Brainwashed Kid Thinks It’d Be Better Off If Humans Were All Dead

I’m usually loathe to cite World Net Daily, a website I think has gone off the rails since Obama was elected with way too much in terms of conspiracy articles, but, this is on video (via Junk Science)

A 12-year-old girl has responded with the stunning “I wish we didn’t exist” to questions about how she feels about pollution and humanity’s impact on the earth, according to a new video released by Brian Sussman, author of “Eco-Tyranny: How the Left’s Green Agenda will Dismantle America.”

The response came from a 6th-grade girl identified only as Kalie, from Gault Elementary. Sussman met her during Earth Day events in Santa Cruz, Calif., recently, where he traveled to ask “What is the most serious threat facing mankind?”

“Kalie has been green-washed to the point where she readily admits, ‘Sometimes I wish we didn’t exist,’” Sussman reported. (snip)

Sussman asked, “Is Kalie an example of a child on her way to becoming a ‘good environmental citizen?’ Or is this 6th-grader a victim of eco-child abuse? No youngster should be manipulated into thinking that human life is invaluable and so expendable.”

Make sure to read the whole thing.

Read: Brainwashed Kid Thinks It’d Be Better Off If Humans Were All Dead »

If All You See…

…is a dog that is bad for the climate, you might just be a Warmist

I should make Barack Obama’s campaign site, I Eat Dogs, the blog of the day, but, let’s make it Right Wing News. I don’t link RWN enough, since I cross post over there. And, I think I’ve beaten the I Eat Dogs meme enough for the time being.

Read: If All You See… »

Warmist Suggests Legislation Restricting Number Of Kids

Another day, another unhinged pronouncement (via Tom Nelson)

(New Age)Changes in average weather condition lasting over decades depict the term climate change. Signs of this change have been very high or low wet and dry seasons.

Among causes of climate change is global warming, a term used to mean a rise in average temperature of Earth’s atmosphere.

So, what are the other causes? Computer models? Oh, how about natural variability? Anyhow (grammar errors left in)

In my view, we need to change our behaviour of producing many children.

The only way this can be possible is by practicing family planning in each and every household. One way to achieve this is through universal access to contraceptives, massive family planning champagnes, sensitization and legislating number of children per household. If we are to fight climate change, we need to reduce our demographic figures.

Efforts need to be done to increase family planning practice to reduce our household size as well as lower fertility and birth rates.

The writer is speaking in terms of Uganda, and praises the Chinese restrictions. Don’t think for a moment that most Warmists wouldn’t think twice about pushing the same around the world.

Read: Warmist Suggests Legislation Restricting Number Of Kids »

Good Grief: Airport Checkpoint Shut Down Over Un-screened Baby

You can’t fully blame this one on the TSA, but, you can blame the over-blown security measures that TSA has put in place

(NJ.com) The failure to properly screen a baby for weapons or explosives led to flight delays and hours of inconvenience for passengers at Newark Liberty International Airport today.

The security breach, which sparked the evacuation of a section of Terminal C, also exposed tensions between the Transportation Security Administration and the Port Authority Police Department, which makes final determinations about shutdowns and passenger re-screening.

A TSA official said police were told the security slipup carried a “low risk factor” given the circumstances of the incident, in which the child was handed from one parent to another during a metal detector walkthrough. Both parents were properly screened before leaving for their gate.

A short time later, TSA personnel realized the baby had not been checked and began searching for the family.

“Port Authority police unilaterally made the decision to evacuate the terminal, sweep the terminal for explosives and re-screen all of the passengers, inconveniencing hundreds of passengers and delaying numerous flights,” said the official, who was not authorized to discuss the issue by name because of its delicacy.

It’s. A. Baby. Airport security is completely out of control.

Read: Good Grief: Airport Checkpoint Shut Down Over Un-screened Baby »

Obama Says Romney Is “In A Time Machine” Regarding Contraception Mandate

It’s utterly no surprise that all Obama has done so far is to attack Romney personally regarding his policies: he damned sure can’t run on his record

(The Hill) President Barack Obama said Friday that Republican positions on women’s health issues were “appalling” and “offensive” and equated an effort to block his regulation to mandate free contraception to like “being in a time machine” during a blistering speech at the Women’s Leadership Forum in Washington on Friday.

The president’s re-election team has made a push for female voters a key priority in his campaign strategy, and Obama sought to portray his legislative successes on health care as a boon for American women.

