…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle causing heat snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Coyote Blog, with a post on a transpartisan approach to healthcare reform.
Read: If All You See… »
…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle causing heat snow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Coyote Blog, with a post on a transpartisan approach to healthcare reform.
Read: If All You See… »
Good idea. Let’s have people who use way more in terms of fossil fuels than the average citizen investigate a fossil fuels company
Environmentalists Urging New Democratic Congress To Investigate Exxon
An influential environmentalist organization is urging the upcoming Congress to investigate ExxonMobil and other major fossil fuel companies regarding their alleged contribution to man-made climate change. (snip)
350.org, an environmental activist organization, is circling a petition that encourages Democratic lawmakers to investigate ExxonMobil over its knowledge and contribution to climate change. The accusations ring very similar to the #ExxonKnew campaign that’s been waged for several years against the major oil company.
“Launch a congressional investigation into ExxonMobil and other fossil fuel corporations for propagating confusion and denial about the scientific truth of climate change and for hiding the risks posed by their business activities to the planet,†read a portion of 350’s letter demanding “real climate leadership†from the upcoming 116th Congress.
Jamie Henn, a 350 co-founder, told Axios that an investigation into Exxon and other big oil companies should be a priority for the House Technology, Science and Space Committee.
Here’s an idea: if Warmists do not like fossil fuels, then they do not have to use them.
Democrats are already planning to dive in come next year and hold hearings on ‘climate change’. Would they attempt the same types of investigations we’ve seen in states? Most likely not. Exxon and other fossil fuels companies are beating back all sorts of legal assaults, and, most likely, the House Democrats are going to go full overreach after Trump, having no time to overreach by going after Exxon.
Regardless, what this is about is attempting to use the power of Government to go after entities involved in Wrongthink. Nothing Fascist about that, eh?
Read: Warmists Are Demanding House Democrats Investigate Exxon Over ‘Climate Change’ »
Harken back to the early days of Obamacare, when we learned that members of Congress and their staffs were exempt from Obamacare, and that they wanted nothing to do with being in it. Now we get
Left wants a vote on single-payer bill in new Congress
Progressive Democrats are pushing for a vote on a controversial health-care bill after the party takes control of the House early next year.
But the left’s push for “Medicare for all†legislation would likely divide Democrats and pose a headache for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who is poised to become Speaker in the next Congress.
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who is co-chair of the Medicare for All Caucus in the House, told supporters on an organizing call Tuesday night that simply expressing support for the idea is not enough.
“When we have that majority, we need to make sure that we put it to use,†she said.
Yet, many other House Democrats, including members of the leadership, are not on board with the idea of government-run universal health insurance.
Supporters say they are going to push for a vote and organize grass-roots efforts to pressure Democratic holdouts to sign on to the legislation. However, any floor vote would probably fail, with all Republicans and some Democrats rejecting the measure.
In all fairness, a decent chunk of these hardcore Progressives (nice Fascists) were not in Congress when Ocare was passed. And Ocare was really just a stepping stone to move towards Single Payer, which is really what Medicare For All is. A government run and dominated system.
Republicans used Medicare for all — otherwise known as single-payer — as a leading area of attack on Democrats during the 2018 midterm elections. They touted a recent cost estimate by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University, which put the bill’s price tag at $32 trillion over 10 years.
If they’re saying $32 trillion, the real cost is probably more like $50 trillion. Not too mention the declining standard of care. Don’t forget, even tiny Vermont couldn’t make it work, as the costs derailed the whole thing. But, Democrats do not care. They don’t care about the quality of your healthcare or access to it. Nor your health. This was shown by Obamacare and the implementation. It’s all about patronizing people to get them beholden and controlled by the government. That’s not a conspiracy theory, that’s what Democrats do.
That said, they might be setting themselves up for an inter-party fight with the old guard who realize this is a bad idea, and further create a situation where their push for single payer helps lose the House and makes sure Trump wins in 2020.
Read: Democrats Who Didn’t Want Obamacare To Apply To Them Now Want Vote On Single Payer »
…is massive amounts of early snow due to carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Flopping Aces, with a post on Florida recount’s hidden gun control agenda.
Read: If All You See… »
Man, if only President Trump had done something about ‘climate change’ during his previous terms over the last 30 years, eh?
