If All You See…

By William Teach January 16, 2013 – 1:00 pm

…is a wonderful tree taking evil CO2 out of the air, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Sister Toldjah, with a post about loony tunes Truthers.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 6 Comments | Trackback URL

Good Grief: Greenpeace Russia Calls Cold Weather Part Of Globull Warming

By William Teach January 16, 2013 – 12:11 pm

If we’re going to talk about mental health for potential gun owners, Warmists should definately be restricted from owning anything more dangerous than a spork (via Tom Nelson)

Abnormal frosts during global warming

Abnormal frosts and snowfalls registered in the world in recent times are the result of global warming. The earth is getting warm – hence, air acquires more moisture. As a result, there appear high snowfall amounts, and we observe a below normal drop in temperature.

Frosts in California in the USA, snowfalls in the Middle East and abnormal frosts in Siberia in Russia. Although we are halfway through the winter, there are many weather surprises today. Wrapping themselves up in the warm clothes, people begin to strongly doubt whether a global warming is really an accomplished fact. Just for nothing, Head of the Greenpeace Russia energy programme Vladimir Chuprov says.

“It would be more correct to speak about global climate change, not about global warming. There have appeared colder deserts where snowfalls occur. The Gulf Stream is getting cold. That is why many people are deceived. Here one should clearly understand one thing – that winters have become colder and summers – warmer. However, on the average, the temperature is going up.”

Read: Good Grief: Greenpeace Russia Calls Cold Weather Part Of Globull Warming »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | Comments Off on Good Grief: Greenpeace Russia Calls Cold Weather Part Of Globull Warming | Trackback URL

In People’s Republik Of California, Teacher Who Appeared In Adult Videos Denied Her Job Back

By William Teach January 16, 2013 – 9:42 am

Liberals are on the forefront of the “if it feels good, do it” attitude. Liberals have created an attitude where pornography is just an expression of sexuality, and should not be condemned, and that “there’s nothing wrong with it”. Yet, there are consequences for expressing that sexuality

(The Blaze) A middle-school science teacher fired after students learned she had appeared in pornographic movies had hoped not just to get her job back, but to set a precedent for people looking to escape an embarrassing personal history. News of the story first broke after the educator was dismissed of her teaching duties in April 2012.

A three-judge commission put a decisive stop to both, saying firmly and unanimously that Stacie Halas should not be in the classroom.

That’s weird. This is the highly liberal People’s Republik of California, where the pornography industry is based, yet this young woman, who only participated in making some videos for 8 months, and not while she was teaching, has lost her job for participating in a legal venture. Where’s the liberal attitude of tolerance? Was she a good teacher? Where are the liberals defending her?

Now, on one hand, she broke no laws. On the other hand, this whole attitude of women showing their bodies off can create problems out in The Real World. While I love sites like The Chive, the attitude of young women taking pictures of themselves in next to nothing isn’t the wisest of ideas. I’m still waiting for the post of “Chivettes Fired From Work”.

It’s interesting to note that in other cases, teachers are damned near impossible to fire. Ones who are abusive, drug users, incompetent, sexually harass students, failing to show up for work. Where’s the liberal teacher’s union? Halas made a mistake then reformed her life.

An interesting comment by TheBurningTruth

Sorry, all out of sympathy for her, and most everyone else. After all:

1) I’ve been deemed “an enemy to be punished” because I disagreed over immigration policy with Der Fuhrer.
2) Declared a racist because I don’t believe in borrowing trillions for political paybacks and Believe people should get what they earn
3) Believe that it’s wrong to hire govt officials to steal other people’s money just to give to me
4) Declared to want kids dead because I believe in the 2nd amendment
5) Called an “extremist” because I have principals and won’t negotiate on just anything that comes along
6) Viciously attacked because I’m straight
7) Called innumerable obscene names by the intolerant Progressive Left because I’m conservative

Note that none of what I did was ever illegal or even really immoral, just that I expressed a legitimate difference of opinion. Too bad, Tiffiny! (Halas’ screen name was “Tiffany Six”)

Further comments go on to point out that liberals have forgiven lefties like Marion Berry. Remember that they had no problem with a sitting president having adulterous sexual relations with a woman young enough to be his daughter in the Oval Office, along with credible complaints of sexual harassment and rape.

