Oregon To Be Doomed 5 Degree Warming By 2074

Who gets fired and loses all credibility when this doesn’t happen? Of course, no one is going to remember this prognostication 50 years from now

Oregon climate report predicts 5-degree warming by 2074, increased drought and less snow

A new report on how climate change is impacting the state of Oregon was released today. The report is released every 2 years and it focuses on shifts in temperature and weather patterns over the Pacific Northwest.

The report found that Oregon’s average annual temperature increased by 2.2 degrees over the last century.

It also indicates the state could become 5 degrees warmer by 2074.

This report found that besides warming, Oregon is prone to more drought and less snow due to a changing climate.

“Could.” In other words, this is all scaremongering. BTW, how does this compare to previous Holocene warm periods? And, even if it does happens, can this be 100% proven to be the fault of Mankind, versus just normal Holocene warming?

“Some recent research that I’ve been involved with, led by scientists at OSU, looked into freezing rain with climate change, such as ice storms. The finding there is that in most parts of western Oregon, warming will reduce the amount of freezing rain and reduce ice storms,” said Paul Loikith, with Portland State University.

That would be a good thing, right? Ice storms suck.

Warming Great Lakes could lead to stronger snow storms, climate scientists say

Sarah Bauer woke up to a shaking house.

She thought maybe an earthquake had struck near her home in Torrance, a village in Ontario’s cottage country.

But when she looked outside, she saw a massive tree had collapsed onto her driveway under the weight of rapidly accumulating snowfall, taking down a power line with it. (snip)

Yet something new is happening. Climate scientists and meteorologists say climate change, driven by the burning of fossil fuels, is helping create conditions that can strengthen the storms.

It’s always something with this cult.

FYI, I have, at this time, no intention of going down the path of global boiling and the California fires. I’ve done it many times, and the cultists are just being too cult with the tragedy, which I bet was caused by people starting the fires.

Read: Oregon To Be Doomed 5 Degree Warming By 2074 »

If All You See…

…is a horrible carbon pollution infused soda causing terrible Bad Weather heatsnow, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Geller Report, with a post on the British parliament voting against an inquiry into rape/grooming gangs.

Read: If All You See… »

Canadian Leaders Say Trump Talking About The 51st State Is No Longer Funny

Did most of them find it funny to start with? Most of the leftists had freakouts when Trump first made the joke. Does anyone actually think Trump would actually make Canada the 51st state? Would possibly invade? There’s zero chance that even the Republican led Congress would authorize it. Trump may possibly be serious about Greenland and even Panama, but, Canada? It’s a troll

Canadian leaders say Trump’s talk about Canada becoming the 51st state isn’t funny anymore

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s comments that Canada should become the 51st state are no longer a joke and are meant to undermine America’s closest ally, Canada’s finance minister said Wednesday.

Dominic LeBlanc, the country’s point person for U.S-Canada relations, said Trump was smiling when he first made the comment during a dinner at Mar-a-Lago with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in late November.

“The joke is over,” said LeBlanc. “It’s a way for him, I think, to sow confusion, to agitate people, to create chaos knowing this will never happen.”

Surprise! LeBlanc gets it.

Trump keeps floating the idea that Canada should join the United States as the 51st state, saying Tuesday he would not use military force to invade the country, which is home to more than 40 million people and is a founding NATO partner.

Instead, Trump said he would rely on “economic force” as he erroneously cast the U.S. trade deficit with Canada — a natural resource-rich nation that provides the U.S. with commodities like oil — as a subsidy.

“It’s becoming very counterproductive,” LeBlanc said, referring to Trump’s rhetoric about Canada.

Is it? Y’all are still talking about it, and, understanding the point, which is more economic equity between the U.S. and Canada

Canadian Immigration Minister Marc Miller also fired back, dismissing Trump’s comments as “ridiculous.”

“There is no chance of us becoming the 51st state. I think that this is beneath a president of the United States,” Miller said. “I said a few weeks ago that this whole thing was like a South Park episode.”

But, you’re still participating in the show, Marc. And maybe, especially with Trudeau gone, Canada could make the trade balances more even so tariffs would not be needed. And, perhaps you will restore all those freedoms taken away, especially during the Trudeau years.

However, if we turn Canada into a territory, they won’t get voting rights in Congress.

The thing is, she seems to get it, and is not doing this in a mean spirited way.

Read: Canadian Leaders Say Trump Talking About The 51st State Is No Longer Funny »

European Climate-weenies Say Trump Is A “Serious Blow” To Doing Something

Hey, maybe if most climate cult policies didn’t revolve around higher taxes/fees, a higher cost of living, and more government which takes away freedom, liberty, and life choices, Doing Something wouldn’t be such an issue

EU warns of ‘serious blow’ from Trump on climate change

Global efforts to address climate change will be dealt a severe blow if U.S. President-elect Donald Trump again pulls the country out of the Paris Agreement, the EU’s head of climate change policy has warned.