By Sunday, the devastating wildfires across California were only 25 percent contained as the death toll rose to 31 across the state. An estimated 200 people still remain missing, and in response to the disaster, President Donald Trump took the opportunity to blame California’s “gross mismanagement of the forests†for the mass destruction.
Hundreds of structures have been destroyed in the fires; among them is Neil Young’s home. On his website, Young called out Trump for his refusal to believe in climate change.
“California is vulnerable – not because of poor forest management as DT (our so-called president) would have us think. We are vulnerable because of climate change; the extreme weather events and our extended drought is part of it,” Young wrote. “Imagine a leader who defies science, saying these solutions shouldn’t be part of his decision-making on our behalf. Imagine a leader who cares more for his own, convenient option than he does for the people he leads. Imagine an unfit leader. Now imagine a fit one.â€
On one hand, Trump should have not dropped that tweet. There are times when it’s best not to do what he does, don’t send the tweets. Even if he was right.
On the other hand, what, exactly, was Trump supposed to do in the 1 3/4 years he’s been in office? Nothing Obama did during his 8 years in office made a difference, especially since large parts of California have always been dry and windy, making them prone to turning small wildfires in to massive blazes.
I’ll hold off in calling Neil a “so-called” musician. He’s made a lot of records in his life, but, has there really been anything good since the release of Live Rust in 1979, which is one of the best live rock albums ever? I’d put it in the top 10, along with ones like Rush’s Exit…Stage Left, The Band’s Last Waltz, Jimmy Buffett’s Feeding Frenzy, and a few others. Anyhow, Yahoo decides to drop a whopper
Even firefighters are blaming the blaze on climate change. In a press conference, Los Angeles Fire Chief Daryl Osby said, “The fact of the matter is if you look at the state of California, climate challenge is happening statewide … it is going to be here for the foreseeable future.”
And this is why the news is not trusted: Osby didn’t blame it on ‘climate change’, he essentially said it was made worse, because we already know that it was started by downed power transmission lines.
Anyhow, I wonder if Neil realizes how much carbon pollution he’s released through all the years of touring and traveling in fossil fueled vehicles, what gets released from the stadiums he’s played and the people coming to see him in fossil fueled vehicles, and so forth.
Read: Neil Young Blames Trump For Losing His House Due To ‘Climate Change’ »
Why would they want to flood the deserts when they are already getting greener? It’d probably be a lot easier if every member of the Cult of Climastrology gave up their own use of fossil fuels and went carbon neutral
Would flooding the deserts help stop global warming?
The idea is “risky, unproven, even unlikely to work,” according to Y Combinator. But if it did work, it could slow climate change.
We could probably stop right after the subhead
Imagine flooding a desert half the size of the Sahara. Using 238 trillion gallons of desalinated ocean water to do the job. Creating millions of 1-acre-square micro-reservoirs to grow enough algae to gobble up all of Earth’s climate-changing carbon dioxide. For an encore: How about spreading the water and fertilizer (the dead algae) to grow a vast new forest of oxygen-producing trees?
A Silicon Valley venture capital firm, Y Combinator, unveiled the radical desert flooding plan as one of four “moonshot†scenarios that it hopes innovators will explore as potential remedies to catastrophic global warming.
But would it work? And should it even be tried?
No and no. But Warmists gonna Warmist
“We do not want to have this be purely profit driven,†said Greg Rau, a University of California, Santa Cruz climate scientist and part of the team that helped Y Combinator craft the request for proposals. “We are trying to benefit the planet, not just make money. So we need this kind of research and development first, but then oversight and governance over how any of this is deployed.â€
In other words, they want Other People to pay for their insane ideas.
The startup accelerator that helped finance Airbnb, Dropbox and Reddit asked innovators last month to come forward with specific proposals on desert flooding and three other extreme plans for reducing greenhouse gas concentrations. The existential threat posed by climate change requires research into solutions that the investment firm itself conceded could be “risky, unproven, even unlikely to work.â€
Which means they need Government money, coming from your wallet.
Y Combinator pegs the price tag at $50 trillion. That’s roughly half the entire globe’s economic productivity for a year. Altman said in an interview that the cost for any solution will need to drop into the billions to become more realistic. “You can do a lot of things that require spending more money than you will ever be able to get,†Altman said, “and it just doesn’t come.†Brought to a more realistic price, he believes that governments will pay.

Read: Hot New Idea To Stop ‘Climate Change’: Flood The Deserts »