Warmist Quote Of The Day

Funny stuff, via Tom Nelson

(UCR Today) “Because higher education provides the intellect and initiative to move this country forward, it is important that we set the standard for society to aspire to and train the intellectual community and the workforce to preserve this planet for future generations … and do battle with the causes of climate change,” said UCR Chancellor Timothy P. White.

Warmists have been “spreading awareness” for 20 years, and, that’s pretty much all they do. I suggest UCR turn all the lights off in order to protect Gaia.

Read: Warmist Quote Of The Day »

If All You See…

…is an evil planet killing iPhone sucking vampire energy, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Public Secrets, with a post on Romney paying his own way.

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another fantastic day in America. Just about time for Warmists to start blaming cold weather on greenhouse gases. This pinup is by Gil Elvgren, with a wee bit of help.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Sentry Journal discusses the consequences of electing leaders with little or no virtue
  2. Sister Toldjah tells Liberals to just get over the fact that Obama lost the debate
  3. The Other McCain wonders if the Obama meltdown is beginning
  4. Villainous Company says Obama “Is” everywhere
  5. Weasel Zippers points out that John Kerry has met Obama’s big shiny bus
  6. Teresamerica discusses Women For Romney
  7. Riehl World News highlights the christening of the USS Michael Murphy
  8. Powerline wonders about an October surprise
  9. Maggie’s Notebook discusses Obama’s untraceable donations
  10. Legal Insurrection wants someone to cry themselves to sleep
  11. Jammie Wearing Fools covers the SNL spoof of the debate
  12. Hot Air discusses “gun stamping”
  13. Gay Patriot catches the NY Times doing something funny regarding gas prices
  14. Flopping Aces has the Sunday Funnies
  15. And last, but not least, Fire Andrea Mitchell is having a tough time wondering who to root for, Code Pink or the Taliban
  16. And one to grow on: Doug Ross delves deeper into the Israeli shootdown of an Iranian drone

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

The posts do take a long time, so, if you want to send me your links for Rule 5 babeage or links, use ye olde email in the header bar (remove the NOSPAM part). Preferably, create the html link so I can copy and paste how you want it to read.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

Good Grief: Washington Post Complains That Romney Should Be Worth More

The media, including opinion writers, spent oodles of time and planet killing paper and energy writing about Haditha, Korans in toilets, soldiers peeing on dead Taliban bodies, loud music and cold temps at Gitmo, but can’t find it in themselves to write about the Taliban resurgence in Afghanistan, al Qaeda growing in Egypt and Libya, Fast and Furious, the Libyan 9/11 attack cover up, why Obama is using official White House resources for campaigning, and a host of other issues. The difference is the letter of Party affiliation. But, they can come out with stuff like this (via Ace)

Mitt Romney is worth $250 million. Why so little?

Mitt Romney is indisputably a very rich man. And if he is elected president on Nov. 6, he will become one of the wealthiest people ever to hold the office.

But exactly how wealthy is Romney? The figure that gets tossed around is $250 million in net worth — meaning the total value of his assets, financial and others, minus any debts.

It’s a big number, but frankly, it seems low. Given the industry in which he made his fortune (private equity), the era when he made it (the 1980s and 1990s) and the wealth of his peers in that business (mostly billionaires), Romney should be worth a good bit more than that.

Why isn’t he?

Then we get all sorts of gobbledygook (interestingly, that word is part of WordPress spellcheck, but spellcheck isn’t) as to why Romney should be richer but isn’t, finally getting to the point that Romney left Bain before the private equity market took off. And then we learn that a guy who gives over 30% of his income every year to charity is stingy

He has also been exceedingly charitable with his wealth, although unlike several of his private-equity peers, he has not signed the Giving Pledge, which would commit him to giving most of his fortune to philanthropic causes.

Facepalm, considering that Democrats are exceedingly stingy with their own money when it comes to charity (as opposed to being forthcoming with Other People’s money)

Does it really matter if Romney is worth $250 million, $1 billion or more? Rich is rich after all, right? I think it does, politically as well as substantively.

