Your Fault: World Experienced Abrupt Climate Swings In Past

Say, what caused this to happen? This is how you take a perfectly reasonable scientific research project and make it into a doomsday cult piece

Ancient Earth experienced abrupt climate swings without polar ice, study finds

Professor Chengshan Wang of the China University of Geosciences led an international research team examining sediment cores from China’s Songliao Basin from about 83 million years ago in the Late Cretaceous, ScienceDaily reported.

At the time, the planet had very high carbon dioxide levels and almost no polar ice.

Many researchers had tied abrupt climate swings mainly to large ice sheets growing and melting. That view fit the last Ice Age. Greenland warmed by up to 16 degrees Celsius within decades, and repeated pulses of icebergs disrupted circulation in the North Atlantic.

But the new study points to a different mechanism of slow changes in Earth’s orbit and axial wobble.

So, wait, it was totally natural? I didn’t think that was possible, per Cult Of Climastrology dogma

The Late Cretaceous may offer one of the best natural comparisons for a much warmer world.

“During the Late Cretaceous, atmospheric CO2 levels reached about 1,000 parts per million — comparable to projections for the end of this century,” said Michael Wagreich, a paleoclimatologist at the University of Vienna, as reported by ScienceDaily.

If global temperatures continue rising, understanding how climate systems behaved under those conditions before could help scientists better anticipate risks.

Read: Your Fault: World Experienced Abrupt Climate Swings In Past »

If All You See…

…is a field which would be perfect for a solar farm that you won’t have to see, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Last Refuge, with a post on the feds announcing 14 more indictments for major fraud.

Read: If All You See… »

Four Squishes Join Democrats In Vote To Block More Strikes On Iran

There’s nothing here about Congress taking back its war making power. There’s nothing about Congressional powers. There’s nothing here about standing for one’s principles. This is all just Trump Derangement Syndrome, with all the Democrats and four Squishes choosing to help Iran, a violent enemy of the U.S.

In a first, House votes to block Trump from ordering further strikes on Iran

The House passed a resolution Wednesday to block President Donald Trump from ordering further strikes on Iran, ratcheting up pressure on the administration to find a way to end the unpopular war.

The 215-208 vote marked the first time that such a measure has cleared the House or Senate on a final vote since the start of the conflict more than three months ago. The Senate advanced a similar resolution last month on a procedural vote, reflecting growing impatience with a war Congress hasn’t authorized.

The effort faces sizable hurdles, however, before Congress could force Trump to end hostilities.

In the House, four Republicans — Reps. Thomas Massie (Kentucky), Tom Barrett (Michigan), Warren Davidson (Ohio) and Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania) — joined Democrats in voting to force Trump to end the war.

It’s not quite at the level of Democrats abandoning the troops in Vietnam, but, this gives Iran shelter and help in their negotiations to end hostilities. Of course Massie is involved. All 211 Democrats voted for this.

To reach Trump’s desk, the Senate resolution would require a final vote in the chamber, which could be tough if every senator is voting. Three Republican senators who have opposed similar resolutions in the past missed the procedural vote on the Senate resolution last month, allowing it to advance. If they had voted the way they have in the past, it would have failed 50-50.

The House would also need to pass the Senate version before it reached Trump’s desk. Trump would almost certainly veto it, forcing the Senate and the House to override his veto with a two-thirds vote in both chambers before the resolution could take effect. No war powers resolution has ever overcome a veto.

Good luck.

While testifying before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that Congress passing a resolution would make Iranians less likely to come to the negotiating table.

Rubio said the vote makes Iranian negotiators think that “somehow” the Trump administration’s hands “are going to be tied and we won’t be able to do anything to them, so why make a deal?”