Read: In People’s Republik Of California, Teacher Who Appeared In Adult Videos Denied Her Job Back »

Posted in Liberal World, Musings | 5 Comments | Trackback URL

Oregon Sheriff Says Won’t Enforce Un-Constitutional Gun Laws

By William Teach January 16, 2013 – 9:06 am

I hope Sheriff Tim Mueller understands how much vitriol is going to come his way from the tolerant and peaceful liberals

(Daily Caller) An Oregon sheriff has sent a letter to Vice President Joe Biden saying his department will not enforce any new gun laws it considers unconstitutional.

Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller, in his letter dated Monday, said politicians are “attempting to exploit the deaths of innocent victims” by supporting laws that would harm law-abiding Americans. The sheriff said he took an oath to support the Constitution, and laws preventing citizens from owning certain semi-automatic firearms and ammunition magazines would violate their rights.

“We are Americans,” Mueller wrote. “We must not allow, nor shall we tolerate, the actions of criminals, no matter how heinous the crimes, to prompt politicians to enact laws that will infringe upon the liberties of responsible citizens who have broken no laws.”

The full letter is available at the link, or you can click this one to see it full size.

He further goes on to write:

In summary, it is the position of this Sheriff that I refuse to participate, or stand idly by, while my citizens are turned into criminals due to the unconstitutional actions of misguided politicians.

It would be nice if more elected public officials would take a stand to uphold and protect the Constitution. Liberals won’t. The ACLU won’t. President Obama won’t. Democrats won’t. Some Republicans won’t.

Now it’s time to wait and see what (NMP) Obama will announce when he finally deigns to show up for his own press conference today. According to the Seattle Times (and many other outlets), what he will announce will be

According to a lobbyist briefed Tuesday, Obama will present a three-part plan focused on gun violence, education and mental health. He’ll call for:

– A focus on universal background checks. Right now some 40 percent of gun sales take place without background checks, including by private sellers at gun shows or over the Internet, according to the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. (I think most of us can agree to this)

– A ban on assault weapons and limiting ammunition magazines to 10 rounds or fewer. (it’ll never pass Congress, and will give Obama a way to demonize Republicans)

– A federal statute to stop “straw man” purchases of guns and crack down on trafficking rings. (Now that’s funny, considering agencies within the Obama were making straw purchases during Fast and Furious)

– More anti-bullying efforts; more training for teachers, counselors and principals; and funding for schools for more counselors and resource officers. (In other words, he wants to funnel more money towards teacher’s unions)

Obama also will order federal agencies to conduct more research on gun use and crimes, the lobbyist said, something Republican congressional majorities have limited through language in budget bills.

But will any of this stop violent criminals from obtaining guns and using them? You’ll weed out a few through background checks, but, that only applies to handguns, not rifles and shotguns. Instead of buying “scary looking” rifles, people could purchase the exact same thing in non-scary looking manner. You can easily purchase rifles in .223, same as the Ar-15, that do not have a pistol grip and aren’t painted black.

I’ll be interested to see if Obama proposes anything that goes after criminals during his stern lecture that will surely demonize legal gun owners, while armed men and women look on from the background.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: Oregon Sheriff Says Won’t Enforce Un-Constitutional Gun Laws »

Posted in 2nd Amendment, Barry Obama | 2 Comments | Trackback URL

Shameless Obama To Use Children As Props During Gun Control Announcement

By William Teach January 15, 2013 – 2:54 pm

The return of the human shields

(Washington Examiner) Carney said that the president will be joined by Vice President Joe Biden as well as children who wrote to the president after the Newtown shootings.

“They will be joined by children around the country expressing their concerns about gun violence and school safety, along with their parents,” Carney confirmed. (See video of Carney’s remarks here.)

Pathetic.

Read: Shameless Obama To Use Children As Props During Gun Control Announcement »

Posted in Barry Obama, Unhinged Tools | 19 Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach January 15, 2013 – 1:00 pm

…is an evil old school fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Watcher of Weasels, with a debate on whether there is a reasonable solution to the debt ceiling.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Bummer: “Winter Doesn’t Seem To Exist Anymore”

By William Teach January 15, 2013 – 11:26 am

That would certainly cut down on people freezing to death, frostbite, injuries and deadly accidents in the snow and ice, crops being ruined from cold, and would cut down on spending for seasonal wardrobes. Though I do love wearing a nice leather jacket (via Tom Nelson)

(Technician) “People need to wake up. This is not a political ploy, it is science,” Bruck said. “A global holocaust is what it will take for people to wake up after tens of thousands of people die.”

