great Recession, the rising cost of education, the unreliability of health insurance and the growing precariousness of the workplace has left young people with gnawing material insecurity. They have no memory of the widespread failure of Communism, but the failures of capitalism are all around them.

Got that? They want total control. Goldberg yammers on about an “authoritarian president” (forgetting how Obama ruled with his pen), but the DSA wants all power over everything to reside in Washington, D.C. Included controlling the means of production. Nationalizing industries. It’s not a failure of capitalism when people spend money they do not have. And it’s that same capitalism that allows the Millennials to have all their smartphones and tablets and cruise the Internet and talk with people around the world and post their favorite selfie of them eating lunch.

These are not true Socialists. In the political model for Democracy, Socialism is to the left, with Liberalism (classical, what most American conservatives practice) in the middle and Conservativism (classical) to the right. For Socialism, yes, they do want the government heavily involved in the means of production. Wants the government to own businesses and sell products. Total control of the economy. In the Political Core, this is about virtually everyone voting directly on everything. Have you heard the term “direct democracy?” They want even non-citizens and illegals to vote. But, they won’t accept the results when they lose on votes. Which negates the whole thing. Finally, the 3rd core, the Moral, is about how involved the government is with our lives. In the Socialist model, the government stays the hell out of our lives: does that sound anywhere close to what these DSA members, these Socialists (and Dems et all) are pushing?

But, hey, kiddies, you do you. And you’ll be surprised as hell when you find out that all this stuff that you want for free comes with a hefty price tag, starting with the government telling you how to live your lives.

Like several other chapters, the Pittsburgh D.S.A. holds clinics where members change people’s burned-out car brake lights for free, helping them avoid unnecessary police run-ins while making inroads into the community. A local mechanic named Metal Mary helped train them.

A brake bulb costs about $7 for 2. I know, because I just did this. It took all of 5 minutes of my time to replace one. Seriously, these people shouldn’t have a car if they can’t afford a lightbulb. But, they want Someone Else to pay for it. The scare-mongering about the police is cute, though, eh?

Read: The Millennial Socialists Are Coming Or Something »

Even If You Don’t Believe In ‘Climate Change’, You Should Totally Be Up For A Carbon Tax Or Something

It’s funny how the Warmists are always finding new and exciting ways to push one of their main “solutions”, a carbon tax. Here we have Elen Van Velsor, group leader of the Greensboro chapter and North Carolina’s state coordinator for Citizens Climate Lobby, being funny

Ellen Van Velsor: This climate-change plan could work

This news is too good not to share — there is a solution to climate change. At the recent Citizens Climate International Conference, experts from the fields of public health, economics and climate science as well as from the oil, auto, food and utilities industries all called for action on climate change now. And citizen opinion supports their views. The Yale Climate Opinion Study shows that 62 percent of North Carolinians believe that global warming is happening and that more than half of the people in our state are worried.

A solution, people, a solution! It’s about Warmists giving up their own use of fossil fuels and making their lives carbon neutral….oh, wait

Regardless of whether one believes that climate change is caused by human activity, greenhouse gases put our health and economy at risk. The most effective solution is a price on carbon, which is like an insurance policy against risk. We get life insurance, not because we expect to die tomorrow but so that when we do, our assets and our loved ones will be protected. In much the same way, a well-constructed carbon policy protects not only our collective assets, our health and our economy, but it helps create a livable world for those we leave behind. There are no downsides.

Got that? Even if you do not believe the increase in GHGs is mostly/solely caused by Mankind, you should totally agree that an economy killing carbon tax that will increase your cost of living is totally awesome!

Experts from all fields agree the very best insurance we can have is a carbon-fee-and-dividend policy. (snip)

This idea is significantly different from a carbon “tax.” Taxes revert to government coffers. Instead, returning 100 percent of fees to households as a monthly dividend check not only would make rising prices for expenses like gasoline and heating fuel affordable, it would provide additional income for those at the lowest income levels and incentive for people at the highest incomes to reduce their carbon footprint.

Interesting how this again increase the power of government and makes citizens more dependent on government, eh? They’re admitting that the cost of living will skyrocket, but, does anyone actually think that government will give 100% back to the citizens? Please. Regardless, you can call it a fee and dividend policy, it’s still a tax.

Furthermore, a bipartisan carbon-fee-and-dividend policy works through the market rather than through government regulation and is equitable and pro-growth in that it puts money into the hands of those households that are most likely to spend it.

?????? It’s not a market solution of the government is mandating it.

Read: Even If You Don’t Believe In ‘Climate Change’, You Should Totally Be Up For A Carbon Tax Or Something »

If All You See…

…are wonderful trees which will soon die from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Right Way, with a post saying good morning.

Why, yes, it is America week on IAYS.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another great day in America. The Sun is shining, the birds are singing, we’re coming up on a day of patriotism, and we know how much Democrats hate that. At least for America. This pinup is by Greg Hildebrandt, with a wee bit of help.