And that is exactly what will happen. Dems and the 4 squishes could have, instead, come together and told Iran to end this with a deal, could have pressured them, but, no, Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Read: Four Squishes Join Democrats In Vote To Block More Strikes On Iran »

Bummer: 9th Circuit Torpedoes Yutes Climate (scam) Lawsuit

Too bad they didn’t ask the kiddies if they have given up their own use of fossil fuels and made their lives carbon neutral

Ninth Circuit Court denies young Americans’ lawsuit challenging Trump’s handling of climate change

A legal effort by 22 young Americans to curb atmosphere-warming greenhouse gas emissions experienced a major setback Tuesday. The Ninth Circuit Court rejected a lawsuit seeking to reverse President Donald Trump’s efforts to expand fossil fuel development.

In a 10-page opinion, the Ninth Circuit wrote that the climate change-related injuries the plaintiffs reported in their litigation bear too tenuous a tie to a trio of executive orders they sought to reverse with the lawsuit.

Those executive orders, issued in the early days of Trump’s second term, directed federal agencies to “unleash” American energy, use emergency powers to expedite permitting for fossil fuel extraction, and identify and rescind actions that place an “undue burden [on] domestic energy resources” such as oil, gas, hydropower and biofuels.

Drawing extensive parallels between Juliana v. United States, a decade-long lawsuit seeking a federal climate response plan, the court foregrounded separation-of-power concerns in its opinion. The judges in 2024 wrote that the judicial branch lacks the power to grant or enforce the federal policy changes the plaintiffs requested.

There’s no law requiring any of what Trump killed, and what he killed were Executive Orders, which any president can kill. Biden rescinded 70-80 of Trump’s EOs. If the yutes are so concerned they should get all their fellow yutes to go carbon neutral.

“Similar to the injunction requested in Juliana, the injunction Plaintiffs seek would require extensive judicial supervision of executive branch actions related to energy policy,” the trio of appellate judges wrote. “Indeed, Plaintiffs explicitly seek to undo everything from staffing reductions, to the revocation of research grants, to anticipated rule changes, to the type of language the current administration has used on government websites. To assign such policy-laden choices to one district court would invert the ‘common understanding what activities are appropriate to legislatures, to executives, and to courts.’”

That’s not even counting that the Supreme Court ruling on Trump v. CASA, Inc, which, while it was meant for district judges, would also apply to circuit courts making nationwide rulings. If they had ruled for the kiddies it would only have applied in the 9th Circuit Court’s jurisdiction.

Julia Olson, co-director of Our Children’s Trust, the Oregon-based nonprofit that represented the plaintiffs in the litigation, maintains that the executive orders are unconstitutional and expressed frustration with the court’s decision not to examine that component of the litigation.

She can maintain that all she wants, but, her little astroturfed lawsuit shamefully using easily pliable children lost, because there is nothing in the Constitution stopping those EOs, nor in federal law.

Read: Bummer: 9th Circuit Torpedoes Yutes Climate (scam) Lawsuit »

Pro-Illegal Activists In Philly Want More Protections With Soccer Tournament Coming Up

Wild how these same people fail to push for safety for American citizens from illegal aliens who kill them, rape them, abuse children, steal social security numbers, and more

Immigrant advocates push for protections at FIFA World Cup event in Philadelphia

Immigrant advocates and members of Philadelphia City Council gathered outside City Hall on Wednesday to call for stronger protections for undocumented and mixed-status families.

The Pennsylvania Immigrant Coalition said its goal is to ensure residents understand their rights, especially those who may fear potential immigration enforcement at large gatherings.

“If we wait until ICE shows up at a watch party it’s already too late,” said Council Minority Leader Kendra Brooks.

Organizers urged restaurants, block party hosts and even FIFA Fan Fest planners to take steps that make attendees feel safe.

Do they even understand what ICE would be doing in Philly during FIFA, along with the other cities?

In a video posted online, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said federal efforts during the World Cup will focus on counterfeit tickets and merchandise, human trafficking and drug smuggling.

He did not specifically address immigration enforcement.