Trump’s transition team has prepared executive orders to withdraw the United States – currently the world’s second-biggest polluter, after China – from the main global treaty on climate change, according to sources in the team.

CO2 is not a pollutant

“If that were to happen, that would be a serious blow for international climate diplomacy,” EU climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra told Reuters in an interview.

Another U.S. exit from the Paris Agreement would require other countries to “double down on climate diplomacy” in response, he said.

“There’s no alternative to make sure that, in the end, everyone chips in, because climate change is indiscriminate,” Hoekstra said of the U.N. climate talks. “This truly is a problem that the world needs to solve together.”

And? Why is this our problem? If you want to Do Something, have at it. Why must they drag everyone into their little cult? At least Scientology and other cults do not try to force Everyone Else to comply. Worry about yourselves, EU weenies. Oh, and don’t forget that your peasants are ready to revolt over your nice Fascism on ‘climate change’, among other issues.

Read: European Climate-weenies Say Trump Is A “Serious Blow” To Doing Something »

Democrats Offer BS Excuses Why They Voted Against Laken Riley Bill

Why don’t they just admit that they prioritize illegal aliens and fake asylum seekers, even if they committed crime, above American citizen. Seriously, this gaslighting is absurd and transparent to most Americans

Social posts target Democrats’ vote on migrant offenders bill. Here’s why they say they opposed it.

U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., reintroduced legislation Jan. 3 she said would keep dangerous immigrants out of the country — people who have committed sex crimes or domestic abuse.

On social media, critics used the occasion to deride House Democrats who first voted against the bill in September.

“There is no justification. 158 Democrats voted against deporting illegal immigrants who are convicted sex offenders,” one Jan. 5 Instagram post said. (big snip)

But Democrats and domestic violence groups who opposed the bill told PolitiFact that the law already provides for deportation of migrants convicted of sex offenses and crimes against children. And the bill’s language could have the unintended effect of harming immigrant domestic violence survivors, they warned.

“I voted against this bill for several reasons. First, it is redundant because all serious sexual and violent offenses already render someone deportable under the law,” U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., wrote in an email to PolitiFact.

Except, they aren’t really being deported. “Ibarra had been previously arrested by both federal and state officials in multiple jurisdictions. In September 2023, Ibarra was arrested in New York City and charged with “acting in a manner to injure a child less than 17 and a motor vehicle license violation.” He was arrested for crimes again after that in Georgia. And, yet, the Biden-Harris admin failed to deport him.

Current U.S. law already makes inadmissible people convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude,” which courts generally define as crimes involving harm to people or property or fraud offenses.

And yet the Biden-Harris admin has allowed murderers, rapists, child abusers, arsonists, gang members, and members of Islamic terrorist groups into the U.S., when they are supposed to be turned away immediately.

Mace’s bill would add sex offenses and broaden the definition of domestic violence offenses in the “deportable aliens” section of the federal criminal code.

That’s a good thing, right? Or, do Democrats no longer want to protect women?

North Carolina University law professor Rick Su said aggravated felonies are already deportable offenses. Those are currently defined in the Immigration and Nationality Act — a law enacted in 1952 that governs U.S. immigration policy — to include rape, sexual abuse of a minor, all crimes of violence, child pornography and sex trafficking, Su said.

Refer back to part about the Biden-Harris admin barely deporting them, and not working particularly hard to catch them.

Another section of current law already makes domestic violence, stalking or violation of a protection order, and crimes against children deportable offenses, Su said. The law also makes “crimes involving moral turpitude” deportable offenses.

“Even if domestic violence and sex crimes were not explicitly noted as deportable offenses, they would almost certainly fall under a ‘crime involving moral turpitude,’” Su said.

Again, those laws are barely being applied. And they keep on giving excuse after excuse, ending with

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee said in a fact sheet that despite the bill’s name focusing on “illegal aliens,” the bill would “sweep in green card holders, those seeking to come to U.S. lawfully, and DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) and TPS (Temporary Protected Status) recipients.”

So, they do not want non-citizens who break the law to be deported. Why, is the real question. What is in it for Democrats?

Read: Democrats Offer BS Excuses Why They Voted Against Laken Riley Bill »

If All You See…

…are tire tracks from a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Don Surber, with a post on Zuckerberg going full Musk.

Read: If All You See… »

Surprise: First World Turning Against Progressive Agenda

I wonder why? The Hill’s Merrill Matthews explains

Opinion – Developed economies across the globe are abandoning progressive policies

Since November, Democrats have been trying to understand how they could possibly have lost an election to the likes of Donald Trump. But it’s not just Trump and the United States. Several key elements of the progressive-liberal policy agenda are in retreat in developed economies as voters and elected officials turn to more reasonable, practical and financially sustainable policies.

