Say, Why Is The Arab World So Easily Offended?

The Washington Post’s Fouad Ajami poses this question, and works to answer it, which is rather strange, considering that so many Liberals constantly tell us that it’s not the 1.3 billion plus Muslims who are bat guano violent, just a small minority. Ajami seems to be saying that all are like this, at least in the Middle East.

Modernity requires the willingness to be offended. And as anti-American violence across the Middle East and beyond shows, that willingness is something the Arab world, the heartland of Islam, still lacks.

Time and again in recent years, as the outside world has battered the walls of Muslim lands and as Muslims have left their places of birth in search of greater opportunities in the Western world, modernity — with its sometimes distasteful but ultimately benign criticism of Islam — has sparked fatal protests. To understand why violence keeps erupting and to seek to prevent it, we must discern what fuels this sense of grievance.

I’d suggest because so many of their values, and I’m speaking of Islamists, not Muslims as a whole, are left in the 13th century. Ajami then goes on to describe how the Muslim world went on to conquer, or, as he writes, “overran”, so much of Europe, Arabia, and Northern Africa, before

The ruling caliphate, with its base in Baghdad, was torn asunder by a Mongol invasion in the 13th century.

Apparently they’re still a little pissed about that, and haven’t been able to move on and join us here in the 21st century.

The coming of the West to their world brought superior military, administrative and intellectual achievement into their midst — and the outsiders were unsparing in their judgments. They belittled the military prowess of the Arabs, and they were scandalized by the traditional treatment of women and the separation of the sexes that crippled Arab society.

And there you go: it’s the fault of the Western World, the 1st World, and most assuredly America, that these regressives who aren’t capable of modern military tactics, incapable of using their modern military arms correctly (let’s not forget that tiny Israel kicked the asses of multiple Arab countries multiple times), treat their women as chattel, marry off girls as young as 11, treat gays horrendously, and so much more.

Even as Arabs insist that their defects were inflicted on them by outsiders, they know their weaknesses. Younger Arabs today can be brittle and proud about their culture, yet deeply ashamed of what they see around them. They know that more than 300 million Arabs have fallen to economic stagnation and cultural decline. They know that the standing of Arab states along the measures that matter — political freedom, status of women, economic growth — is low. In the privacy of their own language, in daily chatter on the street, on blogs and in the media, and in works of art and fiction, they probe endlessly what befell them.

Yet, they aren’t trying to modernize: the Islamists are attempting to keep their culture in the 13th century while still using many devices of the modern era. They want a Renaissance of the pre-13th century, where they conquer the world and force people to either accept their hardcore version of Islam or kill them. They don’t want political freedom: they want compliance in a fascist/theological world wide caliphate. They want an ultra-paternalistic culture, where women need 4 witnesses if they are raped, where women can only be seen in public with either their husband or a male member of their family, while wearing a burka, of course. Economic growth with the Middle East is solely based on their oil: without it, what economy they have would collapse. Making IEDs isn’t a huge market force.

Ajami continues on in that vein for quite some time, but he never gets to the root of the matter, namely that in mosques and madrasas around the world Muslims are being taught the regressive, Sharia compliant, hardcore version of Islam, particularly within the Muslim nations. More and more are being indoctrinated into the culture of hate, if you will. Until Muslims stand up and say “hey, it’s time to get over the 13th century and reform,” things won’t change. In fact, they’ll continue to get worse.

Lastly, consider this article from the Onion (via The Lonely Conservative): a truly nasty graphic about religions other than Islam. Yet, still no violence resulting.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Say, Why Is The Arab World So Easily Offended? »

Protests In Belgium And Sydney: Weird How The Pseudo al Qaeda Banner Showed Up

We already know about the protest in Sydney went: signs about beheading those who insult Islam showing up, held by a young child. Interesting, this also showed up in Sydney

Yeah, he has the “behead” sign. Notice the headband, though. And the flag behind him. And the headband on the guy to the left. Seem familiar?

Let’s head to Belgium (sorry about the Press TV link, being owned by the Iranian government. Only source with a photo)

Nearly 120 people have been arrested in the Belgian city of Antwerp after clashes broke out between the police and protesters demonstrating against an anti-Islamic film made in the United States.

