Why, No, Democrats Haven’t Given Up On Raising Taxes

They’re intent on further destroying America’s economy

(Washington Post) Senate Democrats plan to draft a budget blueprint that calls for significantly higher taxes on the wealthy, oil and gas companies and corporations doing business overseas, reopening a battle over taxes Republicans had hoped to lay to rest with the “fiscal cliff.”

Raise taxes on corporations and those companies will pass the costs on to the consumers. It’ll also drive corporations and wealthy out of the country, removing more wealth from the nation. Democrats do not care, as they want money to continue being Big Daddy Government.

For nearly four years, Senate leaders have ducked their legal duty to craft a comprehensive budget framework. Now, however, Democrats see the budget process as “a great opportunity” to pursue additional tax increases — and to create a fast-track process to push them through the Senate, Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

On the bright side, there really is little chance there will actually be a budget brought forth. While it could be passed without Republican votes, Harry Reid has never had enough Democrat votes to pass one previously, so hasn’t bothered bringing a budget to the floor.

Read: Why, No, Democrats Haven’t Given Up On Raising Taxes »

Bummer: Researchers Puzzled Why Globull Warming At A Standstill

Der Spiegel is breaking the silence about the reality of global warming. Perhaps they are confused about warming considering that 4 of the last 5 winters have been very harsh. The Global Warming Policy Foundation provides a translation

Flowers are blooming earlier, sea level is rising – no doubt the climate is changing. The last year, as reported by NASA, was the ninth warmest since measurements began 132 years ago. The past decade was the warmest in this period.

But it has become common knowledge for some time that the climate has recently developed differently than predicted. The warming has stalled for 15 years; the upward trend in the average global temperature has not continued since 1998 (sic). “The standstill has led to the suggestion that global warming has stopped,” NASA admit.

The British Met Office has recently forecast that the warming standstill could continue until the end of 2017 – despite the rapid increase in greenhouse gas emissions. Then global warming would have stalled for 20 years. How many years – goes a now common question – has the temperature standstill to last until climate scientists start to reconsider their forecasts of future warming?

Scientists previously thought 14 years without further warming could be brought into line with their forecasts – but not “15 years or more,” as NASA scientists stated four years ago in the journal “Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society”. In an email to colleagues a renowned scientist wrote on 7 May 2009, at a time when the warming standstill had already lasted for eleven years: “the ‘no upward trend’ has to continue for a total of 15 years before we get worried.”

Now, 15 years without warming has happened. The warming standstill of the global surface temperature shows that the uncertainties of climate predictions are surprisingly large. The interested public anxiously awaits whether the IPCC’s new Assessment Report, which is due in September, will address the warming pause – the discussions are ongoing in Australia’s Hobart. The researchers are discussing several cogent reasons that might have slowed the upward trend of temperatures.

The climate astrologers are desperately searching for a reason behind the standstill, things like the ocean magically absorbing the missing heat, a dry stratosphere, exhaust gases in Asia, and cold water flood in the Pacific, anything to find a way to continue blaming Mankind’s output of CO2, instead of actually investigating the reality, namely that the primary driver of climate is the Sun, along with other natural forces. Though Warmists do, humorously, attempt now and then to say that natural processes are causing the standstill which masks the anthropogenic causes. The thought that the warming since the Little Ice Age could be mostly or solely natural never crosses their minds.

Of course, since Warmists call it “climate change” they are set up to blame this standstill on Mankind, just like they blame snow and cold on greenhouse gases.

Read: Bummer: Researchers Puzzled Why Globull Warming At A Standstill »

School Brands 5 Year Old Terrorist Over Bubble Blower

We’ve already witnessed two 6 year olds suspended for playing cops and robbers, making gun hands (fortunately they weren’t playing cowboys and Indians, they would have been branded raaaaacists, too). Now we have this hysteria

(ABC) A 5-year-old girl was suspended from school earlier this week after she made what the school called a “terrorist threat.”

Her weapon of choice? A small, Hello Kitty automatic bubble blower.

The kindergartner, who attends Mount Carmel Area Elementary School in Pennsylvania, caught administrators’ attention after suggesting she and a classmate should shoot each other with bubbles.

I wonder if Piers Morgan will go on an epic rant telling us of the danger from bubble blowers?

The parents are having a tough time find the snowflake another school because of how she was suspended. Think this will mess with her self esteem?