Here are three key components of the progressive agenda that are now being spurned.

Open borders. Illegal immigration has roiled U.S. politics for years, but in the election it “surged to the top of the most important problem list,” according to Gallup, even as Democrats both defended the illegal immigrant surge and went to extremes to argue it wasn’t happening. But the U.S. wasn’t alone.

recent report from the Center for Migration Studies says, “The European Union (EU), as well as individual European countries, have in the last several years launched several initiatives to prevent asylum-seekers from reaching their shores.” Those candidates campaigning for immigration clampdowns gained seats in this year’s European Parliament elections.

Reuters says concerns over immigration and asylum policies were high on the list of the EU’s five biggest countries by population: “Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Poland — plus Sweden.” As a result, political parties pushing immigration reform made gains in several EU countries:

Matthews provides much more on the subject, but, let’s consider that immigration was actually a lower ranking issue going into the 2024 U.S. election per many polls throughout 2024. When it came to actually voting it jumped much higher, as people remembered the border being overrun and Biden shipping fake asylum seekers all over the country, especially to small towns, then saw him actually able to significantly lower border crossings with the stroke of a pen. People in sanctuary cities saw the outcome when Texas shipped huge numbers to the cities, which saw crime, filth, and 3rd world conditions emerge, all while their hard-earned tax dollars were spent on foreigners.

In Europe they are mostly dealing with fake asylum seekers from Africa and the Muslim world, with many coming from Africa also being Muslim. They refuse to assimilate and, instead, install their own cultures. They create no-go zones. They harass and assault citizens. And the governments take the side of the FASs rather than the citizens, even jailing citizens for saying and writing Mean things. So, the citizens are turning against their progressive overlords.

The green energy transition. Developed economies in Europe and the U.S. under Democratic administrations have made transitioning to clean energy more of a mandate than a goal. They have taken major steps, both politically and financially, to implement the net-zero economy — where greenhouse gases being emitted into the atmosphere equal the amount being removed. That’s changing.

As Wall Street Journal columnist Joseph C. Strenberg writes, “2025 may be the year net zero dies. Such a development isn’t inevitable, but what was once described as ‘the climate crisis’ is morphing into the climate-crisis crisis as voters lose patience with the project and grow less shy about saying so.”

Citizens may support cleaner energy, heck, I do, but, they do not support the forced transition which is raising the cost of energy, limiting the availability of energy, raising the cost of food and goods, and seeing the removal of their rights to Big Government. And many governments are now backtracking on their Net Zero pledges, especially in Europe.

Transgender youth. The trans issue in the November election wasn’t about adults who transition — they’re old enough to make their choices and live with them — but about children, along with biological males playing in women’s sports. Most Americans oppose both, and the issue played a role in some voters’ decisions.

But Europe is also having second thoughts. Forbes reports, “Increasingly, European nations are adopting a more cautious approach to gender-affirming care among minors.” And that shift began a year before the release of the Cass Report in England, which raised several red flags about pushing gender-affirming care on minors.

Citizens realize that it is child abuse and people should be jailed for allowing, and, really, forcing children to go through drugs and surgeries, to live as the opposite sex. Most agree that if you’re an adult, do what you want. Children? No. It’s driven by parents, teachers, and other adults who are plain nuts and shouldn’t be around any children. It’s as horrible as constantly mentally and physically abusing a child.

Likewise, people are getting more vocal over the notion that trans of all ages should not be in the safe spaces and sports of real women.

Will the politicians get a clue? Will the majority of people who support the policies start getting a clue and switch their support and votes like many of their brethren did and vote against the wacko Progressive (nice Fascist) politicians who force this on the citizens regardless of their opinion?

Read: Surprise: First World Turning Against Progressive Agenda »

159 Democrats Voted Against Laken Riley Act

A bit of a follow up, forgot to hit post on this Tuesday

(Daily Caller) 159 House Democrats voted Tuesday against legislation titled the Laken Riley Act that would require federal immigration authorities to detain illegal migrants who commit theft-related crimes in the U.S and would also allow states to sue the Department of Homeland Security for harm caused to their residents because of illegal immigration. (snip)

“Laken Riley was brutally murdered by an illegal alien that President Biden and the Democrats let into this country with their open border policy. It is hard to believe after countless horrific stories like Laken’s, ANY House Democrats would vote against deporting illegal aliens who commit violent crimes against American citizens,” Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said in a statement.

“But 159 just did, demonstrating some Democrats have ignored the loud and clear message from voters in this election who demanded secure borders, the deportation of violent illegal aliens, and laws that put the safety and security of the American people first,” Johnson added.

These Democrats are prioritizing illegal aliens and fake asylum seekers over U.S. citizens. How many Democrat Senators will vote against it?

