…are tire tracks from a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Don Surber, with a post on Zuckerberg going full Musk.
Read: If All You See… »
…are tire tracks from a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Don Surber, with a post on Zuckerberg going full Musk.
Read: If All You See… »
I wonder why? The Hill’s Merrill Matthews explains
Opinion – Developed economies across the globe are abandoning progressive policies
Since November, Democrats have been trying to understand how they could possibly have lost an election to the likes of Donald Trump. But it’s not just Trump and the United States. Several key elements of the progressive-liberal policy agenda are in retreat in developed economies as voters and elected officials turn to more reasonable, practical and financially sustainable policies.
Here are three key components of the progressive agenda that are now being spurned.
Open borders. Illegal immigration has roiled U.S. politics for years, but in the election it “surged to the top of the most important problem list,” according to Gallup, even as Democrats both defended the illegal immigrant surge and went to extremes to argue it wasn’t happening. But the U.S. wasn’t alone.
A recent report from the Center for Migration Studies says, “The European Union (EU), as well as individual European countries, have in the last several years launched several initiatives to prevent asylum-seekers from reaching their shores.” Those candidates campaigning for immigration clampdowns gained seats in this year’s European Parliament elections.
Reuters says concerns over immigration and asylum policies were high on the list of the EU’s five biggest countries by population: “Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Poland — plus Sweden.” As a result, political parties pushing immigration reform made gains in several EU countries:
Matthews provides much more on the subject, but, let’s consider that immigration was actually a lower ranking issue going into the 2024 U.S. election per many polls throughout 2024. When it came to actually voting it jumped much higher, as people remembered the border being overrun and Biden shipping fake asylum seekers all over the country, especially to small towns, then saw him actually able to significantly lower border crossings with the stroke of a pen. People in sanctuary cities saw the outcome when Texas shipped huge numbers to the cities, which saw crime, filth, and 3rd world conditions emerge, all while their hard-earned tax dollars were spent on foreigners.
In Europe they are mostly dealing with fake asylum seekers from Africa and the Muslim world, with many coming from Africa also being Muslim. They refuse to assimilate and, instead, install their own cultures. They create no-go zones. They harass and assault citizens. And the governments take the side of the FASs rather than the citizens, even jailing citizens for saying and writing Mean things. So, the citizens are turning against their progressive overlords.
The green energy transition. Developed economies in Europe and the U.S. under Democratic administrations have made transitioning to clean energy more of a mandate than a goal. They have taken major steps, both politically and financially, to implement the net-zero economy — where greenhouse gases being emitted into the atmosphere equal the amount being removed. That’s changing.
As Wall Street Journal columnist Joseph C. Strenberg writes, “2025 may be the year net zero dies. Such a development isn’t inevitable, but what was once described as ‘the climate crisis’ is morphing into the climate-crisis crisis as voters lose patience with the project and grow less shy about saying so.”
Citizens may support cleaner energy, heck, I do, but, they do not support the forced transition which is raising the cost of energy, limiting the availability of energy, raising the cost of food and goods, and seeing the removal of their rights to Big Government. And many governments are now backtracking on their Net Zero pledges, especially in Europe.
Transgender youth. The trans issue in the November election wasn’t about adults who transition — they’re old enough to make their choices and live with them — but about children, along with biological males playing in women’s sports. Most Americans oppose both, and the issue played a role in some voters’ decisions.
But Europe is also having second thoughts. Forbes reports, “Increasingly, European nations are adopting a more cautious approach to gender-affirming care among minors.” And that shift began a year before the release of the Cass Report in England, which raised several red flags about pushing gender-affirming care on minors.
Citizens realize that it is child abuse and people should be jailed for allowing, and, really, forcing children to go through drugs and surgeries, to live as the opposite sex. Most agree that if you’re an adult, do what you want. Children? No. It’s driven by parents, teachers, and other adults who are plain nuts and shouldn’t be around any children. It’s as horrible as constantly mentally and physically abusing a child.
Likewise, people are getting more vocal over the notion that trans of all ages should not be in the safe spaces and sports of real women.
Will the politicians get a clue? Will the majority of people who support the policies start getting a clue and switch their support and votes like many of their brethren did and vote against the wacko Progressive (nice Fascist) politicians who force this on the citizens regardless of their opinion?
