NAACP/Obama Appointee Racism On Display

Hey, ‘memba this?

Today, NAACP delegates passed a resolution to condemn extremist elements within the Tea Party, calling on Tea Party leaders to repudiate those in their ranks who use racist language in their signs and speeches.

I’m sure the NAACP will jump right up and repudiate those in their ranks who use racist language in their signs and speeches, right? Folks in their ranks exposed by Andrew Breitbart, who offers up this video

Breitbart writes

We are in possession of a video from in which Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions.

I’m sure the NAACP already has a post or story up decrying what Sherrod said and pitching her out…..it doesn’t? Well, certainly, she will be asked to resign from the position that Obama appointed her to soon, right?

Others, via Memeorandum: Hot Air, NY Daily News, BAGnewsNotes, DaTechguy’s Blog, Gateway Pundit, YID With LID, Verum Serum, Tammy Bruce, Pajamas Media, Breitbart.tv, American Thinker, Minnesota Independent, American Power, and JammieWearingFool

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

14 Responses to “NAACP/Obama Appointee Racism On Display”

  1. […] Pirate’s Cove, BAGnewsNotes, NY Daily News, Don Surber, Sister Toldjah, Right Wing News, The Foundry, Gateway […]

  2. John Ryan says:

    good one Teach you really nailed this one. If you have no other defense ALWAYS BLAME THE VICTIM

  3. dissident says:

    And she’s gone.

  4. gitarcarver says:

    good one Teach you really nailed this one. If you have no other defense ALWAYS BLAME THE VICTIM

    You mean we should blame the farmer she speaks of for being the victim of her racism?

    That’s what Sherrod did, right? She blamed the guy for being white.

    You see Ryan, what you fail to realize is that over the course of American history, the Republicans have done more to promote racial equality than Democrats and liberals like yourself.

    You continually prove your ignorance on this subject matter.

    By the way, have you stopped driving and polluting the air yet?

  5. Otter says:

    He’s not ignorant, git. He approves of what she said and did.

  6. Reasic says:

    I find it HILARIOUS when conservatives bring out the old “we’re more concerned about Civil Rights than you” argument. Political parties shift and change over time. During the time of slavery and into the Civil Rights era, fighting against freedom and equal opportunity for minorities was a CONSERVATIVE position. The vast majority of the opposition was in the South, by socially conservative Dixiecrats.

  7. gitarcarver says:

    I find it HILARIOUS when conservatives bring out the old “we’re more concerned about Civil Rights than you” argument.

    I find it hilarious when liberals deny that historically, Republicans have been more concerned with civil rights than the Democrat Party.

    I also find it hysterical when people say that Democrats are the party of Civil Rights when in fact, their policies do everything they can to keep minorities oppressed and dependent on the government.

    Nothing says “freedom” like a new “Massa” called the Democrat Party.

  8. Reasic says:

    I find it hilarious when liberals deny that historically, Republicans have been more concerned with civil rights than the Democrat Party.

    I see you missed the part about political parties shifting ideologically on various issues over large time scales. Opposition to Civil Rights legislation was an ideologically CONSERVATIVE position. Civil Rights legislation voting was split primarily among geographical lines:

    The original House version:

    Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
    Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
    Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
    Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)

    The Senate version:

    Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%)
    Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%)
    Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%)
    Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%)

    In the north, more Republicans were against. Socially CONSERVATIVE Southern Dixicrats were the primary opposition in the Democratic Party. Don’t rewrite history to suit your purposes.

    I also find it hysterical when people say that Democrats are the party of Civil Rights when in fact, their policies do everything they can to keep minorities oppressed and dependent on the government.

    Name one.

  9. Bunny Colvin says:

    You’re wasting your time, Reasic. GC doesn’t know shit about history. Or politics. He doesn’t even understand the meaning of the word “and”. What a moron.

  10. gitarcarver says:

    I see you missed the part about political parties shifting ideologically on various issues over large time scales

    I didn’t miss it. Apparently you missed this: “I find it hilarious when liberals deny that historically, Republicans have been more concerned with civil rights than the Democrat Party.” Notice the word “historically.”

    Name one.

    School choice, gun laws, hiring quotas… just to name a few.

    What a moron.

    Still can’t make a substantive argument, can you?

  11. Bunny Colvin says:

    GC-gun laws? Gun laws keep minorities oppressed? Do we need more guns in the hood? Good thinkin! AND?

  12. Reasic says:

    School choice, gun laws, hiring quotas… just to name a few.

    Thanks for the list, but I want to see your reasoning. Let’s start with your first. How does “school choice” keep minorities “oppressed and dependent on the government”?

  13. Reasic says:

    Hello? GC?

  14. Bunny Colvin says:

    Hello? GC/Squatter/Trish?

Bad Behavior has blocked 7294 access attempts in the last 7 days.