On Saturday, protesters in Antwerp were chanting slogans against the United States and burned a US flag before the clashes broke out.

Hey, what’s this?

Interesting. Not too surprised by the Palestinian Keffiyeh showing  up, but, check the flag in the background.

In the top picture, that is the flag of al Qaeda in Iraq. The other flags are and headbands in both pictures are similar to those flown and worn by al Qaeda, proclaiming “there is no God but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet”. Isn’t it strange how this supposed “grassroots” and “spontaneous” demonstration, starting coincidentally on September 11th, sees so many carrying and wearing al Qaeda style (and specific al Qaeda) flags and headbands in Sydney and Antwerp? As well as throughout so many parts of the world where demonstrations were held? In Amsterdam it looks like they are hold a Taliban style banner (Taliban uses black letters on white background) Either this was planned, or there are a lot of Muslims who purchase al Qaeda style flags and headbands. Or both.

Meanwhile, Professor Glenn Reynolds says Obama should resign immediately for directly violating the Presidential Oath of Office.

Read: Protests In Belgium And Sydney: Weird How The Pseudo al Qaeda Banner Showed Up »

Obama: “We Reject The Denigration Of Religion”

Obama turned what was a decent Weekly Address, dealing with the deaths of the diplomatic personnel in Libya, into idiocy with one short paragraph

This tragic attack takes place at a time of turmoil and protest in many different countries. I have made it clear that the United States has a profound respect for people of all faiths. We stand for religious freedom. And we reject the denigration of any religion – including Islam.

Especially Islam. Where’s the condemnation for those, including Obama’s own campaign advisers, who denigrate the Mormon religion? And Christianity? And Judaism?

He also seems to want to reject the notion of Free Speech in stopping people from “denigrating” religion.

Read: Obama: “We Reject The Denigration Of Religion” »

If All You See…

…is a planet killing plastic water bottle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Pundit and Pundette, with a post about …. yard sales for Obama?

Oh, and below the fold you’ll find another attempt to earn a fatwa, or at least to be banned in a Islamist country. Or blamed by the Obama administration.

Read More »

Read: If All You See… »

Goracle Blames Cold Weather On Globull Warming

It must be nice to own a few mcmansions, drive in convoys, and take lots of fossil fueled air travel. And crack. Lots of crack

(Al’s Journal) “Over the past several months, extreme weather and climate events in the form of heat waves, droughts, fires, and flooding have seemed to become the norm rather than the exception. In the past half-year alone, millions of people have been affected across the globe –from Europe suffering from the worst cold snap in a quarter century; to extreme flooding in Australia, Brazil, China, and the Philippines; to drought in the Sahel. Records have been broken monthly in the continental United States, with the warmest spring and 12-month period experienced this year and severe fires and drought affecting large swaths of the country.”

So buy carbon credits, that way Al can get more money for his massive carbon footprint life.

Read: Goracle Blames Cold Weather On Globull Warming »

EPA Demands People Use More Food For Fuel

Hey, can you guess who thinks that using food for fuel is a Bad Idea? The New York Times. Obviously, the ministers at the Central Department Of Environmental Truth feel differently. And, instead of going through the legislative branch, you know, that pesky creation of the Constitution given lawmaking ability, here comes another “rule” from the CDET (via Erika Johnson)

(The Hill) The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Friday raised biofuels targets for 2013 despite an ongoing legal battle with the oil-and-gas industry on the issue.

Refiners will be required to blend 1.28 billion gallons of biodiesel — which EPA includes in its definition of “advanced” biofuels — into traditional transportation fuel in 2013, up from 1 billion gallons this year.

“This action, which meets goals designated by Congress, is another step that strengthens America’s energy security by reducing dependence on foreign oil,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said Friday in a statement.

Ethanol is less powerful, releases just as much if not more greenhouse gases as gasoline, and uses vast amounts of water to produce, not too mention taking large piles of what could become …….. food!!!!!!!…… to produce. Which drives up the cost of food. It also causes deforestation and species eradication around the world as forests and jungles are clear cut and the animals intentionally slaughtered to create farms for materiel used to create biofuels.