“This contraception fight in particular was illuminating. It was like being in a time machine,” Obama told the crowd, many of whom had purchased tickets that cost $1,000 to attend. “Republicans in Congress were going so far as to say an employer should be able to have a say in the health care decisions of its female employees.  You know, for a party that prides itself on being rabidly anti-regulations of almost any kind, for folks who claim to believe in freedom from government interference and meddling, it doesn’t seem to bother them when it comes to a woman’s health.”

Yet, it’s not a decision of the female employees. Nor is it the company having a say. The decisions are out of their hands. It’s the Central Government having a say in mandating that women be provided contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients with no copays. Which seems rather patronizing to women, in that it assumes that women aren’t competent enough to be able to earn the money to pay for these products.

What do you think, ladies? Do you enjoy the notion that Big Government needs to take care of you because you can’t do it yourself?

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Obama Says Romney Is “In A Time Machine” Regarding Contraception Mandate »

If All You See…

…is a dog which requires huge amounts of Gaia’s resources, you might just be a Warmist

I should make Barack Obama’s campaign site, I Eat Dogs, the blog of the day, but, let’s make it Laughing Conservative.

Read: If All You See… »

Pathetic: Team Obama Makes Osama Killing A Campaign Issue, Questions Romney

Well, really, what else does Team Obama have to hang their hat on?

(USA Today) A year after authorizing the mission that killed Osama bin Laden, President Obama and his election team are making it an election issue.

The Obama election team has a new ad in which former president Bill Clinton talks about the risks Obama took in ordering the mission that took place on May 2 of last year.

The ad also asks: “What path would Mitt Romney have taken?”

Disgraceful. Speculating that Romney would not have ordered the raid. Not sure how this will play with Liberals, since many were aghast over this targeted assassination without due process. I doubt Independents and Moderates will approve of this over the top ad, as well. Over at The Hill, Obama is being ripped for this. Best comment

WOW….(an UNNAMED source) from the Obama campaign speculates on what Mitt Romney would do……if that’s not a reach to make news I don’t know what is. Why not attach a name to the article?
How about Obama running on his record?  Nah, too dangerous right?

Read: Pathetic: Team Obama Makes Osama Killing A Campaign Issue, Questions Romney »

NJ Devils Defeat Panthers In Double OT

Devils head coach Pete DeBoer said “This was exhausting and I didn’t even play.” It was exhausting for Devils fans, too, who’ve been waiting for a playoff series win for quite some time, and after missing the playoffs last year. But

Let the brawling and cheap shots begin.

The Flyers are next for the resilient Devils and there is barely enough time for goalie Martin Brodeur and his weary teammates to rest.

After overcoming the Florida Panthers, 3-2, when rookie center Adam Henrique scored at 3:47 of the second overtime in Game 7 of their Eastern Conference quarterfinal series Thursday night at the BankAtlantic Center, the Devils advanced to the semifinals and will play Game 1 in Philadelphia on Sunday at 3 p.m.

“This feels pretty good. For a day. Then we have to face the Flyers,” Brodeur said.

This should be a heck of a series, as well.

“I think I blacked out when I heard the thud at the back of the net,” Henrique said. “An NHL Game 7 winner. That’s the game you always play with mini-sticks at home in the hallway or living room.”

Good for him, netting his 2nd goal of the game as the series winner. And good for Stephen Gionta and the other 4th liners, who really stepped it up in the Playoffs, scoring several goals and being an energy line, which is what teams want during the “second season.”

The Rangers get the Capitals. St. Louis vs. Los Angeles. Phoenix vs. Nashville. Full schedule here.

Read: NJ Devils Defeat Panthers In Double OT »

Is There Really A Need To Panic Over a .29C Rise In World Temperatures?

Is there any need to implement massive Central Government regulations that include large transfers of money from the private sector to the government sector along with numerous lifestyle limiting burdens?

(UK Daily Mail) World temperatures have remained almost stagnant in the last two decades, new figures have revealed.

Temperatures across the globe rose by around a third of a degree last year from the average of 14 degrees Celsius recorded between 1961 and 1990.

In some years, temperatures rose by just 0.29 degrees C while in others they rose by .53 degrees.

Most of that warming occurred in the 1990’s, with a rise of about .2C, ending with the El Nino year of 1998. Since then, barely any rise, and, in many places, a dip. The UN IPCC “best” scenario, using their vaunted computer models, was for around .46C over the period of 1990-2012 (via Clive Best). Furthermore, from 1961-1980, the Earth was in a cooling period (the overall cooling period started in the 1940’s), meaning the average temperature was deflated to start with during the current warm period, which was preceded by a long term cool period, and a period that was warmer than today, then a cool period, and a warmer than today period.

