Alexandria Ocasion-Cortez Tricks People Into Donating To Her Campaign With Green New Deal Fun Run

Well, give it up to AOC, who’s already perfected the old school shady way of raising money

Participants in AOC’s “fun run” didn’t know they were donating to her campaign

Her new deal is all about the green, alright.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez held a 5k in Queens Saturday that she billed as “a Family Fun Run supporting U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal on the Saturday following Earth Day.”

But many of the 400 runners didn’t realize their $30 registration fees were going directly into the lawmaker’s campaign coffers.

“We’re getting together for our own health, for our planet’s health … and to fight for the Green New Deal together,” the freshman Democrat told the participants before they set off.

Environmentally conscious supporters — who jogged through Astoria Park alongside a beaming, strolling AOC — believed their money was going to help save the planet.

“It’s going to help raise awareness and educate people,” a female runner told The Post.

Would this be the same Green New Deal which she not only hasn’t demanded a vote on in the House, but flipped out when Mitch McConnell decided to bring it up for a vote in the Senate, with almost all Democrats voting “present”? Yes, yes it would be.

A vaguely worded notices on AOC’s Facebook page — saying that the run would support “U.S. Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez & the Green New Deal” — worsened the confusion.

But the fine print on a third event-related website revealed the truth.

“Registration fees are contributions to AOC for Congress,” reads the legal disclosure on aoc5k.com, which lists the Federal Election Commission rules that donors must follow.

“It was a campaign fundraiser,” Ocasio-Cortez spokesman Corbin Trent said confirmed.

Even more fun, she had parents coughing up $20 per child to have their kid participate, which, whoops, is a violation of campaign finance rules for individuals, meaning the parents broke the law. Parents cannot contribute in their child’s name under the law.

The amount raised is a drop in the bucket for AOC, whose superstar status and combative Twitter feed vaulted her into the fundraising stratosphere in the first quarter of this year, when she raised $726,000 through online solicitations.

But only 4 percent of that total came from constituents in her own district.

At Saturday’s event, 198 runners came from the Bronx and from Queens neighborhoods within the 14th congressional district. The other 200 came from elsewhere.

So, wait, her district encompasses 744,000 people. There are 2.359 million people in Queens, and 1.471 million in the Bronx. And the best she could do was 198 from her area? Heck, just 200 more from elsewhere? Kinda like her campaign donations, most comes from far away.

I wonder if any reporter will ever ask her why she isn’t demanding a vote on the Green New Deal? She talks about it a lot, she yammers on friendly TV shows and events, but, what’s the point if it won’t be voted on?

Read: Alexandria Ocasion-Cortez Tricks People Into Donating To Her Campaign With Green New Deal Fun Run »

House Freshman Democrats Want More Money For ‘Climate Change’ Programs

Strangely, none of them are demanding to vote on AOC’s Green New Deal, nor giving up their own giant carbon footprints

House Freshman Democrats Urge Funds for Climate Change Programs

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who is the lead sponsor of the Green New Deal resolution in the House of Representatives, isn’t the only freshman Democratic member of Congress pushing for action on climate change.

More than half of the freshman Democrats in Congress have signed onto a 24 April letter urging the House Committee on Appropriations “to provide robust funding for our nation’s climate change research programs” in fiscal year (FY) 2020 appropriations bills. The letter, dated 16 April, was released on 24 April, after members of Congress signed onto it.

The Trump administration’s FY 2020 budget request“recommends across the board cuts to climate science,” states the letter that was signed by 35 of the 64 newly elected House Democrats, including Ocasio-Cortez. Among those cuts, the letter highlights the administration’s plans to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Global Climate Change Research Office, decrease the National Science Foundation’s budget by 12%, and slash funding for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research by 41%.

“Without strong funding for climate science programs such as these, we will not be equipped to address the greatest challenge facing our nation today,” according to the letter.

The letter calls for significant funding for climate research at those agencies and others, including NASA, the Department of Energy, and the U.S. Geological Survey.

Basically, this is all about being mad at Orange Man for daring to cut money to programs not based on science. And attempting to spread some taxpayer loot to people who vote Democrat. Part of the letter reads “We have an opportunity and a moral obligation to act on climate.” Yet, these same climaloonies fail to reduce their own carbon footprints. Most of the energy for the House and the office buildings comes from a coal fired plant. When will they demand it be replaced, or at least operate without lights and heat/AC in the House chamber and the offices?

Oh, and the above photo comes from the article. If you hover your mouse over it at the link, the subtext is “fossil fuel processing plants spewing carbon pollution into the atmosphere.” First, CO2 is not a pollutant, but, most of you know that already. Further, what you see is primarily steam, ie, water vapor. Also not a pollutant. But, Warmists are dishonest. We all know that.

Read: House Freshman Democrats Want More Money For ‘Climate Change’ Programs »

If All You See…

…is a horrible, evil, no good golf course sucking down water and causing temperatures to skyrocket, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Other McCain, with a post on three scary words.

Read: If All You See… »

Did FBI Consider Infiltrating Presidential Elect Trump’s Administration?

As we’ve seen, where there’s smoke there’s usually fire when it comes to the way the FBI under Mr. Obama was going after Trump, his campaign, and his people

Senators: Strzok-Page Texts Suggest FBI Wanted to Develop Sources Within Trump Administration

Two top Republican senators are asking Attorney General William Barr to look into text messages between former FBI agent Peter Strzok and former FBI lawyer Lisa Page that suggest that shortly after the 2016 election, the FBI wanted to develop sources within the incoming Trump administration for surveillance purposes.

Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Ron Johnson (R-WI) wrote in a letter to Barr on Thursday:

[I]n the course of our oversight work we have reviewed certain text messages that may show potential attempts by the FBI to conduct surveillance of President-elect Trump’s transition team. In text messages exchanged between former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and former FBI Attorney Lisa Page, the two discussed the possibility of developing ‘potential relationships’ at a November 2016 FBI briefing for presidential transition team staff.

While discussing who should attend the briefing, Strzok texted Page on November 17, 2016: “If Katie’s husband is there, he can see if there are people we can develop for potential relationships.”

Grassley and Johnson wrote that the nature of the communications and the precise purpose of any attempts to “develop relationships” with Trump or Pence transition team staff “are not immediately clear.”

“Were these efforts done to gain better communication between the respective parties, or were the briefings used as intelligence gathering operations? Further, did any such surveillance activities continue beyond the inauguration, and in the event they did, were those activities subject to proper predication?

“Any improper FBI surveillance activities that were conducted before or after the 2016 election must be brought to light and properly addressed,” they wrote.

These are questions that need to be answered. We got the investigation into Trump and his campaign and Russia Russia Russia, which was a big fail for the Trump haters on the left and the #NeverTrumpers on the right. Now it is time to investigate just how parts of the Executive Office, as led by President Barack H. Obama, spied on a presidential candidate.

Read: Did FBI Consider Infiltrating Presidential Elect Trump’s Administration? »

‘Climate Change’ Reporting Should Be “Obligatory” Or Something

This is a new one, in my experience. I’ve witnessed many a Warmist complain about the news media not providing enough (doomsaying) coverage of anthropogenic climate change. Further, they’ve taken to whining when news allows skeptics to debate and reply. I don’t think I’ve seen a Warmist make this case, though

Climate change reporting should be obligatory

By any objective standards, the global climate and biodiversity crisis should be front page news almost every day. Rationally, you would expect updates on the battle to maintain a habitable biosphere to also be leading most TV and radio news bulletins. We do not, it seems, live in a world governed by reason

Let’s note one thing: people often think of the word “obligatory” as something one should really do. Many bloggers will write headlines like “Obligatory Post On Something”. But, looking at the dictionary, we get “required by a legal, moral, or other rule; compulsory.” So, some of that is by actual government.

Climate breakdown has been labelled the “problem from hell”. Sphinx-like, it appears both remote and abstract, yet simultaneously overwhelming and complex. If ever a crisis seemed designed to stymie humanity’s ability or will to confront it, this is it.

While Ireland’s collective response to the climate crisis has been woeful, the 2017 report by the Citizens Assembly revealed a previously untapped public appetite for radical action. This in turn gave the political impetus for the creation of the Oireachtas Joint Committee on Climate Action (JCCA).

People get most of their information via the media, and the prominence it gives to a story shapes how seriously the public regard it. Since the climate crisis is covered only fitfully, and often simply framed as a dispute between opposing factions, it’s hardly a surprise that so many people have no idea just how dire the situation already is.

The JCCA report recommends: ‘the imposition of climate change content quotas on all licensed broadcasters’ as is now the case for news and current affairs. This is a bold, potentially transformative proposal, as it would require broadcasters to develop expertise and real depth in this crucial field.

And boom, there it is: governmental laws requiring certain coverage of Hotcoldwetdry, and you know that the regulations would require it be covered only towards the Warmist side, while disallowing skeptical coverage. And they could get away with it in much of the world, where they do not have anything like the 1st Amendment, which protects freedom of the press. The Cult of Climastrology is most certainly Authoritarian.

Read: ‘Climate Change’ Reporting Should Be “Obligatory” Or Something »

NY Times Seems Pretty Upset That White People Are Buying Homes In Black Neighborhoods

Can you imagine them complaining about black people buying homes in white neighborhoods? Further, it is funny that they and their progressive SJW allies think that blacks cause deflated home prices

The Neighborhood Is Mostly Black. The Home Buyers Are Mostly White.

In the African-American neighborhoods near downtown Raleigh, the playfully painted doors signal what’s coming. Colored in crimson, in coral, in seafoam, the doors accent newly renovated craftsman cottages and boxy modern homes that have replaced vacant lots.

To longtime residents, the doors mean higher home prices ahead, more investors knocking, more white neighbors.

Here, and in the center of cities across the United States, a kind of demographic change most often associated with gentrifying parts of New York and Washington has been accelerating. White residents are increasingly moving into nonwhite neighborhoods, largely African-American ones.

It should be noted that that many of the areas being “gentrified”, which is racist language for white people moving in, the area itself was originally dominated by white people. At some point, blacks or Latinos moved in and took the neighborhood over. This has played out many times in Raleigh.

In America, racial diversity has much more often come to white neighborhoods. Between 1980 and 2000, more than 98 percent of census tracts that grew more diverse did so in that way, as Hispanic, Asian-American and African-American families settled in neighborhoods that were once predominantly white.

See?

But since 2000, according to an analysis of demographic and housing data, the arrival of white residents is now changing nonwhite communities in cities of all sizes, affecting about one in six predominantly African-American census tracts. The pattern, though still modest in scope, is playing out with remarkable consistency across the country — in ways that jolt the mortgage market, the architecture, the value of land itself.

That’s pretty racist, wanting to exclude white people from certain areas, as well as saying that blacks and latinos keep property prices down.

In city after city, a map of racial change shows predominantly minority neighborhoods near downtown growing whiter, while suburban neighborhoods that were once largely white are experiencing an increased share of black, Hispanic and Asian-American residents.

Again, we’re witnessing this here in Raleigh, it’s been going on for most of this century. All sorts of downtown areas are being renovated and upgraded. Homes, shops, restaurants. You’re seeing a lot of the 35 and younger crowd wanting to live in the crowded urban areas. Likewise, many blacks are moving out of those central areas to outside the beltline (I-440) and even beyond, getting away from the areas of despair created by Democratic plantation policies.

In neighborhoods like South Park (almost no one refers to it as such, it’s just Southeast Raleigh), white residents are changing not only the racial mix of the community; they are also altering the economics of the real estate beneath everyone.

“That’s what finally came to me — it’s not just the fact that the neighborhoods look different, that people behave differently,” said Kia E. Baker, who grew up in southeast Raleigh and now directs a nonprofit, Southeast Raleigh Promise, that serves the community.

Some of that change can be positive, she said. This realization was not: “Our black bodies literally have less economic value than the body of a white person,” she said. “As soon as a white body moves into the same space that I occupied, all of a sudden this place is more valuable.”

See, it’s raaaaacist that white people move in. You know what has also happened? A reduction in violent crimes in SE Raleigh.

But, you know what’s also happening? Many of the neighborhoods near several colleges within the 440 beltline (NC State and Meredith College, more specifically) are seeing lots of rejuvenation to their west in what were college kids housing areas. Why? Easy access to the interstates.

But, you know, white people bad. The article complains a lot about it.

Read: NY Times Seems Pretty Upset That White People Are Buying Homes In Black Neighborhoods »

Not Open Borders: Washington Airports Ban Deportation Of Illegal Aliens

Open Borders advocates are a crazy group. They say they’re not for the criminals, they want them gone. Just keep the good ones (stop me if you’ve heard this before). Yet, they keep doing all they can to protect all of them. Remember the incident in the UK in 2018 where a bunch of people raised hell on an airplane to stop the deportation of an illegal back to Somalia?

(UK Daily Mail) Officials escorting Yaqub Ahmed on a flight from Heathrow to Turkey were forced to abandon his deportation when around a dozen holidaymakers who felt sorry for him angrily intervened shortly before take-off.

At one stage during the astonishing episode, filmed on mobile phones, one traveller complained: ‘They’re separating him from his family’, while others chanted ‘take him off the plane’.

When harassed security guards caved in and walked 29-year-old Ahmed off the Turkish Airlines flight, he was seen thanking those on board for their support as they cheered and applauded.

But the passengers who thought they were doing a good deed were unaware that the man they were defending had been sentenced to nine years in jail for his part in a vicious gang rape of a teenage girl – and that another member of his gang later fought for Islamic State in Syria.

He and his compatriots gang raped a 16 year old girl. As one person stated when the real info came out “Well done silly interfering, self-seeking, do-gooding idiots!’” Now, of course, at least for Ahmed, he was a refugee. The Open Borders advocates want them to have a free pass, as well, and would block the deportation flight of a rapist in Washington

Sanctuary Airports: Washington State Official Bans Deportation of Criminal Illegal Aliens

An executive order by King County, Washington, Executive Dow Constantine signed this week bans the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency from using the King County International Airport, commonly known as Boeing Field, to deport all illegal aliens from the country, including those convicted of crimes against Americans.

Constantine, in a statement, said his decision to ban ICE from using the airport to charter deportation flights of criminal illegal aliens is because King County “respects the rights of all people.”

“Here in King County, we are a welcoming community that respects the rights of all people,” Constantine said. “My Executive Order seeks to make sure all those who do business with King County uphold the same values.”

“Our goal is to ban flights of immigrant detainees from our publicly owned airport, and I hope members of Congress shine a light on this practice and how it is currently funded,” Constantine continued.

Of course, he can’t necessarily legally do this, because federal law takes precedence over state, county, and local law on the subject of immigration. Plus, airports tend to be under the jurisdiction of Los Federales, as this is interstate and international travel. You can put all your money in betting that ICE will visibly move illegals and other deportees through Boeing Field.

Read: Not Open Borders: Washington Airports Ban Deportation Of Illegal Aliens »

If All You See…

…is a sea that will soon rise and swamp all the coastal cities…soon!!!!…, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Tradition, with a post on a German women’s mag showing how to treat stab wounds after unfettered immigration from Islamist areas.

Read: If All You See… »

NYC Looks To Do Away With Hot Dog Purchases By City For ‘Climate Change’

Hyper-Warmist Bill De Blasio isn’t looking to ban all hot dogs sales in NYC (yet), as has been going around

NYC Vows to Start ‘Phasing Out’ Hot Dogs to Save the Planet as Part of Their Own $14B Green New Deal

Hot dogs may become harder to find following the approval of New York City’s version of the Green New Deal as local politicians pick of the sword to take on climate change.

On Monday, Mayor Bill de Blasio (D-N.Y.) slapped his signature on his city’s blueprint for combatting climate change. Following in the footsteps of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), the city passed a Green New Deal to mobilize the city’s resources to combat climate change.

Unfortunately for hot dog lovers, the plan includes a goal of eliminating processed meat from all city-owned property.

According to NYC’s Green New Deal, hot dogs must go if New Yorkers want to maintain a “livable climate.” The plan details the city’s goal of “reducing the purchasing of beef and phasing out the purchasing of processed meat” from all city-owned facilities.

Now, Snopes jumped into this, based on the erroneous report by an iHeart radio affiliate claiming all hot dogs would be banned from NYC, which ran through social media like wildfire. That is false. But, in attempting to show this is false, Snopes drops the ball

First, hot dogs are not being banned throughout the city. The city government plans to reduce the purchase of processed meats consumed at city-run facilities, such as hospitals, public schools, and correctional facilities, but this policy will have no effect on vendors, restaurants, grocery stores, or any other privately owned businesses that sell hot dogs, or on their customers who eat them.

Second, the city’s plan to reduce the consumption of hot dogs is only partly based on an effort to “improve climate.” NYC’s “Green New Deal” policies are part of the city’s “OneNYC 2050: Building a Strong and Fair City” strategy. While these policies address climate-change issues, they also deal with community well-being and the general health of the city’s population. The section of OneNYC 2050 dealing with processed meats can actually be found in the “Healthy Living” portion of this strategy. More specifically, the section dealing with processed meats explains that reducing the consumption of hot dogs will lower the risk of heart disease and cancer.

So, just banned for government facilities, and, that OneNYC 2050 is really primarily about ‘climate change’. The fact that it would lower risks of heart disease and cancer is just a byproduct. A lower ranking reasoning.

Here’s the relevant section of OneNYC 2050 (emphasis ours):

ADOPT MORE SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION PRACTICES IN CITY GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

The City will shift away from goods that have an outsized impact on the environment and identify opportunities to reduce waste and cut GHG emissions throughout City government. Through updates to our Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) and executive action, we are ending the purchasing of unnecessary single-use plastic foodware, reducing the purchasing of beef, and phasing out the purchasing of processed meat.

It’s right there: GHG emissions, otherwise known as greenhouse gases.

So, yes, it is primarily about ‘climate change’, but, no, not everywhere. That comes later. Or at least an attempt at a prohibition on processed meats.

Read: NYC Looks To Do Away With Hot Dog Purchases By City For ‘Climate Change’ »

Climate Lunatics Again Yank Out The Glue To Protest

The Extinction Rebellion wankers are still at it in the streets of London

Screwing up people’s day for fake science

They’ve glued themselves together. What kind of idiot does this? The cops showed up quickly and found a way to un-glue them and arrest them.

Read More »

Read: Climate Lunatics Again Yank Out The Glue To Protest »

Pirate's Cove