But, wait, it gets better!

With prices at the pump worrying Americans, Republicans have railed against the Environmental Protection Agency’s new gas mandate that requires consumers to buy at least four gallons when purchasing from stations with hoses containing 10 percent and 15 percent ethanol-blended fuel.

On Monday, Republicans on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology sent a letter to Environmental Protection Agency Chief Administrator Lisa Jackson criticizing the agency’s approval of the sale of gasoline containing 15 volume percent ethanol.

Specifically, the EPA will require that consumers purchase a minimum of four gallons when buying from a gas station that sells gasoline containing 10 percent ethanol and 15 percent ethanol — also known as “E15″ — out of the same gas pump.

So now we have the CDET mandating how much gas someone must purchase? What if a person doesn’t have a 4 gallon tank?

“What if a rider doesn’t have a motorcycle with a four gallon tank?” Sensenbrenner asked in a statement. “Or if someone wants to fill a canister for their lawnmower or outboard boat engine, but it only holds 2 or 3 gallons? Or what if an American, struggling in this economy, just can’t afford 4 gallons of gas?”

What if one has one of those annoying Vespas or other moped style transportation vehicle? The typical Vespa has a 2.3 gallon tank. I know that here in Raleigh virtually every gas station uses a blend containing up to 10% ethanol. Are the Vespa riders supposed to pump the extra into someone else’s gas tank? This is what happens when the Central Government is given, and takes, too much power, especially considering most of the people making the rules have never worked a day in their lives in the private sector.

Read: EPA Demands People Use More Food For Fuel »

Surprise! Pakistan Interior Minister Asking Interpol To Ban On-line Anti-Islam Material

You’ll remember that the Muslim bloc of nations amongst the UN Human Rights Council have attempted to pass a “defamation of religion” resolution multiple times that would make it a crime to defame Islam and Mohammed, and have tried other routes at the UN since 1999. Hillary Clinton sympathized. And we’ve seen Mr. Obama and Clinton, along with a raft of others, sympathize with Islamists being offended by a video, which was simply a pretext, considering that the video came out months ago.

Question: if this was a spontaneous grassroots demonstration, where’d all the al Qaeda style flags and headbands come from so quickly? Or is it that a ton of Muslims keep the flags and headbands that are similar to the al Qaeda ones around “just in case”?

Anyhow, here we go

(Daily Caller) If one well-known Pakistani politician gets his way, international law will forbid “anti-Islam” material from the Internet.

Friday afternoon, Pakistan Interior Minister Rehman Malik wrote in a series of tweets that he has spoken with and written to the Secretary General of Interpol about enacting an international law to stop all anti-Islam propaganda online.

Considering that, as I mentioned yesterday, the US government is acting in a censorship role in asking YouTube to see if the stupid video violates the terms of service, it seems the Obama admin. thinks that offending Muslims should be stopped on-line, too. Fortunately, Google decided not to remove the video. Yet. And then we have the film maker being brought in for “questioning” on the pretense that he broke the terms of his parole. The message is “don’t insult Islam”.

And where’s the ACLU? They’re “concerned”

(Daily Caller) In a statement to The Daily Caller, director of the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project Ben Wizner said,

“To our knowledge, no U.S. government official has questioned the right of anyone to make this repellent film, and rightly so. We do get concerned when the federal government appears to throw its weight behind a request for self-censorship, but we don’t know the details of the government’s interactions with Google.”

That’s about as squishy a message as one can offer. Boy Wonder Jay Carny stated during his press conference that White House asked YouTube to look at the TOS to see if there was a violation. On the bright side, the US State Dept. says to stop questioning them on what happened in Benghazi

The State Department told reporters Friday afternoon that it won’t answer any more questions about the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate in Benghazi that killed four Americans until the investigation into the incident is complete.

“I’m going to frustrate all of you, infinitely, by telling you that now that we have an open FBI investigation on the death of these four Americans, we are not going to be in a position to talk at all about what the U.S. government may or may not be learning about how any of this this happened — not who they were, not how it happened, not what happened to Ambassador Stevens, not any of it — until the Justice Department is ready to talk about the investigation that’s its got,” State Department spokeswoman Victorian Nuland told reporters late Friday afternoon.