What’s happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Chicks On The Right discusses the Socialist sweetheart being a great lipstick seller
  2. 357 Magnum covers the #WalkAway movement
  3. America’s Watchtower notes the FBI unwilling to hand over Loretta Lynch documents
  4. Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler covers the increasing panicky NeverTrumpers
  5. Bizzy Blog explains that reporters really do not understand guns
  6. Geller Report discusses Sweden being in a low-intensive civil war
  7. Jihad Watch notes a UK politician charged with hate speech for asking if mosques will be monitored for hate speech
  8. Legal Insurrection covers Tom Steyer wanting a nuclear war ’cause Trump
  9. Moonbattery features Nancy Pelosi’s mind unraveling
  10. MOTUS AD features the Democrats really bad week
  11. Powerline has the liberal freakout in 2 minutes
  12. The First Street Journal notes why we need the 1st Amendment
  13. The Lid discusses that the 1st Amendment is supposed to be a weapon
  14. The People’s Cube has fun facts about Maxine Waters
  15. And last, but not least, The Powers That Be discusses that accidental Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Washington Post: Trump Has Accused Dems Of Wanting To Abolish Ice

One has to wonder if the people who write the headlines and subheads actually read the articles. Or is it just about trying to create a Narrative for people who never read the articles?

Front page of the Washington Post this morning

Trump aims to inflict political pain on Democrats over calls to abolish immigration enforcement agency
He accused Democrats of wanting to abolish ICE, the agency charged with detaining and deporting undocumented immigrants, even though only a handful have supported doing so.

See? He accused! ZOMG! How dare he! The headline within the article reads “Trump defends agency charged with detaining and deporting undocumented immigrants”

President Trump on Saturday opened a new front in the immigration debate, diverting attention away from his administration’s treatment of undocumented immigrants to a broader fight over the federal agency charged with detaining and deporting them.

In a pair of tweets from his private Bedminister golf club, Trump forcefully defended the performance of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and lambasted Democrats for pushing a “radical left” agenda to abolish it, even though only a handful have publicly supported doing so.

Um, the entire point of the marches about “Families Belong Together” seemed to be about abolishing ICE.

But, hey, Trump’s tweets!!!!!

“To the great and brave men and women of ICE, do not worry or lose your spirit,” Trump wrote in one tweet. “You are doing a fantastic job of keeping us safe by eradicating the worst criminal elements.”

You also had DHS

Twitchy has many that were posted. Somehow, this is all a distraction according to the Washington Post’s David Nakamura

Over the past week, several prominent Democrats have proposed eliminating ICE, citing its unjust treatment of immigrants. Among them were Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the 28-year-old Democratic socialist who upset Rep. Joseph Crowley (D-N.Y.) in a primary election Tuesday, and Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).

So, Trump accused them of wanting to abolish ICE, and they did! Well, that’s weird. The WP front page made it seem like Trump was making things up.

Nakamura does note deep in the article

Yet other Democrats fear that such a position is fraught for the party as Trump continues to paint immigrants as dangerous to put his political rivals on the defensive.

“I think it’s a winning issue for him,” said Leon Fresco, an immigration attorney who served as an aide to Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) during Congress’s unsuccessful effort to pass comprehensive immigration reform in 2013-2014. “If it’s a binary choice and people think it’s the end of immigration enforcement, that’s not a good place for us to be.”

A nationwide protest of ICE and stopping illegal immigration is not a good look for Democrats. Wanting to abolish the primary federal agency for catching illegal aliens is not a good look, either. These are the kinds of things that helped Trump win, and we’ll see if this helps come November and the mid-terms.

https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/1012712493351948288

More under the fold

Read More »

Read: Washington Post: Trump Has Accused Dems Of Wanting To Abolish Ice »

‘Climate Change’ (scam) Believing UK Not On Carbon Emissions Target

The United Kingdom has long been a climastrology nation, especially its leaders, who love the notion of laws that give them more power and more money. UK leaders were big supporters of the Paris Climate Agreement, and were very upset when Donald Trump said the U.S. was going to pull out. They also have had their own laws on this. Certainly, the UK is upholding their Paris pledges and the law, right?

The UK is not on track to meet its carbon emissions targets for the next 15 years

The UK has a target of reducing its carbon emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, as set out in the Climate Change Act 2008. To meet this target, the UK also sets “carbon budgets” on how much carbon it can emit in a five-year period.

Lord Deben, Chairman of the Committee on Climate Change this week said “the fact is that we’re off track to meet our own emissions targets in the 2020s and 2030s”, based on the carbon budgets for that period. The Committee on Climate Change is an independent body which advises the government on emissions targets, and was formed under the Climate Change Act 2008. (snip)

This week, a report by the Committee on Climate Change said “Our conclusion is that the Government’s current plans and proposals are not on track to meet carbon budgets.”

They point out that in its Clean Growth Strategy, “the Government stated that a 5% yearly reduction (in emissions) was required to 2032 to meet the fifth carbon budget. The reduction in 2017 was therefore not on track”—it was around 4% in reality.

We keep seeing these types of articles. Countries like Ireland, France, Germany, Canada, and so many others who have their own climate change laws and regs, ones who signed on to the Paris agreement and decried Trump cancelling America’s involvement, are failing to meet their targets. Surprise?

Read: ‘Climate Change’ (scam) Believing UK Not On Carbon Emissions Target »

If All You See…

…is a horrible climate killing plastic bottle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Daley Gator, with a post on a great self defense story.

Read: If All You See… »

Pirate's Cove