Read: Surprise: First World Turning Against Progressive Agenda »
A bit of a follow up, forgot to hit post on this Tuesday
(Daily Caller) 159 House Democrats voted Tuesday against legislation titled the Laken Riley Act that would require federal immigration authorities to detain illegal migrants who commit theft-related crimes in the U.S and would also allow states to sue the Department of Homeland Security for harm caused to their residents because of illegal immigration. (snip)
“Laken Riley was brutally murdered by an illegal alien that President Biden and the Democrats let into this country with their open border policy. It is hard to believe after countless horrific stories like Laken’s, ANY House Democrats would vote against deporting illegal aliens who commit violent crimes against American citizens,” Speaker of the House Mike Johnson said in a statement.
“But 159 just did, demonstrating some Democrats have ignored the loud and clear message from voters in this election who demanded secure borders, the deportation of violent illegal aliens, and laws that put the safety and security of the American people first,” Johnson added.
These Democrats are prioritizing illegal aliens and fake asylum seekers over U.S. citizens. How many Democrat Senators will vote against it?
Despicable that @RepDeborahRoss voted against deporting criminal illegal aliens. Why does she support illegals over US citizens? https://t.co/i51kz0bCpS
— William Teach2 ??????? #refuseresist (@WTeach2) January 7, 2025
Ross is my Rep. You also had North Carolina reps Alma Adams and Valarie Foushee, both Democrats, voting against. Donald Davis (D) voted for the legislation. Calls and emails to Ross’ office have gone unanswered. They do not care about you.
After all this time it’s pretty easy to read between the lines
The international effort to avert climate catastrophe has become mired by misinformation and bad faith actors, and must be fundamentally reformed, according to a leading UN climate expert.
Elisa Morgera, the UN special rapporteur on climate change, said the annual UN climate summits and the consensus-based, state-driven process is dominated by powerful forces pushing false narratives and by tech fixes that divert attention from real, equitable solutions for the countries least responsible and most affected.
“The current climate regime was built in a way, maybe unconsciously, that locked in an ineffective approach that is blind to the disproportionate harms of climate change – and increasingly climate solutions – and the disproportionate benefits that the current situation is accruing to very few states and very few individuals,” said Morgera, in an exclusive interview with the Guardian.
“We can observe that some states are not acting in good faith in very clear ways, which is the basis of any international regime. There is widespread disregard for the rule of international law, and also a very clear pushback on the science, and shrinking of civil spaces at all levels. Basically, the truth is out of the conversation. That is the problem – there is no space at Cop for the truth,” said Morgera.
“Fundamental reform is possible, if there is a willingness by the states and the secretariat, but it’s hard to see that at the moment.”
Her Government Speak is simply code for “nations need to crack down on the free speech of their citizens. No more skepticism. No difference of opinion. Cut them off of social media. Do not allow them on TV and in the news. Block them. Start taking everyone’s money and Do Something.” I’ve been saying for 20 years that this is all about authoritarian government, not science, and they keep saying things that prove that.
Read: UN Climate Cult Leader Upset Nations Aren’t Cracking Down On Their Peasants »
Yet another case of “what could possibly go wrong”
FDNY union leaders are fighting back against the Big Apple’s new congestion pricing, warning the toll will negatively impact response times, leaving residents and first responders to deal with potentially deadly results.
Uniformed Firefighters Association President Andrew Ansbro and Uniformed Fire Officers Association President Jim Brosi discussed the new congestion pricing and its inadvertent side effects on the fire department during “FOX & Friends.”
“We begged, and we pleaded, ‘Don’t don’t go down this road,'” Ansbro told Lawrence Jones on Tuesday. “There’s only about 270 firefighters every single day working in the zone. We estimate the cost to be $3,000 a day because we bring our vehicles into the zone, and we bring vehicles into the city, and then we use them when they move us from firehouse to firehouse.”
“When there’s a shortage [in] one place, and a surplus in another… twice a day, you have three to 400 firefighters going to a different firehouse or returning from that firehouse, and they used to have the ability to use 2000 of our cars at a moment’s notice,” he continued.