Transparency. Of course, the American reporters probably want to know what effect Mitt Romney had on the situation for daring to question the Obama administration’s response. Which is interesting, considering

(Fox News) While the Obama administration says there was no actionable intelligence that could have prevented the assault on the U.S. Consulate in Libya, there was a heightened threat in the region due to at least four attacks on diplomatic and western targets leading up to the murder of the U.S. ambassador.

Hey, campaigning is hard work, and who would’ve thought that Islamists would riot and attack?

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Surprise! Pakistan Interior Minister Asking Interpol To Ban On-line Anti-Islam Material »

Aussie Carbon Cops Living The Highlife

Healing the planet one 40 wine bottle holder at a time

(Adelaide now) As Australian families facing electricity price hikes due to the carbon tax are told to switch off bar fridges to save money, tender documents show the Department of Climate Change plans to splash out on at least 10 bar fridges when it goes shopping for a host of high-end whitegoods this month.

The department’s tender list specifies appliances must be stainless steel, glass, fingerprint proof and energy and water efficient.

They’re looking for 23 fridges, 14 dishwashers, 26 microwaves, two ovens, two cooktops, two wall-mounted rangehoods and a 40-bottle wine cabinet with a glass and stainless-steel front.

But the government insists the energy efficiency of the building will save taxpayers money in the long run.

Yeah, about that saving money thing

The building, with a yearly rent of $6.4 million, offers 738 public servants luxury digs over seven floors, with space of 16sq m per person and two kitchenettes on each level.

Keeping the planet from overheating sounds like a cushy gig.

 

Read: Aussie Carbon Cops Living The Highlife »

If All You See….

…is a flooded world because some other jerk refused to buy local, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Flopping Aces, with a reader post claiming Ambassador Steven’s blood is on Obama’s hands.

Read: If All You See…. »

Islamists In Sudan Burn German Embassy, KFC Burned In Tripoli

If anyone thinks this is about a film that came out months ago, they’re sadly deluded

(Reuters) Sudanese demonstrators broke into the German embassy in Khartoum on Friday, raising an Islamic flag and setting the building on fire in a protest against a film that demeaned the Prophet Mohammad, witnesses said.

Police had earlier fired tear gas to try to disperse some 5,000 protesters who had ringed the German embassy and nearby British mission. But a Reuters witness said policemen just stood by when the crowd forced its way into Germany’s mission.

Demonstrators hoisted a black Islamic flag saying in white letters “there is no God but God and Mohammed is his prophet”. They smashed windows, cameras and furniture in the building and then started a fire, witnesses said.

Ed Morrissey writes

Apparently, the insistence by the West that they deplore religious debate isn’t working out terribly well.  The more this expands, the less it looks like a flash of grassroots anger, and more like coordination.

And then we get

(Telegraph) 14.08 (09.08 A demonstrator has been killed and 25 people hurt after an angry crowd of Islamists set fire to a KFC restaurant in northern Lebanon. The crowd of 300 attacked on the US fast-food chain’s outlet came as Pope Benedict XVI arrived in Lebanon for a three-day visit, calling for Christian-Muslim coexistence and attacking religious extremism.

Not sure what one has to do with the other, besides the fact that the Islamists use any excuse to riot, vandalize, burn, and kill. Check out the picture at the Telegraph link regarding protesters attempting to burn the wall at the Cairo embassy: notice the al Qaeda stylized head band.

The British embassy in Khartoum was also under attack. American embassies in Tunis and Sudan are under attack.

And what’s Obama up to?

And he has a light schedule today, with another fundraiser tonight. Can we even call this leading from behind when there isn’t even a hint of leadership?

More: The Obama administration has asked YouTube to look into the video to see if it violates the TOS. This is what’s called “censorship.”

As the Jawa Report points out, the Obama admin was conspicuously absent when the play “The Book Of Mormon” was winning Tony awards for defaming the Mormon religion.

Read: Islamists In Sudan Burn German Embassy, KFC Burned In Tripoli »

Pirate's Cove