The Mount Carmel Area School District told ABC News, “We are confident that much of the information supplied to the media may not be consistent with the facts… The Mount Carmel Area School District takes the well-being and safety of students and staff very seriously.”

Obviously we wouldn’t want to harm someone with a bubble from a scary looking bubble shooter!

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: School Brands 5 Year Old Terrorist Over Bubble Blower »

If All You See…

…is a wonderful planet healing bike, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Just One Minute, with a post about the NY Times catching up on the Arab Spring reality

Read: If All You See… »

Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup

Patriotic Pinup

Happy Sunday! Another gorgeous day in America. Not a clue who did this pinup, which I added a wee bit to. If anyone knows, drop me a line.

What is happening in Ye Olde Blogosphere? The Fine 15

  1. Legal Insurrection recommends banning rock concerts to save just one life
  2. Soopermexican discusses gun appreciation day
  3. Phineas (Sister Toldjah) says media bias? What media bias?
  4. The Looking Spoon wonders what letters from Conservative kids would look like
  5. Steven Goddard highlights the latest Al Qaeda weapon
  6. Over at Watts Up With That? we see that Al Gore is losing his climate bet
  7. Zilla has the Zilla Awards, Part 2
  8. Right Newz has Biden’s latest gaffe
  9. The People’s Cube wants you to celebrate Obama’s coronation
  10. The Other McCain notes that gun grabbers are now targeting Blue Dogs
  11. The Lonely Conservative has Newsweek’s latest Obama worship cover
  12. Allergic To Bull discusses Time Warner no longer showing ads with guns
  13. Bookworm Room discusses leftist indoctrination of children
  14. Gay Patriot covers Obama’s soaring rhetoric
  15. And last, but not least, Jammie Wearing Fools notices that a company is firing Obama supporters to save for ObamaCare
  16. And one to grow on: Victory Girls discusses the value of a conspiracy theory

As always, the full set of pinups can be seen in the Patriotic Pinup category, or over at my Gallery page. While we are on pinups, since it is that time of year, have you gotten your “Pinups for Vets” calendar yet? And don’t forget to check out what I declare to be our War on Women Rule 5 and linky luv posts

Anyone else have a link or hotty-fest going on? Let me know so I can add you to the list. (BTW, since someone asked, the reason I leave links for the previous week up (or you might see a *) is because they are place holders for later in the day or for next weeks. Easier than rewriting all the time. Also, the listing order has to do with how they are added over time, not how good a post is. I just copy and paste from the previous week, then edit. If you see one of the *’s, go ahead and check out the blog anyhow, see if there is an update. I cannot update with my Android during the day.

The posts do take a long time, so, if you want to send me your links for Rule 5 babeage or links, use ye olde email in the header bar (remove the NOSPAM part). Preferably, create the html link so I can copy and paste how you want it to read.

Read: Sorta Blogless Sunday Pinup »

NY Times Writer Demonizes People With Depression, Wants Their Right To A Gun Taken Away

This is what I was writing about when I mentioned that dealing with gun restrictions on people with mental health issues is a slippery slope. Here comes Wendy Burton, form far left political speech writer, who starts off with a long missive about how some drunk was looking to break into her home, so she called the police, who came and took the drunk away, then

(NY Times) I considered buying a gun. The threat of violence rattles you like that. What rolled round my head after that dark morning was: what if I hadn’t heard the noise, what if it’s different next time? While I held that chair with all of my strength, I wished that I had had a gun because if he had gotten in, then I could have pointed it at him, maybe deterred him and if necessary pulled the trigger.

So I looked at guns. Some had mother-of-pearl handles and looked like something Mae West would use in a movie. Others were Glocks, shotguns and rifles. I had gone as far as to dial the number of the Metropolitan Police Department’s firearms registration division and begin the process. Then I stopped and put my BlackBerry down.

I remembered who I am.

I am one of the millions of people in this country who live with depression. I knew that in the gun registration form there would be a version of this question: Have you ever voluntarily or involuntarily been committed to a hospital? The answer is yes — voluntarily. But because my hospitalization was years earlier and I wasn’t in treatment at the time, I could have gotten a gun.

People with depression are obviously more prone to commit suicide than others without. And having a gun makes it that much easier than pills, hanging, or slitting wrists. Does that mean that The Central Planning Office should deny people with depression the Constitutional Right to self protection with a gun? Ms. Wendy thinks so. The title of the article is Please Take Away My Right To A Gun

But since most people like me are more likely to harm ourselves than to turn into mass-murdering monsters, our leaders should do more to keep us safe from ourselves.