Politically, the alternatives are not great. If he were perceived as the first real billionaire to run for president, it would only exacerbate popular doubts about how someone living so removed from the concerns of average Americans — or even just 47 percent of them — could effectively represent them.

And if he is not a billionaire, doesn’t it suggest that he was not a great private-equity investor after all, thus torpedoing his claim to understand how to create jobs and get the economy back on track?

Something to keep in mind on Nov. 6.

Good f*cking grief. Romney’s damned if he does damned if he doesn’t. He took off to pursue saving the Olympics and then elected political positions, but, damnitall, he should have made more money. Or maybe spent his time agitating people and writing books like Obama, who’s done such a wonderful job with the economy and jobs.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Good Grief: Washington Post Complains That Romney Should Be Worth More »

Bummer: Electric Cars Bad For Environment

The article does pose the position that electric cars are better in the long run, but, of course, there is no data yet to support that position

(BBC) Electric cars might pollute much more than petrol or diesel-powered cars, according to new research.

The Norwegian University of Science and Technology study found greenhouse gas emissions rose dramatically if coal was used to produce the electricity.

Electric car factories also emitted more toxic waste than conventional car factories, their report in the Journal of Industrial Ecology said.

Hmm, that sounds bad

“The production phase of electric vehicles proved substantially more environmentally intensive,” the report said, comparing it to how petrol and diesel cars are made.

“The global warming potential from electric vehicle production is about twice that of conventional vehicles.”

In addition, producing batteries and electric motors requires a lot of toxic minerals such as nickel, copper and aluminium.

Hence, the acidification impact is much greater than that of conventional car production.

“Across the other impacts considered in the analysis including potential for effects related to acid rain, airborne particulate matter, smog, human toxicity, ecosystem toxicity and depletion of fossil fuel and mineral resources, electric vehicles consistently perform worse or on par with modern internal combustion engine vehicles, despite virtually zero direct emissions during operation,” according to Prof Stromman.

So, they pretty much suck.

Read: Bummer: Electric Cars Bad For Environment »

If All You See…

…is snow that no longer exists but is created by a warming world, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is protein wisdom, with a post on that empty chair New Yorker cover

Read: If All You See… »

New Romney Ad Highlights Disappointment In Obama

Oh, and Hitler found out that Obama lost the election, via Zilla.

Read: New Romney Ad Highlights Disappointment In Obama »

Ambassador Susan Rice Decides To Blame Intelligence Community For Foolishly Blaming Mohammed Video

This seems to be much the consensus amongst the Obama administration, which has repeatedly blamed a “lack of intelligence” for coming out and blaming the video time and time again, including when Obama gave his speech at the United Nation, despite knowing within hours that the attack was most likely a pre-planned terrorist attack by an al Qaeda offshoot

(Washington Post) The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has denied she tried to mislead Congress when she initially called the Sept. 11 attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, Libya a spontaneous protest.

Susan Rice, in a letter released Friday, wrote three Republican senators that her comments on television news shows after the attack were based on the best information available at the time from intelligence officials.

Rice wrote Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin that she “consistently qualified, in some instances twice, the information I provided as preliminary.” U.S. officials modified their initial public assessment and said the attack was an act of terrorism, with some attackers linked to groups affiliated with, or sympathetic to, al-Qaida.

Johnson replied that he knows what standing in cow patties feels like, growing up in Wisconsin with all those bovines, Ayotte went looking for a sporting goods store to purchase some hip waders, and McCain told Rice to get off his lawn.

The senators said in a joint statement that they did not accept Rice’s explanation.

“The Obama administration failed to sufficiently protect our consulate and diplomats in Benghazi in the face of obvious and growing threats in eastern Libya in the months leading up to the September 11, 2012, terrorist attack,” they said. “To make matters worse, the administration mishandled its response to the attack and appears to have selected intelligence that mischaracterized the attack and misled the American people. “

“Either the Obama administration is misleading Congress and the American people, or it is blaming the entire failure on the intelligence community,” the senators said. They added the administration’s conduct after the attack “indicates a breathtaking level of incompetence.”