Because they won’t be there looking for the illegals, they will be doing the same job they were doing when they were in Italy for the Olympics, especially for human traffickers. Because events like this end up with quite a lot, almost exclusively women and children. Does the pro-illegal crowd prefer women and children being trafficked over illegal aliens? Remember, Immigration And Customs Enforcement: they do more than just illegal aliens.

This is the kind of person the Dems want in Philly for manufacturing and dealing drugs, intent to distribute, all which hurts Americans, and he had already been deported, making coming back a felony.

Read: Pro-Illegal Activists In Philly Want More Protections With Soccer Tournament Coming Up »

“Experts” To Gather In Rome For Climate Conference

Why do they never gather in someplace like Newark, NJ or St. Mary’s, Florida? Someplace basic? It’s always at a nice resort town

From the screed

Experts are meeting in Rome this week to discuss the latest science and evidence on the impacts, adaptation, and solution pathways of climate change on agriculture and food systems. Hosted at the headquarters of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the meeting is a co-sponsored undertaking by FAO and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). It will be held from 2 to 5 June 2026.

This Expert Meeting will bring together more than 80 leading scientists, researchers, and practitioners with expertise across food systems domains, from crop production to livestock and fisheries production, to land and water dynamics, climate-resilient value chains and agricultural policy.

It will cover emerging and future risks and impacts across different food and agricultural commodity chains, adaptation-mitigation synergies in agrifood systems solutions, and the social and policy pathways for implementing good practices.

So all these “leading scientists”, who most likely have never ever worked growing food, worked with livestock or fisheries, are going to take long, fossil fueled trips for a few days in Rome, along with a lot of bureaucrats and UN flunkies to attempt to control the agriculture industry? F off.

Seriously, they couldn’t do a Zoom?

Read: “Experts” To Gather In Rome For Climate Conference »

If All You See…

…is an area flooded from carbon pollution Bad Weather, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Cold Fury, with a post on a real “I can’t breathe” incident in Britain.

Read: If All You See… »

Chuck Schumer, A Jew, Supports Jew Hater And Nazi Tattooed Graham Platner

Ethics? Civility? Courtesy? Respect? Democrats talk about these things a lot. They just do not follow them

WATCH: Chuck Schumer sidesteps Platner scandals, confirms support for controversial Dem

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., ignored persistent questions about controversies surrounding Democrat Graham Platner and reaffirmed his support for the embattled Senate candidate.

Platner, a Marine veteran and oyster farmer, has faced a series of controversies in recent weeks, including criticism over a tattoo with links to Nazi imagery, resurfaced Reddit posts where he made inflammatory comments about veterans and reports about sexually explicit messages exchanged with other women during his marriage.

Speaking with journalists in the Capitol on Tuesday, Schumer was pressed on whether he, as the top Senate Democrat, is satisfied with Platner’s explanations of the scandals dogging his campaign. In response, he said, “I met with Graham Platner today, we’re going to beat [Sen.] Susan Collins and take back the Senate.”

Schumer was asked several more times whether he still supports Platner in the face of the scandals considering his endorsement came before all the controversy. He was also asked whether Democrats’ backing of Platner undermines the party’s credibility in criticizing Texas Republican Senate candidate Ken Paxton, who has faced some similar scandals.

The New York senator did not respond to these questions directly. Instead, he repeated: “We’re going to beat Susan Collins and take back the Senate.”

And then he tried to get reporters to ask other questions. One should have asked “You’re a Jew. You talk about respect for Jewish people. Yet you’re essentially supporting a guy who had a Nazi tattoo, who knew what that tattoo meant, and hates Israel and Jews. How is it possible to support Platner?”

Dems have spent a decade calling Trump Hitler in waiting, a Nazi, a Fascist. Yet, Dems will mostly not say anything against Platner, since winning the Maine Senate race is more important than any sort of consistency of belief. Because, at the end of the day, their only true belief is power.

