NY Times Wants Everyone To Relax On Socialism

This is partly their way off attempting to protect AOC and the new breed of Democratic Socialists, which they managed to do in an incredibly sexist manner

https://twitter.com/brandondarby/status/1122658506354626560

And away go (hey, I wonder if writer David Bentley Hart will ask the folks who run the Times if they’ll pay their fair share of taxes?) with an article that is way worse than the casual sexism towards AOC

Can We Please Relax About ‘Socialism’?
Only in America is the word freighted with so much perceived menace.

To be trapped in the boarding area of a smallish airport in the upper Midwest is, as often as not, to be subjected to that bestial din of fricatives, gutturals, plosives and shrieks of hysterical alarm that constitutes political discussion on Fox News, pouring incessantly from those obnoxious pendulous ceiling televisions. And unless one fancies running the T.S.A.’s gantlet of gropers again, there’s no escape. The experience is especially nasty if one’s wait coincides with the prime-time shows hosted by those two almost indistinguishable fellows with the suety faces, bouffant coiffures and nerve-racking mezzo-castrato voices.

So, Hart just managed to insult most Midwesterners, everyone who watches Fox New, and TSA agents. Good job.

That fate, at least, I avoided a few weeks back. Instead, there I was with the commentator Ben Stein hovering over me like some grim heathen god, exuding all the effervescent charm of a despondent tree sloth, glumly wobbling his jowls and opining that Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez espouses a political philosophy that in the past led to the rise of Hitler and Stalin.

Now, I realize that this has become axiomatic on America’s excitable right. I know also that in this country we employ terms like “socialism” with wanton indifference to historical details and conceptual distinctions. I grasp too that many among us truly believe that, say, a higher marginal tax rate or a public subsidy for poor children’s dentistry is only a step away from the gulags. And I am painfully aware that the male Fox commentariat nurtures its sickly obsession with Ms. Ocasio-Cortez partly because they resent her cleverness, charisma and moral vitality, but mostly because they suspect that in high school she was one of those girls they had no hope of getting a date with (though, really, she comes across as someone who could look past a face of even the purest suet if she thought she glimpsed a healthy soul behind it).

And there’s the sexism

Well — only in America, as they say. Only here is the word “socialism” freighted with so much perceived menace. I take this to be a symptom of our unique national genius for stupidity. In every other free society with a functioning market economy, socialism is an ordinary, rather general term for sane and compassionate governance of the public purse for the purpose of promoting general welfare and a more widespread share in national prosperity.

Well, maybe you folks in Europe like the notion of a strong central government controlling your lives, dictating everything. We fought a war over two hundred years ago to get away from that. It’s interesting that most of Europe has a low GDP and much higher unemployment rate. It’s interesting that most of the big inventions come from the freedom of America, not Europe. It’s interesting that America had to save the world from the threat of Socialist styled governments twice in the past century.

He keeps blabbing on, but, hey, if these Leftist really love Socialism so much, why are they not sending at least 50% of their earnings to the federal government? Why do they want to keep their freedom and choice? Germany has the largest population in Europe, at 82 million. England comes in at 67 million. We have well over 327 million, spread out over an area bigger than Europe. Most of our states are larger than EU countries. And we see the failures and government dominance in places like California. The homelessness in uber-leftist cities. The nanny state controls. The loss of freedom. The crime. They can redwash this as much as they’d like, but Modern Socialism (which is really a light version of Fascism) is against America and its beliefs in freedom.

Read: NY Times Wants Everyone To Relax On Socialism »

Extinction Rebellion Nutter Glues Her Breasts To Ground To Protest ‘Climate Change’

This is not a joke….well, these people are funny as hell in their insanity, but they are dead serious in their insanity

That leads to the UK Sun, which has many pictures of the idiot lying in the road, and authorities trying to unglue her. Obviously, other outlets were covering

https://twitter.com/StephaniScruggs/status/1122183701046030336

Read: Extinction Rebellion Nutter Glues Her Breasts To Ground To Protest ‘Climate Change’ »

If All You See…

…is a world flooded by carbon pollution from America*, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Weasel Zippers, with a post on a hero who took a bullet to save her Rabbi’s life.

