Surprise: Warmists Suddenly Find Computer Model From Almost 30 Ago That Is Totally Awesome

Of course they did. Strange how they weren’t telling us about this earlier

(UK Independent) Nearly 30 years ago, scientists developed a computer model of the Earth’s climate that predicted the level of global warming – to the ridicule of ‘sceptics’ at a time when there still seemed to be a debate over the issue.

Now two leading researchers have compared the model’s results with what actually happened over the last three decades and, to their surprise, found they were “very similar”. (snip)

Writing in the journal Nature Climate Change, Dr Ronald Stouffer, head of the climate and ecosystem group at Princeton University, and Dr Syukuro Manabe, a senior meteorologist at the same US college, said they had not expected the model to be so accurate.

The model is strictly looking at what can happen from CO2, and ignores natural processes like volcanoes, solar forcing, and other things like man made aerosols. It includes areas that would have had not true hard data for temperature, and wouldn’t have seen satellite cover early on.

That said, it is interesting that it suddenly pops up on the radar.

And, perhaps it is a good model. The vast majority of models are failures, having failed to account for the statistically insignificant warming since 1998. Perhaps this model continues to perform. The authors, though, do a good job at the end of their short paper in hedging their bets, stating that more research needs to be done. They seem to be more interested in the science, rather than advocacy.

The advocacy is apparent in the media articles on the paper, of course.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

6 Responses to “Surprise: Warmists Suddenly Find Computer Model From Almost 30 Ago That Is Totally Awesome”

  1. Jeffery says:

    The vast majority of models are failures, having failed to account for the statistically insignificant warming since 1998.

    Two lies in one sentence!!

  2. Zachriel says:

    William Teach: statistically insignificant warming since 1998.

    That is incorrect. There is a 99% chance of surface warming since 1998.

    1998-2017
    NOAA: 0.169 ±0.103 °C/decade
    GISS: 0.174 ±0.111 °C/decade

    • Rev.Hoagie® says:

      That is incorrect. There is a 99% chance of surface warming since 1998.

      1998-2017
      NOAA: 0.169 ±0.103 °C/decade
      GISS: 0.174 ±0.111 °C/decade

      Proving the point that even the NOAA and GISS can’t agree on their voodoo science.

      • Zachriel says:

        Rev.Hoagie®: Proving the point that even the NOAA and GISS can’t agree on their voodoo science.

        Huh? They do agree within their margins of error.

  3. Jeffery says:

    Teach: Why do you choose 1998 as the start of the interval? (Rhetorical: We know why you cherrypick your start date).

Bad Behavior has blocked 9489 access attempts in the last 7 days.