Bruck said mankind is a large contributor, if not the sole cause, for the excessive warming of the earth.

“Winter doesn’t seem to exist anymore,” Bruck said.

Someone needs to tell the people in China, Alaska, Russia, and Europe this, since they are dealing with serious cold temperatures right now. Oh, and as California is going through a massive cold snap.

Read: Bummer: “Winter Doesn’t Seem To Exist Anymore” »

Posted in AGW Scaremongering, Global Warming | 11 Comments | Trackback URL

Portman: Obama Misses The Point On Debt Ceiling

By William Teach January 15, 2013 – 10:01 am

During yesterday’s Obama PC, he stated that he was a “pretty friendly guy“, which got a lot of laughs from the lapdog media, which had asked if he was “too insular”. Of course, that seems to apply only to partying, playing golf, and vacations, but, not to people in both his own Party and towards Republicans/Conservatives. He later went on to provide another laugh-riot soundbite

(Politico) “While I’m willing to compromise and find common ground over how to reduce our deficit, America cannot afford another debate with this Congress over how to pay the bills they’ve already racked up,” Obama said at the press conference. “To even entertain the idea of this happening, of America not paying its bills, is irresponsible. It’s absurd.”

Do you know what is absurd? The debt clock stands at $16,452,197,201,456 (I had to freeze the last 8 numbers at some point, because they just kept going up and up and up). As Glenn Reynolds points out, Obama owns the debt, which is up 60% since he first took office.

What’s also absurd is that Obama is willing to compromise. Every fiscal issue is a massive fight, since he takes a hard stand before even talking, is unwilling to listen to opposing voices, especially those who were also elected by American citizens, and then when a deal is finally hammered out, demands more in order to scuttle the thing.

Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) said Tuesday that President Barack Obama “misses the whole point” with regard to the debt ceiling and government spending.

“Yes, we need to raise the debt limit at some point, but we have to do it in the context of getting the spending under control. The president says we need to pay our bills. He misses the whole point. The point is we need to adjust what bills we’re paying and how we’re paying them,” Portman said on Fox News.

“It is a compelling message saying we need to pay the bills that we’ve racked up. But it misses the whole point. Think about it in terms of a credit card,” said Portman, who served as budget director for former President George W. Bush. “If you have a son or daughter who exceeds the limits, what do you do? The first thing you do is probably rip up the card. The second thing you do is say, ‘We need to change our spending habits.’ This is what the president won’t do.”

Of course not. Because it’s not Obama’s money. He just wants what he wants, regardless of the consequences. I have to wonder if Obama has considered what kind of nation he’s leaving to his children? Does the thought cross his mind? And if thinks he’s making things better, then he’s a complete fool. This nation is broke. And he’s taking it down a road to ruin.

Is Obama missing the point? Or does he just not give a damn?

BTW, during the few minutes it took to write and cut and paste everything after the debt clock, it now stands above $16.452.201 trillion.

Read: Portman: Obama Misses The Point On Debt Ceiling »

Posted in Barry Obama, Economy | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

NY Set To Pass Gun Law Making NY Great Place For Criminals

By William Teach January 15, 2013 – 9:36 am

The upshot of so many gun laws is that law abiding citizens see their gun freedoms restricted, while criminals are free to be even better criminals.

(USA Today) “We’re not looking to demonize gun owners,” Governor Cuomo (who hasn’t given up his own armed security) said. “Gun owners have done nothing wrong.”

Yet, the legislation demonizes gun owners

(NY Times, which refuses to give up their own armed guards) The expanded ban on assault weapons would broaden the definition of such weapons, banning semiautomatic pistols and rifles with detachable magazines and one military-style feature, as well as semiautomatic shotguns with one military-style feature. New Yorkers who already own such guns could keep them but would be required to register them with the state.

What will they designate as “military style features”? Since the text of the legislation is not online, that’s hard to know. Does it shoot bullets? That sounds military style. Is it a scary black color? Military style.