Read: Chuck Schumer, A Jew, Supports Jew Hater And Nazi Tattooed Graham Platner »

Surprise: Book Show How To Climate “Science” Into Political Gains

Whoa hoe, another cult piece that let’s the cat out of the bag

New book offers tips to translate climate science into political gains

At a time when climate politics in the United States and globally remain deeply polarized, Will Hackman, a climate advocate and political operative, argues that the climate movement needs a new language — one rooted less in doom, guilt and abstract planetary crisis, and more in people’s everyday lives, health, safety, costs and communities.

Yeah, that sounds like a different type of scaring the shit out of people on a personal level

In his new bookRadically Reframing Climate Change: A Guide to Saving Ourselves, he makes the case that climate advocates have too often spoken to those who already agree with them, while failing to reach people who may be cautious, doubtful or simply disconnected from the issue. The challenge, he says, is not only scientific or technological. It is political, cultural and communicative.

Political, huh? FYI, all these next excerpts are Hackman’s responses to questions

We are not doing this to save the planet. We are doing this to save ourselves. This is about the future sustainability of human civilization. We need to stabilize the climate and reduce greenhouse gas emissions so that we can protect the ecosystems we depend on for survival.

So, let’s talk about public health. Let’s talk about pollen counts, allergies, lung inflammation, asthma and other conditions made worse by climate change. Let’s talk about hurricanes, floods and fires, but not only from 30,000 feet. Let’s talk about what happened in those communities and what it took for people to rebuild.

There are so many ways to make this more specific to humans. It is not about saving the planet. It is about saving us. It is not just a climate crisis; it is a humanity crisis.

A different method of scaremongering, one that is much more personal

The climate movement is in a wilderness right now. A lot has failed recently — our messages, our tactics, our energy and enthusiasm. Since the 2024 [U.S. presidential] election, many people have been looking for a way forward.

We need new messages that connect with more people. But we also need to rebuild empowerment within ourselves. The first action chapter in my book is about rebuilding personal empowerment, and it is grounded in optimism.

So 35 years of doomsaying was wrong, so, let’s use more doomsaying to get government to take people’s money and freedom. It’s a very long article, but, really, the same old same old, showing the failed scaremongering and the notion that government should be empowered.

Read: Surprise: Book Show How To Climate “Science” Into Political Gains »

Indiana Law Cracking Down On Illegal Aliens To Take Effect July 1

Are there lawsuits over this from the pro-illegals folks? There must be

Gov. Braun ceremonially signs FAIRNESS Act, focusing on illegal immigration

Indiana Governor Mike Braun is building on his immigration enforcement efforts by ceremonially signing Senate Enrolled Act 76, also known as the FAIRNESS Act.

It’s a new law that strengthens Indiana’s cooperation with federal immigration authorities, holds employers accountable for hiring illegal immigrants, and ensures no community in Indiana operates as a sanctuary for illegal immigration.

Gov. Braun says, “On day one as Governor, I made clear that Indiana would not be a safe haven for illegal immigration. With the FAIRNESS Act, we are taking the next step in partnering with federal authorities to enforce the most fundamental laws of our country and protect Hoosier communities.”

Upon taking office, Gov. Braun partnered with federal authorities and empowered the Indiana Department of Homeland Security and the Indiana State Police to bolster enforcement.

Gov. Braun also took action to revoke all CDLs from illegal immigrants and penalize companies who employ them, as well as partnering with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement on ‘Operation Midway Blitz’ to remove illegal immigrants driving trucks from Indiana’s roadways.

Those are all common sense, right?

SEA 76 prohibits Indiana employers from knowingly recruiting, hiring, or employing individuals who are not authorized to work in the United States. Employers who use E-Verify, or a comparable federal verification program in good faith, are shielded from liability.

The law grants the Indiana Attorney General new authority to investigate and pursue violations, ensuring that no jurisdiction in Indiana — and no employer doing business in Indiana — becomes a safe haven for illegal immigration.

Most of this is simply a state following federal law. How many Democrats will protest against this?

Read: Indiana Law Cracking Down On Illegal Aliens To Take Effect July 1 »

Pirate's Cove