Please take away my Second Amendment right. Do more to help us protect ourselves because what’s most likely to wake me in the early hours isn’t a man’s body slamming at my door but depression, that raven, tapping, rapping, banging for relief.

I have a better chance of surviving if I never have the option of being able to pull the trigger.

Here’s an idea, Wendy: don’t buy an f’ing gun!!!!!! No one is forcing you to buy one. There’s no guy or gal wearing a big coat on the corner enticing you to purchase one. There are no commercials advertising them on TV (unlike alcohol, which is a factor in 30% of all US suicides). You have the option to not buy one.

Instead, what Wendy wants is to remove the right to buy a gun from people who are little to no threat to others because they have clinical depression, and wants this done by The Government. Typical fascist liberal.

Is there a point where someone with depression might have their 2nd Amendment Right pulled? Probably. But Wendy is demonizing all with depression, making a blanket assertion to deny rights. Typical fascist liberal.

Funny how she fails to mention that perhaps The Government should do more to stop the criminals, and goes after law abiding citizens with mental health problems. And forgets to mention that perhaps we could help those with depression. Instead, she wants to make them targets for criminals. Typical fascist liberal.

Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU.

Read: NY Times Writer Demonizes People With Depression, Wants Their Right To A Gun Taken Away »

Idiocy Of Gun Control Explained

The Looking Spoon found this graphic out on the web, which explains the sheer idiocy of  gun magazine control

That got me thinking

Read: Idiocy Of Gun Control Explained »

If All You See…

…is a CO2 infused beer causing Gaia to boil, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The First Street Journal, with the $50 Lesson.

Read: If All You See… »

Heh! Planet May Get Baked To A Cinder

Kevin Jones has left the reservation in a post about why cap and trade failed

(Mother Jones) Climate change doesn’t have that history. It hasn’t yet been bred into Democratic DNA and (cap and trade) hasn’t yet failed enough times to make it clear to everyone just how hard it is and just what kind of infuriating compromises it takes to finally pass something. The unfortunate truth is that for something this big, you have to fail a few times before you can succeed.

The problem, of course, is that we don’t have time for several decades of failure before finally doing something serious about climate change. This means that the usual legislative process might simply be unworkable as a way of limiting carbon emissions. The climate community may have to get a bit more direct about things if they want to make progress before the planet gets baked to a cinder.

Here’s a recommendation for “getting a bit more direct”: make your own lives carbon neutral. Give up your fossil fueled travel. Take two minute showers….well, you know all the things I recommend. It would be nice if Warmists would watch some of the science and history channels, perhaps learn that through most of the Earth’s history it was much, much, much warmer, and life thrived.

 

Read: Heh! Planet May Get Baked To A Cinder »

Warmists Think Obama Can Control The Weather

Climate astrology at its best. The Reuters story is all about how Obama may deal with the Keystone Pipeline (which he will probably do his best to kill, despite being a way to provide tens of thousands of jobs here in the US) and Hotcoldwetdry, and provides this spiffy quote

Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club, said Obama’s second term will be pivotal in the fight against climate change, which he called the “singular issue of our time for anyone who cares about clean air, clean water and a safe future for our families.”

Brune urged Obama to take “swift, decisive action to prevent more erratic weather, superstorms and wildfires.”

There’s so much wrong with those two paragraphs that all it deserves is

Ed Morrissey points out that Sierra Club must be thrilled over the number of fossil fueled vehicles and private jets being used to bring ObamaZombies in for the 2nd Coronation.

Fortunately, hyper-climate astrologist Seth Borenstein shoots the “Obama can control the weather” meme in the foot, to some degree

Scientifically, the president doesn’t have control of day-to-day weather. While his policies can lessen or worsen future projected global warming on a large scale, they cannot do anything about Washington’s daily temperature on Jan. 21.

See? Not the weather. But, the Lightbringer can, in the minds of fevered-Warmists, control the global temperatures. The Sun can’t, but Obama can.

(just to be clear, this is not a post knocking Obama, though he has made a few crazy pronouncements, like causing the seas to recede, but Warmists)

Read: Warmists Think Obama Can Control The Weather »

Pirate's Cove