Warmist Patton Oswalt Wants OMB Director Prosecuted For ‘Climate Change’ Skepticism

Yesterday I told you about Monty Python member Eric Idle going bat guano insane on the subject of ‘climate change’, stating he wants “deniers” prosecuted in the International Criminal Court, and even going as far as to suggest that they be executed. Now we get

This is in response to

That’s OMB Director Mick Mulvaney, who stated that spending money on ‘climate change’ is a waste of taxpayer money, and the Trump administration wouldn’t do it anymore. Liberals are pretty tolerant, are they not?

Not really.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

10 Responses to “Warmist Patton Oswalt Wants OMB Director Prosecuted For ‘Climate Change’ Skepticism”

  1. Dana says:

    I love how the left believe that not spending money on global warming climate change is actually a criminal offense.

  2. Jeffery says:

    It’s their money too. The right wants to spend money on issues they support, and care little about society writ large.

    Taxpayers will pay more this year supporting the trump family lifestyle than we’ll spend on the National Endowment for the Arts.

    One F35 will cost about $100 million (which is still less than we’ll pay this year to keep Mrs. trump “happy” in Manhattan – at least it keeps her away from her troll husband).

    85% of your federal taxes (income tax and FICA) pays for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense and interest on the debt. 15% pays for everything else, State Dept, Clean air and water, medical R&D (trump wants to cut R&D spending), FBI, CIA, courts, FDA, etc. Cut away.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      Exaggerate much, little guy?

    • Rev.Hoagie® says:

      It’s their money too. The right wants to spend money on issues they support, and care little about society writ large.

      Unlike radical leftist ideologues who are just full of compassion and love when they force their “issues they support” on every working person.

      Taxpayers will pay more this year supporting the trump family lifestyle than we’ll spend on the National Endowment for the Arts.

      Of course no comment would be complete without Jeffery’s Trump Derangement Syndrome making it’s appearance. Trump’s still livin’ there for free Jeffery, you batshit crazy bastard.

      One F35 will cost about $100 million (which is still less than we’ll pay this year to keep Mrs. trump “happy” in Manhattan – at least it keeps her away from her troll husband).

      So, you want to eliminate jets? What could go wrong there? You’re a fuckin’ genius. Why didn’t Obama think of that. Just eliminate jets and bingo!, problem solved. But you sink into your misogynistic and anti immigrant hate for Melania. She’s in your head too you bigot.

      85% of your federal taxes (income tax and FICA) pays for Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, defense and interest on the debt. 15% pays for everything else, State Dept, Clean air and water, medical R&D (trump wants to cut R&D spending), FBI, CIA, courts, FDA, etc. Cut away.

      Thank you for pointing out the vast amount of waste is caused by unconstitutional programs put in place by unscrupulous leftist seditionists and it’s they who caused the problem and the debt. Idiot.

    • Dana says:

      Jeffrey wrote:

      Taxpayers will pay more this year supporting the trump family lifestyle than we’ll spend on the National Endowment for the Arts.

      If the President gets his way, that’ll absolutely be right, because he wants to eliminate all federal funding for the NEA! That is something I wholeheartedly support. If a particular piece of art, or performance, whatever, is good enough, it will be paid for in the free market; if a particular artist’s work is not good enough to support him in the free market, why should the taxpayers support him? He needs to find a line of work for which the free market will pay him.

      That isn’t to say that we aren’t spending way too much on the President’s lifestyle. All of those trips to Mar-a-Lago are going to wind up costing us a lot more than President Obama wasted on his vacations! Just because I support some of what President Trump is doing does not mean that I’m going to support everything.

  3. drowningpuppies says:

    Bye-bye… a good start with these 80…

    https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2017-trump-budget/

  4. Jl says:

    And this dumb little fool, when and if he reads about the Spanish Inquisition, will no doubt think to himself “these people were evil…” Clueless. And notice what he thinks constitutes terrorism-skepticism. Real terrorists, probably not so much.

  5. Jeffery says:

    Oswald is wrong. Ignorance isn’t, and shouldn’t be, a crime. Of course, we shouldn’t reward it either.

  6. Jeffery says:

    Stinky the Idiot typed:

    the vast amount of waste is caused by unconstitutional programs put in place by unscrupulous leftist seditionists and it’s they who caused the problem and the debt.

    You think Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are unConstitutional? Perhaps trumpy’s new Supreme Court can rule against them.

Bad Behavior has blocked 8364 access attempts in the last 7 days.