The first question, which has been asked many a time without an answer, is why the Obama admin. would send the US Ambassador to the UN out on to the political show circuit in the first place, and with those talking points. The second question is what the administration thinks they will accomplish by throwing the intelligence community under the bus

Weeks before the presidential election, President Barack Obama’s administration faces mounting opposition from within the ranks of U.S. intelligence agencies over what career officers say is a “cover up” of intelligence information about terrorism in North Africa.

Intelligence held back from senior officials and the public includes numerous classified reports revealing clear Iranian support for jihadists throughout the tumultuous North Africa and Middle East region, as well as notably widespread al Qaeda penetration into Egypt and Libya in the months before the deadly Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…

Officials with access to intelligence reports, based on both technical spying and human agents, said specific reporting revealed an alarming surge in clandestine al Qaeda activity months before the attack in Benghazi…

“The Obama Administration is afraid to admit al Qaeda is running rampant throughout the region because it would expose the truth instead of what President Obama so pompously spouted during the Democratic Convention” said the official.

We’ve read the reports about all the attacks made on the consulate, how Ambassador Stevens feared he was being targeted, and how Westerners in Benghazi were being targeted by Islamic extremists. As Ed Morrissey points out

Two reports prepared for Congress and released in August — before the attack in Benghazi — warned explicitly that the power vacuum in Libya combined with easy access to heavy weapons stolen from Qaddafi’s stockpiles made the country a natural draw for jihadists. One of those reports claimed that Al Qaeda’s senior leadership in Pakistan had dispatched top operatives to Libya with orders to start setting up a new network there under a different name.

Yet, the Obama admin. refused to increase security at the Benghazi consulate, then decided to blame the Mohammed video which no one had seen with Susan Rice as the tip of the talking points spear.

Read: Ambassador Susan Rice Decides To Blame Intelligence Community For Foolishly Blaming Mohammed Video »

Serial Misogynist Bill Maher: “Hey, Obama Kinda Sucked During Debate”

And provides some more words that will surely soon be considered racist

(The Blaze) During his HBO show on Friday, Liberal comedian Bill Maher, who donated $1 million to a pro-Obama Super PAC earlier this year, jokingly wondered what President Obama spent his money on after watching his poor debate performance this week, saying it looked like the president spent his entire donation on “weed.”

“I’m sorry, he sucked. He looked tired. He had trouble getting his answers out. He looked like he took my million and spent it all on weed,” Maher said.

The comedian said Obama looked “disinterested” and “annoyed” at the debate while his rival Mitt Romney looked “all charged up.”

“And now we know what Michael Jackson looked like when he was on the Diprivan,” Maher joked.

Now, if a Conservative said those things, they would be considered racist, not to mention completely out of bounds, as the Credentialed Media would tell us in hundreds of stories and opinion pieces (not that there’s that much difference anymore). And that shot about Michael Jackson? Racist. Just like

“Seriously, I haven’t seen a black man look that disinterested and annoyed since I dragged Chris Rock to that beach boys concert,” he added.

Personally, I think Obama was out of it because he was upset that someone was actually allowed to talk back as well as having his time to pontificate capped.

There’s video available at Mediaite, if you feel the need.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Serial Misogynist Bill Maher: “Hey, Obama Kinda Sucked During Debate” »

Good Grief: Liberals Wonder If Romney Cheated During Debate

Lefties simply can’t believe that Obama was unprepared, incompetent, bored, out of answers, and a SCOAMF. No….

Mitt Romney’s campaign is shooting down a simmering online theory the Republican nominee used a “cheat sheet” in Wednesday night’s debate against President Barack Obama.

The theory — extensively documented by the liberal blog Daily Kos and picked up on the Daily Beast and elsewhere — focuses on a brief moment as Romney took the stage, pulled something out of his pocket, and put it on the podium.

But according to a Romney aide the object was simply a handkerchief, not an illicit list of zingers.

“It’s a handkerchief,” the aide said simply in response to the post.

Liberals need Prozac.

The Lonely Conservative: “Oh, and maybe President Obama should have brought along a hanky so he didn’t have to use his fingers.”

And some Charmin Ultra Soft for his butthurt.

 

Read: Good Grief: Liberals Wonder If Romney Cheated During Debate »

Pirate's Cove