This week’s theme is ladies of Chile! And those are Chile flag bikinis. *But we know Leftists will see the colors and blame America

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! It’s a gorgeous day in America, and a great day to take a drive somewhere, right! This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Climate Change Dispatch notes Chicago will break snow records with weekend storm
  2. Jo Nova covers an e-bike fire
  3. 357 Magnum notes the missing media bias
  4. America’s Watchtower discusses a potential bombshell report on FBI abuses
  5. Blazing Cat Fur covers a Michigan lawsuit against the AG’s attempt to criminalize speech
  6. Blogs For Victory notes the Left’s war on memory
  7. Brass Pills covers the NY Times white knighting to change men’s working hours to help women
  8. Bunkerville discusses a lunatic Democrat wanting to kill off golf
  9. Chicks On The Right covers testing of Woke straws
  10. Common Cents highlights Biden’s best gaffes
  11. Creeping Sharia notes more terror-linked Muslim groups meeting Democrat reps
  12. DC Clothesline will shock you with whom ISIS is praising
  13. Diogenes’ Middle Finger has your guide to Dem candidate slogans
  14. Free North Carolina covers Canadian officials seizing Wrongthink books at the border
  15. And last, but not least, Jihad Watch notes Sri Lanka protecting mosques while shutting down churches

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page (nope, that’s gone, the newest Apache killed access, and the program hasn’t been upgraded since 2014). While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts and things that interest me

Don’t forget to check out all the other great material all the linked blogs have!

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Alexandria Ocasion-Cortez Tricks People Into Donating To Her Campaign With Green New Deal Fun Run

Well, give it up to AOC, who’s already perfected the old school shady way of raising money

Participants in AOC’s “fun run” didn’t know they were donating to her campaign

Her new deal is all about the green, alright.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez held a 5k in Queens Saturday that she billed as “a Family Fun Run supporting U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal on the Saturday following Earth Day.”

But many of the 400 runners didn’t realize their $30 registration fees were going directly into the lawmaker’s campaign coffers.

“We’re getting together for our own health, for our planet’s health … and to fight for the Green New Deal together,” the freshman Democrat told the participants before they set off.

Environmentally conscious supporters — who jogged through Astoria Park alongside a beaming, strolling AOC — believed their money was going to help save the planet.

“It’s going to help raise awareness and educate people,” a female runner told The Post.

Would this be the same Green New Deal which she not only hasn’t demanded a vote on in the House, but flipped out when Mitch McConnell decided to bring it up for a vote in the Senate, with almost all Democrats voting “present”? Yes, yes it would be.

A vaguely worded notices on AOC’s Facebook page — saying that the run would support “U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez & the Green New Deal” — worsened the confusion.

But the fine print on a third event-related website revealed the truth.

“Registration fees are contributions to AOC for Congress,” reads the legal disclosure on aoc5k.com, which lists the Federal Election Commission rules that donors must follow.

“It was a campaign fundraiser,” Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent said confirmed.

Even more fun, she had parents coughing up $20 per child to have their kid participate, which, whoops, is a violation of campaign finance rules for individuals, meaning the parents broke the law. Parents cannot contribute in their child’s name under the law.

The amount raised is a drop in the bucket for AOC, whose superstar status and combative Twitter feed vaulted her into the fundraising stratosphere in the first quarter of this year, when she raised $726,000 through online solicitations.

But only 4 percent of that total came from constituents in her own district.

At Saturday’s event, 198 runners came from the Bronx and from Queens neighborhoods within the 14th congressional district. The other 200 came from elsewhere.

So, wait, her district encompasses 744,000 people. There are 2.359 million people in Queens, and 1.471 million in the Bronx. And the best she could do was 198 from her area? Heck, just 200 more from elsewhere? Kinda like her campaign donations, most comes from far away.

I wonder if any reporter will ever ask her why she isn’t demanding a vote on the Green New Deal? She talks about it a lot, she yammers on friendly TV shows and events, but, what’s the point if it won’t be voted on?

Read: Alexandria Ocasion-Cortez Tricks People Into Donating To Her Campaign With Green New Deal Fun Run »

House Freshman Democrats Want More Money For ‘Climate Change’ Programs

Strangely, none of them are demanding to vote on AOC’s Green New Deal, nor giving up their own giant carbon footprints

House Freshman Democrats Urge Funds for Climate Change Programs

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who is the lead sponsor of the Green New Deal resolution in the House of Representatives, isn’t the only freshman Democratic member of Congress pushing for action on climate change.

More than half of the freshman Democrats in Congress have signed onto a 24 April letter urging the House Committee on Appropriations “to provide robust funding for our nation’s climate change research programs” in fiscal year (FY) 2020 appropriations bills. The letter, dated 16 April, was released on 24 April, after members of Congress signed onto it.