Are we really supposed to panic over .29C over 22 years?

The findings come as consumers feel the full force of a raft of environment policies introduced by the coalition and the previous Labour government in the name of climate change.

By 2030, ‘green’ policy burdens could cost families an extra £267 a year and have already raised current energy bills by £78 annually.

This is the kind of idiotic policy that saw the Queensland Labor Party lose so many seats in this years election that they aren’t even considered a Party within the government. But, then, the point has never been to “stop anthropogenic global warming”, it’s always been to increase the power of the government over the private sector and shift more and more money into the government coffers.

HadCrut and NASA temps are “significantly lower than IPCC climate model predictions.” This is why the Warmists have switched to blaming every weather event on “climate change”, ie, Other People living a modern life, after they told us that “weather is not climate.” It’s also why they are pushing “biodiversity” and “sustainability”. Creating fantasies that snow can only be caused by warm weather. That no matter what happens, it is the fault of climate change. They especially enjoy discussing these notions in exotic vacation spots around the world reached by fossil fueled flights on the taxpayer quarter.

Read: Is There Really A Need To Panic Over a .29C Rise In World Temperatures? »

Here We Go: Ray LaHood Calls For A Federal Ban On Cell Phone Use While Driving

LaHood has been flirting with the notion of banning wireless phone usage for a few years, running it up the flag pole, pushing cities and states to ban the usage, but, many people stated that this was simply Ray thinking out loud, a little wishful thinking, nothing would happen. But, now

(MSNBC) U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood called on Thursday for a federal law to ban talking on a cell phone or texting while driving any type of vehicle on any road in the country.

Tough federal legislation is the only way to deal with what he called a “national epidemic,” he said at a distracted-driving summit in San Antonio, Texas, that drew doctors, advocates and government officials.

LaHood said it is important for the police to have “the opportunity to write tickets when people are foolishly thinking they can drive safely or use a cell phone and text and drive.”

LaHood has previously criticized behind-the-wheel use of cell phones and other devices, but calling for a federal law prohibiting the practice takes his effort to a new level.

Just another in a long line of big nanny state liberals. However, the chance of there being legislation crafted and voted on in Congress is effectively nill. Nor would Obama attempt an executive order. Whether some Congress Critters, particularly Democrats, call for legislation, or at least hearings, well, that I could see happening. And perhaps a law which creates a “spreading awareness” campaign that costs hundreds of millions of dollars.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration estimates that 3,000 fatal traffic accidents nationwide last year were the result of distracted driving. Using a cell phone while driving delays reaction time the same amount as having a blood alcohol concentration of .08, the legal limit, the highway agency said.

On the other hand, LaHood has a good point. Driving while using electronic devices is pretty darned distracting

The nine most common distractions observed in conjunction with a risky driving maneuver were (for 2010):

  • Object in Hand/44.5%
  • Talking on a Handheld Mobile Phone/13.4%
  • Beverage/12.7%
  • Food /10.1%
  • Smoking/9.9%
  • Operating a Handheld Device/9.1%
  • Talking/Listening Mobile Phone – Hands Free/5.2%
  • Manifest, Map or Navigation/1.0%
  • Grooming/Personal Hygiene/0.6%

Basically, driving a car is risky behavior. Taking your eyes off the road for just two seconds doubles your chance of being involved in an accident. Missing from the list above is talking to passengers and car stereos.

Whether it’s turning around to talk to your kids or looking at the person sitting in your passenger seat, the NHTSA estimates that talking to passengers was the leading distraction in 7,000 crashes last year. Although the department’s research stated that passengers typically pose only a “cognitive” distraction, it’s still one of the most common causes of distracted driving.

We should have a federal law banning passengers. We should ban beverages and food, because they are, for all intense purposes, as bad as talking on a phone. And MP3 players should be banned. I know I’ve been distracted by them while searching for a song. I bet you have, too.

Exactly what would a law do? There are already existing laws that make distracted driving illegal. At the State level. Driving while impaired laws are state laws, not federal laws (except on federal property. A federal law covers that). If a State or city wants to pass laws, that’s within their right. The last thing we need is more federal regulation, though, I wonder if the Feds would sue and state or municipality that passes restrictions that are tougher than federal law, like with the Arizona and other states’ immigration laws.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Here We Go: Ray LaHood Calls For A Federal Ban On Cell Phone Use While Driving »

Pirate's Cove