Ross is my Rep. You also had North Carolina reps Alma Adams and Valarie Foushee, both Democrats, voting against. Donald Davis (D) voted for the legislation. Calls and emails to Ross’ office have gone unanswered. They do not care about you.

Read: 159 Democrats Voted Against Laken Riley Act »

UN Climate Cult Leader Upset Nations Aren’t Cracking Down On Their Peasants

After all this time it’s pretty easy to read between the lines

World’s climate fight needs fundamental reform, UN expert says: ‘Some states are not acting in good faith’

Green Climate Thought PoliceThe international effort to avert climate catastrophe has become mired by misinformation and bad faith actors, and must be fundamentally reformed, according to a leading UN climate expert.

Elisa Morgera, the UN special rapporteur on climate change, said the annual UN climate summits and the consensus-based, state-driven process is dominated by powerful forces pushing false narratives and by tech fixes that divert attention from real, equitable solutions for the countries least responsible and most affected.

“The current climate regime was built in a way, maybe unconsciously, that locked in an ineffective approach that is blind to the disproportionate harms of climate change – and increasingly climate solutions – and the disproportionate benefits that the current situation is accruing to very few states and very few individuals,” said Morgera, in an exclusive interview with the Guardian.

“We can observe that some states are not acting in good faith in very clear ways, which is the basis of any international regime. There is widespread disregard for the rule of international law, and also a very clear pushback on the science, and shrinking of civil spaces at all levels. Basically, the truth is out of the conversation. That is the problem – there is no space at Cop for the truth,” said Morgera.

“Fundamental reform is possible, if there is a willingness by the states and the secretariat, but it’s hard to see that at the moment.”

Her Government Speak is simply code for “nations need to crack down on the free speech of their citizens. No more skepticism. No difference of opinion. Cut them off of social media. Do not allow them on TV and in the news. Block them. Start taking everyone’s money and Do Something.” I’ve been saying for 20 years that this is all about authoritarian government, not science, and they keep saying things that prove that.

Read: UN Climate Cult Leader Upset Nations Aren’t Cracking Down On Their Peasants »

Surprise: NYC’s Congestion Pricing Will Cause Trouble For Firefighter Response

Yet another case of “what could possibly go wrong”

FDNY union leaders warn against congestion pricing after being denied exemption: ‘Don’t go down this road’

unintended consequencesFDNY union leaders are fighting back against the Big Apple’s new congestion pricing, warning the toll will negatively impact response times, leaving residents and first responders to deal with potentially deadly results.

Uniformed Firefighters Association President Andrew Ansbro and Uniformed Fire Officers Association President Jim Brosi discussed the new congestion pricing and its inadvertent side effects on the fire department during “FOX & Friends.”

“We begged, and we pleaded, ‘Don’t don’t go down this road,'” Ansbro told Lawrence Jones on Tuesday. “There’s only about 270 firefighters every single day working in the zone. We estimate the cost to be $3,000 a day because we bring our vehicles into the zone, and we bring vehicles into the city, and then we use them when they move us from firehouse to firehouse.”

“When there’s a shortage [in] one place, and a surplus in another… twice a day, you have three to 400 firefighters going to a different firehouse or returning from that firehouse, and they used to have the ability to use 2000 of our cars at a moment’s notice,” he continued.

So, basically firefighters need to be able to move around, and, if they cannot take their own vehicles they have to wait for the bus or take the subway, which could increase response time as well as reduce the number of firefighters available for response. Especially since they could dragging along 85+ pounds of equipment. I wonder what the government elites and all those cheering the congestion pricing will think when this causes a delayed response time for their emergency

“Change is hard. And when things are going well for people — like the 90% of people who know that the system that gets them to work or to school every single day is going to be invested in, is going to be there for them and their families — they’re not taking to the streets to say how great this is. But they are the beneficiaries, the mass majority of people who work in this area,” Gov. Kathy Hochul said on Monday.

Hey, I wonder if Hochul will be using the subway or buses when she’s in NYC? Or driving around in her big SUV? How about NYC employees: will they have to pay out of their own pockets when they drive through the congestion zone? That should be required.

Brosi argued the likely delayed response times and unconventional traffic outside the congestion pricing zones could be dangerous for residents and firefighters alike, and could cost millions if the department needs additional vehicles to fill the void.

They would need a whole bunch of new, government owned vehicles to avoid the toll.

“It’s difficult to see how the response times wouldn’t be affected because these units are operating well beyond their normal routine response area,” Brosi said. “We’ve already seen firefighters stay on duty for an extra two, four, six or eight hours after a 24-hour shift in a place where they’re really already doing 6,000 runs a year. That is a tremendous toll on the members and likely to lead to more injuries.”

And, instead of exempting the firefighters from the tolls the city will end up spending a fortune in overtime.

Read: Surprise: NYC’s Congestion Pricing Will Cause Trouble For Firefighter Response »

Pirate's Cove