The Trump administration’s FY 2020 budget request“recommends across the board cuts to climate science,” states the letter that was signed by 35 of the 64 newly elected House Democrats, including Ocasio-Cortez. Among those cuts, the letter highlights the administration’s plans to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Global Climate Change Research Office, decrease the National Science Foundation’s budget by 12%, and slash funding for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research by 41%.

“Without strong funding for climate science programs such as these, we will not be equipped to address the greatest challenge facing our nation today,” according to the letter.

The letter calls for significant funding for climate research at those agencies and others, including NASA, the Department of Energy, and the U.S. Geological Survey.

Basically, this is all about being mad at Orange Man for daring to cut money to programs not based on science. And attempting to spread some taxpayer loot to people who vote Democrat. Part of the letter reads “We have an opportunity and a moral obligation to act on climate.” Yet, these same climaloonies fail to reduce their own carbon footprints. Most of the energy for the House and the office buildings comes from a coal fired plant. When will they demand it be replaced, or at least operate without lights and heat/AC in the House chamber and the offices?

Oh, and the above photo comes from the article. If you hover your mouse over it at the link, the subtext is “fossil fuel processing plants spewing carbon pollution into the atmosphere.” First, CO2 is not a pollutant, but, most of you know that already. Further, what you see is primarily steam, ie, water vapor. Also not a pollutant. But, Warmists are dishonest. We all know that.

Read: House Freshman Democrats Want More Money For ‘Climate Change’ Programs »

If All You See…

…is a horrible, evil, no good golf course sucking down water and causing temperatures to skyrocket, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on three scary words.

Read: If All You See… »

Did FBI Consider Infiltrating Presidential Elect Trump’s Administration?

As we’ve seen, where there’s smoke there’s usually fire when it comes to the way the FBI under Mr. Obama was going after Trump, his campaign, and his people

Senators: Strzok-Page Texts Suggest FBI Wanted to Develop Sources Within Trump Administration

Two top Republican senators are asking Attorney General William Barr to look into text messages between former FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page that suggest that shortly after the 2016 election, the FBI wanted to develop sources within the incoming Trump administration for surveillance purposes.

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) wrote in a letter to Barr on Thursday:

[I]n the course of our oversight work we have reviewed certain text messages that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trump’s transition team. In text messages exchanged between former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, the two discussed the possibility of developing ‘potential relationships’ at a November 2016 FBI briefing for presidential transition team staff.

While discussing who should attend the briefing, Strzok texted Page on November 17, 2016: “If Katie’s husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships.”

Grassley and Johnson wrote that the nature of the communications and the precise purpose of any attempts to “develop relationships” with Trump or Pence transition team staff “are not immediately clear.”

“Were these efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations? Further, did any such surveillance activities continue beyond the inauguration, and in the event they did, were those activities subject to proper predication?

“Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed,” they wrote.

These are questions that need to be answered. We got the investigation into Trump and his campaign and Russia Russia Russia, which was a big fail for the Trump haters on the left and the #NeverTrumpers on the right. Now it is time to investigate just how parts of the Executive Office, as led by President Barack H. Obama, spied on a presidential candidate.

Read: Did FBI Consider Infiltrating Presidential Elect Trump’s Administration? »

‘Climate Change’ Reporting Should Be “Obligatory” Or Something

This is a new one, in my experience. I’ve witnessed many a Warmist complain about the news media not providing enough (doomsaying) coverage of anthropogenic climate change. Further, they’ve taken to whining when news allows skeptics to debate and reply. I don’t think I’ve seen a Warmist make this case, though

Climate change reporting should be obligatory

By any objective standards, the global climate and biodiversity crisis should be front page news almost every day. Rationally, you would expect updates on the battle to maintain a habitable biosphere to also be leading most TV and radio news bulletins. We do not, it seems, live in a world governed by reason

Let’s note one thing: people often think of the word “obligatory” as something one should really do. Many bloggers will write headlines like “Obligatory Post On Something”. But, looking at the dictionary, we get “required by a legal, moral, or other rule; compulsory.” So, some of that is by actual government.

Climate breakdown has been labelled the “problem from hell”. Sphinx-like, it appears both remote and abstract, yet simultaneously overwhelming and complex. If ever a crisis seemed designed to stymie humanity’s ability or will to confront it, this is it.