The legislative package, which Mr. Cuomo said he believed would be “the most comprehensive package in the nation,” would ban any gun magazine that can hold over 7 rounds of ammunition — the current limit is 10 rounds. It would also require background checks of ammunition buyers and automated alerts to law enforcement of high-volume purchases.

Again, the devil is in the details. No story I have perused says whether this only applies to new sales or is retroactive. Most handguns come with magazines that are at least 8. My Walther P99 came with a 15 round mag, and P22 has a 10 round mag. Either gun makers will have to create magazines that only hold 7 rounds to fit in guns that have grips that are designed to hold more, or they will just not bother selling in New York state. Which I suspect is the point.

The legislation does increase punishment for those who shoot first responders, and would protect gun owners information from open records requests (see the USA Today article.)

It would also require background checks for ammunition purchases. Again, devil/details, in terms of does a buyer need one each time, or just a permit such as when purchasing a handgun?

Here’s where it gets even more interesting

In an acknowledgment that many people have suggested that part of the solution to gun violence is a better government response to mental illness, the legislation includes not only new restrictions on gun ownership, but also efforts to limit access to guns by the mentally ill.

The most significant new proposal would require mental health professionals to report to local mental health officials when they believe that patients are likely to harm themselves or others. Law enforcement would then be authorized to confiscate any firearm owned by a dangerous patient; therapists would not be sanctioned for a failure to report such patients if they acted “in good faith.”

“People who have mental health issues should not have guns,” Mr. Cuomo told reporters. “They could hurt themselves, they could hurt other people.”

The article then goes on to mention that this affects patient confidentiality, and could keep people with mental health issues from seeking treatment. The law would further expand the ability of judges to order people to receive outpatient treatment.

Now, over in the comments at Right Wing News and other places I’ve seen both right and left agree that we need to do something about the mentally ill. But, let me through this out there: have they broken laws to where their rights should be taken away?

This is a slippery slope. Obviously, some mentally ill are a serious danger to themselves and/or others. But, what about someone, from a right-side point of view, who rants on about 9/11 being an inside job and that every mention of the dangers from Islamists is “Islamophobia”? From a left-side POV, what about someone who rants on about the danger from The Government and becomes a survivalists living far, far away from everyone else? Are they mentally ill? Could they be deemed mentally ill?

Wherein lies the point where The State can deem someone ill enough to take away their Constitutional Right to be armed even though they have broken no laws nor been convicted of any laws?

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Set To Pass Gun Law Making NY Great Place For Criminals »

Posted in 2nd Amendment | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

GE: Hybrid And Electric Vehicles Make No Financial Sense

By William Teach January 14, 2013 – 3:19 pm

Yeah, the same company which did everything they could to avoid paying “their fair share” has lost that loving feeling for hybrids and electric vehicles (via Doug Ross)

(Gas2) While General Electric has a vested interest in see electric and plug-in hybrid cars storm the car market, GE has apparently had a change of heart. The electronics and aviation giant announced that it was no longer seeking to replace much of its fleet with 25,000 hybrid and electric vehicles. Instead, GE will pursue other alt-fuel options, including CNG and propane.

That isn’t to say GE is completely abandoning its plans to buy electrified vehicles; just a few months ago GE announced that it would be buying 2,000 Ford C-Max Energi plug-in hybrids to bolster its fleet. Add to that the thousands of Chevy Volts GE has already purchased, and it is fair to say that GE put its money where its mouth is.

Unfortunately, as GE soon found out, hybrids and electric vehicles don’t make financial sense for every job or situation. With many GE employees logging an average of 100 miles or more a day, the hybrids face diminishing returns when it comes to fuel savings, and a Chevy Volt is a poor replacement for a work truck or van.

The Volt is a poor replacement for a car, much less a truck or van. Strange, why wouldn’t they be thrilled with vehicles that cost in the $35k to $45k range when

The Volt’s range is 380 miles, including 38 miles in electric-only mode, while the C-Max averages 620 miles, with 21 miles in electric mode, according to the EPA.

So, if you want to go anywhere, you have to use evil fossil fuels.

Read: GE: Hybrid And Electric Vehicles Make No Financial Sense »

Posted in Energy | 6 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove