Army To Require Troops To Shower With Gender Confused

We are boned if we need to get into a war, and this will further tank recruitment and retention. This was just a week ago

Every branch of the military is struggling to make its 2022 recruiting goals, officials say
With a record low number of Americans eligible to serve, and few of those willing to do it, this “is the year we question the sustainability of the all-volunteer force,” said an expert.

The Woke who want to join are so often unable to meet the standards, even the lowered standards. And probably poop themselves when they have to fire a gun. And probably want nothing to do with combat roles. And most of the lefties do not want to join. And the Wokeness of the military is driving away the patriotic men and women who make the best fighters. And this does not help

Exclusive: Army Training Says Soldiers Must Shower with Transgender Persons of Opposite Sex

An Army training slide obtained by Breitbart News instructs soldiers to shower with transgender members of the opposite sex even if they have not undergone a surgical transition.

The training slide offers a “vignette” instructing soldiers on what to do if they encounter a female soldier who identifies as male according to the Department of Defense’s personnel tracking system known as Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS), but has not surgically transitioned and still has “female genitalia.”

The slide, titled “Soldier/Unit Training Barracks, Bathrooms, and Showers,” reads:

Vignette: Following his transition from female to male (which did not include sex reassignment surgery) and gender marker change in DEERS, a transgender Soldier begins using male barracks, bathroom, and shower facilities. Because he did not undergo a surgical change, the Soldier still has female genitalia.

The slide instructs soldiers: “Soldiers must accept living and working conditions that are often austere, primitive, and characterized by little or no privacy. … Understand anyone may encounter individuals in barracks, bathrooms, or shower facilities with physical characteristics of the opposite sex despite having the same gender marker in DEERS.”

As Dana Pico notes: “Note how example given by the is female-to-male transition, but problem to which more people would object are “intact” biologically male soldiers in the females’ bathrooms.” Exactly. It’s a bunch of mule fritters gaslighting from the Army. The number of women doing this will be tiny. The number of men with gender confusion will be much higher. And, the existing soldiers will just have to suck it up and deal with. Women are once again having their spaces invaded by crazy people with penis. Ones who have a much higher rate of mental health issues (beside the fantasy that they’re the other gender) and suicidal thoughts.

The training slides warn soldiers that violations of Equal Opportunity (EO) policies may result in disciplinary actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and that EO policies “apply to working, living, and recreational environment (on and off-post, during duty and non-duty hours).”

In the military it has always been that members must conform to the long standing standards of the military. You’ve heard the slogan “An Army of One.” Now, the majority must conform to a tiny number of mental health rejects, and, if they don’t like it, they’ll be disciplined. Think this will work well for retention?

Another slide from the presentation states that a soldier’s gender transition is considered administratively “complete” once the soldier has completed the “medical care necessary to achieve stability in the self-identified gender,” but that the medical care is the “medical process identified or approved by a military medical provider in a documented medical treatment plan” and “often does not include surgical treatment.”

Why are soldiers transitioning on the military’s time? Let do it on their time.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

20 Responses to “Army To Require Troops To Shower With Gender Confused”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Of the over 2,000,000 US military personnel, with some 3000 to 11,000, or less than 0.5%, estimated to be trans.

    “American” right wing switched sides during the time of tRump (TOT) for some reason (hint: politics), and now disparages the US military at ever turn. “Unprepared”, “feminized”, “woke”, “incapable”, “poop themselves when they have to fire a gun”, “military is driving away the patriotic men and women”…

    Anyway, “American” right-wingers pretend to care because it serves their luntzian political agenda to characterize Democrats as “perverts”, “groomers”, “girls”, “child molesters”, “baby killers” etc.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      That’s 3,000 to 11,000 too many, pervert.
      Rimjob seems somewhat confused himself.
      How was it when you joined the US Army?

      Bwaha! Lolgf

    • Colonel Will says:

      Hey, Dorkus Minimus, when did you serve? (I’m going to guess never). Go back under your bridge, troll.

  2. […] Also see: William Teach: Army To Require Troops To Shower With Gender Confused […]

  3. Most soldiers are male, so perhaps putting as female-to-male transgenders would be more practical, but by doing so, it ignores that which would most commonly be more objectionable: a “transgender female” who “did not undergo a surgical change” and still has male genitalia. As the father of a female staff sergeant and squad leader currently deployed to a desert area of the Middle East, I am aware that she shares quarters with another female soldier, but it doesn’t take much thought to realize that, with President Biden’s reversal of President Trump’s policy of banning the transgendered from military service, my daughter could be assigned a ‘transgender’ female who is still an intact male as a roommate.

    Sunset in the sandbox.

  4. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Do you feel the staff sergeant and squad leader object to sharing quarters with a trans female?

    • Dana says:

      The subject hasn’t arisen, and naturally, if assigned such a roommate, she would not be allowed to object, because our military are consumed with political correctness.

      But she was reared in a normal home, by normal parents, and has normal attitudes, so I suspect that she would not take it all that well.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Of course she could object if she was upset. It’s surprising you’ve not discussed the political correctness, gays and trans in the military with her.

        Are you concerned for her safety because of the wrongthink of military brass?

        • david7134 says:

          You have zero knowledge of the military. No, she can object but it might result in a mark against her.

  5. Hairy says:

    We all can see how easily puppyboy can be triggered
    Is this current condition caused by earlier childhood sexual trauma? Did that trauma also encourage to to base his most important relationship on a dog?

  6. ET's Cinema PsychoMasonica says:

    Very good article but terrible grammar and misplaced words. If I was your English teacher this would be covered in red X’s. Sorry but this stuff drives me crazy when I’m forced to read it to finish an otherwise excellent article. You would catch a lot of this yourself simply by going back over what you write. I understand if you don’t post this but understand it was meant in a very constructive spirit.

    • UnkleC says:

      ET, i’m in agreement with you. I can overlook a bit with the amateurs on these blogs, but the poor grammar, etc. from the ‘professional’ journalists/writers is inexcusable. It drives my educator wife to distraction.

  7. david7134 says:

    John, or hairy, whatever,
    You and Jeff persist in thinking that transgender people are normal. Far from it. These people are often psychotic or at least clinically mentally disturbed. So, would you like to be confined with an individual that is mentally ill? The only reason for these people being in the military is a political stunt fostered by the Dems/ communist.

    Pups is right in his concern about these folks and if I was going to war with one of them, I can assure you that a terrible accident would befall them.

    Now, why would you fault pups for not desiring to spend time with psychotic people? With your vast knowledge, maybe you can explain what childhood event would cause pups to avoid crazy folks.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      So Porter David would murder a fellow soldier. Good to know.

      And you call a trans person mentally ill, but only a crazy person would want to murder fellow warrior for no reason.

      Why your lil buddy and you hate everyone is for you two to resolve.

      • david7134 says:

        Sorry, you are the one murdering the thing. My job is to get as many of my men back safe and sound, not baby sit your freak.

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Porter Dave,

          You think murder of trans persons is morally justified?

          • david7134 says:

            I have been around these people. LSU had a big program 50 years ago. They are nuts, emotionally unstable and a danger to a military unit. If you insist on them being there then you and the other nut jobs are responsible for the Purple Hearts. An officer takes care of his unit. If something interferes with the function of the unit, it goes. If you play political bullshit and leave officers no choice, then things happen. Murder is only an offense if you get caught.

  8. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    David Porter,

    You are an immoral, hateful person.

    • david7134 says:

      You finally got something right!! Now, I do have an in of officers minds in the military and can assure you that my statements are truthful.

Pirate's Cove