While Ireland’s collective response to the climate crisis has been woeful, the 2017 report by the Citizens Assembly revealed a previously untapped public appetite for radical action. This in turn gave the political impetus for the creation of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate Action (JCCA).

People get most of their information via the media, and the prominence it gives to a story shapes how seriously the public regard it. Since the climate crisis is covered only fitfully, and often simply framed as a dispute between opposing factions, it’s hardly a surprise that so many people have no idea just how dire the situation already is.

The JCCA report recommends: ‘the imposition of climate change content quotas on all licensed broadcasters’ as is now the case for news and current affairs. This is a bold, potentially transformative proposal, as it would require broadcasters to develop expertise and real depth in this crucial field.

And boom, there it is: governmental laws requiring certain coverage of Hotcoldwetdry, and you know that the regulations would require it be covered only towards the Warmist side, while disallowing skeptical coverage. And they could get away with it in much of the world, where they do not have anything like the 1st Amendment, which protects freedom of the press. The Cult of Climastrology is most certainly Authoritarian.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Reporting Should Be “Obligatory” Or Something »

NY Times Seems Pretty Upset That White People Are Buying Homes In Black Neighborhoods

Can you imagine them complaining about black people buying homes in white neighborhoods? Further, it is funny that they and their progressive SJW allies think that blacks cause deflated home prices

The Neighborhood Is Mostly Black. The Home Buyers Are Mostly White.

In the African-American neighborhoods near downtown Raleigh, the playfully painted doors signal what’s coming. Colored in crimson, in coral, in seafoam, the doors accent newly renovated craftsman cottages and boxy modern homes that have replaced vacant lots.

To longtime residents, the doors mean higher home prices ahead, more investors knocking, more white neighbors.

Here, and in the center of cities across the United States, a kind of demographic change most often associated with gentrifying parts of New York and Washington has been accelerating. White residents are increasingly moving into nonwhite neighborhoods, largely African-American ones.

It should be noted that that many of the areas being “gentrified”, which is racist language for white people moving in, the area itself was originally dominated by white people. At some point, blacks or Latinos moved in and took the neighborhood over. This has played out many times in Raleigh.

In America, racial diversity has much more often come to white neighborhoods. Between 1980 and 2000, more than 98 percent of census tracts that grew more diverse did so in that way, as Hispanic, Asian-American and African-American families settled in neighborhoods that were once predominantly white.

See?

But since 2000, according to an analysis of demographic and housing data, the arrival of white residents is now changing nonwhite communities in cities of all sizes, affecting about one in six predominantly African-American census tracts. The pattern, though still modest in scope, is playing out with remarkable consistency across the country — in ways that jolt the mortgage market, the architecture, the value of land itself.

That’s pretty racist, wanting to exclude white people from certain areas, as well as saying that blacks and latinos keep property prices down.

In city after city, a map of racial change shows predominantly minority neighborhoods near downtown growing whiter, while suburban neighborhoods that were once largely white are experiencing an increased share of black, Hispanic and Asian-American residents.

Again, we’re witnessing this here in Raleigh, it’s been going on for most of this century. All sorts of downtown areas are being renovated and upgraded. Homes, shops, restaurants. You’re seeing a lot of the 35 and younger crowd wanting to live in the crowded urban areas. Likewise, many blacks are moving out of those central areas to outside the beltline (I-440) and even beyond, getting away from the areas of despair created by Democratic plantation policies.

In neighborhoods like South Park (almost no one refers to it as such, it’s just Southeast Raleigh), white residents are changing not only the racial mix of the community; they are also altering the economics of the real estate beneath everyone.

“That’s what finally came to me — it’s not just the fact that the neighborhoods look different, that people behave differently,” said Kia E. Baker, who grew up in southeast Raleigh and now directs a nonprofit, Southeast Raleigh Promise, that serves the community.

Some of that change can be positive, she said. This realization was not: “Our black bodies literally have less economic value than the body of a white person,” she said. “As soon as a white body moves into the same space that I occupied, all of a sudden this place is more valuable.”

See, it’s raaaaacist that white people move in. You know what has also happened? A reduction in violent crimes in SE Raleigh.

But, you know what’s also happening? Many of the neighborhoods near several colleges within the 440 beltline (NC State and Meredith College, more specifically) are seeing lots of rejuvenation to their west in what were college kids housing areas. Why? Easy access to the interstates.

But, you know, white people bad. The article complains a lot about it.

Read: NY Times Seems Pretty Upset That White People Are Buying Homes In Black Neighborhoods »

Pirate's Cove