So, basically firefighters need to be able to move around, and, if they cannot take their own vehicles they have to wait for the bus or take the subway, which could increase response time as well as reduce the number of firefighters available for response. Especially since they could dragging along 85+ pounds of equipment. I wonder what the government elites and all those cheering the congestion pricing will think when this causes a delayed response time for their emergency
“Change is hard. And when things are going well for people — like the 90% of people who know that the system that gets them to work or to school every single day is going to be invested in, is going to be there for them and their families — they’re not taking to the streets to say how great this is. But they are the beneficiaries, the mass majority of people who work in this area,” Gov. Kathy Hochul said on Monday.
Hey, I wonder if Hochul will be using the subway or buses when she’s in NYC? Or driving around in her big SUV? How about NYC employees: will they have to pay out of their own pockets when they drive through the congestion zone? That should be required.
Brosi argued the likely delayed response times and unconventional traffic outside the congestion pricing zones could be dangerous for residents and firefighters alike, and could cost millions if the department needs additional vehicles to fill the void.
They would need a whole bunch of new, government owned vehicles to avoid the toll.
“It’s difficult to see how the response times wouldn’t be affected because these units are operating well beyond their normal routine response area,” Brosi said. “We’ve already seen firefighters stay on duty for an extra two, four, six or eight hours after a 24-hour shift in a place where they’re really already doing 6,000 runs a year. That is a tremendous toll on the members and likely to lead to more injuries.”
And, instead of exempting the firefighters from the tolls the city will end up spending a fortune in overtime.
Read: Surprise: NYC’s Congestion Pricing Will Cause Trouble For Firefighter Response »
Once the doomsday cult sinks their teeth into a talking point they never let go, no matter how crazy
Leading climate scientists attribute recent snowfall and cold temperatures (like this week) to global warming, and are made much more frequent and severe.
Heavy snow and "polar vortex" cold blasts are much more likely & severe in a warming climate. https://t.co/sTjC5zdeZc
— Ryan Maue (@RyanMaue) January 7, 2025
From the link
Frigid air that normally stays trapped in the Arctic has escaped, plunging deep into the United States for an extended visit that is expected to provoke teeth-chattering but not be record-shattering.
It’s a cold air outbreak that some experts say is happening more frequently, and paradoxically, because of a warming world. Such cold air blasts have become known as the polar vortex. It’s a long-established weather term that’s become mainstream as its technical meaning changed a bit on the way.
What it really means to average Americans in areas where the cold air comes: brrrrr.
Yeah, we can stop there, no need to repeat the climamoonbattery “science” yet again. The cultists, in this case uber-Warmist Seth Borenstein, really do blame winter on too much warmth. Did too much warmth cause the Little Ice Age?
Read: Your Yearly Reminder That Cold And Winter Weather Is All Your Fault »
…are disappearing glaciers from atmospheric cancer, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Cold Fury, with a post on asking a stupid question.
Read: If All You See… »
I’m expecting about 167 no votes from Democrats
Republicans tee up fast votes on Laken Riley Act to deport illegal immigrants who steal, shoplift
Congressional Republicans are speeding their first immigration crackdown bill through Congress with an initial vote scheduled later this week on the Laken Riley Act, which would pressure Homeland Security to detain and deport illegal immigrants who shoplift or steal.
Sen. Katie Britt, Alabama Republican, announced a Senate version of the bill on Tuesday and Rep. Mike Collins, Georgia Republican, announced the House version.
House GOP leaders have already slated it for a floor vote on Tuesday, and given the backing of new Senate Majority Leader John Thune, the bill will likely see fast action in the upper chamber, too. (big snip through what happened to Laken Riley)
The Laken Riley Act would push ICE to arrest and detain illegal immigrants who commit shoplifting, burglary, larceny or theft offenses.
It would also create an avenue for states to bring a civil case in court against federal officials who refuse to enforce immigration law.
It shouldn’t even be necessary to pass another law: they are here illegally, on some sort of state sponsored status, or fake asylum seekers, and any violation of the law should mean immediate deportation. If a person is going through the legal citizenship process and breaks the law that status ends and they are sent packing.
A version of the Laken Riley Act was approved in the GOP-led House last year in a 251-170 vote. More than three dozen Democrats backed it.
Will there be several dozen Democrats voting for it this time? Or, will they vote en mass against it, being no election upcoming? Because Democrats ran the Senate it never got a vote. This time it will pass the House and then get a vote in the senate. But, will 8 Democrats cross over and vote for it to overcome the filibuster threshold? Regardless, the GOP should wait till Trump takes the oath of office, as there is no telling what Biden will do. If he vetoes it they’ll just have to vote again.
A blue state governor who pledged to fight Trump administration deportation efforts expressed outrage Monday after a migrant was allegedly caught with nearly $1 million worth of drugs and an AR-15 rifle at a hotel that is being temporarily used as a shelter.
“It’s outrageous that this individual took advantage of our shelter system to engage in criminal activity,” Massachusetts Democratic Gov. Maura Healey said in a statement.
Healey was responding to news of Leonardo Andujar Sanchez, a native of the Dominican Republic, facing firearm and drug trafficking charges while using the state’s shelter system. The suspect, 28, was found at a Quality Inn in Revere, Massachusetts, which currently serves as a shelter.
Who would have thought that all these fake asylum seekers, mostly young men, would be a problem? Someone should have warned Healey.
It’s always some sort of doom with this crowd
Climate change is hampering US apple quality and output: Study
Many of the nation’s biggest apple-generating regions are confronting challenges in crop growth and development, due to the impacts of a changing climate, a new study has found.
While apple orchards nationwide have become increasingly vulnerable to warming trends, the three U.S. counties with the biggest output are among the most affected, according to the study, published on Monday in Environmental Research Letters.
At the top of that list was Yakima County, Wash., which is home to more than 48,800 acres of orchards — and which showed worrisome signs in five of six metrics analyzed by Washington State University scientists. Next in line were Kent County, Mich., and Wayne County, N.Y.
“We shouldn’t take the delicious apples we love to consume for granted,” said corresponding Deepti Singh, a Washington State climate scientist, in a statement. “Changing climate conditions over multiple parts of the growth cycle pose potentially compounding threats to the production and quality of apples.”
So, a 1.6F increase in global temperatures since 1850 are dooming apples? These people. They are just so tiresome.
Read: Doom Today: Global Boiling Causing Problems With Apples »
The left is losing their minds over this
Nebraska Senator Deb Fischer’s husband Bruce refused to shake Kamala Harris’ hand after his wife was sworn in for her third term in Senate. pic.twitter.com/Xv8bgX0by1
— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) January 6, 2025
It’s all raaaaacism this and raaaaacism that
(The Grio) Bruce Fischer refused to make any eye or physical contact with America’s first female, first Black woman and first South Asian vice president.
A resurfaced clip of Nebraska Republican Senator Deb Fischer’s husband refusing to shake Vice President Kamala Harris‘s hand has gone viral on social media.
On Friday, Jan. 3, Harris performed her duty as vice president to swear in the new class of U.S. senators in the new 119th Congress — which includes both Democrats and Republicans. However, after Sen. Fischer was sworn in by Harris for her third term in office, her husband, Bruce Fischer, who held up the Bible during the swearing-in ceremony, deliberately declined to shake the vice president’s hand as she reached for his hand.
“Congratulations to you,” said the vice president as she extended her hand to Bruce Fischer after shaking his wife’s hand. Bruce Fischer instead looked down and simply nodded his head and said, “Thank you.” He refused to make any eye or physical contact with America’s first female, first Black woman and first South Asian vice president. Harris, who appeared taken aback by the snub, simply smiled and said, “You sure?”
How horrible! How mean! How rude! How raaaaacist! Oh, wait
The husband of Deb Fischer was holding a Bible in one hand and holding on to his cane with his other hand. He didn't have a free hand available to shake Kamala's hand.
— Annie Bond (@annlillianbond) January 6, 2025
As Sister Toldjah writes
I saw some folks suggest that Fischer could have shaken her hand after he gave the Bible back to the Senator. But the full video clip shows that Mr. Fischer looked a little unsteady on his feet and was watching the floor, perhaps to make sure he didn’t fall
Speaking from my role as a caregiver, I watched my dad constantly look down when he used his cane over the years and then later his walker, terrified he was going to fall. My mom has done the same. Dad did not like to be touched (hand on back, shoulder, handshake, etc), either, while using the cane and walker for the same reasons.
My dad looks down a lot, as well, with his cane and walker. I looked down a lot when I was much younger on the separate occasions I was on crutches from breaking my ankle then breaking my leg. And then when I moved to a walking cast.
Read: Manufactured Kerfuffle Of The Day: GOP Rep Deb Fischer’s Husband Refused To Shake Hands With Kamala »